Parents who want their children home for the afternoon (or morning) instead of having them at school for 3 extra hours protest that the time with family (mom?, nanny? younger siblings?) is of more value than the time in school. Really? I am going out on a limb here, but not much of a limb, in wagering that many of those kids are spending some of that time on an ipad, or watching mommy (or nanny) texting to God-knows-who. Or maybe they are being rushed right from kindergarten to karate or ballet. Staying at school would not be a bad alternative; far from it, staying at school would be infinitely preferable.
Those who protest that children need more unscheduled time are using a half-baked argument. I am a big fan of down-time, but most kids of that age are up and awake for 13 or 14 hours a day. Surely adding a half-day more of school for the 180 days a year that they go to school would not preclude plenty of down-time.
The cost? Well, I for one would rather have my tax money going to the children, the future, than having it go to some of the ridiculous projects that have come up in recent years in Ridgewood. This would be money well spent.
Come on Ridgewood, let’s vote YES for all-day-K, and catch up with the rest of the country. Do it for the kids!