By Pete Kasperowics, Jun. 26, 2015, Washington Examiner
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts argued in his dissent in Friday’s same-sex marriage case that by saying gay marriages are constitutional, the Court may be heading down the road toward legalizing polygamy.
Roberts was one of four dissenters in the case, and argued that the Court’s majority opinion goes too far in prescribing law in an area that had been left to the states. He also said it raises significant questions, including whether states have a right to define marriage as being between two people.
“Although the majority randomly inserts the adjective ‘two’ in various places, it offers no reason at all why the two-person element of the core definition of marriage may be preserved while the man-woman element may not,” Roberts wrote. “Indeed, from the standpoint of history and tradition, a leap from opposite-sex marriage to same-sex marriage is much greater than one from a two-person union to plural unions, which have deep roots in some cultures around the world.”
“If the majority is willing to take the big leap, it is hard to see how it can say no to the shorter one,” he wrote.
Why not…the liberals on the court completely disregarded the will of the people as set by many referenderendum through out the states and completely ignored those results. To think that the actions of a few will somehow stop the will of God and his people is foolhardy…the count down
Has begun…mind your swords as judgement approaches.
Why not your pet dog also?
According to recent polls 57% supported the Supreme Court talking this action… The views of many have changed since the 2008 elections…. here was one of the recent polls…
“Do you think it should be legal or not legal for same-sex couples to marry?”
Legal Not legal Unsure/No answer
% % %
6/10-14/15 57 35 8
Republicans 36 55 9
Democrats 69 26 5
Independents 59 32 9
To “Paul Smith”, so now the Constitution is dependent on polls – great, just great.
Didnt say that… just showed the poll… young people look at this issue much differently than those of middle age and above…
“According to recent polls 57% supported the Supreme Court talking this action.” Nothing about the Supreme Court in the poll.
I agree that same-sex marriage should be legal, I am aghast that the Supreme Court is making these decisions. As with abortion, the Supreme Court shouldn’t be making things up in order to get to a desired result.
I didn’t say the constitution is dependent on polls.. horror of horrors, I just showed what citizens thought…. I guess judicial interference with the 13th amendment was horrible as well… should we bring back the 3/5 compromise?
Paul, funny you said “pet dog”. I was thinking “a zebra in a tux!” On a serious note, I had hoped Americans would be less concerned about gender and more concerned about violence.
I do like the boob’s.
13th amendment (1865) did away with slavery so no more 3/5ths.. Partially to prevent laws limiting rights of former slaves, the 14th amendment (1868) among other things stated clearly “Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.”
Amendments to the Constitution, plain and straightforward.
Don’t Expect a Flood of Gay Marriages
Aquilla Report ^ | July 1, 2015 | David Murray
Posted on 7/1/2015 9:44:34 AM by Gamecock
Although gay marriage is now legal in all 50 states, don’t expect to see long lines of homosexuals applying for marriage licenses (especially after the initial publicity-seeking flurry is over). After 10 years of same-sex marriage in the Netherlands, The Institute For Marriage and Public Policy commissioned research into the question: What has the demand for same-sex marriage turned out to be among same-sex couples? The answer: “Gay marriage is relatively rare.” The central statistics are: Just 20 percent of Dutch homosexual couples are married, compared with 80 percent of heterosexual couples. Dutch survey data suggests that 2.8% of Dutch men and 1.4% of Dutch women are gay or lesbian. About 8% of gay and lesbian people have chosen to marry.
Why so little take-up of same-sex marriage?
Vera Bergkamp, head of a Dutch gay rights organization, says there are three main reasons for the lack of nuptial enthusiasm among gay couples:
Less pressure from family and friends, fewer gay couples marrying to have children than their straight counterparts, and a more individualist, less family‐orientated mindset among many homosexuals.
Why then has so much time, money, and effort been invested in a gay marriage drive that that will only result in a small percent of a tiny percent actually being married?
As I’ve written before: Gay marriage is not primarily about gay marriage, it is mainly about silencing gay consciences. But there’s a second reason. Gay marriage is also about silencing Christians.
Silencing Christians
If I hated God and despised Christians, I’d be an ardent supporter of same-sex marriage. What better way to express enmity against God and His people? That’s a major reason why so many homosexuals who will never marry, and why so many heterosexuals who have no interest in same-sex marriage, wanted it legalized and mandated by the Supreme Court. They wanted a weapon to shove in the face of God and to wield against His faithful people. And the Supreme Court effectively handed our heads to them on a platter. Just watch as this instrument of “equal love” is now wielded against all dissenters. You’re about to see some very unequal hate.
Yes, there will be high-profile cases where pastors and other prominent Christians will be convicted, bankrupted, and imprisoned for so-called hate crimes. Businesses will continue to be targeted and closed down for any explicit or implicit disapproval of same-sex weddings.
But much of the persecution will go largely unnoticed, behind closed doors, in the everyday lives of ordinary Christians: jobs will not be offered, promotions will not be awarded, contracts will be lost, team positions will be forfeited, downsizing will carefully “select” its victims, our children will suffer lost opportunities, our churches will be penalized. All for holding the “wrong view” of marriage; which was the right view in all human civilization until the last few years.
Loving Darkness, Hating Light
We are about to see as we have never seen before in the West in our lifetime: “Light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone practicing evil hates the light” (John 3:19-20).
Remember what happened to the two angels when they came into Sodom (Genesis 19). A whole city of homosexuals lined up to attack them. And even when God blinded them, they still searched and scrabbled at the door to get to their intended victims.
As they weren’t exactly lacking in opportunities for homosexual sex, what motivated their irrational desire to attack these two particular men? They saw holiness as they had never seen it before, they saw brighter light than ever before, and they were nearer to God than ever before. And the holiness had to be quashed; the light had to be extinguished; the god-like-ness had to be erased.
That, I believe is what gay marriage is about for many (note, I did not say ALL) homosexuals, and for many heterosexuals too. Yes, it’s about silencing conscience; but it’s also about silencing Christians. And ultimately it’s about silencing God.
(I know there are many “moderate” homosexuals out there who just want to live a quiet life, who don’t want anything to do with persecuting Christians, and who are embarrassed about what bad winners many gay leaders are being. But I’m giving up hope that such moderates will ever have the courage to speak up against their own radicals and fundamentalists.)
So, don’t expect a flood of same-sex marriages. But do expect a flood of “hate-crime” laws and “non-discrimination statutes,” and “conditional government contracts.” And then a flood of Christian victims.
Unless there’s a flood of fire and brimstone first.
Flood of Love
In the meantime, we have an opportunity to love our haters as never before.
No, we will never agree with your same-sex marriage or do anything that in any way expresses approval of same-sex weddings. But if you do marry (and if you don’t), we will love you in every other way possible; we will love you in ways that will surprise and astonish you.
We’ll bless you when you curse us.
We’ll pray for you when you abuse us.
We’ll be kind to you when you are cruel to us.
We’ll not retaliate when you ruin us.
We’ll defend your right to speak and disagree with us even when you want to silence us.
We’ll be a Good Samaritan to you when you are a road-crosser and other-sider to us.
We’ll employ you for non-faith-related jobs if you are the best candidate, even though you want to bankrupt our businesses.
We’ll help you when you’re poor even though you want to impoverish us.
We’ll not insult you when you call us bigots.
We’ll be the best neighbors you’ve ever had.
We’ll love you as much as we love ourselves – and that’s a lot.
And we just have two simple requests of you. Accept that, because of the Bible’s teaching, we will never agree with gay marriage. And please don’t ask us to do anything for your weddings.
That’s it. Is that really too much to ask?
David Murray is Professor of Old Testament & Practical Theology at Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary. This article first appeared on his blog, Head Heart Hand, and is used with permission.