Posted on Leave a comment

Do You Want Your Private Financial Information Automatically Shared with Russia or China?

Vladimir Putin signs 30-year gas deal with China

Do You Want Your Private Financial Information Automatically Shared with Russia or China?

David Burton / July 23, 2014

On Monday, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development released the full version of the global standard for automatic exchange of information.

The Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters calls on governments to obtain detailed account information from their financial institutions and exchange that information automatically with other jurisdictions on an annual basis. The standard was endorsed by G20 Finance Ministers in February 2014 and approved by the OECD Council.

It is one thing to exchange financial account information with Western countries that generally respect privacy and are allied with the United States. It is an entirely different matter to exchange sensitive financial information about American citizens or corporations with countries that do not respect Western privacy norms, have systematic problems with corruption or are antagonistic to the United States. States that fall into one of these problematic categories but are participating in the OECD automatic exchange of information initiative include Colombia, China and Russia.

The standard provides for governments to annually and automatically exchange financial account information—such as balances, interest, dividends and proceeds from sales of financial assets—that are reported to governments by financial institutions and cover accounts held by individuals and entities, including businesses, trusts and foundations. Banks, broker-dealers, investment funds and insurance companies are required to report.

Corrupt governments may use American’s financial information for criminal purposes such as identity theft

The Obama administration enthusiastically supports the OECD initiative, but even the administration has realized important privacy issues at are stake. Robert B. Stack, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Tax Affairs, has testified that “the United States will not enter into an information exchange agreement unless the Treasury Department and the IRS are satisfied that the foreign government has strict confidentiality protections. Specifically, prior to entering into an information exchange agreement with another jurisdiction, the Treasury Department and the IRS closely review the foreign jurisdiction’s legal framework for maintaining the confidentiality of taxpayer information.”

Leaving these determinations to a tax agency with little institutional interest in anything other than raising tax revenue is dangerous. There is little doubt sensitive financial information about American citizens and businesses can and will be used by some governments for reasons that have nothing to do with tax administration, such as identifying political opponents’ financial resources or industrial espionage. In addition, individuals in corrupt governments may use the information for criminal purposes such as identity theft, to access others’ funds or to identify potential kidnapping victims. It is naïve to think otherwise.

Automatic information exchange should be limited to law enforcement and anti-terrorist purposes and should be restricted to governments that are (1) democratic, (2) respect free markets, private property and the rule of law, (3) can be expected to always use the information in a manner consistent with the security interests of the member states and (4) have in place—in law and in practice—adequate safeguards to prevent the information from being obtained by hostile parties or used for inappropriate commercial, political or other purposes.

In February, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a briefhearing on a number of treaties, including the Proposed Protocol Amending The Multilateral Convention On Mutual Administrative Assistance In Tax Matters, which would implement automatic information sharing and expand the number of countries that participate beyond the OECD and the Council of Europe.

The Senate should not ratify this protocol. The risks to American citizens and American businesses are too great.

Posted on 1 Comment

Edward Snowden to SXSW: NSA Leaders Have Harmed Our National Security ‘More Than Anything’ Else

o-EDWARD-SNOWDEN-facebook

Edward Snowden to SXSW: NSA Leaders Have Harmed Our National Security ‘More Than Anything’ Else

The fugitive leaker, appearing by video conference, attacked virtually every corner of the national security apparatus during a Q&A session at the festival.

America’s most high-profile fugitive visited one of the country’s most popular entertainment festivals in Texas on Monday, drawing thunderous applause from a crowded room filled with his adoring fans.

Edward Snowden, appearing from Russia through a live video stream, told attendees of the South by Southwest Interactive conference in Austin that Congress had fundamentally failed to do its job as an overseer of the government’s bulk surveillance programs, declaring that “we need a watchdog that watches Congress.

The former National Security Agency contractor, in a conversation with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Christopher Soghoian and Ben Wizner, also charged the current and most recent chief of the NSA as the two people most responsible for jeopardizing the country’s national security due to their preference for aggressive collection of data rather than protection of it after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

“More than anything, there are two officials who have harmed our Internet security and national security,” Snowden said, his image backdropped by an enlarged copy of the U.S. Constitution. “Those two officials are Michael Hayden and Keith Alexander.”

https://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/edward-snowden-to-sxsw-nsa-leaders-have-harmed-our-national-security-more-than-anything-else-20140310

Posted on 2 Comments

Websites look to ‘harness the outrage’

prisonerresigning

Websites look to ‘harness the outrage’
February 09, 2014, 06:00 am
By Julian Hattem

Thousands of websites on Tuesday will take a stand against government surveillance by plastering protests across their home pages.

Tech companies and civil liberties organizations are hoping the demonstration, called The Day We Fight Back, will replicate their success in defeating the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) in 2012.

This time activists are focusing their energy on supporting the USA Freedom Act, which would end or curtail many of the most controversial surveillance programs at the National Security Agency (NSA) and elsewhere.

“The idea is to really harness the outrage of the Internet community in speaking out in one big voice on Feb. 11,” said Rainey Reitman, the director of activism at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

The protest comes nearly a month after President Obama announced a handful of changes to the embattled spy agency’s most controversial practices. Critics said the changes weren’t nearly enough.

Read more: https://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/197859-thousands-of-sites-to-protest-nsa-spying#ixzz2spkXyhnl

Posted on 3 Comments

If the U.S. Supreme Court applies an appropriate constitutional analysis the NSA’s program of wholesale collection of data will be dismantled

bigbrother

If  the U.S. Supreme Court applies an appropriate constitutional analysis the NSA’s program of wholesale collection of data will be dismantled

I just read the Constitutional Law section of the Privacy and Civil Liberty Oversight Board’s January 23, 2014 Report on the NSA’s Telephone Records Program. I also skimmed the other sections, including one that analyzes the policy aspects of the program. The entire document can be found at: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1008957-final-report.html

As an attorney, I found the Constitutional law section to be well-written, incisive, and balanced. As a citizen and patriot, I appreciate the fact that the authors of this report appear to have a firm grip on the fact that the ultimate authority in this country resides in the citizens themselves (We the People), regardless of what anyone vocationally associated with the Federal Government, or philosophically committed to promoting statism, may believe to the contrary.

I am now convinced that the NSA’s program of wholesale collection and long-term storage of U.S. citizens’ telephone data is a vastly expensive and expansive sitting duck that will be dismantled and cast onto the ash heap of history as soon as the U.S. Supreme Court applies an appropriate constitutional analysis to it, if not sooner (e.g., pursuant to a lawful order of a lower court). It is absolutely unconscionable that such a program was allowed to proceed as far as it did, and our federal government should be ashamed of itself.

Regardless of what anyone believes the definition of the terms ‘traitor’ and ‘treason’ to be, Edward Snowden did all U.S. citizens a solid favor by so clearly bringing the scope and details of this program to the attention of the U.S. public at large. Why? Because without the enormous amount of concentrated critical attention on the NSA that Snowden triggered, this behemoth of a government program and system could well have closed the loop on all of our freedoms and important constitutional rights in a very short period of time (e.g., before the end of the Obama Administration), permanently altering the relationship between ordinary U.S. citizens and the federal government, and leaving us powerless to force the federal government to reverse course or enact necessary reforms. So if time was truly of the essence, and Snowden acted in a timely fashion, are we the law-abiding duty-bound to condemn him?

Highly-placed members of the George W. Bush administration involved in national security, and Bush-era government lawyers who should have been (and likely were) aware of the clear unconstitutionality of the program as it was designed and run prior to Obama’s inauguration in January 2009, should be roughly ignored if they persist in supporting the NSA’s bulk telephone data collection program. They are compromised from a political and professional standpoint and will never admit that what they did was wrong. Going forward, they will need to be dragged kicking and screaming into a corrected view of reality in which our constitutional rights and liberties are abruptly restored, and the federal government is forced to take its medicine.

wine.com