Can your Golden Retriever count as a dependent on your tax return?
file photo courtesy of www.artchickphotography.com
the staff of thge Ridgewood blog
New York NY, one New York attorney is betting on it. In a move that has captured the attention of pet owners and tax professionals alike, a lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District of New York that could fundamentally change how the IRS views our four-legged companions.
Amanda Reynolds, a New York-based attorney, alongside her 8-year-old Golden Retriever, Finnegan, is officially suing the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Her goal? To have pets legally classified as dependents for tax purposes.
The Argument: “Finnegan is Like My Daughter”
According to the filing, Reynolds argues that Finnegan meets the literal criteria the IRS uses to define a dependent. She points to several key factors that mirror the requirements for human dependents:
-
Total Reliance: Finnegan relies entirely on Reynolds for food, shelter, transportation, and medical care.
-
Financial Independence: Like a minor child, the dog has no independent income.
-
Residency: Finnegan resides exclusively with Reynolds in her New York home.
-
Cost of Care: Reynolds notes that Finnegan’s annual expenses exceed $5,000, which aligns with the financial support thresholds often discussed in dependency cases.
“For all intents and purposes, Finnegan is like my daughter,” Reynolds told Quartz. “He is definitely a ‘dependent.'”
Property vs. Family: The Legal Battle
Currently, the IRS defines pets as “property,” similar to a car or a piece of furniture. While this sounds cold to the millions of Americans who view their pets as family, it is a long-standing pillar of tax law.
However, Reynolds argues that this definition is inconsistent. Currently, the IRS does allow tax advantages for certain animals, such as:
-
Service Animals: Costs for guide dogs can be deducted as medical expenses.
-
Working Animals: Guard dogs or farm dogs can sometimes be deducted as business expenses.
Reynolds contends that the current rules create an unfair burden on taxpayers who provide high-level care for “companion” animals that function identically to dependents in every other way.
What’s Next for the “Pet Tax” Lawsuit?
The case is currently being overseen by Judge James M. Wicks. As of now, the legal road ahead looks steep:
-
Motion to Dismiss: Judge Wicks has granted a motion to pause the discovery process, a sign that the IRS is preparing to file a motion to dismiss the case entirely.
-
Frivolous or Landmark? While many might see the case as a long shot, Reynolds insists the lawsuit is not “frivolous or meritless,” but rather a necessary challenge to outdated tax codes.
Would Pet Dependents Benefit You?
If this lawsuit were to succeed, the financial implications for the 86 million U.S. households with pets would be massive. It could open the door for:
-
Child-style tax credits for pet owners.
-
Deductions for veterinary bills and life-saving surgeries.
-
Tax-free “Pet HSA” accounts for pet insurance premiums.
Quick Stats: The Cost of a “Dependent” Pet
| Expense Category | Average Annual Cost (High-End) |
| Premium Food | $1,200 – $2,000 |
| Veterinary Care | $700 – $1,500 |
| Insurance | $600 – $1,000 |
| Grooming/Training | $500 – $1,000 |
| Total Potential Deduction | $3,000 – $5,500+ |
Gusto is a payroll and HR software that helps you pay your team, file taxes, offer benefits, and more. See how Gusto compares to other providers, get a free trial, and learn how to switch to Gusto in minutes.
https://gusto.com/i/james3539
