the staff of the Ridgewood blog
Washington DC, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that could dramatically change how mail-in ballots are counted across the country, setting the stage for a potentially historic ruling that redefines the meaning of Election Day in America.
The court’s decision to take on this high-profile case — without a single dissenting vote — centers on a challenge to an Illinois law that allows mail-in ballots to be counted up to 14 days after Election Day, provided they are postmarked on or before the deadline.
The Post-Election Ballot Controversy
Currently, 18 U.S. states accept and count mailed ballots received after Election Day, sparking controversy over election integrity and transparency. Critics argue that extended ballot deadlines can sow confusion and delay final election results, potentially undermining public trust.
The issue gained national attention during the 2020 presidential election, when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended its ballot deadline — a move that fueled intense legal battles and public skepticism.
The Illinois Case and Federal Response
The current challenge targets Illinois’ 14-day grace period, one of the most generous in the country. Plaintiffs argue that such extended counting windows violate the constitutional principle of a single, definitive Election Day.
In response to rising concerns, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill in April seeking to standardize ballot counting by restricting post-Election Day acceptance. The bill gained bipartisan support, with four Democrats voting in favor.
Trump Administration Steps In
Adding further fuel to the fire, former President Donald Trump issued an executive order that would withhold federal funding from states that continue to count ballots received after Election Day. The move was hailed by election integrity advocates but criticized by state officials who view it as federal overreach.
What’s at Stake?
The upcoming Supreme Court decision could determine:
-
Whether states can legally extend mail-in ballot deadlines
-
If federal standards will override state-level election laws
-
The long-term definition and legal sanctity of Election Day
Supporters of the challenge argue that uniformity and clarity are essential to restoring public trust in the electoral process. Opponents claim that stricter deadlines could disenfranchise voters, especially military and overseas ballots that often arrive late.
Stay updated on state and national news that affects you. From politics to policy, from culture to current affairs, our eBlast will keep you well-informed . http://eepurl.com/bgt6T #RidgewoodBlog #News #LocalNews #StateNews #NationalNews #Subscribe #StayInformed #Community
But how on earth are Democrats expected to win if this current mail in voting scam is eliminated? The next thing will be illegals and the dead have their viting rights taken away.
This “election season” voting is BS.
If you can’t make the effort to vote on Election Day, then you are not responsible enough to deserve the right to vote.