>Bad news for Ridgewood in DOE’s Just Released School Violence Report
>
Today (8/30), the Ledger reported on the Department of Education’s latest report on school violence, vandalism, weapons and substance abuse. The report contains some very troubling news for Ridgewood. This is regardless of the fact that the reporting across districts and counties may be flawed, though not flawed enough to render the report irresponsible. It would be wise for administrators to pay close heed to these findings and consider what they have done in the past that either has not worked, or may have inadvertently exacerbated the problem. Here’s a comparative look of four districts in the report: Glen Rock, Hackensack, Ridgewood and Newark.
Glen Rock, with an enrollment of 2,471 students, reported a total number of 8 incidences of the above
Hackensack City, with an enrollment of 5,059, students reported a total number of 24 incidences
Ridgewood, with an enrollment of 5,553 students, reported a total of 95 incidences.
Newark City, with an enrollment of 41,855 students, reported a total of 414 incidences (unless you’re terc impaired, you know that that would extrapolate to more incidences by percentage in Ridgewood).
Could it be that Glen Rock, Hackensack and Newark are drastically underreporting or does Ridgewood have more than a Starbucks’s problem? Regardless, our administrators owe Ridgewood parents and taxpayers a revealing discussion of this issue rather than the usual explaining away of what the numbers mean. The full report is available at:
http://www.state.nj.us/education/schools/vandv/0506/appende1.pdf
Share this article
This entry was posted by admin on August 30, 2007 at 8:44 am, and is filed under Uncategorized. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0.You can leave a response or trackback from your own site.
-
#3 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#4 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Ridgewood went from “23″ instances of violence in ’02-’03 to “37″ in ’05-’06. Substances for the same periods went from “9″ to “14″. Most other districts went down. This does not bode well for Ridgewood.
Glen Rock, Northern Highlands and Ramsey are looking more appealing by the moment — AND — they also don’t teach TERC math — AND — their taxes are lower. Goodbye, Ridgewood!
It’ll be intesting to see the spin that the boe will put on this and we know they will.
-
#5 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>The infamous RHS survey of 1999 was a sham — many students (my children included) had a field day answering the questions. My daughter started the survey by indicating that she was an American Indian — not true.
The most shocking, revealing and truthful account of substance abuse at RHS came from an article in the RHS student newspaper in June of 2006 … the year of this Violence Report. As I recall, the co-principals threatened to not allow those students involved in the article to graduate because they would not divulge their sources.
Student surveys are worthless. The news article in The High Times was priceless.
-
#7 written by BBwool 5 years ago
>The news article in the High Times was just as fabricated as your daughters’ American Indian status, I can assure you. Or at least that’s what one of the students responsible told me.
I WISH we could take this info and digest it and all sit down to analyze it and then decide as a community how best to respond. As the initial poster said, a close look at the methodology would be in order before jumping too far to conclusions.
That said, obviously we all should look into this…and not just knee-jerk jump to criticizing Mark Bombace and the BOE. Give me a break. Exactly which Board policy would you point to that would explain this data? Curriculum and school policies are FAR LESS likely to affect violent behavior, vandalism, weapons and substance abuse than our own parenting and community values. Sorry folks, but if anyone is responsible for this it’s going to be US, and we are going to have to do some soul-searching and community-building.
-
#9 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Hey 10:28 AM, I consider the DOE report a more accurate survey of actual facts. As I recall, the old survey that was done was self-reported data. In other words, the data are unreliable because its based on unpredictable levels or lack thereof of honesty in any given student or student body. BEtter to have an actual report to work with.
-
#10 written by sharpe james 5 years ago
>there you go again bb ,perhaps we do need TERC in ridgewood after all acourding to some BOE members we are just like newark and patterson ,and the level of criminality woul be s out..nothing like pushing the blame off bb you guys wrecked the school system and now its everonelses fault oh brother ,yes it Bush thats right …well I guess it could be our fault we voted for you dolts ….
-
#11 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Forget about the unreliable self-reported data from the students. We must look at the hard data: police & fire departments, hospital emergency rooms, school guidance counselors, doctors, social service agencies, mental health clinics, etc. These entities have the facts and without divulging the names of individuals they should be able to supply the numbers to our community.
-
#17 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#18 written by BBwool 5 years ago
>Hey, what’s with “you guys wrecked the school system?” I’m not on the BOE, and don’t work for the schools. Don’t lump me in with those guys! I’m just a parent — and one who doesn’t blame the schools for my kid’s behavior…and takes responsibility for teaching my kids values, e.g., violence at school = bad, vandalism at school = wrong, weapons at school = not allowed, and substance abuse = wrong again. It is not the school rules that are at the root of these types of behaviors. And can we please leave TERC out of ONE conversation, jeez! It’s really stretching to bring it into this topic!
-
#19 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I, for one, subscribe to the notion of fixing the small things and the big will follow. I have friends who live elsewhere in Bergen County and their kids can’t wear hats or chew gum in school- our kids do both at MS and HS levels. The students think they can do whatever they want and act and dress how they choose. The attitude of entitlement grows from there. I WISH, PRAY, BEG for a stricter dress code in the schools. How can you fight it when the kids say, “we have no dress code” and I’m not talking about little ones that you can just put your foot down with…I’m talking about high schoolers and trying to choose your battles and all that. My daughter says kids sit in class with I-pods in their ears and hoods on so the teachers don’t see (or don’t care!). It’s disgraceful. To reiterate, if you fix the small things, the big ones follow. If they are expected to dress in a certain manner they tend to rise to the occasion and act in a certain manner.
My 2 cents… -
#23 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I must go and read the article, I think it is irresponsble of PJBlogger62 to raise this issue without a detailed analysis of the data. Check again ‘school violence, vandalism, weapons and substance abuse’ – So writing on the bathroom wall is included with drug taking and shootings.Lets keep this in perspective and ensure that small minded egos and agendas don’t take over. Ridgewood is a great place.
-
#24 written by rik mayal 5 years ago
>I must go and read the article, I think it is irresponsble of PJBlogger62 …here you dope now learn to read I hate these idiots form the BOE and the RNews posting stupid crap on your blog…
In today’s Star-Ledger there is an article entitled, “N.J. schools shake ‘persistently dangerous’ label.” Ridgewood did not fair well in this report.
For the academic year 2005-06 there were 5,553 students enrolled. During 2005-06 there were 37 acts of violence for a 1 year change in violence of +11. During this same year there were 95 instances of violence, vandalism, weapons and substance abuse for a 1 year total change of +41.
hows that for info jerk
-
#25 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I love Ridgewood, but I’m the one that posted above about the hats and gum in school. Do you others have high schoolers? If so, there is no way to convince them to stay on campus if campus is “open.” Mine wasn’t, in high school, theirs is. How can I be a role model for my kid in this instance, I’m not THERE! It’s easy to criticize if you only have elementary or middle schoolers. What the hell are you supposed to do as a parent of a high school aged teen? Once they’re there at 7:45 they’re out of our hands.
-
#27 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I assume you were not educated in Ridgewood…rik I guess your not kissing up enough ,sorry he is rght the post is very obvious read the article ,and the report is linked the facts are the facts ,I think rik is POed that so many attack the messanger instead of try to fix the problem ,dont attack the blog and i will repeat
In today’s Star-Ledger there is an article entitled, “N.J. schools shake ‘persistently dangerous’ label.” Ridgewood did not fair well in this report.
For the academic year 2005-06 there were 5,553 students enrolled. During 2005-06 there were 37 acts of violence for a 1 year change in violence of +11. During this same year there were 95 instances of violence, vandalism, weapons and substance abuse for a 1 year total change of +41.
read the facts then we will see who is “irresponsble” star with the parents or the BOE -
#28 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Open campus is not the problem — it’s been ‘open’ for 30 years. Like a previous poster mentioned, try fixing the small things first. Start reining in the children (yes, they are still children) with regard to chewing gum, using ipods/phones, etc. first. Then tackle dress codes and see where we are. Once they realize that they do not rule the universe, Ridgewood teens may start to make an attempt to behave. Parents, feel free to step in at any time — thanks!
-
#29 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Parents are trying, but when there is an open campus and only 45 minutes for lunch a lot of kids won’t walk back. Sorry BB Wool, but that’s the schools responsibility.
I can deliver my child and pick them up, but if the school can make sure they aer in class and tell me when they cut, that’s there fault.
Ramsey has a system that enables parents to log in to see their kids attendence and up to date test scores.
I thought the BOE purchased this when it purchased the SASI system.
But there are not parent logins and the progress reports and teacher communications come too late to make any adjustments as parents.
There’s two BOE items – open campus and parental logins like Ramsey.
How about starting there?
-
#31 written by BBwool 5 years ago
>But that article you keep quoting doesn’t give enough info. What are the definitions, for the purpose of this data, of violence, vandalism, weapons and substance abuse? And instead of lumping all four things together, was there one area where the increase was greatest? That would interest me and give some context. I had/have kids in the high school and while I have heard things here and there, the idea that there were 95 “instances” of these things does not jibe with what my kids know/see every day. Maybe they are out of it, but they are fairly involved, connected kids. Without some context, this kind of raw data is not helpful. We need more info before we can attack the problem.
-
#32 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>When we were kids and didn’t follow the rules we got “wacked”
(not like Sopranos do) with the back of the hand, we are not violent because of this. In general we conform and do the right things. Sure maybe we did a little grass, but we didn’t beat people up to get it.
Its time that todays parents spend some time with their kids.
and teach the values that were passed on from our parents.
By the time our kids reach HS they have the values that they learned from us. If they learned at all.WAKE UP FOLKS its YOUR fault that the kids are the way they are today.
NOT THE SCHOOLS.
Its too late for the middle school kids right now. But do your job for the grade school childern NOW while you can.
YOU TEACH THEM VALUES. -
#33 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>You’re right. 6:23
Get rid of the nanny and spend time with your childern. You can do this with out help. Your mother did it and so did her mother.
And they didn’t need to medicate to cope.
Teach your childern to behave and they won’t give you a headache.
Playing tennis is ok but you need to spend QUALITY time with the kids too. -
#34 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Two thoughts -
When I moved to Ridgewood I applied to become a substitute teacher until I could find a full time teaching job. I worked at the High School and I was shocked at the attitute of not only the students but some of the techers. When I took attendance the students then just walked out, or they brought friends into the classroom, or they listened to their i-pods or ate or played card games. If you pulled them up on it you just got attitude – from both student, teacher and admin.
My own highschool kids say that happens all the time!
Enough is enough – there should be better leadership from admin after all they get paid the big bucks. They should expect be unpopular with some of the people in the community but in the long run the students would benefit.
As a parent of highschoolers I hate the block scheduling and long lunches because my kids are constantly coming home or into town. How can I keep track of them when even the school can’t. What happened to in loco parentis. I let the school have my kids in their care and expect them to look after them as I would – which means knowing where they are at all times. How can the school safe guard my child when they don’t know where they are.
Also as an open campus there is so little security it is a joke. You can get in any door without being asked what you are there for and the students often open doors for their friends
-
#35 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>You’re on the right track. Open Campus and Block Schedules should be a topic of discussion. The world has changed over the 30 years since Ridgewood opened its campus. Lets all accept this and perhaps identify if tightening things up will help.
While I agree with the posters who say “Raise your own kid the right way..,” I also understand that my HS student is out of my hands while school is in session. What I see, even at the middle school level?
Disrespectful kids. Teachers and administrators who are, at times, afraid to crack down on bad behavior. They arent afraid of the kids, at least not yet. But they are afraid of the parents… the “How dare you???” Entitlement crowd, who immediately go to the principal or their friends on the BOE and claim the rights of their precious student have been violated.
Lets have a dress code. No hats or hoods on inside the building. Thats called respect for the institution. No IPODS allowed in the classrooms. Thats called respect for the teacher. No gum in the school building. If your child doesnt like it? Simple answser: Too bad.
If we allow the middle schools and RHS to tighten things up? Many of our kids will actually breath a sigh of relief. The peer pressure to show disrespect to authority will quickly go away, once that same authorty can be demonstrated. -
#36 written by Jerseygirl89 5 years ago
>Even though I grew up in Ridgewood and am a proud graduate of Ridgewood High School, a few trips to Ridgewood parks convinced me to raise my children in another town. You want to fault the high school teachers who don’t do anything? Look at the parents who REFUSE to discipline their children, who get OFFENDED when you tell their children to stop hitting yours. How do you think those parents react when teachers report bad behavior? You want to blame open campus? If the problems are happening as students stroll to Renato’s, why are the reports AT THE HIGH SCHOOL? You want to blame the Board of Ed? They’re not raising these kids with the nasty sense of entitlement and disregard for others, the parents are.
The administration and BOE should be blamed for fearing parents so much that they don’t effectively discipline the students. Of course, seeing what happens to district employees who incur the wrath of the parents, it’s easy to see why they don’t.
-
#38 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>First, bbwool you were outed on this blog for lying so I’m surprised you’re back. Second, your call for “more info” is not genuine because PJ’s post provides the link to the DOE’s report. All you have to do is go and read it. As for lumping things together, the breakdown is right there for you to ponder.
Usually, with miscreant behavior in a school population, it’s often a small percentage of children that become repeat offenders and increase reported incidences. Largely, parents are doing their jobs, but some parents have lost control of their children and those children are in our schools, like it or not. The schools know who these children are and should be able to monitor them closely and protect the student body at large. That is why we have so many administrators at great cost to the taxpayers.
School policy, however, is a great contributor to the socially permissive atmosphere that used to exist at the HS. I say “used” to exist because the new principal has made a complete right turn on this and I expect we will see results and improvements in next year’s report.
The BOE needs to provide much support to his efforts. They can also encourage middle school principals to deal early with these few repeat offenders.
Everyone in the school system knows who they are. Other students have given them names: ever heard of “the juvees” in middle school? The administration didn’t need a “survey” to find them. They are right in front of their noses.
They must deal seriously with these students and must involve their parents in helping to keep them in line.
The past leadership at the HS was the worst I have ever seen. Clueless administrators and leaders who ignored the problems. I personally went to the HS two years ago and told the administrators that my children couldn’t come there unless things changed.
I think they fnally have. Thanks to Jack Lorenz.The fact that the BOE let the zoo continue for as long as it did is a derelection of duty. None of them should keep their positions for having presided over this.
-
#39 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#40 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>”Don’t the parents who raise these children have any responsibility???”
Yes, but this is a report on SCHOOL violence not HOME violence. Parents are not in school with their children. Therefore the BOE must take ultimate responsibility for what has happend in our schools. They select and hire the administrators, many of whom are not up to the task.
Fire bad people and recruit good people; that is their first responsibility. Sadly, I think they can’t tell the difference. Look at their support for Ives and Botsford, both of whom are failing up quickly.
-
#42 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>9:55
Childern learn at home first, then go on to school to misbehave.
This is not about home violence but about teaching your kids AT HOME right from wrong so that they won’t be violent in school.
It’s not ALL the kids, but enough of them so that this situation at the schools stands out to make the news.IT’S GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SCHOOL, BOE, TEACHERS OR ADMINISTRATORS and everything to do with how the kids are raised ( or not raised) by their parents.
The parents need to do a better job with the k-5 kids so that by the time they get to middle school they know better.
TAKE THE TIME AND TEACH YOUR OWN KIDS!! -
#43 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I teach my kids – manners, proper behavior, respect, math, grammar … what am I paying this town for? my well behaved kids are constantly subjected to the poorly behaved kids – simpleton teachers believe the good behavior will rub off – time to crack down – teach, kids in desks, less group work, and those misbehaving can go sit with the principal.
-
#44 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>agreed 1139. but if the teachers start to actually work, then they will demand MORE money and threaten ANOTHER strike and use the bullshit tactics as before (such as refusing to write student recommendations for college..which IS INEXCUSABLE)but since they act like garbage truck union members rather than professionals….you see the results!
-
#45 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>11:39
How would you like it if the TEACHER said to your kid “Behave or get out of my class”.
This would be the teacher’s fault?
How about if the teacher slapped your kid’s hand and said “put that pencil back were it belongs”.
NO CAN DO.BUT YOU CAN. and it’s FREE no tax dollars there.
We don’t pay top dollar in school taxes to have Gestopo type teachers and to have our kids yelled at by the teachers or even (God forbid) physical contact.
We pay for GOOD teachers and Good programs.
If you want someone else to teach your kid respect, manors and discipline then send them to a southern military school.
Otherwise it’s your job. -
#46 written by From the outside looking in 5 years ago
>Have you all thought about the possibility that the increase in reported incidents have to do with a zero tolerance in the High School?
I know Mr. Lorentz runs a tight ship, he is fair but tough. In my mind the increase in incidents may well be that he, and the adminstrators working for him, have demonstrated to the student body that that type of behavior will not be swept under the rug. Good for them! I look forward to better statistics next year. -
#48 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>The BOE likes to think of itself as “progressive” which is a kind way of saying Left wing. And it favors progressive left wing policies. That’s why we have TERC and Open Circle, etc.
But Left wing anything, especially cities, are total failures — Detroit comes to mind. Look at New York City under Dinkins. Total disaster.
It took a completely Right turn to make NY livable again. I know because we fled the city when Dinkins was mayor.
It will take a similar change in direction of our local gov’t to embrace sound principles of leadership–they will also save money. Otherwise the inmates will continue to run the asylum.
-
#49 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>9:12- well said! (Jersey Girl!) For every parent that wants their child effectively and appropriately disciplined in school, there are probably 5 who wouldn’t think twice of bringing a lawsuit upon a teacher or the district. I have seen it happen. In another Bergen County town, the student was walking out of a teacher’s detention, she pulled his backpack, he kept walking and it must have left a mark and the parents called the police! She had to leave school and couldn’t come back until she cleared a psych exam and had to give statements to the police and such. She has been teaching for 30 years. So, it works both ways. The next time a teacher calls home to speak to you about your child, are you receptive? Many are, some are not and it’s those “some” that make it a very difficult job.
-
#50 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>Ah, but the left wing from the Upper West Side of Manhattan will never allow their so called “progressive gains” be undermined by common sense and morals.
They believe in socialism, and that they know best for us mere hayseeds out here.
They have made a stake here, like they did in Montclair. Upending them will be very difficult. They always trot out racism and intolerance when challenged.
Who needs that. Time to leave Ridgewood for Allendale and the northern towns of Bergen County.
Besides, those places have lower taxes and better schools.
-
#51 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I believe it is the responsibility of the Community and the Parents to question the BOE about the numbers described in article and how they were derived. Hoping that the BOE does not add to the problem by being untruthful or skirting the issue, they will hopefully be able to provide better insight as to where the issues exist.
Now that is the correct course of action for current residents of Ridgewood. However, after seeing many areas of the once “Prestigious” Ridgewood deterioate, have decided I would never raise my children in Ridgewood at the present time. Although I was born and raised in Ridgewood and graduated from RHS, I have made a firm decision to relocated to a closeby town with better law enforcement, lower crime rates, LOWER TAXES, a top rated Public Education System, and decently priced homes compared to Ridgewood. Not to mention Ridgewood’s management consisting of leaders who put their own agendas first, scandals and/or cover-ups, and nepotism.
I find it troubling that, according to the published article, Ridgewood Board of Ed has a higher Crime rate than Newark Public Schools. Whether true or not, this displays a horrible image of Ridgewood. If the article is accurate, I blame 4 groups, all of whom share responsiblity for this issue, and they will need to work together to return Ridgewood BOE to its glory days:
1. The Students themselves – For acting immature, entitled, and acting above the law. Additionally they need to assume responsiblity for their own futures.
2. The Police leadership – For encouraging their officers to not fully Enforce and uphold laws in the Village and BOE – Many students are let go with no consequences after minor crimes because Police Leadership are scared by the misbehaving children’s inattentive parents. Once they get away with minor crimes, they feel entitled and pursue more serious crimes such as drugs, alcohol abuse, vandelism, violence, and even rape.
3. The parents – Of those misbehaving students for not instilling respect, family values, and common decency and allowing young students to stay home alone and unattended resulting in parties, drug and alcohol abuse.
4. The Faculty and Administration of the BOE for not upholding those values, not enforcing good behavior, and not enforcing rules and regulations or diciplining students for violations of such.That is just my peace, but if my thoughts are shared by others, the community should take immediate action before property values drop further.
-
#52 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>BTW, in the last long comment I posted referring to Nepotism in Ridgewood, I was not referring to possible Nepotism in the RPD and RFD where Civil Service testing is required and most related parties their are just trying to pursue family heritage of public service to their community. I was referring to other areas where some Village Employees and BOE employees were hired to positions they were not qualified for or some where positions were created out of no where for relatives of higher-ups in Village leadership.
-
#53 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>In order to solve a problem, you must first admit the problem exists.
Ridgewood seems unable to solve many problems because its leaders seem to have a very, very hard time admitting that there are problems in the first place. Perfect Ridgewood must be the cover story at all times!
This DOE report says loudly and clearly that there is a problem. Of course, it involves the home and the school but shoving it off to one side or the other won’t make the problem go away.
Case in point (and this really happened): what is a student or parent supposed to do when his child comes home and says that a student is dealing pot out of the locker next to his?
What would you do?
-
#54 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#56 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>I totally agree with post 8:09 pm, and yes there is plenty of blame to go around. There needs to be a community wide effort by all concerned to reverse the negative and dangerous trend that is emerging in our village. Not only should the children themselves be held accountable for their conduct, but those whom are responsible for their guidance must accept some responsibility. I have heard many parents complain that the BOE and the town are failing our children, and that they have been met with indifference when seeking assistance. I believe the source of the apathy by the BOE, Police, Fire and Village employees stems from the top of the Village Management. The vast majority of the teachers and village employees care about this community, however after years of trying to do a good job and watching others being taken care of due to being connected through family or otherwise tends to beat one down. There have been positions created throughout the BOE and Village which at best could be described as ill conceived and unnecessary. Unfortunately the people who have gotten these positions all have either been related to a top official or connected through friendship or other means. While the Fire and Police departments are supposed to be governed by civil service, the Village has circumvented rules governing promotions repeatedly. For example the creation of a director of the fire department when someone failed to pass the test. I know of at least two firefighters whom were passed over for another. Then there is the police department where they have had legal issues regarding promotions and where positions have been created and the structure of the department rearranged take care of certain persons. What do these people do in their new found positions, it’s any ones guess as they can rarely be found. Have you tried to find any of the village’s top leadership at village hall? Don’t even bother trying to reach any of the BOE leadership either. What we appear to be experiencing is a absence of leadership with in village government, the BOE and unfortunately in many homes.
My point here is that the leaders of these organizations are setting the tone and example for their employees, unfortunately the example they are setting is that of taking care of themselves rather than the mission of their organizations which our community. Just as parents should be setting and reinforcing the proper examples for their children, the leadership of the village should be doing the same. Before we can hope to affect a positive can in our community we need to establish an atmosphere where such things positive work ethic, integrity, family values, respect for others and community service are rewarded, rather than what we have seen thus far. Please, this is not an attack on any ones’ parenting skills; I have made enough of my own. The vast majority of us are doing the best we know how; however it is a wake up call. If we are not leading our children down the right path, there are plenty of others willing to lead them down the wrong path. We are just as responsible if we allow the council and village management to continue to abuse the trust we have placed in them. -
#63 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#66 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>All the kids know abot eighteen cuts per class and they use them as their own personal time. There should be a school mechanism that intercedes by having family conferences at ,say, five cuts to see if there are valid reasons for these cuts. Otherwise the kids intercxept the 5:05PM telephone notifications and the parents are none the wiser. The kids are still wandering around getting into trouble. How can the school monitor the kids when they’re all wandering around campus or intown just hanging out. Are we saying that these juveniles are allowed to make these decisions on their own without any repercussions? Yhey aare not little adults they are teenagers that need guidance. Left to their own devices we’ll wind up with “Animal House” or “Lord of the Flies” as the major theme at RHS. The lack of guidance, leadership, and accountability at RHS is deplorable. We’ve got a very high priced guidance department; we got very high priced grade administrators; and, we’ve got a very high priced administration, and we’re leaving accountability to the kids? We need some adult guidance and supervision there and we’re not getting it. Let’s stop blaming the kids for being kids.
-
#68 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>To 8:08 AM: The whole school has to have lunch at the same time because of “block scheduling.” So, for that whole lunch time no classrooms are being used. Because no classrooms are being used for a whole period, we needed to expand the high school.
BTW, there were more students attending RHS in the 70′s then there are now with one more grade….there were 3 kids to a locker back then.
Someone said it best up further in the comments: block scheduling + open campus = T-R-O-U-B-L-E.
-
#69 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>There are some of those in charge of our kids at RHS who do not have the respect of our children and for good reasons (smoking pot, lewd comments, extramarital affairs, etc.). After my kids graduated from RHS they filled me in on some of the crap that goes on with teachers, coaches, custodians and others. RHS needs to clean up period.
-
#71 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>My daughter came home from high school many times and said that a male gym teacher wearing shorts would prop his leg up on a bench and be 3 feet in front of girls. She said it was not only “disgusting” but that he knew exactly what he was doing. My son had this same teacher years later and confirmed what she said.
-
#72 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#74 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>5:10, I assume from your knowledge of RHS in the 70s you were a student there then? I’m curious (and this is a dead serious question) in regard to several comments posted under yours – did you find the teachers disrespectful to students then? When I was there, I would say about 60% of my teachers commented on the amount of “money” in this town. They really seemed to resent their perception of who had what. I know there are some of those teachers still at the high school and I understand many of them (either new or veteran)who make similar comments today. It’s such a shame. I hated hearing that “poor little rich kid” stuff from my teachers then and I’m sure a lot of the kids hate hearing it now.
-
#75 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>9:50
As a 1984 RHS grad, I don’t recall anything like you said poor little rich kid.
We lived on the east side in a modest home, my father worked for NJT and my mother worked part time at Grand Union.
Some of my friends lived a more lavish life on the west side but I don’t recall any division between rich and poor.
What teacher in there right mind would make a comment that would get back to parents? Even today.
Some teachers today make upwards of $100,000 a year with a pension and benifits, of course this is not 1 million–but its alot better then my folks did in the 80s. -
#76 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>On any given day I could walk into RHS and ask to be escorted to my child’d class. I’m sure that I would be accomodated by the administration. If I found that my child wasn’t in the class where he/she was supposed to be, I’d ask the teacher where my child was. The teacher wouldn’t know. I’d ask the guidance cousnselors, they wouldn’t know. I’d ask the grade administrators, they wouldn’t know. I’d ask the administrators, they wouldn’t know. There are many who would call me a bad parent because I didn’t know where my child was. Well, I dropped her/him off at school in the morning and now no one knows where she/he is. Allowing eighteen cuts per class is insane. These are children. Allowing an open campus is insane. These are children. My point is that none of the adults we leave our children with are accountable for them. This isn’t good.
-
#77 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>7:12 – I am the anonymous from 9:50 and also graduated from RHS in 1984. I didn’t mean to imply there was any division between rich and poor as far as the kids were concerned or even as far as the teachers were concerned. I just remember a few teachers over my 3 year HS career making negative comments about ALL Ridgewood kids. I was just curious if this was anyone else’s experience, as I have 2 friends these days who have mentioned the very same thing happening to their kids who attend the HS. Thanks for your insight into your HS experience…I’m sure we know each other
-
#78 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>”We’ve got a very high priced guidance department; we got very high priced grade administrators; and, we’ve got a very high priced administration, and we’re leaving accountability to the kids? We need some adult guidance and supervision there and we’re not getting it. Let’s stop blaming the kids for being kids. “
This is so true. In Ramsey parents are given a login into the attendence and grading system and can keep track of their kids that way.
Why doesn’t Ridgewood have that?
-
#80 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
>i graduated RHS in 1976 and NEVER ever heard any teachers making comments about rich kids. There were over 600 in my graduating class (just had the 30 year reunion in 2006) and there were NONE of these ‘divisions’ I read about here today. We had good-natured ‘kidding’ with many teachers, and it was a happy bunch. Having lived/worked other places since graduation as well as my home here in town, I have to say we had a VERY decent bunch of class members. As far as teacher problems, there was a science teacher fired for smoking pot but ended up getting his job back through either the union or legal channels. Sad to see that the NEW ARRIVALS here in town have chosen to tear it apart. We would be much better off if they moved back to wherever they came from. We NEVER had these outspoken negative name-calling rude people. used to be a great town…because of the residents.
-
#81 written by Anonymous 5 years ago
-
#84 written by RHSsenior 5 years ago
>8:08 AM – Only certain areas are allowed for lunch (probably to prevent bug problems and dirty class rooms). The Campus Center, the cafeteria, and Gym 2 are full of kids every day and there are more in the halls. Lunch is also only served on 3 lines in the cafeteria, 1 line in the Campus Center and at a small station outside the gym. Giving most kids (especially underclassmen) around 15-20 minutes to actually eat their food and get to class. Rainy days are the worst because fewer kids leave. Also, many people eat during frees and spend lunchtime in the library doing school work. Is it reasonable to ask 1600 students to share 5 lunch lines?
-
- Comment Feed for this Post
Didn't find any related posts :(





>between the dumb math and now a high rate of violence, its time for a CHANGE
so not only does our fireman boe president allow dumb dumb math, he’s allowing violence at an unacceptable rate – and is ALL of it being reported?
recall this BOE
shameful – too bad they are too stupid to feel shame