Posted on 8 Comments

Confessions of a Village Merchant

>ballons

Parking is the issue he told the fly, the rents don’t mean anything if you have the traffic and this town needs out of towners to come in and shop in order for the down town to survive, there are just not enough locals shopping. I asked him but do you really think we need a huge garage? Yes if it’s done tastefully and fits into the down town, but I said aren’t you worried about this monster garage will only being used for NJT commuters and not shoppers? Well that could happen but all the down town employees could use the garage for parking .Restaurants employ a lot of people and the garage could get them off street parking and open the streets up for customers. Look there are lots of businesses in town not just retail, restaurants and banks all would benefit if people had easy parking. I don’t have anything against banks and restaurants we just need more parking.

The parking meter money was originally targeted to raise funds to build a garage but then they just pushed it into the general fund.

The village he said should use it efforts to market to stores to get them to move into town but they have to be careful not to make the down town look like any shopping mall.

He said over and over, they should have built the parking when they had a chance in the 1970’s.

Why has there been so many who continue to speak up against the parking garage? Well the Village Hall renovation was a total fiasco and the council has never come clean, the architects, council and the engineers all made a mess of it. The flooding is worse now than ever. This gives them no credibility with any construction projects, people just worry they are going to screw it up.

Posted on Leave a comment

>House Overwhelmingly Passes Garrett Amendment Protecting Small Business

>House Overwhelmingly Passes Garrett Amendment Protecting Small Business
Garrett Amendment is a “Key Vote” for U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed Congressman Scott Garrett’s amendment to the Fiscal Year 2008 Financial Services Appropriations Act, helping small businesses grow and American financial markets thrive, by a strong bipartisan vote of 267- 154.

“Small business is the backbone of our economy and it deserves our help,” said Garrett. “The excessive auditing and reporting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley law are breaking the backs of public companies and American financial markets and they will surely crush small businesses altogether. Today, the House said with a strong voice that small business is important to our economy and we will protect them from overly-burdensome regulations that keep them from prospering.”

Garrett’s amendment was supported by the American Banking Association, Independent Community Bankers Association, National Taxpayers Union, Citizens Against Government Waste, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which deemed a vote in favor of the Garrett amendment a “key vote” for American small business.

Garrett has also introduced a bill, the Small Business SOX Compliance Extension Act (H.R. 2727), to extend the current small business exemption under Section 404(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley a full year.

Posted on 37 Comments

>Look at the Test Scores

>From the vormath site:

Look at the test scores.

In 2000, Travell was ranked 81st in the state for 4th graders.
In 2006, Travell was ranked (dropped) to 277.

In 2000, Orchard was ranked 47th in the state for 4th grader.
In 2006, Orchard was ranked 174.

Rankings were based upon the aggregate (total) of the advanced, proficient, and partial proficient NJAsk math scores for 4th graders. (Visit psk12.com to see scores from 2000 to now).

Posted on 11 Comments

>Reader claims ,"Birthing babies is the MOST profitable aspect of Valley Hospital"

>A Valley insider had this to say:

Birthing babies is the MOST profitable aspect of Valley Hospital. They are losing potential mommies to hospitals with more SINGLE rooms. Now, every new mother to be wants a single room and she is willing to pay the extra $s for it. Valley wants to be able to provide that single room to every pregnant patient that wants one. Ka ching!

For this, they need to set aside an entire new wing, also moving diagnostic and pediatrics with it.

It is definitely about competition, but it’s competition over getting the profitable patients not in getting the most high tech equipment and personnel to handle the more expensive illnesses. Manhattan, after all, is not that far away.

Is it possible for valley to get what it wants without changing the building code?

We don’t really know, do we? They have not been made to provide other scenarios as yet (forget the DVD, that’s their opening gambit). They have not been made to provide an EIS (Environment Impact Statement). That should be necessary given that they are requesting a CHANGE in the town’s code. The EIS will provide much needed independent information to residents and planning members about noise, pollution, traffic, growth, pedestrian safety, effectiveness of proposed abatements, etc.

“Not-for-profit” and “competition” are an ungainly fit. So should the residents nearby (and the Village’s character) bear the brunt of this problem that Valley faces?

The planning board needs to ask the right questions. These will not be the questions Valley wants to be asked.

Let’s hope they are up to the task.

Posted on 5 Comments

>Reader writes isnt this just a Turf War between Valley and Hackensack Hospitals

>Let’s think about the real issue here.

This is a business plan. A good old turf war. The two players are Valley and Hackensack. Bottom line is Hackensack has been pulling top physicians in for years, Pascack is kaput and Valley is trying to play catch up. It almost seems that Valley wants to grow up to be a “University Medical Center” and not the “community” hospital that it states it wants to be. The previous blogger said it perfectly, “whose community are they trying to serve?”

I have read a number of blog entries from various web sites and some of you have nailed the aftermath issues dead on. One being that with all the new additions and clinics being proposed based on the zoning changes what’s or who’s to stop the zoning board approval for future home offices all around the hospital.

I would have had no idea what this blogger was referencing but coincidentally a week before I read this, I had taken the bus back from Manhattan. This particular route took a circuitous route through Hackensack and I did notice something peculiar. Clinics and Dr offices lined up all of the streets for countless blocks. At the time I remember thinking wow I can’t believe all of these homes were converted like this. Now I get it.

This not about a $750,000,000 dollar expansion for an increase of 3 beds. Though I could be wrong but I do have three beds for sale and I will be willing to let them go for a mere $249,999,999 a piece. I will even throw in two more beds and a complete home but come quickly because at this rate they’ll sell pretty fast.

Bottom line is, if my family or I get a broken arm or an earache I’ll go to Valley. Anything more serious than that I’m heading to Manhattan’s finest.

As for the other issues rising out of the main one ie taxes, community giving, etc… I couldn’t agree more. Where is Valley???

Posted on 17 Comments

>The Ridgewood Blog has its first Stalker

>just a few of the posts or attempted posts …..

why wasn’t pj at the meetingAnonymous said… Mayb…
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

why wasn’t pj at the meetingAnonymous said… Mayb…
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

Posted at the Ridgewood Views BlogAnonymous said…..
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

Wow you are really taking a beating on the Ridgewo…
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

there are no short term memory problems in this to…
(I WAS AT THE MEETING)
6/18/07

The fly swatter says where were you big mouth. to …
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

Posted at Ridgewood ViewsBoard Critic and Math Ref…
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

Is a Google Search For a Superintendant a Good Ide…
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

PJ I encourage you to post this if you really mean…
(Anonymous)
6/18/07

pj did you know Bergen County Schools received an …
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

the other blog is reporting news about the Bergen …
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

Yawn give it a rest
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

Are you a professional mud slinger or does this ju…
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

Posted on the Ridgewood Views Blog The One Way Blo…
(Andrew)
6/17/07

pj I hear you don’t like taking a bit of you own m…
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

so let me see if I understand this correctly you…
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

pj it’s been said you don’t like people saying thi…
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

Yawn, this is boring.The fly swatter
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

Don’t make me get the fly swatter after you again….
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

I think this is a screwball idea.The fly swatter
(Anonymous)
6/17/07

And you a parking expert because you have what deg…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

The newspaper (ridgewood news) should be a non bia…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

pj, Wow, I must have really made you mad. It s…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

Hey pj Are you mad at me. your buddy the fly s…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

You just can’t give it a rest can you?Your buddy t…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

PJ, Looks like you have some people who are ques…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

Hey pj, It’s me, your old buddy the fly swatter….
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

ORDER FINE ART/ STOCK PRINTS ON-LINE

Hey pj old buddy, It’s your friend the fly swat…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

Hey pj, Just a heads up. You may be interested…
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

Hey jimbo old buddy, I see your trying to avoid …
(Anonymous)
6/16/07

pj, please help me out here. Can you explain to me…
(Anonymous)
6/15/07

Don’t tell me the fly swatter is annoying the fly!…
(Anonymous)
6/15/07

Hey pj, it appears that you have been a bit busy d…
(Anonymous)
6/15/07

Posted on 6 Comments

>Upcoming BOE Meetings

>Pursuant to the requirements of the Open Public Meetings Act, N.J.S.A.
10:4-6 et seq., notice is hereby given that the Ridgewood Board of Education
will hold Special Public Meetings on the following dates:

Monday, June 25, 2007
Special Public Meeting at 7:30 p.m. in the third floor Board Room at the
Education Center for the purpose of going into Executive Session.

Thursday, June 28, 2007
Special Public Meeting at 7:30 p.m. in the third floor Board Room at the
Education Center. Actions will be taken.

Monday, July 9, 2007
Special Public Meeting with the Village Council at Village Hall at 7:30 p.m.
The purpose is discussion of the Village of Ridgewood Parks & Recreation
Master Plan.

Posted on 7 Comments

>Local Artist Proposes solution for train tunnel

>mosaic blooming sm

I know New Jersey Transit wanted to renovate our historical train
station by building an unneeded monstrosity. To tell you the truth
everything accept for the tunnel looks fine to me. That tunnel
needs some serious renovation. I think tiles would solve this issue.
Better yet why not let local artist in our community
exhibit the history of such a great village thru tile work.
Posted on 37 Comments

>You can’t follow The Valley Hospital action unless you know the players . . .

>And you can’t tell the players without a program.

Here are the Planning Board players:
Members:Morgan Hurley – Chairman (Ethelbert Place)David Nicholson – Vice-Chairman (Liberty Street)David Pfund – Mayor (Hillcrest Road)Kim Ringler Shagin – Councilwoman (Walthery Avenue)James Bombace (Midwood Road)Richard Fricke (Woodland Avenue)Anne Ward (Melrose Place)Albert Pucciarelli (Cottage Place)Nick Tsapatsaris (North Murray Avenue)Charles Nalbantian – Alternate 1 (Bellair Road)Richard Barclay – Alternate 2 (Brookside Avenue)

Staff:Gail L. Price, Esq., Board AttorneyBlais L. Brancheau, PP, PlannerChristopher J. Rutishauser, PE, Village EngineerBarbara K. Carlton, Board Secretary

And also for the record, Valley Hospital President, Ms. Audrey D. Meyers, lives on Highland Avenue. The Valley’s attorney, Charles (Chuck) Collins, owns property on Bellair Road and on Prospect Street.

Posted on 8 Comments

>TERC – WHEN IT FAILS, IT’S BECA– USE OF THE TEACHERS, not our Mishugona* curriculum

>TERC – WHEN IT FAILS, IT’S BECA– USE OF THE TEACHERS, not our Mishugona* curriculum

An excerpt from “Changing the Elementary Mathematics Curriculum: Obstacles and Challenges”, Susan Jo Russell

TERC , 2067 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140

Curriculum as teacher development

We see our curriculum as a vehicle for teacher development. The actual curriculum is not what we envision and write down, but what happens between students and teachers in the moment of teaching and learning. So while part of our responsibility is to provide the material, the actual investigations, in which students will participate-and this in itself is no easy matter-the other, equally critical part of our responsibility is to open up that material to teachers, to invite them in both to the mathematics and to children’s mathematical thinking.

The audience, therefore, for our materials, is teachers, not students. Our units are written to the teachers with many digressions about mathematics and about children’s learning of mathematics. The responsibility is absolutely on the teachers to make this material work. If they fail, the material fails. On the other hand, by not making teachers partners in the past, we have made a grievous error. By not inviting teachers in to mathematics, by attempting to make materials “teacher proof” because educators or mathematicians believed that classroom teachers were not smart enough about mathematics to teach it, not only have we denied the students a good mathematical education, but we have denied generations of elementary teachers-largely women-access to mathematics.

It could be me, but if I were a teacher, I’d be insulted.

*”Mishugona” is Yiddish for crazy, the fly is trying to appeal to a more ethnic audience

show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=97526

Posted on 82 Comments

The Now Infamous Letter ?

>This is NOT PJ’s comment, but MY comment, which you can see posted under the headline “Pro BOE reader…”I DID NOT address the comment as “Hello Everyone” – this intro was inserted by PJ.MY intro was “Hey, bbwool,” responding to bbwool’s accusation. So my “basically” pokes fun at his use of the word “basically.” And, of course,the “lie” refers to what bbwool claimed and the liar is, of course, bbwool.thanks a bunch, pj, for making it look like i was calling “everyone” a liar.

*My mistake PJ

Hello Everybody .

I found that letter from Frances to Brooks and she DID NOT tell him not to come. so what YOU said was…ummm…”basically” a lie. which makes you “basically” a liar.

in fact, she gave him a heads up on the math discussion in our district. furthermore, her polite communication enabled Brooks to respond in kind. it gave him a chance to publicly explain his position and i must say, he did it well and graciously.

bbwool, why did you say the Ridgewood Blog “proudly” posted her letter but not tell us the whole truth, that it also posted Brooks’ response??

but hey, everyone, you don’t have to take MY word for it because here is the parent’s letter and Brooks’ response from the May 9, 2007 blog:

“Dr. Mr. Brooks,

I am a Ridgewood parent of three children in our public schools and I, like many others here, have been made aware of your pending position as our new superintendent. Our Board may not have advised you of this, but you should be aware of the present climate in our district with regard to the “Investigation” math curriculum. Several articles and ‘letters to the editor’ have appeared in our local paper over recent weeks. If the Board kept you in the dark with regard to this protracted circumstance, there may be little left for you to do but to give it your deepest contemplation. The link below is but a sample of the present discussion underway.

Respectfully,
Frances”

https://www.lindamoran.net/blog_teen/2007/04/the_disaster_at_plainview_old.html

“Dear Ms. Edwards:

Thanks for this note. I’d like to make a few comments about the link you attached. The math wars, like the whole language wars of the past decade, are based on a false dichotomy: traditional education v. progressive education. Good instruction focuses on the needs of the child – every child, one by one – and no one approach meets the needs of all children.

The math issue is interesting in that the battle seems to be pitched around algorithmic fluency v. conceptual understanding. They are not mutually exclusive. Both are essential for mathematically literacy. Students who learn algorithms procedurally without conceptual understanding aren’t truly fluent because although they are able to answer questions correctly on tests (when the questions are posed in the precise format the students are used to seeing), they often have difficulty knowing whether to (and how to) apply that algorithm to new and different situations. Teaching for conceptual understanding helps children develop efficient strategies for computing. Understanding the concept that underlies the algorithm helps students know how and when to apply it, helping them to become more proficient in solving new, differently presented problems and/or more complex problems.

Programs don’t teach children, teachers do. Good teachers vary their instruction – and their materials – based on student response.

Respectfully,
Marty Brooks”

Posted on 28 Comments

>Pro BOE Reader resonds to call for apology

>”Bombace posted in that “obscure blog” at the request of one of the math moms. She evidently felt that posting on your blog was not cool.You did not have to dig too far, the comment is also posted on the VOR math website.So your feelings are hurt that your blog did not get the scoop, it looks like Grandpa Nizzo outdone you! No apology needed, the comments by the Board were true and validated by facts. Many of the parents involved in this controversy have chosen to distance themselves from those who chose those tactics.I can only hope they chose to distance themselves from this blog. Choosing to post on another blog looks like a start. “

*BUT this blogger wants to know ,what are these “tactics” everyone is taking about ?