Posted on Leave a comment

>Port Authority salaries climbed $5 million last year, despite job cuts

>

Port Authority salaries climbed $5 million last year, despite job cuts

A Port Authority police lieutenant was the agency’s sixth-highest paid employee in 2010 at $236,564, earning more than the superintendent of police and the two deputy chiefs to whom he reports, thanks to $112,466 in overtime last year.

Three Port Authority police lieutenants and four sergeants outearned Superintendent of Police Michael Fedorko’s $215,098 because of overtime pay, according to Port Authority salary records. Two deputy chiefs who earn $157,558 each also were left in the fiscal dust by the seven officers’ total pay for 2010.

An examination of salary and overtime records for 2010 and 2009 obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request showed that the authority, which increased tolls and PATH train fares this fall, spent $5 million more on salaries in 2010 than it did in 2009. This happened despite boasts by authority officials that the agency trimmed its work force as a cost-cutting measure.  (Higgs, Gannett)

Posted on Leave a comment

>Downtown for the Holidays 2011!

>

ridgewoodtreelighting thridgewoodblog.net



Downtown for the Holidays 2011!
Fri, December 02, 2011 – Sat, December 24, 2011
Time: 5:30 PM – 9:00 PM
By the NJ Transit Train Station, End of East Ridgewood Ave and Broad Street

Please come join us Friday December 2, 2011 for our annual tree lighting at the “traditional location” – east side of NJ Transit Train Station.

Shop and Dine in Ridgewood.
Join us for dinner at one of Ridgewood’s finest.
Make your reservations NOW!

The music starts on E. Ridgewood Avenue at 5:30pm, stage performances begins at 7:00pm,
Tree Lighting Celebration around 7:30pm,
stage entertainment over around 8:00pm

After the stage entertainment….

Entertainment back on the street from 8:00-9:00pm

In the park- Santa will be in his house from 8:00-9:00pm
By the park- there will be a live band playing from 8:00-9:00pm with lots of surprises in between. Don’t miss the double-decker bus for picture taking!

Streets re-open at 9:00pm

This will be a fun and festive evening for the entire family.

E. Ridgewood Avenue will be closed off at 4:30pm.
For more information, call 201-445-2600, [email protected].
facebook.com/twitter

SATURDAY, DECEMBER 3RD:

If you want to continue the festivities:
Join Santa for breakfast at Park West Tavern
Call for reservations: 201-445-5400

Santa will be coming up E. Ridgewood Ave in a big village fire truck straight to Columbia Bank to give gifts to all visiting children from 10:00am- 2:00pm. Art of Motion will be entertaining from 10:00am-2:00pm.

10:30am- Free children’s holiday moviefor the entire family to enjoy!

11:00am- 4:00pm
FREE Trolley rides for shoppers, children, and families
Ride the Holiday Trolley every Saturday until Christmas!
Memorial Park at Van Neste Square visit Santa at his Ridgewood home!
Bring your list!!

SATURDAY, DECEMBER 10TH, 17TH, & 24TH
Santa’s House in Memorial Park at Van Neste Square. Free Trolley Rides!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Holiday Boutique : YWCA Newcomer

>
Holiday Boutique : YWCA Newcomers

Shopping has it’s benefits! Join us on Thursday, December 1, 2011 from 9:30am to 4:00pm at Christ Church, 105 Cottage Place, Ridgewood for a fun day of shopping, which benefits the YWCA and its programs. this boutique will feature over 20 vendors, including jewlery , accessories, hostess gifts, kids itema and more! Spread the word and bringyour friends. No addmisison fee.

Posted on Leave a comment

>SIDEWALKS

>SIDEWALKS

Residents are responsible for the installation, maintenance and repair of sidewalks, aprons and curbs adjacent to their property. If there is a hazardous condition that needs to be corrected, please contact the Engineering Office (201/670-5500 x238) at Village Hall to file a report and/or to obtain a permit before any work begins. Tree roots are often the cause of raised sidewalks. The Village’s inspection of the site will help to ensure that proper steps are taken to remedy the hazard. (Village Code: Chapter 249; Section 24)

Posted on Leave a comment

>Glen Rock, Ridgewood police report luring incidents

>Glen Rock, Ridgewood police report luring incidents
Monday November 28, 2011, 11:58 AM
BY RICHARD DE SANTA
STAFF WRITER
Glen Rock Gazette

The Glen Rock Police Department reported four new instances of males in vehicles approaching and in some cases propositioning females walking or jogging alone.

The Saturday, Nov. 26 incidents, occurring in Glen Rock and Ridgewood, were reported to the respective police departments between 9:30 and 11 a.m.

In a weekend advisory released to local school district officials and the Glen Rock Gazette, Police Capt. Jon Miller stated that the department’s detective bureau does not presently believe the new incidents are related to three recent cases of drivers accosting young girls walking in Glen Rock, Allendale and Montvale.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/134608108_Glen_Rock__Ridgewood_police_report_luring_incidents.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Number of N.J. residents receiving food stamps doubled in last four year

>Number of N.J. residents receiving food stamps doubled in last four years
Published: Sunday, November 27, 2011, 12:30 PM

STATEWIDE— The number of New Jersey residents receiving food stamps has doubled in the past four years and is at its highest level in more than a decade as the nation’s still sputtering economy continues to take its toll on the poorest residents of the Garden State, state and federal data show.

As of September, the most recent data released by the state Department of Human Services, more than 400,000 households and nearly 822,000 people were enrolled in the food stamp program, meaning nearly one out of every 10 residents in New Jersey receives assistance.

https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/11/number_of_nj_residents_on_food.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Valley Renewal: We were very dismayed with how Valley management handled this whole process

>Valley Renewal: We were very dismayed with how Valley management handled this whole process

My family has been here a long time and has been very supportive of Valley in the past, through many expansions.

However, we did not support this plan and have said so many times.

We were also very dismayed with how Valley mgmt handled this whole process, to say the least.

For a long time Valley represented a high standard of being both a good community resource as well as a good citizen.

It’s not that way now. The way Valley management handled all this process proves that. So does how they handled everything regarding Pascack re-opening, and so does all the money and effort they spend trying to attract patients from areas very far away from this one.

Also, they have stressed the need for all single patient rooms. And sure, I agree with that – in concept- for many reasons.

But there are some downsides to that too. Apparently ONLY if you build NEW buildings is this a requirement. If you renovate (or “renew”) it is NOT. And most hospitals in NJ do not have ONLY private rooms.

Why is this impt? Well, my small business has been looking at new insurance plans and we have many proposals for diff plans and carriers.

ALL of them state that they will pay ONLY for semi-private rooms. That means if only private rooms can be had, the patient is responsible for the upcharge, which can be sizable.

At first I thought, “can’t be right”, but looking around online, it DOES seem to be right.

Also pretty sure Medicare (and thus most wraparound M/care coverage) works the same way – only pays for semi private.

I’m no expert on this though– if someone here knows more, please share with the rest of us.

If this is how it works, then we get all the “side effects” and costs of hosting Valley, but if we need to use Valley as a patient, even with good insurance, we would have to pay extra because of that private room upcharge.

Wow. That’s really being a community resource, huh?

Again, pls weigh in if you know more – I very much hope this is NOT how it works, but from what I’ve read, seems to be.

Also checked the NJ Direct Employee benefit handbook at link below and it says same thing re semi-private versus private. Muni employees, teachers, etc are apparently covered by this.

https://www.state.nj.us/treasury/pensions/epbam/exhibits/handbook/njdirectbk.pdf

The recent numbers I saw for such upcharges (from semi to private) were high. Those won’t be going down either.

Yet if Valley renovates without building all new, then there is no such “mandate” for private rooms. Seems to shed a little more light on what is perhaps the real agenda in all this.

In any case, I too have a much different opinion of Valley’s management now than our family used to. Rather than being upfront and engaging and involving the community so all could really work together to find a solution that everyone could live with, they handled this much differently, and likely will continue to do so.

And all the while they fought Pascack re-opening bitterly.

They also expect Ridgewood to pay all the costs of hosting “renewed” Valley — and yet right now way less than 10% of Valley’s patients come from Ridgewood – and they are actively marketing Valley as far away as New England and PA.

If they build anything like this plan, it looks like they would have a facility that only the very wealthy can use – since insurance won’t pay for private rooms – unless you can fight the carrier and truly demonstrate medical necessity.

If you’ve ever had a claim denied with a health insurer, you know real well how difficult it is to get such a decision reversed.

Thanks a lot Valley mgmt. Shouldn’t you want to modernize in a way that lets you market to the largest possible share of those in THIS area – in ways that those customers’ insurance will cover?

Microsoft Store

Posted on Leave a comment

I don’t see how this pertains to Ridgewood : "Friday Night Lights Prove To Be Budget Busters":

>I don’t see how this pertains to Ridgewood : “Friday Night Lights Prove To Be Budget Busters”: 

I don’t see how this pertains to Ridgewood. I also wonder whether the original poster actually read the article. It is not a discussion about youth sports, which are self-funded in Ridgewood, turf, lights or even that high school football programs in Dallas, Texas are cost prohibitive. It was about how ALL high school football teams in Dallas, Texas generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue to defray the costs of their programs and, in a few rare cases, highly successful programs can EASE school budget constraints. The essence of the article is summed up in this line, “as schools are forced to cut back, football teams can offer a rare revenue generator to a district’s general fund — if they are winning football teams.” It concluded that winning football records directly impact whether the school districts studied in Dallas make a profit or not. Interestingly, it very clearly went on to say that “Nothing costs a district more than coaching stipends and salaries.” Sound familiar?? Of 31 schools, the median school’s total net football expenses were less than 3% of the school’s total annual expenses and the head football coach’s salary (alone) was approximately 2% of the school’s total annual expenses. Perhaps that is the message to take away from the article.

The last time I checked, high school sports are not intended or expected to be profit-making enterprises. They are an operating expense for school districts around the country. In Texas, however, the unique culture around high school football creates an opportunity for some winning programs to generate more money for the school than they cost. Those profits then go to the general revenue fund to support non-football programs. That is a nice benefit. But, it is not the objective of any high school sports programs in the United States.

Contrary to the misleading headline of the commentary that was posted on the Ridgewood Blog, the point of the article is NOT to suggest that high school football programs in Dallas are “busting” their school district budgets. It did not blame elaborate facilities or special considerations that are not integral to all sports programs for adversely impacting school budgets. Although as noted above, it did point out that the average head coach’s salary is 40% of he average school expenditure on football. This did not include benefits or the salary and benefits for assistant coaches.

The full article and survey results can be viewed at this address:

https://www.dallasnews.com/sports/high-schools/football-news/headlines/20111117-texas-high-school-football-playoffs-can-pay-off-for-winning-teams-districts.ece

The bottom line is that I am not aware of any Ridgewood high school sports program that generates revenue even close to that of high school football programs in Dallas. I am not sure how the expenses compare. My guess is that RHS football is the most expensive athletic program in the school. But, I doubt that Chuck Johnson’s salary is 2% of the total school budget. So, I don’t see the relevance of this article to Ridgewood. More to the point, it has nothing to do with youth sports, college scholarships, the rationale for high school athletics, turf fields or lights.

So, I think the original question, which has gone unanswered, is a fair one. Why was this posted on the Ridgewood Blog?

Save up to 40% on Last Minute Flights with Hotwire Limited Rates!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Bill clarifying student loan obligations reintroduces in Congress

>Bill clarifying student loan obligations reintroduces in Congress


When the Bryski family of Marlton contacted their congressman in 2009, they told his staff about their son’s death and the burden of the student loan debt they had inherited. The next September, a bill named in honor of their son, Christopher, passed the U.S. House.

But then the bill’s shepherd, U.S. Rep. John Adler (D., N.J.), was defeated in the November 2010 election. In the spring, Adler, 51, of Cherry Hill, died suddenly of an infection after heart surgery.
The House bill, which aimed to further clarify the student loan process to borrowers, expired in 2010, and a similar measure proposed in the U.S. Senate failed to become law.  (Farrell, The Philadelphia Inquirer)

Posted on Leave a comment

>Suburban schools vs. charter: First round goes to the suburbs

>Suburban schools vs. charter: First round goes to the suburbs


An administrative law decision in favor of three suburban districts fighting a charter school in their midst could embolden districts facing similar battles.

That was the essence of the discussion among both charter and district advocates yesterday. The subject: the decision on Friday by administrative law judge Lisa James-Beavers rejecting Princeton International Academy Charter School (PIACS) in its suit against three districts challenging its opening.

PIACS had charged that Princeton Regional, West Windsor-Plainsboro, and South Brunswick had wrongfully spent more than $100,000 in taxpayers’ money for legal and other fees to fight the school’s opening, including opposing PIACS’ application for a zoning variance.  (Mooney, NJ Spotlight)

Posted on Leave a comment

>Teaneck virtual charter school will delay opening if funding law stays the same

>

Teaneck virtual charter school will delay opening if funding law stays the same

The lead founder of the Garden State Virtual Charter School said Monday that the school would delay opening if the state charter school law is not amended to address funding for virtual charter schools.

“Should the New Jersey Department of Education … approve our charter application, but … restrict it to just a single school district, our board intends to decline the charter approval and not implement the school,” Jason Flynn, a Teaneck resident and parent of a Teaneck public school student, wrote to school officials over the weekend. “Rather, the school would await specific legislative or regulatory changes that would permit unrestricted statewide student enrollment prior to launching our program.”  (Superville, The Record)

Posted on Leave a comment

>N.J. energy program improves homes

>N.J. energy program improves homes


Owning her own home has been Denise Melendez’s dream since she left Puerto Rico more than a decade ago and moved to Camden.

After renting an apartment, the working mother and single parent of two boys eventually bought a house for less than $150,000 in East Camden. She soon discovered repairs were needed.

Through word of mouth from friends and family, Melendez contacted the Comfort Partners Program, a free statewide energy upgrade initiative for low-income families. Now she is saving thousands of dollars on materials, appliances and installation to make her house on Mitchell Street more energy-efficient.  (Comegno, Gannett)

Posted on Leave a comment

>N.J. treasurer: $1.2 trillion in federal savings would not significantly hurt state budget

>N.J. treasurer: $1.2 trillion in federal savings would not significantly hurt state budget


State Treasurer Andrew P. Sidamon-Eristoff said Wednesday the $1.2 trillion in federal spending cuts triggered by a congressional committee’s failure to reach a deficit reduction agreement would not significantly harm New Jersey’s budget.

The bipartisan panel, which was established this summer, failed to reach an agreement earlier in the week, setting off a default plan to make across-the-board-spending cuts.

The reductions in spending will come from the military budget and a host of domestic programs. But Social Security, Medicaid, food stamps and other federal programs, which states rely heavily on, were spared from the budget ax.  (Renshaw, The Star-Ledger)

Posted on Leave a comment

>As lameduck period begins, Assembly panel to consider ‘Back to Work NJ’ job training bill

>As lameduck period begins, Assembly panel to consider ‘Back to Work NJ’ job training bill


The Assembly on Monday will begin what is scheduled as a three-week lame duck session with committee meetings where lawmakers will consider renewed legislation to create the Back to Work NJ job creation program and bills to help employers stave off layoffs, assist local governments repair Hurricane Irene damage, strengthen teen driver safety, promote the state’s wine industry, help juveniles forced into prostitution get services they need and protect the state from cyber terrorism.

The Labor Committee will consider legislation (A-4332) sponsored by Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver (D-Essex) to establish the Back to Work NJ program to help out-of-work residents receive job training from potential employers. Gov. Chris Christie vetoed a similar bill earlier this year. A similar program is in effect in Georgia, and President Obama has included the concept in his jobs program.  (Hester, New Jersey Newsroom)

Posted on Leave a comment

>Garrett: FHA Report Proves Conforming Loan Level Increase is Reckless

>Garrett: FHA Report Proves Conforming Loan Level Increase is Reckless 
WASHINGTON, DC, November 15, 2011

Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises, issued the following statement today after an independent audit of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) revealed that the housing agency’s cash reserves are down 45% from last year and the “chance that future net losses on the current, outstanding portfolio could exceed current capital resources is close to 50 percent,” which could necessitate a taxpayer bailout next year:

“This is what happens when the federal government meddles in economic affairs best left to the private market.  Because the federal government has played an outsized role in our country’s housing system, the American taxpayers are now at risk of another costly bailout that will put future generations even deeper into debt.  Today’s report shows that FHA is overleveraged at a shockingly high rate of 400 to 1, making Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns, the poster children of the 2008 financial collapse, look like financially solvent institutions.  The FHA audit proves once again that, if left unchanged, the reckless policies currently guiding our nation’s housing finance system will threaten the financial solvency of the United States of America.

“In light of this bleak outlook for the FHA, it makes no sense to increase the size of the loans the FHA can insure.  With the potential for tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer losses, it is unconscionable to be even considering raising the conforming loan limit so that the American taxpayers can insure the mortgages for million dollar homes.”

wine.comshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=209195