>The Ridgewood Blog invites all readers to comment on the pro’s and con’s of BOE budget :
“Well, which is it that you object to, the accounting standards or the teachers’ union? Look, I agree that the union is out of control, I don’t know how to fix that, I’ll be the first to admit. But the fact is, voting down the budget or cutting OTHER things from the budget A) doesn’t solve the problem of the teachers taking too large a chunk, and B) harms my kids as services or opportunities are taken away. I feel like the only way to ensure my kids keep getting the truly quality education that they get in Ridgewood (and if you don’t believe me, just go live somewhere else like California and see what your money does or doesn’t get you), the only thing I can do is hold on to what they’ve got… I’m just being honest here. You can see the budget yourself…exactly which line item would you suggest they reduce, if they can’t reduce the teachers’ salaries and benefits? Make a suggestion…let’s hear it. I’m not hiding behind the kids, I’m trying to save their education as best I can. What are you doing to HELP? “
“And one more thing…you keep complaining about taxes going up like it’s something unique to Ridgewood. From 2000-2006, Ridgewood’s level of tax increase ranked 448th lowest out of 568 communities in New Jersey. That doesn’t exactly place us in the forefront of rampant tax increases. I’m not using the “everybody’s doing it” excuse, just giving you a little perspective…the cost of education and its illogical tie to property taxes is a statewide problem. Be honest, you don’t really care about the education budget or how much is spent on our kids. You only care because of what it does to your own property taxes. If the costs were buried in some statewide budget like in many other states, you’d be content to let the school board use its judgment to do what they felt was right. That bothers me. Fix the real problem, the whacky funding formula for NJ schools. “
“wait a minute… you can’t compare percent increase to the dollar increase. An increase of $10 million in five years is not the same as a 15% increase in other districts.
As per the quality of education… I doubt the it has increased by $20M to the quality of education I received 10 years ago in the RPS.
Salaries going up is one thing… and my friends are teachers and I support quality education… but.. . The increase is not just for salaries and what are the kids gaining from this?
Building maintenance should be part of the regular budget. New books should be part of the regular budget, and IT improvements should be included in the regular budget, not a supplement to the annual tax increase…
What new programs were created as a result of the tax increase?
Why do I have to volunteer for the BOE when I can voice my opinion as a resident and make a bigger impact?
Why compare Ridgewood to California when we can compare it to 5 years ago? Is the budget increase merely sustaining performance levels or are we seeing a difference. I would rather pay more to see a significant difference if it could be justified as opposed to merely the status quo of raising taxes. Why do Ridgewood residents pay Ridgewood taxes and still send their kids to private schools?
Honestly the biggest change in RPS education that I have noticed is a lack of interest of parents to hold their kids accountable. I am not saying that you are one of them, but kids these days are spoiled rotten and parents blame the schools before disciplining their kids. When was the last time you heard of parents checking their kids homework, or their class notes, etc. Maybe you are a good parent, but I grew up with kids in this town that were not as motivated as I was because their parents were always on vacation.
MAYBE WE SHOULD BE HOLDING THE PARENTS MORE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF OUR SCHOOLS AND NOT JUST THROW MONEY AT THE PROBLEM. “
“Let’s not confuse the issues. Parenting skills may be a problem, but the discussion here is on the school budget. Here’s what’s worrying me. In his book, “The World is Flat,” Tom Friedman makes the argument that the US is woefully behind in training the next generation of science and technology experts, inventors and scientists. That means everything from doctors, engineers, astronauts, mathemeticians, comptuer scientists, accountants, etc. Who IS training for these positions? Pretty much every country that can, but especially, China, Korea and India. So what does Ridgewood propose to help turn this trend around? Believe it or not “a rich, humanities-based education.” Is this the right way to go? Did anybody on the BoE ask this question? No. The televised budget discussion was a touchy-feely session where all in attendance looked relieved that they couldn’t come up with a penetrating important question–or, didn’t have to answer one.Who is going to inherit the high-tech legacies and companies built by Jobs, Wozniak, Watson and Grove? Apparently, not us Ridgewoodians.We’re digging our own graves. One budget cycle at a time.”