Posted on

First Threats Now Physical Assaults Good Thing the Ridgewood has Far Higher Standards

3 amigos in action Ridgewood NJ
file photo by Boyd Loving of Council Majority
Readers not happy with council response to unacceptable attacks of residents  :
Seriously, someone argues it is ok to knock a camera out of a person’s hands? Yes, no one should shove a camera in someone else’s face. But that is not what happened here. (And if it did, someone should have called the Police earlier.) Condoning and urging violence between Villagers cannot be viewed simply as the ravings of a self-styled curmudgeon. It is what we would expect to hear from a fascist who seeks to undermine democracy. Sadly, the comment personifies the mire into which we have been led by members of our Council.

This just in from Big Al – clearly he is running on defense. We know that Albert hates Dana, we heard him threaten Dana a few weeks ago, then we saw him join in a middle-school-boys’ bashing of Dana in cahoots with Aronsohn and Bob Fuhrman. Albert may claim that he does not want to outlaw taping, but he sure as hell does What he hates more than anything is that all of his nasty, inappropriate outbursts have been caught on tape by the Village cameras (and by other peoples cameras) and replayed over and over and over. It makes it impossible for him to escape the truth about himself, that his temper is unmanageable and flares up often and publicly. So read what Albert is saying here:

·If the reference in this article to an ordinance “introduced” at the January 27 Village Council meeting is referring to a draft ordinance that I circulated for comment, that ordinance does not purport to prohibit or restrict video or audio recording at Council meetings. It would require that participants at meetings that are not otherwise being recorded, such as a meeting of the Arts Council, be informed that the meeting is being recorded.
Albert Pucciarell

Reader says Delzio was standing with his foot inside the legs of Dana’s tripod. He had his face in Dana’s face. He was twisting his neck and putting his face in front of the camera lens. Dana was silently standing there with his camera, as he is entitled to do by law. He did not rise to the provocation of this aggressor at all. The only thing he did was take out his cell phone AFTER Delizio started cell-phone-taping HIM. Delzio was 100% aggressor and Dana was 100% passive, quiet, and orderly. You did not see what happened, and your wife sure as heck did not because her eyes were glued onto Jim Griffiths’ event. So your commentary is less than meaningless. You constantly criticize the blog, but you are posting based on the skewed report that your friend Gwenn gave you – and remember, GWENN STATED THAT SHE DID NOT SEE ANYTHING and that NO ONE SAW ANYTHING. Consider your source. Have some warm milk and go to bed.

11 thoughts on “First Threats Now Physical Assaults Good Thing the Ridgewood has Far Higher Standards

  1. “I know nothing! I see nothing! I hear nothing!” (“I see nothing, nothing!”).

  2. If any act of violence occurs during an event, regardless of how great or small, the council chamber should be cleared. This is common sense. Obviously the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, who are presumed to be in charge, should know this and have acted accordingly. Who’s to say when and where the next act of aggression will occur? Never mind civility, how about simple public safety.

  3. Since when did Ridgewood have standards???
    It’s the reason we’re in the position were in now…IT NEVER EXISTED.

  4. The ordinance given to other colleagues on Jan 27th looked like a few pages. It’s not as simple as just announcing that ‘hey I am recording’. It has multiple pages.

  5. The three amigos are more interested in shaming their perceived political opponents into verbal silence than restraining their toadies, lackeys, and bootlicker against physical violence.

  6. The three amigos are disgraceful. Each one is horrible. As a whole the completely suck

  7. I am new to Ridgewood, so here comes a newbie question –
    Were previous village managers also as politically active as the current one? i.e. supporting and promoting specific council members and their agenda, and withholding information from other council members?
    Shouldn’t that be a politically neutral position?

  8. I have wondered why the village manager has been such a vocal supporter for the council.

    In the past is was a low key position, the managers just did their job.

    Schoenfield was a member of the self proclaimed “Tiger Team” that worked as a self-important financial advisory committee. Now we have a permanent financial advisory committee that also is active in promoting the council projects. They are intertwined and hardly objective.

  9. Really? Financial Advisory Committee?
    Have you seen her answers to questions related to ‘numbers’ in the council meetings?

  10. “I am new to Ridgewood, so here comes a newbie question” You don’t sound like a newbie. You sound like a person who is trying to distract the conversation from the current discussion. That was then this is now. Two wrongs don’t make a right.

  11. Hey Newbie if you remember that then maybe you can remember that there were no assaults under that manager or council.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *