>
Month: January 2012
>Shining a light on hazards of fluorescent bulbs
>
Shining a light on hazards of fluorescent bulbs
Energy-efficient coils booming, but disposal of mercury poses problems
By M. Alex Johnson
Compact fluorescent light bulbs, long touted by environmentalists as a more efficient and longer-lasting alternative to the incandescent bulbs that have lighted homes for more than a century, are running into resistance from waste industry officials and some environmental scientists, who warn that the bulbs’ poisonous innards pose a bigger threat to health and the environment than previously thought.
Fluorescents — the squiggly, coiled bulbs that generate light by heating gases in a glass tube — are generally considered to use more than 50 percent less energy and to last several times longer than incandescent bulbs.
When fluorescent bulbs first hit store shelves several years ago, consumers complained about the loud noise they made, their harsh light, their bluish color, their clunky shape and the long time it took for them to warm up.
Since then, the bulbs — known as CFLs — have been revamped, and strict government guidelines have alleviated most of those problems. But while the bulbs are extremely energy-efficient, one problem hasn’t gone away: All CFLs contain mercury, a neurotoxin that can cause kidney and brain damage.
The amount is tiny — about 5 milligrams, or barely enough to cover the tip of a pen — but that is enough to contaminate up to 6,000 gallons of water beyond safe drinking levels, extrapolated from Stanford University research on mercury. Even the latest lamps promoted as “low-mercury” can contaminate more than 1,000 gallons of water beyond safe levels.
>Follow Up to the November 26th Pedestrian Tagically Killed on Route 17
>
photo courtesy of Boyd Loving
Follow Up to the November 26th Pedestrian Tagically Killed on Route 17
R. Marsal
The woman that was killed was my mother. She had never taken a bus in her life. I was waiting in the park and ride across the highway where i had dropped her off. There is NO place to park on the side she was dropped off.
If i had known that she was going to be dropped off on that side I would have been waiting on the bench for her. She was dropped off in the dark on the side of the highway and she was probably not given any instructions on how to get to the park and ride. She apparently was trying to get to the brightly lit gas station to ask questions.
People with rude and insensitive comments should re-examine their thoughts and hearts. She was a mother, grandmother, aunt, and a loving productive member of the community. She was healthy. She ran a successful business. She was going to a concert the next day. She was planning a vacation. Her death is a great loss to her family, friends and community. God bless all of you.

![]()
>Congressional Redistricting : changes to the 5th Congressional District
>Congressional Redistricting : changes to the 5th Congressional District
Rep. Scott Garrett
December 29, 2011
With Congressional redistricting now complete, many New Jerseyans have called with questions about the process and changes to the 5th Congressional District. We hope the below FAQs help answer some of these questions.
What is Congressional redistricting?
Congressional redistricting is a process that happens every ten years to ensure that the 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are evenly distributed to reflect changes in population. Because New Jersey’s population growth did not keep up with other states, we lost one Congressional seat. With your help, the 5th Congressional District will continue to be represented by Scott Garrett.
Who created New Jersey’s new Congressional map?
A bipartisan commission of six Republicans, six Democrats, and one tie-breaking member was tasked with creating New Jersey’s new Congressional map. The tie-breaking member, Rutgers Law School Dean John Farmer, was agreed upon by both the Republicans and the Democrats. A majority of the commission voted to approve the new Congressional map on Friday, December 23rd.
When does this new map take effect?
Candidates will run in these new districts in the 2012 election. Once a new Congress is sworn in the first week of January 2013, the Members of Congress will officially represent these new districts.
Is my town still in the 5th Congressional District?
The new 5th Congressional District includes many of the same towns that it currently does, but with a few important changes. In Bergen County, the district lost Cresskill and Tenafly and picked up Fair Lawn, Maywood, Lodi, Hackensack, Bogota, and part of Teaneck. In Passaic County, the district lost Wanaque and Bloomingdale. In Sussex County, the district lost Ogdensburg and Sparta. In Warren County, the district lost Harmony, Franklin, Lopatcong, Greenwich, Phillipsburg, Alpha, and Pohatcong.
>No rubber-stamp governor: N.J.’s Christie often invokes his veto power
>
>Bill would allow restaurants to add horse racing bets to the menu
>Bill would allow restaurants to add horse racing bets to the menu
>Countdown to NJ’s health insurance exchange
>Countdown to NJ’s health insurance exchange
>N.J.’s elderly population to surge
>N.J.’s elderly population to surge
>“Biggest Loser” Contestant to Help You Improve Your Health in the New Year
>
“Biggest Loser” Contestant to Help You Improve Your Health in the New Year
The Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce, along with The Valley Hospital, Van Dyke Health Care, and other local sponsors and vendors, invite you to a Health Fair on January 19 to help you start the New Year off on a healthy foot.
January 19, 2012
(snow date January 26)
5 to 8 p.m.
Ridgewood YMCA/YWCA of Bergen County
112 Oak Street
Ridgewood, NJ
Amanda Arlauskas from NBC’s “Biggest Loser” will speak at 7 p.m. Visit all of the vendors that have information on wellness and preparing yourself for a healthy future.
For more information call 201-445-2600, or e-mail the Chamber at info@ridgewoodchamber.com.
>Readers ask can we afford Paul Aronsohn and his pro-union ,pro big government agenda?
>Readers ask can we afford Paul Aronsohn and his pro-union ,pro big government agenda of which he spells out so clearly in his own words in this Mach 4th article in PolitickerNJ ?
Welcome Home, Democrats
by Paul Aronsohn on Mar 4, 2011 • 4:09 pm No Comments
Published in PolitickerNJ
It warmed my heart. It gave me hope.
When thousands of police officers and firefighters converged on the state capitol yesterday, they were greeted by scores of Democratic legislators. From Barbara Buono to Paul Sarlo … from Bonnie Watson Coleman to Joe Cryan — the Democrats were out in full force to welcome NJ’s finest with words of support and gratitude.
In many respects, it was a flashback to an earlier time – when Democrats would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with union workers, particularly those who put their lives on the line every day. The banners and signs. The adrenaline-filled speeches. The solidarity between Democrats and the hardworking people they represent. It was all there, and it was all good.
Sadly, however, it was all too unfamiliar as well.
For the past year, my Party has largely stood on the sidelines as union workers were vilified and scapegoated. Silent and passive, many Democrats did nothing as others attacked the very people at the center of our Party. No defense. No counteroffensive. No nothing. During the past year’s great debate over worker’s rights and responsibilities, the Democrats – by and large – refused to show up.
This is not to suggest that all Democrats have abandoned the cause. Some of our legislators not only get it; they have also demonstrated their willingness to passionately fight for it.
And this is not to suggest that Democrats and union members should agree with each other on each and every issue and negotiating position. Quite the contrary. The Democratic Party is as diverse as union membership, and thus, disagreements over the particulars are not uncommon.
I am suggesting, however, that Democrats were wrong for deserting our friends in their time of need and wrong for taking so long to realize it. Attacks on teachers went unanswered. Attacks on public safety officials went unchallenged.
https://www.paularonsohn.com/writings/welcome-home-democrats
https://www.politickernj.com/45532/welcome-home-democrats
>Time for Shared Services for New Jersey Police ?
>Time for Shared Services for New Jersey Police ?
According to the Star-Ledger N.J. police salaries rank highest in nation with median pay of $90,672. With the state’s average per capita income of $50,313 and the fact that Suburban cops are paid the best while city officers generally make less and police tend to be paid the best in small towns with little or no crime ,maybe its time for a serious discussion on shared policing services ? After all wealthy suburban districts are called on to fund public schools in less fortunate or “Abbott” districts why not put the police where the crime is ?
The Ridgewod blog used the data supplied by the Star Ledger in an article by Chris Megerian Published: Sunday, September 19, 2010, 6:40 AM
https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/nj_police_salaries_rank_highes.html
To analyze police salaries in New Jersey, The Star-Ledger used 2009 data from the New Jersey Division of Pensions and Benefits. The data includes all police officers paying into the Police and Firemen’s Retirement System by the end of March 2010. It does not include a small minority of officers who are part of the Public Employees’ Retirement System, a separate pension fund.
https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/nj_police_salaries_rank_highes.html
A Star-Ledger analysis shows the average municipal cop in New Jersey is paid 80 percent more than the average resident, and three of 10 made at least $100,000 last year. In addition, police tend to be paid the best in small towns with little crime.
Among the other findings:
• The median salary for the state’s 20,525 municipal officers was $90,672 last year, meaning half earned more and half earned less.
• A total of 6,198 municipal officers made at least $100,000 last year. Ninety-nine of 466 towns that pay police have six-figure median salaries. Most are in North Jersey, primarily Bergen County.
• Suburban cops are paid the best while city officers generally make less and rural cops make the least.
The Star-Ledger’s analysis is based on the 2009 base salaries of all municipal officers paying into the police and firefighter pension fund by the end of March, when the statistics were collected. It includes municipal officers at all ranks — from patrolmen and detectives to sergeants and chiefs — but not state troopers, sheriff’s officers or county and state investigators. A small minority of officers in a separate pension fund are not included here.
In Bergen County, 59 of 68 towns have median police salaries above $100,000. The highest median pay in the state was $134,132 in Rochelle Park, where 19 cops patrol a one-square-mile borough near the intersection of the Garden State Parkway and Route 80.
Police salaries stack up well when compared with other professions. The average municipal police salary last year was $89,630, compared to the state’s average per capita income of $50,313.
Data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics show municipal police make more than civil engineers ($87,090), architects ($85,050) and rank-and-file firefighters ($71,810). They make less than dentists ($154,130), veterinarians ($117,170) and real estate brokers ($96,240).
Federal data on 2009 wages also show New Jersey officers are the best paid in the country — the median salary for municipal and sheriff patrol officers is $80,120. (That’s lower than The Star-Ledger’s calculation for median salary, which includes superior officers.)
New Jersey is rivaled only by California at $78,460, according to the federal statistics. Illinois trails in third with $69,900. New York is ninth at $60,620, Connecticut 10th at $60,490, and Pennsylvania 19th at $54,140.
https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/nj_police_salaries_rank_highes.html
>‘Occupy Wall Street’ Participation To Earn Class Credit At Columbia U.
>‘Occupy Wall Street’ Participation To Earn Class Credit At Columbia U.
Announcement Comes As Dozens Are Arrested On New Year’s Eve
January 1, 2012 7:00 PM
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork/AP) — Columbia University will offer a new course for upperclassmen and grad students next semester. An Occupy Wall Street class will send students into the field and will be taught by Dr. Hannah Appel, a veteran of the Occupy movement.
The course begins next semester and will be divided between class work at Columbia’s Morningside Heights campus and fieldwork that will require students to become involved with the Occupy movement outside of the classroom.
The course will be called “Occupy the Field: Global Finance, Inequality, Social Movement” it will be run by the anthropology department.
https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/01/01/new-class-at-columbia-focuses-on-occupy-wall-street/
>Time to Pull plug on electric vehicle subsidies
>Time to Pull plug on electric vehicle subsidies
On Thanksgiving Day, a Chevrolet Volt battery pack that had been recently crash-tested at a defense facility in Virginia caught on fire.
In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes a variety of opinions from outside writers. On political and policy matters, we publish opinions from across the political spectrum.
Roughly half of our columns come from our Board of Contributors, a group whose interests range from education to religion to sports to the economy. Their charge is to chronicle American culture by telling the stories, large and small, that collectively make us what we are.
We also publish weekly columns by Al Neuharth, USA TODAY’s founder, and DeWayne Wickham, who writes primarily on matters of race but on other subjects as well. That leaves plenty of room for other views from across the nation by well-known and lesser-known names alike.
It wasn’t the first time this happened, which is why the very next day, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) launched an investigation into the safety of the Chevy Volt, General Motors Co.’s signature plug-in electric car, and the risk its lithium-ion battery pack poses after a serious crash.
To quiet the fears of the roughly 5,000 Volt owners on the road today, General Motors announced it will loan cars to Volt drivers who are worried that their battery could ignite in the event of a crash. (On Thursday, the company’s CEO told the Associated Press that GM will buy back Volts from customers who fear that their vehicles will catch fire.)
The NHTSA investigation is just one of several setbacks experienced by the Volt, which, along with every other subsidized electric vehicle, has become the poster child of President Obama’s failed green agenda.
https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/story/2011-12-01/chevy-volt-green-taxpayers/51545634/1
>Live Greener in the New Year by adopting these 12 simple tips.
>
Live Greener in the New Year by adopting these 12 simple tips.
SUNDAY, JANUARY 1, 2012
BY SACHI FUJIMORI
STAFF WRITER
THE RECORD
By now you’ve probably determined your resolutions for 2012. Perhaps you want to exercise more, pay off those credit cards, or volunteer in your community. But before you execute this plan, remember there are some small things you can resolve to do each day to live a little greener.
Thinking about climate change, our limited natural resources and waste issues can be overwhelming. But experts say taking small steps to reduce our environmental impact can make a significant difference.
“The global community, and particularly people living in industrialized societies, have put unsustainable demands on our planet’s limited resources,” says Robert Engelman, president of the Worldwatch Institute, an environmental research organization based in Washington, D.C. “If we expect to be able to feed, shelter and provide even basic living conditions to our growing populations in years to come, we must act now to change.”
If you’re at home and three-quarters of the lights are on while the family is spending time in the living room, that’s a huge energy waste, said Ed Schwartz, a Ridgewood resident and co-founder of Green Living Solutions, a home energy auditing company. “It’s wasting up to 1,500 watts at any given time,” he said.
>New Year’s Resolutions for Conservatives
>
New Year’s Resolutions for Conservatives
David Azerrad January 2, 2012 at 7:11 am
https://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/02/morning-bell-new-years-resolutions-for-conservatives/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell
Let’s be honest: We all know you’re not really gonna quit smoking, start exercising, and eat more vegetables as of today. As Emerson wryly remarked: “All promise outruns performance.”
The key to keeping your New Year’s resolutions is to make them more realistic. Rather than try to drastically change the way you live, why not start with the more modest goal of changing the way you speak? And what better place to start for conservatives than with America’s Founding principles?
As conservatives continue to rediscover the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, it is important to use words and embrace ideas that are consistent with our Founding principles.
If you’re fond of the term “states’ rights,” have a soft spot for nullification, are tempted by isolationism or are wary of equality, here are four simple resolutions to begin getting right with America’s principles. Once you have these down, you can start correcting your friends and move on to other core concepts.
1. Speak of Federalism, not “States’ Rights”
States don’t have rights. People do.
States have powers. Nowhere in the Constitution are states said to possess rights. Congress has certain powers, clearly enumerated in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, and the conservative-favorite Tenth Amendment makes clear that all the other powers are reserved to the states.
Not only is it incorrect to speak of states’ rights, but the expression has more baggage than Samsonite and Louis Vuitton combined. In case you didn’t know, “states’ rights” was the rallying cry of segregationists. Since no right-thinking conservative will keep company with such people, let’s just drop the term states’ rights once and for all.
If you’re concerned about federal encroachments on state sovereignty or the erosion of federalism–as you should be–then speak of federal encroachments on state sovereignty or the erosion of federalism. Or of the need to restore limited constitutional government, reinvigorate local self-government, decentralize power or check the growth of out-of-control government. With so many great formulations to choose from, why weaken the case for liberty by relying on “states’” rights?
2. Resist the Nullification Temptation
Are you unhappy with the constitutional abomination called Obamacare? Do you think that Congress has no power to compel you to purchase health insurance?
Good. Now encourage the repeal of the law or wait and see what mood Justice Anthony Kennedy will be in next June when the Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of Obamacare.
But please don’t start talking about nullification as the magical silver bullet that other conservatives somehow overlooked in their efforts to repeal Obamacare (or any other unconstitutional law, for that matter).
Nullification is blatantly unconstitutional. As James Madison pointed out in 1798, 1800 and again during the Nullification Crisis of 1832, individual states do not have the power to unilaterally declare federal legislation unconstitutional. They have the power–in fact, the duty–to challenge laws they deem objectionable, but this must be done within the existing constitutional framework. Let us behold a republican remedy, as Madison would say, to this federal overreach.
3. Isolationism is un-American
Unless you’re describing the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan or the hermit kingdom of North Korea, “isolationism” should be eliminated from conservative foreign policy discussions.
As a nation dedicated to the universal truth of human equality, America simply cannot withdraw from the world and be indifferent to the fate of liberty. American exceptionalism is fundamentally incompatible with isolationism. More so than any other country, we have a duty to stand for liberty.
And no, the Founders were not isolationists. The Heritage Foundation’s Marion Smith has written the definitive refutation of this bogus argument in “The Myth of Isolationism.”
So if we’re not isolationists, does that mean we’re interventionists who want to make the world “safe for democracy“? Of course not. There is a middle ground between naive isolationism and crusading interventionism: a distinctively American foreign policy, anchored in the principles of the Founding, that secures our interests all the while upholding our commitment to liberty–a commitment which need not necessarily translate into military interventions.
4. Equality is not a four-letter word
Seeing how the Left blathers on incessantly about inequality and dreams of a Harrison Bergersonesque America, some conservatives are wary of equality. Yet no word is more central to the American tradition which we uphold than equality.
Equality is the first self-evident truth proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence and ours is a country “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” By this, of course, we mean equal natural rights and the equal opportunities afforded by free markets and the rule of law.
The real tragedy of inequality in America is not that some earn more than others–class envy is something that afflicts Europeans, not Americans. Rather, it is that big government breeds what Paul Ryan calls “a class of bureaucrats and connected crony capitalists trying to rise above the rest of us, call the shots, rig the rules, and preserve their place atop society.”
Let us therefore reclaim the mantle of equality from those who’ve perverted it in the pursuit of equal outcomes.
– David Azerrad is Assistant Director, B. Kenneth Simon Center for Principles and Politics.
https://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/02/morning-bell-new-years-resolutions-for-conservatives/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell




