>
“Keep your mouth closed.” Indeed!!
I don’t know about others, but this is the first I’ve heard of the 200:1 advantage Graydon has over other municipal pools when it comes to avoiding regulatory consequences from poor results in fecal coliform tests. That’s a pretty nice cushion to have if you can get it.
I pay attention pretty well, and I don’t recall seeing Graydon described as a one-of-a-kind man‐made pond having no circulation or filtration systems. Does this mean that if Graydon implements any form of circulation or filtering system at all, that it will immediately be shackled with burdensome cleanliness standards that it has no chance of meeting?
“Don’t drink the water.” NFN, 10:27, but I don’t think you’ll be accomplishing much in the way of personal persuasion with that approach.
It sounds as if Graydon, if it is to be improved much at all, will have to be professionally managed on the Village’s behalf once the improvements are in place, or possibly privately owned under preferential rules set by the Village, if it has any chance of surviving, much less thriving, in today’s modern regulatory environment. Can anyone else with a higher altitude perspective weigh in on this question?
