Posted on

Secrecy around police surveillance equipment proves a case’s undoing

unnamed-14

unnamed-14

file photo Boyd Loving

Secrecy around police surveillance equipment proves a case’s undoing

By Ellen Nakashima February 22 at 3:10 PM

TALLAHASSEE — The case against Tadrae McKenzie looked like an easy win for prosecutors. He and two buddies robbed a small-time pot dealer of $130 worth of weed using BB guns. Under Florida law, that was robbery with a deadly weapon, with a sentence of at least four years in prison.

But before trial, his defense team detected investigators’ use of a secret surveillance tool, one that raises significant privacy concerns. In an unprecedented move, a state judge ordered the police to show the device —a cell-tower simulator sometimes called a StingRay — to the attorneys.

Rather than show the equipment, the state offered McKenzie a plea bargain.

Today, 20-year-old McKenzie is serving six months’ probation ­after pleading guilty to a second-degree misdemeanor. He got, as one civil liberties advocate said, the deal of the century. (The other two defendants also pleaded guilty and were sentenced to two years’ probation.)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/secrecy-around-police-surveillance-equipment-proves-a-cases-undoing/2015/02/22/ce72308a-b7ac-11e4-aa05-1ce812b3fdd2_story.html?hpid=z1

2 thoughts on “Secrecy around police surveillance equipment proves a case’s undoing

  1. What or why is there a problem ever since the patriot act we have been living in a police state.

  2. Right JJJ thats why you can say anything you what on this blog because we are in a Police State. Get a life.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *