Posted on

Brooks Declines Ridgewood Superintendency

>

From the Village Website!!!

Brooks Declines Ridgewood Superintendency

Dr. Martin Brooks has informed the Ridgewood Board of Education that because of personal reasons he will not accept the Superintendency in Ridgewood. It is the position of the Board that before Dr. Brooks’ arrival he was made to feel unwelcome. Anonymous phone calls, emails, blogs, and web postings by some community members questioned his integrity, ethics and educational philosophy. The Board considers this to be a most unfortunate situation for the Village and schools. It is not reflective of Ridgewood’s supportive community and its values.After an extensive nine-month process, using criteria and specifications developed in collaboration with the community, the Board selected Dr. Brooks to be the next superintendent. Some in the community took exception to the Board’s decision and have undermined the process.At its June 18, 2007, meeting, the Board will discuss the hiring of an interim superintendent and the initiation of a second superintendent search. As always, the Board will continue to focus on the education of more than 5,600 students in the Ridgewood Public School system.

62 thoughts on “Brooks Declines Ridgewood Superintendency

  1. >The Board of Education’s statement on the reason for Brooks’ withdrawal is an outrage. In typical fashion they now blame the parents who spoke in the best interests of their children, and not themselves.

    This is a time for us to unify, and not divide, and make sure they get it right next time around. The Board, however, has elected to use the language of division in their announcement.

    The public discussion of Brooks’ appointment is “reflective of Ridgewood’s supportive community and its values.”

    When we speak on behalf of our children we are not “undermin[ing] the process.”

    Call the Board of Ed now. Demand that they retract their public statement and that they publicly apologize for their unfortunate choice of words.

  2. >Dr. Brooks cited “personal reasons” as HIS reason for not assuming the superintendency position. This is not surprising, considering he has lived in New York for so many years, his wife works there, and presumably they both have many years invested in personal and work relationships, there.

    Evidently Dr. Brooks is not citing phone calls, blogs and web postings as his reason for declining the position. Therefore, the BOE’s stated position (evidently designed to suppress dissent in our community) needlessly embarasses him.

    I just hope the BOE’s comments haven’t opened our District up to an HR lawsuit.

  3. >The BOE made a mistake when they hired him. Thankfully, he has corrected that.

  4. >Good riddance to bad rubbish.

  5. >If you review Sheila’s comments about him it was all boilerplate nonsense and marketing jargon…enough crap to make a river reverse its flow to the opposite direction.

    Don’t they know that we DON’T BELIEVE them when they talk like that?

    Most BOEs shoot themselves in the foot…ours shoots itself in the head.

    What’s up with that?

  6. >So even daring to QUESTION a superintendent’s educational philosophy is “not reflective of Ridgewood’s supportive community and its values”?? Let me get this straight, the BOE says that QUESTIONS are not supportive? Then what “values” is the BOE referring to…would those be Nazi-like mindless acceptance of the decisions of the powers that be??

  7. >If they were focusing on the education of the 5,600 students they wouldn’t have let the district buy that stupid math program or hire a guy who put it in his whole district.

    Where were POB old test scores? 45 or 53 in the Nassau County…Nice track record to hire a guy on.

    People respect when you admit your mistakes not deny them.

  8. >The audacity of a lot of people in this blog is amazing. Go back to many postings and how some refered to the superintendent in many derrogatory terms. Yes, he does read this and if he didn’t some community member made it their mission to make sure exactly how they felt about him by postings, emails and YES anonymous phone calls. That is a fact. I read the release from the board and nowhere does it say “parents”. No one is blaming parents in general. That is a shrewed tactic by whoever posted this statement to deflect blame away. Some people in this town have decided to go the guerrilla warfare tactic way and now they are “offended” when the truth comes out? I applaud the BOE for making the decision to let the rest of us know what gutter tactics are being used behind the scene.
    To whoever posted:
    .”When we speak on behalf of our children we are not “undermin[ing] the process.”Call the Board of Ed now. Demand that they retract their public statement and that they publicly apologize for “

    Everyone is entitled to speak on behalf of their children and many people have, in the open via BOE meeting comments, letters to the editor, petitions etc etc. What I find inexcusable is hidding in a cloak of anonimity to do a hitman job. Folks, unfortunately you succeeded.
    Do not confuse this issue with the legitimate right of many caring parents to voice their opposition to curriculum and even appointments.

  9. >If people really did make anonymous phone calls to his home or his work, that is not right.
    I am against the TERC program and want it removed,but if you have something to say, then say it publically.

  10. >I think he had to be embarrassed that he and his wife have taken money to promote reformed math.

    How could he come to Ridgewood and not promote it?

    How could he come to Ridgewood and promote it?

    It’s a no win situation for him. But it’s a situation of his own making. He knew this long ago…why did he take the job in the first place?

  11. >Give me a break.

    You cannot really believe that Brooks is out because someone said something nasty in an anonymous posting, e-mail, or phone call.

    Bottom line is he happened to get the nod at the same time parents were questioning a pre-Brooks educational philosophy, that happens to match the philosphy he has pushed throughout his career. The same battle was already roaring in his old district.

    He is on the brink of retirement. Why go from the fire to the frying pan? You can’t blame him for deciding to steer clear of a controversy which has yet to come to a head.

    Why does the Board have to decide “a position” on why he is not coming? Why not let the man speak for himself.

    I am pleased he is not coming, but I wish him well.

    Rather than hurl accusations the Board should look carefully at what has happened and make sure it does not happen again.

    I do not question that the Board thinks it is acting in the best interests of the children. Why do they always seem defensive and suspect when parents are also acting in the best interests of their children.

    The anonymity provided by a blog is good, not bad. It allows parents, residents, etc… to say things they can’t say in public due to a record (actual or perceived) of retaliation and retribution.

    Maybe the next selection process needs to be more transparent, like it is in many other districts.

  12. >The audacity of a lot of people …folks dont by this bull TERC is crap ..it Time to Start Raising Standards Again …and if the means getting rid of that lame bunch on the BOE then lets make it happen …you know they are going to try something else ,..so keep a sharp eye

  13. >Anyone who makes phone calls anonymously does so because they are afraid to do so openly.

    Why would anyone be afraid of a coward?

    If Brooks is painted by the BOE like he’s “scared” because he got such calls (if he even did) then shame on the BOE.

    A superintendent’s job is to deal with parents; the board’s comments make it seem like he can’t.

    They just made this man un-hireable.

  14. >To 11:46:

    Kudos to you! Finally someone who sees the big picture. I am tired of seeing people twist the truth on this and other blogs. Stick to the facts it will get you further.

    Again, the personal attacks have really shown the ugliness of some people.

    This whole thing has really made us an embarrassment to other towns in the area. Try looking from the outside in.

  15. >”Why would anyone be afraid of a coward?”

    Or, put another way, “Why would anyone be afraid of someone who has so little power and is so fearful of retribution that s/he acts in secret?”

    Agreed that the BOE did NOT do Brooks a favor by painting him as a victim.

  16. >At 10:56 “anonymous” said: “good riddance to bad rubbish”. Where are the voices of reason in Ridgewood? Whether you like the math program or hate it, is this the way to resolve anything? Is this the example to set for your children?! If you don’t like something don’t ask for a discussion, demand that it be your way and everyone with a different opinion be damn. Why teach children about Open Circle if their parents, who are supposed to be role models, teach their children that you get what you want by refusing to talk things through, be as loud and demanding as you can, and, when all else fails, smear those who think otherwise. I am old enough to remember the days of the “silent majority”. Well, Ridgewood Silent Majority, if you do exist, you’d better open your mouths or the bullies, yes, bullies, will ride roughshod over everyone.

  17. >This whole thing has really made us an embarrassment to other towns in the area. Try looking from the outside in.

    Your right TERC is an embarrassment ,so is the village hall, the wells situations ,should I go on?

  18. >The Board of Ed believes that because people spoke up, Dr. Brooks was made to feel unwelcome. It also seems that they are upset because people challenged them over their decision to hire Dr. Brooks. Well Board Members, you are elected to represent the interests of the public. If you don’t like it when people disagree with your decisions then resign from the board or don’t run for re-election when your term is up.

  19. >Well, Ridgewood Silent Majority, if you do exist, you’d better open your mouths or the bullies, yes, bullies, will ride roughshod over everyone.

    we just did ,and we are not going to let you and your buddies wreck our schools with that dumb dumb math or any other STUPID ways you want to lower standards,Ridewood used to have a the best schools we want them back!

  20. >For those of you who don’t like the vitriol and anonymous comments you find here, you might like to visit The Eclectic Educator.

    The Eclectic Educator is written by a licensed math educator and resident of Ridgewood who afterschools her kids at home in math, using Singapore and Saxon Math.

    The Eclectic Educator (yours truly) tries her best to offer reasoned, measured, thoughts on education, especially trends and fads in education, but also about afterschooling.

    Yes, she has opinions, but she also can see the shades of gray, and tries to look for truth wherever she finds it.

    Not as exciting as getting into heated debates, but if you want to read an intellectual approach, from a parent’s point of view (and dare to consider that the issues are nuanced), she’s happy to have readers and commenters there.

    While she does print comments that disagree with her, she doesn’t publish comments that are rude, personal, or unkind.

    Also, it is easy to find out who the Eclectic Educator is. She has nothing to hide.

    You can even subscribe to receive her blog entries by email if you want to.

  21. >To 1:39 pm
    Where are the people that support this Board of Ed. They don’t exist. They are all ashamed of them. You’re kidding yourself if you don’t know that the “silent majority” is with us!

    This board is ruining our schools. Look at the High School….they can’t even bare to make it a safe environment for our children. What with mold and peeling paint…disgusting.

    Instead, they hire consultants and more consultants…and more consultants. Are they so inept that they need so much extra help?

    That’s real money. Hello, is anyone there?

  22. >Here is a wake-up call for the individuals who took it upon themselves to interfer with a decision which was made by a properly elected body! (the BOE)

    You do not represent me, my wife my childern or many of my neighbors.

    You were neither elected, nor were you requested to act on my behalf, even if you believed it was for the benefit of my children!

    Take my advise….don’t wake up the sleeping lion, I assure you you will not like the results!

    One very angry resident

  23. >Take my advise….don’t wake up the sleeping lion, I assure you you will not like the results!

    you already did thats why brooks got the boot!

    TERC is a fraud stop defending it and you or anyone else is going to lie you way out of

  24. >threats will get you no were ,

    we have saved this school system from you total fiasco ,…hire a super whos on the payroll of TERC only in nj could that even beconsidered ,what a joke!

  25. >listen bud over 5000 people look at this blog and almost no one except the village idiot stood up for brooks ,I dont agree with her but at lest she isnt and “after the fact coward “

  26. >You do not represent me, my wife my childern or many of my neighbors.

    and you dont either !!!!!!!!!!!!

  27. >The audacity of a lot of people in this blog is amazing

    yes especialy the posters that are BOE lacky’s

  28. >Retaliation and retribution.

    I hear via quadruple hearsay that:

    Apparently one of our middle school principals was in a meeting with a group of parents this morning and discussed the Brooks situation.

    The principal described the parents who have spoken at Board of Ed meetings as having engaged in inappropriate conduct.

    He apparently linked the alleged anonymous phone calls to Brooks to these people who have chosen to speak out publicly.

    I was not at the meeting and find this hard to believe.

    If you were at the meeting can you verify what was said.

  29. >To One very angry resident,

    Well stated, I could not have said it better myself, Thank you!

  30. >Ridgewood Silent Majority we did speak thats why brooks is out and that was why he was run out of town at his last gig ..”as for the phoney phone call” sounds very desperate to try to silence people in the future ,but dont fear we are sick of you people destroying our school system ,if the schools go this town goes down the drain

  31. >As a Village resident I am embarrased at the amount of rubbish that is posted in this blog. Do not pretend that you are being anonymous because of fear or retaliation, you are remaining anonymous because of fear of a lawsuit! When you resort to attacks and inuendos you have to remain in the shadows, are you proud? If you are then start stating your name! Will your children be proud of all the mud slinging you are doing? I think not! You may be proud of yourself but that’s where it stops.

    Eclectic Educator- I have visited your website. Thanks for providing a civil (heck, sane!) alternative. I also came accross another blog -Ridgewood Views -where the author claims to discuss issues related to the village in a civilized forum- so far, it looks that way.

    Why do you think people are starting their own places? Because
    they have conceded this place to gutter dwellers.

  32. >yes this ..”as for the phoney phone call” sounds a bit desperate

  33. >The Board is not ruining our town, that task is already taken by a few nuts living among us…

  34. >it is easy enough to get the number of the call ,lets see it BOE produce your evidence ..if there is any?

  35. >Will your children be proud of all the mud slinging you are doing…yes because they will know how to add

  36. >To 2:04pm:

    “The Board of Ed believes that because people spoke up, Dr. Brooks was made to feel unwelcome. It also seems that they are upset because people challenged them over their decision to hire Dr. Brooks. Well Board Members, you are elected to represent the interests of the public.”

    EXACTLY- they were elected to represent EVERYONE. I for one I’m glad they had the guts to expose the few bad apples in this community. Dr. Brooks was not feel unwelcomed because parents spoke up, grow up! He is a 25+ year veteran and use to discent and disagreements.
    He did not want to deal with you nut jobs on a daily basis. Can you blame the man???
    The Board could have gone with the company line and sweep everything under the rug for the sake of harmony but you know what? Enough is enough! I may not always agree with the Board’s decision but this one took courage and I applaud it!!! Now, let’s get back to evaluating our math program

  37. >Will your children be proud of all the mud slinging you are doing…yes because they will know how to add

    3:51 PM

    Really? Congratulations! TOO BAD THEY WON’T HAVE A CONSCIENCE!!!

  38. >My children are learning a valuable, hands-on, authentic lesson in how the democratic process works.

    My children see that we as citizens and taxpayers have a voice, and this means they will too, as adults.

    Just as Bob Hutton said in a recent BOE meeting, we have a democracy of those who participate.

    I see nothing negative here.

  39. >For those of you who think this is a Ridgewood-only thing, see the Plainview-Old Bethpage web site, (that’s where Brooks worked last) which says:

    “We still have a lot of hard work ahead of us. With three new members on the BOE and Dr. Brooks leaving the time is here to create a new math program that will benefit all our children and return P-OB as one of the best performing districts on Long Island.”

  40. >Boy oh boy, are there a lot of unhappy folks out there or what?

    Chalk one up for the good guys. They beat back an institutional move to cement reform math in the district by getting Brooks to resign.

    In this struggle, for all you defenders and sycophants of the BoE, all is fair.

    Just like it is fair to have BoE administrators call parents to ask why they signed the petition to remove fuzzy math from our schools.

    Gee, they get to intimadate parents but parents can’t intimidate back?

    Give me e break. If the advocates for real math played nice, they would be ignored.

    Boards of Ed don’t like to loose no matter how wrong they are. They will fight to their last breath. So, you have to go for the jugular. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves.

  41. >To One very angry resident and Tired of this mess….

    I agree with your opinion and views. To those that would try to shout down or stop someone from presenting an opposing view I suggest you consider becoming a MUSLUM and you move to IRAQ or IRAN I hear that they have as much tollerance as you people!
    You should fit right in there…..

    One more resident who thinks this has gotten way out of hand.

  42. >A “MUSLUM”

    So an open dialogue about education is not OK, but it is OK for you to engage in religious bigotry?

    In fact it is OK, you can say whatever you want, but look in the mirror before you type.

  43. >ec said…
    My children are learning a valuable, hands-on, authentic lesson in how the democratic process works.

    My children see that we as citizens and taxpayers have a voice, and this means they will too, as adults.

    Just as Bob Hutton said in a recent BOE meeting, we have a democracy of those who participate.

    I see nothing negative here.

    ec, it’s too bad you don’t see anything negative. You talk about democracy, but that means free speech and exchange of ideas. You don’t want that, you just want to be the judge and jury of a kangaroo court. You’re teaching your children a twisted form of democracy.

  44. >free speech ,sorry bud but free speech means it is free for everyone not just you and all the BOE’s lying about Marty brooks

  45. >and enough with this phoney phone call nonsense what would he do if he got the job?

  46. >Religious bigotry?

    Are you kidding? I stated well known fact that MUSLEMS have no tolerance for other views….and you call that religious bigotry. Exactly what drugs are you on?

    I have no problem looking in the mirror, I don’t see a jackass when I do like some people do! I suggest you consider going to go to rehab.

  47. >Brooks pulled out a job offer in Roslyn Long Island last year because the vote of the BOE to hire him was not going to be unanimous. There was controversy surrounding the salary.

    Brooks believes in constructivism, the method of learning by discovery. Parents in Ridgewood are challenging this approach in the math curriculum. They feel it’s not working and don’t want it to continue.

    You can’t expect Brooks to want to be a superintendent where his ideology isn’t accepted. Why would he want to? He wrote a book about it so it would be two-faced to be a superintendent where its methodology is not being employed.

    It’s true that some comments on this blog have been out of control. Bringing Mrs. Brooks into the conversation really wasn’t fair neither was accusing him of taking money to promote TERC in his district.

    Brooks’ current and soon to be prior district Plainview never accused him any fincial impropriety and they didn’t bring his wife into the discussion either. They focused on the deficiencies of what was going on in the classroom and discrepancies among their schools. They changed their BOE to get new members that will be more responsive to their concerns. Things are far from being fixed but they are heading in the right direction.

    The BOE should not deny people the freedom of opinion. However, knowing that there was a growing contingency of parents concerned about constructivism and reform math and STILL going ahead hiring someone who strongly stood for these ideas was probably not the wisest choice, either. That’s not good representation.

    Ridgewood is lucky – Brooks was a gentleman to pull out. He could have started,and if if didn’t work out the 5 year contract would still have to be honored.

    Maybe that’s another lesson for the BOE – don’t give a long term contract until you are sure of the new hire. And also, listen to what parents are saying.

  48. >We have a group of organized citizens who disagree with a program in the school system, not really in and of it’s self unusual.

    These citizens have a petition, which has been online for about two months, which has 189 signatures on it.

    Currently there are 14,000 registered voters (I have used a low ball number so I am not accused of skewing the numbers)

    Ok, let’s use some math to examine what is going on here. If there are, as I stated earlier, 14,000 registered voters and we to know the percentage of voters who have signed this petition and we were to calculate that the % number would be……drum roll please

    1.4% of the registered voters……hardly a majority. Yet these people have used their minority opinion to intimidate, make accusations, and yes even go so far as to contact Mr. Brooks to voice their venom. So even doubling the numbers given 189 X 2 = 378 citizens or 2.8 % of the registered voters took it upon themselves to decide what would be best for the Village School system! This is an outrage!

    Make no mistake about it…..if anybody was taught questionable math you, who are a very tiny minority, really need to go back to math class to learn what a MAJORITY is…… I will make my own decisions I don’t need you to make it for me!

    If You don’t believe I am pissed your sadly mistaken!

  49. >1.4% of the registered voters……hardly a majority. Yet these people have used their minority opinion to intimidate,…

    another math wiz or BOE flunky ?..how many people voted in the last BOE election? maybe 2000 and how many have kids in school?

  50. >We have a group of organized citizens who disagree ….Brooks believes in constructivism, the method of learning by discovery. ….looks like BOE spin machine in full force…face it I want my kid to learn to add its that simple ,the rest is just crap

  51. >Regardless of the inflammatory nature of the comments on this blog, the Board of Ed clearly made a mistake in hiring such a controversial figure. When making decisions for 5,600 students – an individual with an extreme educational philosophy is an inappropriate choice. One should expect public outcry. Add to that this individuals’ poor record, the fact that he was going to work only 4 days a week, and that he comes from out of town and had no intention of making this his home. Members of the Board of Education we can do better and I hope we will.

    Members of the Board of Education we are your partners in this effort. We deserve your respect. We are the volunteers and the coaches. We attend the concerts and the art shows. We are the taxpayers and we pay a high bill. We deserve better than sloppy seconds.

    It is time for those in leadership positions to be leaders. It is time to move on. It is time for the Board of Ed to speak with a voice that they hope will be mirrored in the tone of their constituents. – Inflammatory remarks will most certainly illicit inflammatory responses. Stop criticizing the very behavior you are modeling. The Board of Education and the school administrators need to fix this mess. Pointing fingers at parents is very, very wrong. If an angry individual made a foolish mistake and placed an intimidating phone call, this move is clearly the exception. The parents I have watched are intelligent, measured and respectful in their discourse with the Board of Ed. If the Board of Ed hasn’t erred enough, it has been reported that a Middle School administrator pointed the finger of blame at the decent parents that spoke on their children’s behalf at recent Board of Ed meetings. The suggestion was made that these parents’ behavior was appalling. Furthermore, in an emotional presentation he indicated that no candidate could compare to Mr. Brooks – I’d have to agree with that – but this blogger is relieved that he is not coming to Ridgewood. Our problems are simpler today than they were yesterday. Everyone should be glad that we will not be fighting over Mr. Brooks’ philosophy for the next five years. Let’s make some peace and make Ridgewood better for the pain of this experience.

  52. >Regardless of the inflammatory nature of the comments on this blog, the Board of Ed clearly made a mistake …its only inflammatory when certain people dont get there way

  53. >6:03 pm – you have a right to be “pissed” about what has happened. But then again, you could have actively been defending your position on this blog and elsewhere, building up a group of others with similar ideas and speaking out at the BOE meetings.

    Just because people don’t sign a petition doesn’t mean that they don’t agree with the petition, either. Not everyone is aware of the petition.

    Same as voting. Only a minority of the community votes. That doesn’t mean it’s a majority rule, either.

    There is no formula to make everybody happy. A community that cares enough to debate what’s going on regarding their kid’s education is a community worth living in.

    There seems to be a decent number of parents concerned about math and something needs to be done about that in a positive manner. Shame on the BOE and any one else for making people feel uncomfortable for questioning the status quo and future direction. For the BOE to ignore the obvious about Brooks’ past while they are in the midst of a similar situation and hoping everyone would look the other way was clearly a poor decision. That’s not a good start in being respectful and only promoted the anger and wrath on the blogs.

    Media like the Bergen County record and NY Times have been looking at what’s going on in Ridgewood- after all, it’s unusual: a parent sponsored petition, web sites, blogs talking about a math program that is controversial nationwide. Add to that a controversial superintendent and what do you expect?

    Unless this was handled by a professional PR firm, it was destined to become chaos.

    The BOE is accountable for what is going on. They need to put a superintendent in place to be the chief educational officer. One whose ideology will be in agreement with what how the taxpayers want their children educated.

    Math needs to be examined and discussed. And math IS the superintendent’s business. As is English, social studies, sports, the budget and everything else that goes on in the schools.

    The inconsistencies between schools in the same community needs to be addressed. Open minded and respectful discussion needs to happen and parents input is of utmost importance.

    BOE should be thankful parents are interested, whether they agree or not, and not take dissension as a negative thing but learn from it. To do otherwise is a huge disservice to the community that voted them in.

  54. >Less than 2,000 Ridgewood voters decided to cast a vote for the Board of Ed members this year. I am willing to bet that most of the petition signers did vote.

    On the budget 2,669 voters participated. 947 were NOs, mostly seniors who tend to vote no.

    5,600 students probably equals 5,000 voters.

    6:03: Did you vote?

    I didn’t think so.

  55. >Anonymous said…
    1.4% of the registered voters……hardly a majority. Yet these people have used their minority opinion to intimidate,…

    another math wiz or BOE flunky ?..how many people voted in the last BOE election? maybe 2000 and how many have kids in school?

    Ok, wise guy lets use your number. So if 2,000 residents voted representing the community and there were 400 who effectively used their influence to get what they wanted the STILL only represent less than 20% of the voters. So the question is are you stupid enough to try to defend that as being proper?

  56. >Anonymous said…

    9:04 PM

    Did you vote?

    How much money would you like to bet on that, I will be happy to take your money.

  57. >Did the BOE really call people who signed the petition to ask why? In the context to learn why people are upset about TERC.

    A more interesting comparision of the numbers would be to see how many people at Travell voted and how many people at Travell signed the petition.

  58. >I do not like what I have read and seen about TERC math. When my 4th grade son brought home a worksheet of TERC math a couple of months back…I was dumbfounded.
    I could not believe this was what he was being taught. I could not make heads or tails out of it. By the way, I have my BS and MBA in Finance.

    I do not like what I have read about the background Dr Brooks and his educational philosophy. It is unfortunate if he was threatened or attacked personally via phone or email. That is not right….but I am glad that he is not coming here.

    I just started reading this blog last week. There are many people that I have spoken to informally over the past week that are just now being made aware of of this program and all of these issues. I am aware of the petition but I am frankly scared to sign it as I fear retaliation….I believe many people in this town feel the same way. I for one will be in attendance at the BOE meeting on Monday for the first time. I am guilty of not voting in the BOE election as I was traveling on business…but frankly don’t know if I would have done so even if I was home. I was just not aware of all this contoversy. It is clear to me that something needs to be done about the math program. I hope that the BOE wakes up and hears what is being said….I believe it is a small minority that is being vocal…..but many more people agree that are not being vocal. Perhaps Mondays meeting will be a wake up call….I hope that everyone that reads and or posts on this blog will be there….I look forward to a spirited and civil debate.

  59. >”Spirited and civil debate”? What debate? How can there be a debate of any kind if the math discussion is permitted only to continue behind closed doors and not at BOE meetings? The BOE has already moved to take the discussion behind closed doors, in the form of a committee.

    The Ridgewood News reports that Joan O’Keefe, one of the anti-fuzzy math voices, was picked by the BOE to join such a committee to evaluate the district’s math programs. It also reports that she “hope[s]” they pick someone from Travell.

    What it doesn’t make clear is whether she accepted the BOE’s offer join the committee.

  60. >Correction, it seems Mrs. O’Keefe was asked to join a “focus group,” whatever that means.

  61. >Wow, I just read through this blog and I’m surprised by all the different viewpoints.

    The Math Moms who were asked have accepted, but we are wary that this is a “conflict resolution” group, not a “curriculum discussion”.

    We only have a conflict with the Math Program and maybe that extends to the folks in the district who continue to advocate for it.

    Here’s a simple example of what’s not taught in 2nd grade.

    7+3=10
    3+7=10
    10-7=3
    10-3=7

    It’s called a “fact family”. It not only teaches kids Math facts, but it teaches them the “inverse relationship” between addition and subtraction.

    It’s important for checking your answers when you take tests. It’s important for algebra, since you can start to leave some of the numbers out and get an equation like this 10-X=7.

    Hopefully, this brings us back to the real issue…Math curriculum.

  62. >I still cant believe no one on the BOE google searched this boozo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.