Posted on

President Donald J. Trump’s Principles for Reforming the U.S. Air Traffic Control System

newark-airport-picture

June 6,2017

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Newark NJ,  from the Presidents desk ,the United States Air Traffic Control (ATC) system is one of the most important and vibrant elements of our Nation’s infrastructure.  Every day, the dedicated men and women of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safely and efficiently guide thousands of aircraft to and from their destinations, collectively carrying millions of passengers and tons of cargo.  Yet, the FAA’s ATC operations are currently mired within a Federal bureaucracy that hinders innovative operations and the timely introduction of new technology.  In order to modernize our ATC system, the Administration supports moving the FAA’s ATC operations into a new non-governmental entity.  This will enable ATC to keep pace with the accelerating rate of change in the aviation industry, including the integration of new entrants such as Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Commercial Space Transports.  A more nimble ATC entity will also be able to more quickly and securely implement Next Generation (NextGen) technology, which will reduce aircraft delays and expand the availability of the National Airspace System (NAS) for all users.

ATC reform presents an exciting infrastructure improvement opportunity, and its completion will demonstrate early progress toward much needed infrastructure reform across all sectors.  The Administration’s principles for reforming ATC will drive legislation that will reduce delays, further improve aviation’s leading safety record, protect access to rural communities, and accelerate much needed capital investment.  These principles insulate one of our most important national assets from political interferences and the crippling effects of budget uncertainty, while keeping intact FAA’s critical safety oversight.  Additionally, they preserve essential working relationships and interoperable capabilities with the Department of Defense (DoD), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and law enforcement agencies that are critical to ensuring the safety and security of the Nation.

This proposal demonstrates that the Federal Government does not have to supply all of the resources required to develop and maintain our Nation’s vast infrastructure.  Often, it simply needs to remove obstacles hindering investment and innovation.  The new ATC entity envisioned in these reform principles will be self-sustaining, financed through fees paid by the users of the NAS.  These fees will be more efficient and less burdensome than the patchwork of aviation taxes that supports the system today.

The time has come to embrace a bolder vision of what our Nation’s ATC system can be and how best to move forward to achieve it.  In 2016, House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster introduced the Aviation Innovation, Reform, and Reauthorization (AIRR) Act to move ATC from the Government to a not-for-profit, independent entity.  The Administration supports the proposed AIRR Act as a good foundation for reforming the ATC system, and believes the legislation can be improved.  Accordingly, the Administration supports the enactment of legislation that incorporates the principles detailed in this document

The Principles

Safety: The FAA’s appropriate role is the inherently governmental function of safety regulator.  Removing ATC operations from the FAA would further this principle, and bring it in line with the recommended practice of the International Civil Aviation Organization’s (ICAO) and the approach used by the majority of developed aviation states around the world.  Aviation safety regulation would remain within the Department of Transportation, and the FAA would migrate to a performance-based framework responsible for providing effective oversight of the new ATC entity.

National Security: Protecting our Nation’s security is of paramount importance.  Accordingly, the new ATC entity must provide airspace access, prioritization, integration, cooperation, navigation, and information management services and support at levels of quality that ensure sustained national security and law enforcement capabilities.  This must be done at no cost to the Federal Government.  The new entity must develop interoperability plans, procedures, policies, and programs that ensure it can operate effectively, under all circumstances, with DoD.  The new entity must also be able to work under DHS control in exigent circumstances involving physical, adversarial, and technological threats and circumstances.  The Federal Government would indemnify the new entity for costs incurred in connection with operations that support Federal national security and law enforcement activities.

Cybersecurity: The new ATC system must be secure, robust, and resilient.  Components will fail, but those failures must not significantly affect the ATC system’s ability to provide safe and effective operation at peak capacity.  Additionally, as part of our Nation’s critical infrastructure, the new ATC system must be able to detect and defeat malicious cyber-based efforts to manipulate or degrade its operations.

Access: The new ATC entity must maintain open access for all users of the airspace and, specifically, those in rural communities, general aviation users, and the military.

Open Access: All users, including the general aviation industry and emerging new entrants, must have open access to our Nation’s airspace.  The FAA would continue to certify new entrants (such as Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Commercial Space Transports) as part of its responsibility to oversee safe use of the NAS.  The new ATC entity would grant FAA-certified users access to the NAS, subject to their participation in the system’s user fees, their being equipped, as necessary, to fly in controlled air space, and their compliance with other applicable rules and regulations.
Rural Access: The new entity must maintain access and services to rural communities and general aviation users.
Military Access: To ensure safe and effective execution of military missions, the new ATC entity must ensure continued military access to delegated Special Activity Airspace (e.g., Military Training Routes, Military Operating Areas, Warning Areas, and Restricted Areas); be capable of enforcing temporary airspace restrictions; and meet national security airspace requirements for DoD training, testing, and exercises.

Noise: Efficient use of the airspace requires new technology and efficient air routes.  The new ATC entity must have the authority, after seeking public comment, to adjust airspace routes.  The proposed route change would only be subject to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review if the change exceeds the FAA-established noise threshold.  The FAA would still be responsible for ensuring—within a reasonable period of time, like 120 days—that any proposed route change does not create a safety hazard.

New Entity: America’s growing aviation system demands a new, independent, non-government organization to operate our Nation’s airspace.  The new entity should have access to capital markets in order to spur capital investment, technology adoption, and innovation faster, more effectively, and securely.  Over the last 20 years, more than 50 countries have already successfully transitioned their ATC operations.

Transition Period: The transfer of ATC operations from the FAA to the new entity should be completed within an established 3-year transition period overseen by the Secretary of Transportation.  The transition period should be marked by milestones developed and monitored by the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, to ensure adequate progress.  The transition period may be extended only with the approval of the President.
Not-For-Profit Entity: The new ATC entity should be a not-for-profit, non-governmental entity.
Fees: The new ATC entity should be financially self-sufficient through the collection of user fees that cover both its costs of operations and recapitalization.  The aviation taxes that currently cover these costs should be sunset, except for those necessary to continue to fund the Airport Improvement Program.  General fund revenues should fund the rest of the FAA.  Users should have input in the fees and their structure, which should be guided by ICAO principles and be consistent with the international obligations of the United States.  Except national-security users (including DoD aircraft, DoD-contracted flights, and foreign military aircraft), diplomatic users (including non-commercial United States Government and foreign sovereign State aircraft), and public safety users, all users should pay their fair share.  To ensure that rates are just and reasonable, however, users should have the ability to request review by the Secretary of Transportation, rather than the Congress.  Any determination by the Secretary of Transportation should be final.
Financial Authority: The new ATC entity should have the authority to borrow funds and enter into contracts, leases, and other arrangements during and after the transition period.  The new entity should also have the authority to procure goods and services, hire employees, and to bond or pledge future revenues to fulfill the terms of financial arrangements and other transactions.  Additionally, the new entity should have the authority to sell or transfer its assets.
Assets: All assets currently owned by the FAA and used in the operation of ATC should be transferred, at no charge, to the new ATC entity.  The users of the ATC system have already paid for those assets and should not be charged for them again.  The assets should be transferred along with any environmental liabilities associated with them.  Accordingly, sufficient funds to account for those liabilities should also be transferred to the new entity.
Governance: A professional Board of Directors should manage the new ATC.  The members of the Board should have a fiduciary responsibility solely to the new ATC entity and be free of any financial conflict of interest.  Board seats should not be reserved for any entity, except for the ATC entity’s Chief Executive Officer, who would serve as a representative of the new entity.  The new entity should represent all users impartially, and no group should have even the appearance of influence over the Board.  The Board should ensure that DoD and national-security equities are adequately represented and that the entity maintains appropriate relationships with national and international air navigation service providers and forums.  To establish the initial Board, the Secretary of Transportation should select eight members from candidate lists provided by five nominating groups.  The nominating groups should be airlines, unions, general aviation, airports, and the Department of Transportation.  Each nominating group would provide lists of six to ten qualified persons to the Secretary.
United States-based carriers with annual revenues greater than $10 billion should develop the airline list.
Unions representing at least 50 percent of FAA employees that would transfer to the new ATC entity or representing more than 10,000 United States commercial pilots should develop the union list.
The two largest trade groups representing general aviation (Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) and National Business Aviation Association (NBAA)), should jointly develop the general aviation list.

Two members should be selected from the airline list, two members should be selected from the union list, one member should be selected from the general aviation list, one member should be selected from the airport list, and two members should be selected from the Department of Transportation list.  Those eight initial Board members would then select a Chief Executive Officer.  Those nine Board members would then select four independent Board members.  The 13-member Board would be constituted for at least the transition period, plus the first year of operation.  After this time, decisions about Board constitution and members’ terms should be left to the discretion of the Board.  Once the initial Board members are nominated, no group should have an exclusive right to name successor Board members.

Labor: The new ATC entity should honor existing labor agreements.  Employees who transition to the new entity will no longer be Federal employees, but they should be held harmless and have similar rights to those they had as Federal employees at the FAA.  Consistent with those rights, employees of the new entity should not be permitted to strike.
Spectrum: The new ATC entity should not be charged for its use of spectrum, as the FAA is not charged for spectrum use today.  The new entity will occupy spectrum shared with Federal entities.  The new entity, however, could be required to vacate existing spectrum band (at some point) and move to another frequency along with other Federal entities.  In any future spectrum reallocation, the new entity should be treated as a Federal entity, including with respect to the use of any reallocation auction proceeds to finance relocation expenses.  Relocation expenses could include those associated with the development, procurement, and installation of new radar systems that are interoperable with government systems on a different spectrum band.

Posted on

Constitutional Amendment Would Lock Gas Tax Revenue for TTF

garber_square_roadwork_theridgewoodblog

 

New Jersey brings in roughly $750 million each year from taxes on gasoline, diesel fuel and other petroleum products, but not all of that money is fully dedicated to repairing the state’s roads, bridges, and mass-transit network. John Reitmeyer, NJSpotlight Read more

Posted on

Transportation stalemate affecting long-term projects

New_Jersey_State_Senator_Stephen_Sweeney

 

As hundreds of large and small transportation projects grounded to a halt Friday due to the state’s inability to fix its depleted Transportation Trust Fund, several long-range projects with years of planning and studies behind them continue to languish. Associated Press Read more

Posted on

Summer fun the State of NJ is spending $27.3M per mile rebuilding Jersey Shore’s Route 35 Golden Highway

Road_work_theridgewoodblog
May 22,2016

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, next time you make a trip to the Jersey shore take a ride on New Jerseys latest tourist attraction, the reconstruction of Sandy-battered Route 35 or the “Golden Highway”.

According to an Asbury Park Press investigation New Jersey taxpayers are being charged tens of millions of dollars in cost overruns.The press found that the project, announced by Gov. Chris Christie in 2013, is already $76 million over budget and a year behind schedule.

Asbury Park Press puts the potential final cost of $341 million , that means that the 12.5-mile road construction in Ocean County will cost a jaw-dropping $27.3 million per mile making it one of the most expensive road projects in the state.

The press also found that the state paid about $24.5 million to have three contractors essentially stop working during design and summer delays.

When the project was announced in 2013, the Governor stressed that “this is not just a resurfacing job.”
and the ,“This new road will be better and more durable in every way,” .

This should give you pause to think when Trenton politicians cry over the depleted state Transportation Trust Fund ,and look to raise gas taxes to fill their pockets .
Posted on

Study: N.J. spends $183,757 to build, maintain a single mile of road

chain-gang-e1303318955368

New Jersey spends $183,757 to build and maintain a single mile of road, according to a new study by Rutgers University and the New Jersey Department of Transportation. Christopher Maag, The Record Read more

Posted on

New Jersey’s Roads Don’t Just Suck: They’re Massively Expensive, Too

garber_square_roadwork_theridgewoodblog

file photo by Boyd Loving
Check out your own state’s cost per mile with Reason Foundation’s Annual Highway Report.

Nick Gillespie|Dec. 7, 2015 12:09 pm

This new video uses data from Reason Foundation’s 21st Annual Highway Report to make a simple but devastating point: New Jersey’s roads are paved not with asphalt but wasted taxpayer dollars. (Disclosure: Reason Foundation is the nonprofit that funds this website.)

Indeed, according to the report, the Garden State spends way, way more than other states to maintain its roads:

South Carolina and West Virginia spent just $39,000 per mile of road in 2012 while New Jersey spent over $2 million per state-controlled mile. Rhode Island, Massachusetts, California and Florida were the next biggest spenders, outlaying more than $500,000 per state-controlled mile.

See where your state stacks up here.

Spoiler alert: if you live in California, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Alaska, or Hawaii, you can suck it in terms of road costs and road quality. But you already knew that, didn’t you?

Legislators in Jersey (and many other states) are eyeing ways to pay for more road construction. Recent polls show about 57 percent of Jersey residents are against a gas-tax hike even as five roadways popped up on a list of the “worst traffic bottlenecks” in the country.

Critics of Reason Foundation’s methodology counter that a fairer accounting of costs finds that Jersey spends “only”$270,000 per mile on its roads.

Yeah, maybe, but almost certainly not.

Jersey’s gas tax is a relatively cheap-o 14.5 cents per gallon while neighboring New York’s is a relatively whopping 45 cents per gallon. These taxes are supposed to fund capital road projects and maintenance but neither is accomplishing that basic task. Capital New York notes that while New Jersey’s transportation fund is wallowing in debt (about one-third of receipts go to debt service), New York’s fund is giving away money to a wide range of activities, with less than a quarter of receipts going to road projects. Give the state too little money and they need more; give it too much and they spend it on whatever they want to.

And there’s this for Jersey folks:

New Jerseyans pay an average $601 annually in extra repairs due to driving on roads in need of fixing, according to [Department of Transportation] data.

https://reason.com/blog/2015/12/07/new-jerseys-roads-dont-just-suck-theyre

For every $1 paid in NJ gas tax:

36 cents – Mass transit
23 cents – “Local System Support,” including regional planning and state aid for county and local roads
12.6 cents – Behind-the-scenes work on implementing the capital program, such as research, planning and design.
12 cents – Road upgrades, including pothole repairs, resurfacing, drainage, landscaping and environmental compliance
8 cents – Bridge maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement
3 cents – Support facilities, such as office buildings and highway rest areas
2 cents – Congestion relief, including road widening
2 cents – Safety improvements at intersections, railroad crossings, traffic signals, restriping highways
1 cent – Multimodal programs, including bicycle, pedestrian, ferry and freight programs
0.4 cents – Airport improvement program

Source: NJ Department of Transportation

Posted on

Scott Garrett: “New Jersey residents deserve to have their tax dollars spent on transportation and infrastructure projects right here in the Garden State instead of being wasted in Washington, D.C.”

Rep Scott Garrett rail car safety

Garrett Statement on Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

Dec 3, 2015
the staff of theRidgewood blog

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Rep. Scott Garrett (NJ-05), issued the following statement after voting against the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act:

“New Jersey residents deserve to have their tax dollars spent on transportation and infrastructure projects right here in the Garden State instead of being wasted in Washington, D.C. Unfortunately, the FAST Act is full of budgetary gimmicks that will ensure another round of taxpayer-funded bailouts when what we really need are substantive reforms that put our transportation funding on a sustainable fiscal path. The reason Americans have spent $143 billion on bailouts over the last seven years is money set aside in the Highway Trust Fund—the tax you pay at the pump—has been wasted on projects that are unrelated to roads and bridges.

“And if the bailouts aren’t bad enough, the FAST Act also includes provisions to resurrect the most shameless example of crony capitalism Washington has ever concocted—the Export-Import Bank. Overall, I believe New Jersey deserves better, which is why I will continue to fight to end bailouts, end special treatment for Washington insiders, and ensure that my constituents can see their transportation dollars being spent closer to home.”

Posted on

New Jersey doesn’t need a gas tax hike

Route_17_Glen062_theridgewoodblog

file photo by Boyd Loving

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2015, 1:21 AM
BY ADRIAN MOORE
THE RECORD

THE New Jersey Legislature is working hard to figure out how to take more money from you, ostensibly for transportation. Both parties look willing to stick it to taxpayers once again with a gas tax hike of as much as 25 cents per gallon.

That tax hike will hit you directly in the wallet every time you fill up your tank — even if gas prices go down. And it will hit you again in the prices of everything you buy, since companies providing goods and services require transportation and pay fuel taxes as well.

State leaders keep talking about how New Jersey has a transportation funding crisis and the only way, they claim, to fix the roads is to raise taxes. That doesn’t pass the laugh test, though, let alone stand up to any real analysis.

State transportation spending is not falling, and lack of money is not the crisis. According to data that all states report to the federal government, transportation spending in New Jersey on state highways nearly doubled from 2007-2012. New Jersey spends more than $2 million per mile of state roads — more than 12 times the national average.

The real crisis is how transportation money is used. New Jersey spends nine times the national average per mile to build roads and bridges, almost six times the national average per mile to maintain its state highways, and four times the national average per mile on office and administration costs.

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-guest-writers/new-jersey-doesn-t-need-a-gas-tax-hike-1.1421492

Posted on

New Jersey gas tax proposal stokes highway cost debate

Road_work_theridgewoodblog

By Mark Lagerkvist  /   February 24, 2015

New Jersey Watchdog

While New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and state lawmakers consider a 25-cent a gallon gas tax hike to raise $2 billion a year to fund transportation projects, a war of words and statistics has erupted over the high cost of highways in the Garden State.

New Jersey pays in excess of $2 million a mile per year, more than 12 times higher than the national average, to maintain 3,338 miles of state-administered roads, according to aReason Foundation study.

Three days after a New Jersey Watchdog report, New Jersey Department of Transportation Commissioner Jamie Fox called the study “inaccurate and unfair” in acolumn published by NJ.com.

“Without the benefit of having the numbers the Reason Foundation used to base its calculations, there is no way to independently review its findings,” Fox wrote.

“That’s strange,” replied David Hartgen, the annual study’s senior author for 21 years. “Our annual highway report is based on data that New Jersey and other states provide themselves to the federal government. And we’ve readily shared the report’s data with state transportation departments and members of the media across the country.”

In his column, Fox argued the Reason study is flawed because it did not take into account increased costs associated with New Jersey’s multi-lane urban highways.

“It’s clear that the $2 million a mile statistic makes a nice headline but doesn’t hold up to scrutiny,” Fox said.

“If the spending per mile metric is punishing New Jersey for having highways that are six or eight lanes wide, as Mr. Fox alleges, then it would make sense that other states with wide highways would suffer too,” Hartgen responded.  “But that is not the case.

“California, home to many of the busiest and widest highways in the country, spends $500,000 per mile,” Hartgen said. “New Jersey spends four times that — $2 million per mile. New Jersey spends three times as much as Massachusetts ($675,000 per mile), three-and-a-half times more than Florida ($572,000 per mile), four times as much as New York ($462,000 per mile), and 12 times more than Texas ($157,000 per mile), which is home to six of the 20 most populous cities in America.”

While Fox challenged the $2-million per mile figure from Reason Foundation, a nonpartisan libertarian think-tank, the transportation commissioner did not offer an alternate number.

“There’s no escaping the conclusion that New Jersey spends a lot of money on its state-administered highways and delivers poor performance in return,” Hartgen concluded. “The key question now is what will New Jersey do about it?”

That may be the biggest question of all.  The state Transportation Trust Fund is out of cash and faces a $17 billion debt.

Christie is expected to address New Jersey’s highway dilemma Tuesday during the governor’s annual budget address to the State Legislature.

https://watchdog.org/201704/new-jersey-gas-tax-highways-cost/

Posted on

Christie says he won’t raise NJ gas tax unless other taxes decrease

Chris_christie_theridgewoodblog

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015, 10:58 AM    LAST UPDATED: MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2015, 11:05 AM
BY SALVADOR RIZZO
STATE HOUSE BUREAU |

Governor Christie will not consider legislation to increase the state’s gas tax, unless it is paired with reductions to other taxes in New Jersey, he said Monday.

Christie did not say definitively which taxes should be cut, but he mentioned New Jersey’s estate tax and inheritance tax — noting that New Jersey and Maryland are the only states in the country that have both.

The dual “death taxes” are preventing New Jersey from being “competitive,” Christie said. A common complaint from state residents, he said, boils down to, “It’s not that I can’t afford to live here; I can’t afford to die here.

“Republicans should not be giving away any votes for an increase in the gas tax — none, zero — unless whatever is presented represents tax fairness for the people of New Jersey,” Christie said at a breakfast hosted by the New Jersey Commerce and Industry Association in Morris County.

Christie also made reference to the state income tax and “a number of other taxes that could stand some reducing,” giving few specifics.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/christie-says-he-won-t-raise-nj-gas-tax-unless-other-taxes-decrease-1.1420256

Posted on

Route 17 to be Closed in Both Directions from 12am to 4am Friday September 4th in Paramus at Garden State Parkway Entrance

Route_17_Glen062_theridgewoodblog

file photo by Boyd Loving
Fri 9/4 from 12:01A until 4A – RTE 17 CLOSED – Both Directions: for GS Parkway work. Detours posted.

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority and the New Jersey State Department of Transportation advise that Route 17 at the Garden State Parkway (Paramus) will be closed in both directions on Friday morning, September 4th, from 12:01 a.m. until 4 a.m. due to the ongoing Garden State Parkway Interchange 163 Improvement Project.

The detour will be via Farview Avenue between Century Road and Midland Avenue in both directions.

There will be lane closures starting at 9 p.m. on Thursday, September 3rd, until 6 a.m. Friday morning, September 4th. Also, expect exit ramp closures on the parkway at Exit 163 in both directions during the full closure of Route 17.

Posted on

Towns Battle PSEG on Road Work

Road work theridgewoodblog.net 1

The Battle Against PSEG Spreads to Woodland Park Following Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop’s Monday decision to shut down PSEG projects in Jersey City, Woodland Park Mayor Keith Kazmark has decided to do the same. (Alyana Alfaro, PolitickerNJ.com) Read more 

see below

Fulop Shuts Down PSEG in Jersey City Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop wants to send a message to PSEG. Effective today, the mayor shut down all of the utility company’s non-essential projects in Jersey City because, according to the mayor and other local and county officials, the company is doing an inadequate and unacceptable job in terms of repairing city streets that have been dug up in order to perform maintenance underground. (Alyana Alfaro, Politickernj.com)https://politickernj.com/2015/08/fulop-shuts-down-pseg-in-jersey-city/

Posted on

Port Authority road-funds probe intensifies

20150319_125543_resized (1)

JULY 4, 2015, 10:59 PM    LAST UPDATED: SATURDAY, JULY 4, 2015, 11:25 PM
BY SHAWN BOBURG
STAFF WRITER |
THE RECORD

At the Port Authority, even the lawyers are getting lawyers.

More than 15 officials — including three in-house attorneys — have lawyered up amid an escalating investigation into the Port Authority’s decision to redirect $1.8 billion in toll money from its Hudson River crossings to fix roads in New Jersey.

The development signals that the 15-month-old joint investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has entered a more serious phase. And the focus on at least three of the agency’s top staff attorneys suggests prosecutors and federal regulators are closely examining the legal justification for shifting toll dollars to New Jersey-owned roads.

The investigation is focused on whether the Port Authority misled investors and bondholders in 2011 when it agreed to use toll money to rebuild the 3.5-mile Pulaski Skyway and three other major New Jersey state roads at the behest of the Christie administration. Laws limit the bi-state agency’s spending to projects associated with its own facilities.

The Port Authority quietly justified the spending by labeling the highways as access roads to the agency’s Lincoln Tunnel — even though they are miles from the tunnel, do not connect to it directly and do not generate any revenues for the Port Authority. Agency lawyers described the repairs in bond documents as “access infrastructure improvements” to the Lincoln Tunnel.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/port-authority-road-funds-probe-intensifies-1.1368743