Posted on

NJEA’s “Disinformation Alert” on Sex Ed Curriculum Is Disingenuous Attempt to Dismiss Parents’ Concerns

logo full

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Trenton NJ, Senator Holly Schepisi said a “Disinformation Alert” issued by the New Jersey Education Association (NJEA) is a disingenuous attempt to dismiss the concerns of parents that new sex education standards could result in their children being exposed to lessons that are age-inappropriate or in conflict with their values.

“The NJEA is being disingenuous at best when they say that sample lesson plans that some parents are being provided by districts are not required by the new state sex ed standards,” said Schepisi (R-39). “The simple fact is that there are only a handful of teaching resources that have been made available, by left-wing groups, that align with and satisfy the new standards. In an effort to comply with the new curriculum requirements for this fall, local school districts will likely feel compelled to pick from the limited menu of options that are currently available, which parents are now learning contains extreme material.”

Schepisi pointed to samples of lesson plans produced by Advocates for Youth that parents in Westfield were provided to demonstrate how the new curriculum standards might be implemented in their school district.

A lesson on gender identity, “Pink, Blue and Purple,” advises teachers to tell children in 2nd grade and under:

“You might feel like you’re a boy even if you have body parts that some people might tell you are ‘girl’ parts. You might feel like you’re a girl even if you have body parts that some people might tell you are ‘boy’ parts.”

A lesson on puberty, “It’s All about the Hormones,” advises teachers on how to discuss puberty blockers with children by the end of 5th grade:

“These medications stop the testicles or ovaries from making testosterone or estrogen and then the young person can take the hormone for the gender they know themselves to be. For example, someone assigned female at birth but who knows inside that he’s a boy could take puberty blockers to stop their body from making estrogen, and then begin to take testosterone so their body will develop physically as a boy.”

“It’s not disinformation as the NJEA suggests to tell parents that these sample lesson and curriculum plans are likely to be adopted by school districts, which is already happening,” said Schepisi. “In fact, Montclair, where the President of the NJEA serves as Mayor, adopted the Advocates for Youth curriculum in full in 2019. It defies belief to suggest that other school districts aren’t feeling the pressure to follow the example of the NJEA President’s local school district to adopt one of the sample curriculum plans to comply with the new state standards.”

Schepisi said parents need to know that these new standards are mandates that school districts must follow and not merely suggestions, as evidenced by the clear language of the minutes of the State Board of Education meeting on June 3, 2020, when the new sex education requirements were adopted:

“Resolved, district boards of education shall fully comply with this resolution and shall implement the revised New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science, Visual and Performing Arts, World Languages, and Career Readiness, Life Literacies, and Key Skills by September 2021 and Comprehensive Health and Physical Education, Social Studies, and Computer Science and Design Thinking by September 2022, align their curricula with the standards…”

“Progressive groups have been trying to incorporate their far-left ideologies into our children’s curriculum for years,” added Schepisi. “They went way too far this time, and they got caught. Instead of owning up to it, they’re saying it’s ‘disinformation’ to educate people about what they’re clearly trying to do. It’s telling that even Governor Murphy is hedging and backtracking now, which he wouldn’t do if we weren’t right.”

9 thoughts on “NJEA’s “Disinformation Alert” on Sex Ed Curriculum Is Disingenuous Attempt to Dismiss Parents’ Concerns

  1. There is not stopping or reforming any of this. Keep your children safe and health. Get them out of school. []

  2. Ironically, it was Shepsi’s Facebook post with the “lesson plans” that bought this to the forefront this past week. Last I checked it was the teachers who made lesson plans according to the state standards and not independent special interest groups.

    1. Teachers didn’t make those lesson plan. The Advocates for Youth made those lesson plans. The lesson plans are on their website under resources and tools, 3rs curriculum. They are the same group of people that create those AMAZE videos.

  3. None of it is age appropriate NJEA SHOULD BE FIGHTING THIS

    1. Njea is promoting it

    2. Why would the NJEA fight it? They support those standards; they follow a political agenda that doesn’t align with having those standards removed.

    3. NJEA is pro-grooming.
      They are FOR these standards.

  4. NJEA promotes itself and teachers.

    There should be an NJSA, and an NJPA, both as powerful and influential as the NJEA, or moreso.

    The NJEA shouldn’t always be given carte blanche but it seems that is what’s been happening recently.

    1. Expect to see more NJEA TV ads telling us what a great job they are doing. They are not only for election time.

      Just a new fill in the blank for the line “If you can___________, thank a teacher.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *