Posted on Leave a comment

>Family Brings Civil Rights Claim Against Ridgewood BOE for Sexual Orientation Based Bullying

>Family Brings Civil Rights Claim Against Ridgewood BOE for Sexual Orientation Based Bullying

January 26, 2011

The Case
The complaint, which was filed Jan. 5, claims that 16-year old Matthew Zimmer – represented by his father, David – faced several months of bullying and improper treatment from peers and staff at Ridgewood High School (RHS) due to his sexual orientation.

Included in the Division of Civil Rights’ documentation of the case, Zimmer claimed examples of bullying occurred, including but not limited to:

A health teacher asking during class time if he was “out of the closet” in addition to several other discriminatory comments. The teacher is also alleged to have said to the class that being gay was “caused by having abnormal genes.”

Several students putting sticky notes on his backpack with words like “fat fag” and, at least one student sending a pornographic Facebook message.

Graffiti spelling the words “gay must die” being discovered in the school’s cafeteria. Zimmer said he and his friends saw the graffiti while they were sitting at their lunch table.

Zimmer claimed his health deteriorated in early 2010. He gained more than 50 pounds, he said, and by March he withdrew from all courses on the RHS campus except for chorus, based on medical advice. He continued to work toward completing ninth grade by enrolling in classes online, participating in tutoring and home-schooling.



https://www.njpsa.org/agr/news.cfm?newsid=1051


The Internal Investigation

An internal investigation of Matthew’s claims was conducted by two employees of the Ridgewood school district from April through June of 2010, and found that no staff member had committed wrongdoing. The local investigation by the Equal Educational Opportunity (EEO) Officer in conjunction with the Director of Human Resources / Affirmative Action Officer for the district.  According to a report by NorthJersey.com. 
The two conducted interviews with 28 individuals, including 21 members of the RHS staff or administration, the district’s physician, and Matthew and his parents. Their findings were submitted to the district on July 13. The family then missed a deadline for an appeal, filing it with the County Superintendent instead of locally.

The Law

The  New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in L.W. v. Toms River Regional School District189 N.J. 381 (2007) provides a stringent legal standard that is applied in determining if a school district is to be held liable for student-on-student harassment based on sexual or affectional orientation. The Supreme Court held that under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) school districts are liable for such harassment when the school district knew or should have known of the harassment and failed to take actions reasonably calculated to end the mistreatment and offensive conduct.

What’s Next


The Division on Civil Rights investigates every complaint it receives, but only after preliminary investigation is conducted and probable cause can be established, does a second phase of litigation begin. A Finding of Probable Cause does not resolve a civil rights complaint. Rather, it means the State has concluded its preliminary investigation and determined there is sufficient evidence to support a reasonable suspicion that New Jersey’s LAD has been violated. The next step is “conciliation” where the division, the family and the board of education try to work out a settlement. If that doesn’t work, the case goes to trial before an administrative law judge.

The LAD provides that each Respondent found to have committed a violation is subject to a penalty of up to $10,000. The LAD also provides for other remedies, including compensatory damages and injunctive relief, such as changes in the employer’s policies and management/staff training.

https://www.njpsa.org/agr/news.cfm?newsid=1051

Bookmark and Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *