Posted on

Officer in fatal shooting of Wyckoff dog was distraught, eyewitnesses say

otto

Otto, the 5-year-old German shepherd that was shot and killed by a Wyckoff police officer, is shown in this photo provided by the family.

MAY 20, 2015, 12:57 PM    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, MAY 20, 2015, 8:06 PM
BY STEVE JANOSKI
STAFF WRITER |
THE RECORD

WYCKOFF — A police internal report has been released showing the chain of events that ended with an officer’s fatal shooting of a family’s dog on April 29.

The report released Tuesday by the Police Department includes a description by Lt. David Murphy, who had been on traffic duty near Lawlins Road, of the shooting’s immediate aftermath.

Murphy found Patrolman Kyle Ferreira “very distraught” and “pacing back and forth” after he’d responded to the wrong address on a possible burglary call and shot Otto, the Vukobratovic family’s 5-year-old German shepherd.

“He was shaking his head and several times, he put both hands on top of his head. To me, he appeared to be visibly upset by whatever events had transpired prior to my arrival,” Murphy said.

Algis Setikas, who lives across the street at 621 Lawlins Road, had reported the possible burglary after finding damage to a window screen and exterior light bulb. The report said he had gone to the Police Department in person so as to not disturb his wife, recovering from surgery, or his newborn.

Minutes later, a police car pulled up in front of his house, but the officer never came to the door. As Setikas walked towards the car, the report said, he heard “four or five consecutive loud bangs,” and looked across the street to see Ferreira in what he described as a “shooting stance.” Setikas checked on his family, then ran to the Vukobratovics, yelling to Ferreira that he had the wrong house.

“He observed that the officer was standing on the driveway outside of the gate with his hands on his head, looking upset and distraught,” the report said.

 

https://www.northjersey.com/news/officer-in-fatal-shooting-of-wyckoff-dog-was-distraught-eyewitnesses-say-1.1338573

Posted on

Readers say Wyckoff investigation of Dog Shooting leaves many unanswered questions

otto
“Exonerated by a township internal affairs investigation”…. Nobody believes this crap anymore, and yet they just keep expecting tax paying citizens to accept their schtick.

Unanswered questions: why when going to take a report of a “Burglary IN THE PAST” does supercop show up with weapon drawn? (If it was burglary in progress the protocol is to wait for a backup officer)
If the dog owner’s allegation that spent shell casings were found at a location other than reported by the officer, why was this not investigated/clarified?
A simple investigation would determine who is telling the truth here.
I guess wyckoff can save money on billy clubs, pepper spray and flashlights since the non-lethal methods are no longer accepted practice here. Shoot first and no questions will be asked.

 

Perhaps its time to reevaluate the rules for the use of deadly force ?

Posted on

Readers not buying Ridgewood Police officer’s defense of Wyckoff dog Shooting

otto
Reader says , There is so much wrong with your editorial I don’t know where to begin.

It was a fenced in yard and the policeman was a stranger. He had a choice: run. Get the hell out of the yard. Or would that be too detrimental to the tough guy image?

Are you saying that people should not allow their dogs to roam their fenced in yards now? The dogs should be confined to the house? Is there a particular room inside the house where the dog should be sequestered?

Your fantasy about the cop saving a child from a fierce beast holds no water. If the kid was from the neighborhood, the dog would have known him. If there was a trespasser in the yard, then good.

I only hope, officer Elwood, that when you find a group of kids smoking a joint behind starbucks some night, and they all scatter, you realize that you do have a choice other than to shoot the slower ones.