Posted on

Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required

imgres-3

Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required

By SHAILA DEWANOCT. 25, 2014

ARNOLDS PARK, Iowa — For almost 40 years, Carole Hinders has dished out Mexican specialties at her modest cash-only restaurant. For just as long, she deposited the earnings at a small bank branch a block away — until last year, when two tax agents knocked on her door and informed her that they had seized her checking account, almost $33,000.

The Internal Revenue Service agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.

“How can this happen?” Ms. Hinders said in a recent interview. “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?”

The federal government does.

Using a law designed to catch drug traffickers, racketeers and terrorists by tracking their cash, the government has gone after run-of-the-mill business owners and wage earners without so much as an allegation that they have committed serious crimes. The government can take the money without ever filing a criminal complaint, and the owners are left to prove they are innocent. Many give up.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/26/us/law-lets-irs-seize-accounts-on-suspicion-no-crime-required.html?_r=0

One thought on “Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required

  1. IRS should be required to have a damn good reason and a legal warrant issued by a judge. Time for our useless congress to get together and rein in the IRS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *