Anti-Semitism is a major pillar in the ideology of Hamas.
by Meir Litvak
Anti-Semitism is a major pillar in the ideology of Hamas (acronym of Harakat al-muqawama al-Islamiyya β Islamic Resistance Movement), a Palestinian national-Islamic movement, which perceives and articulates its conflict with Israel in Manichean and absolutist religious terms. Like most other Islamic movements in the Middle East, Hamas regards the conflict with the latest and most fateful phase of the relentless onslaught waged by western imperialism and culture against Islam since the Crusades. Hamas publications portray the Jews as instruments of the West or, alternatively, as the power that controls and manipulates the West in this war. Concurrently, it views the current struggle as the last link in the war, which the Jews have been waging against Islam since its essence. Consequently, Hamas emphasizes the emphasis on the βIslamic essenceβ of the Palestinian cause.β
As such, the struggle is portrayed as an unbridgeable dichotomy between two absolutes: a βwar of religion and faith,β between Islam and Judaism and between Muslims and Jews, rather than one between Palestinians and Israelis or Zionists.
It is a historical, religious, cultural and existential conflict between the true religion, which supersedes all previous religions, i.e. Islam, and the abrogated superseded religion, Judaism. It is a war between good personified by the Muslims who represent the party of God (Hizballah) against βevil incarnatedβ¦. the party of Satanβ (hizb al-shaytan) represented by the Jews.1
Justifying the Self and Demonizing the Other
Every conflict involves justification of the Self and the demonization of rivals and enemies, or in Hamasβ case the Jews as the βenemies of God and of humanity.β Such an accusation, in the words of Bernard Lewis, applies to all enemies of Islam since, if according to the Quran the fighters for Islam are fighting in holy war βin the path of Godβ and for God, then their opponents are fighting against God and are, therefore, his enemies.2 However, such depiction is used more forcefully and more often against the Jews in view of their explicit castigation by the Quran.
Unlike the non-Islamist Palestinian groups, Hamas makes no distinction between Judaism and Zionism, and uses Zionists and Jews synonymously and interchangeably. Judaism is a βreligion that stipulates racism and hostility towards others in its books and incites to usurp unjustly Palestine under the slogan of the Holy Land.β Zionism, according to this view, transforms these Jewish ideas into reality. Likewise, terrorism is an integral and inherent pillar of Judaism, which stems from the teaching of the Tora, and it finds its expression in Zionist massacres in Palestine.3
The portrayal of the Jews as powerful archenemies of Islam departs from traditional Islamic depictions of the Jews that are associated with cowardice, degradation and wretchedness. It has become a central element in Hamasβ ideology and an important theme in the writings of all Islamist movements in the Middle East as part of a broader need to explain the current crisis of the Muslim world. It is particularly difficult within this context to explain Jewish or Zionist success vis-a-vis the Muslims since, according to Islamic tradition, the Jews were destined to humiliation and subjugation to Muslims after they had rejected the message of the Prophet. It is one thing to be defeated by a super-power such as the U.S., and a completely different situation to be defeated and ruled by the Jews, who had been an inferior minority in the past under the Muslim empire, and who are a small minority in the modern Middle East. The only way to explain this cognitive dissonance is to magnify the power and evil of the Jews, and thereby help to explain Muslim weakness.4
Modern Anti-Jewish Animosity
The modern anti-Jewish animosity of Islamic movements goes much further than traditional Islam. Although Muslims have always viewed Islam as a superior religion, superseding Judaism, they did not consider Judaism as a heresy, which required eradication, as long as it did not challenge Islamβs rule. Historically, Muslims regarded Christianity as a greater threat than Judaism, and devoted greater attention to it in their polemical literature.5 However, due to the conflict with Israel, Judaism rather than Christianity has become the prime enemy for the Islamist organizations, drawing inspiration from anti-Jewish utterances in the Koran and from modern European anti-Semitism.
A good example of this vilification is the Hamas Charter, the movementβs canonical document, which provides a picture of the Jews and Judaism drawn from the notorious anti-Semitic tract, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Article 22, for instance, describes the Jews as controlling the world media with their money and as having established secret organizations throughout the world β such as the Freemasons and Rotary Club β βfor the destruction of societies and the fulfilment of the goals of Zionism.β They have βcaused revolutions all over the world,β from France in 1789 to Russia in 1917 βin order to fulfil their goal.β Likewise, βwith their money, they seized control of the imperialist powers and pushed them to subdue many countries in order to squeeze their resources and spread their corruption.β In addition, Hamas accuses the Jews of fomenting all-important wars in history. Most important, the Jews stood behind the outbreak of World War I, which βeliminatedβ the Ottoman Empire, the βstate of the Islamic Caliphate.β The breakdown of Islamic unity opened the way for the establishment of βthe Zionist entityβ in Palestine. Likewise, they βwere behind World War II, through which they made huge financial gains by trading in armaments, and paved the way for the establishment of their state.β
Of special significance are the wars, which the Jews have waged against Islam from the time of the Prophet. Accordingly, the Jews opposed the Prophet from the moment he arrived in Medina, in a desperate effort to prevent the spread of Islam, rejecting his generous offers and distorting his message. They tried to harm the Islamic umma (nation) and dominate it.β6
Derogatory Descriptions of the Jews
In many of its publications Hamas employs harsh derogatory descriptions of the Jews, often taken from the Koran, such as βblood suckers,β βbrothers of apes,β βkillers of the prophets,β βhuman pigs,β and warmongers βthe descendants of treachery and deceit,β βbutchers.β They are a βcancer expandingβ in the land of Palestine, βthreatening the entire Islamic world.β They are βspreading corruptionβ in the land of Islam. βDeceit and usury are stamped in their nature,β and they are all βthieves, monopolists, and usurers.β7
Almost every issue of the Hamas organ, Filastin al-Muslima contains articles enumerating the evil deeds and character of the Jews based on an analysis and exegetes of specific suras (chapters) from the Koran.
Particularly significant, in view of the historical record, are the equations, which Hamas makes between the Jews, the Zionists and the Nazis and the denial of the Holocaust. Hamas argues that Israelβs actions exceed those of the Nazis, and that βthe Jews represent Nazism in its most criminal form.β8 Yet, following the Stockholm conference on the Holocaust, held in January 2000, Hamas declared that the conference had:
A Hamas promotional display at a West Bank university
A clear Zionist goal, aimed at forging history by hiding the truth about the so-called Holocaust, which is an alleged and invented story with no basis . . .. The invention of these grand illusions of an alleged crime that never occurred, ignoring the millions of dead European victims of Nazism during the war, clearly reveals the racist Zionist face, which believes in the superiority of the Jewish race over the rest of the nations.9
cAbd al-cAziz al-Rantisi, Hamas leader from Gaza, went further by denying the Holocaust, while simultaneously charging that βthe Zionists were behind the Nazisβ murder of many Jews,β with the aim of intimidating and forcing them to immigrate to Palestine. Furthermore, he claimed that the Nazis βreceived tremendous financial aid from the Zionist banks and monopolies,β prior to their seizure of power and that βthis great financial aid helped the Nazis build the military and economic force needed to destroy Europe and annihilate millions.β βWhen we compare the Zionists to the Nazis,β Rantisi concluded, βWe insult the Nazis,β he concluded. 10
Reviewing the life of the late Pope John Paul II, the Hamas weekly al-Risala concluded that his 1998 letter, in which he apologized to the Jews for the Holocaust was his βgreatest crimeβ.11
Advocating Jihad
The perception of the conflict as a religious one brings Hamas to advocate jihad (holy war) as the only way to combat the Jews. Yet, in addition to practical considerations, Hamas endowed the jihad against the Jews with eschatological significance. The messianic element is relegated to secondary importance in the ideology of modern-day Sunni movements. However, because Hamasβ main preoccupation is fighting a national-religious enemy, and possibly as a means to stave off calls for a compromise among the Palestinian masses, it resorts to messianic symbolism. Thus, the jihad against the Jews is a prerequisite for fulfilling Godβs promise to establish His rule over the earth. Citing the tradition (hadith) of the Saltbush, the Hamas Charter states that the final hour will not come until the day when the Muslims will fight the Jews and kill them.12
Lest the meaning of this passage remain unclear, Hamas author Mukhlis Barzaq pointed to the fact that the Prophet had killed more Jews than any other infidels during his wars. The Prophet revealed in a βfirmly established Traditionβ how the Jews should be handled if they betray the Muslims, and he ordered his followers to carry it out without any feelings of sorrow for this βdetested groupβ. He made it clear that the fate of the Jews should be βcomplete killing, total extermination and eradicating perdition (al-qatl al-tam wal-ibada al-kamila wal-fanaβ al-mahiq).β Perhaps equally significant, considering its intended readership, is the editorial in al-Fatih, Hamasβ childrenβs publication, appealing to the children of Iraq to pray to God and ask him βO God exterminate the Jews the tyrannical the usurpersβ (Allahuma, ahlik al-yahud al-zalimin al-mughtasibin).13
https://www.pij.org/details.php?id=345
Can someone name one positive contribution to society from a muslim?
Let’s see, here are a few Muslims who’ve made a positive contribution to society: Muhammad Ali, Shaquille O’Neal, Jawid Karim, co-founder of YouTube, Dr. Oz, Salman Khan, founder of Khan Academy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khan_Academy), Dave Chappelle, Akon, Busta Rhymes, Casey Kasem, Ice Cube, Snoop Dogg, T-Pain, Fareed Zakaria, and Nobel Prize winner Ahmed Zawali. This are just a few American muslims.
Look up Malala Yousafzai #1
Figures, fit all the muslim contributions into 4 lines. What a joke. Rappers and entertainers.
It would take more space than this blog can handle for all of the contributions made by the Jewish community, from inventions to vaccines.
Can Muslims Ever Be Good Americans?
This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish. And send it on to everyone. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.
Can a good Muslim be a good American?
This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years.The following is his reply:
Theologically – No, Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon god of Arabia .
Religiously – No. Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam. (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)
Scripturally – No, Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.
Geographically – No, Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – No, Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically – No, Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America , the great Satan.
Domestically – No, Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him. (Quran 4:34 )
Intellectually – No, Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically – No, Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually – No, Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ The Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent names.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation, perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and ‘good’ Americans. Call it what you wish it’s still the truth. You had better believe it. The more of us that understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future.
The religious war is bigger than we know or understand!
Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE.
#5 that’s a very interesting read!
#5 everyone of those arguments was made against Jews and Catholics immigrating to American in the early part of the 20th Century. The virtue of America is that our nation integrates people from many different cultures and harnesses their strengths to make out nation stronger.
Brian you have to admit the Muslim religion doesn’t lend itself to democracy as other religions do. The Koran actually advocates violence against non believers I’m not a theologian but that form of doctrine seems archaic and narrow.
I do not know The Koran nearly well enough to comment. Every religious text has at one time or another been interpreted by extremists as justifying violence against non-believers.
The problem is not Islam, the problem is Hamas. Hamas is a group that preys on its own citizens to fund its attacks and to prevent peace. The existence of Hamas makes it impossible to even begin to provide humanitarian aid or to bring about economic strength to Gaza.
I go along with Hamas being problematic but with regard to Islam, just look at how many different terror groups use Islam for their root beliefs and rationale for violence most other religions have evolved from that kind of thinking
I don’t recall Jews and Catholics killing innocent Americans (whether flying airplanes into buildings or blowing up buses and nightclubs)
Jews and Catholics came here, worked hard, built a better life, without living on welfare.
I don’t recall Jews and Catholics protesting in the streets (I guess they didn’t have the time since they worked and paid taxes)
I don’t recall Jews and Catholics getting ‘special treatment’.
Take a look north to Boston. The Boston bomber lived on EBT cards, subsidized schools and housing, then thanked the USA with the Bomb.
Read the history of the anarchy movement in America from the late 19th through early 20th century. Lots of bombings, attacks on trains, etc. Many people reacted with prejudice towards Catholics since many of the perpetrators were from Ireland and Italy. Or we can go back further and talk about lots of examples from the crusades, colonization, etc. etc.
When we pervert the argument about Hamas by making it about a religion instead of the beliefs and actions of specific political actors, we weaken the argument.
It would be typical that Radical Muslims hide behind their religion. (they use it to ‘fire up’ the rank and file and to get new members)
If you go back to ancient history you can find fault with almost anyone.
We aren’t talking about Kamakazie pilots who were willing to die to kill other warriors.
These radical muslim terrorists have no problem killing themselves along with innocent civilians.