Posted on Leave a comment

>The Band Plays On – Village Council Moves Forward With Plans to Construct New Retail Space Despite …

>Empty stores in region on rise
Thursday, December 4, 2008
THE RECORD
BY ANDREW TANGEL
STAFF WRITER

The number of vacant stores along major corridors in North Jersey increased to 5.7 percent in November, from 3.6 percent earlier this year, according to a recent survey, another sign of the steep drop in consumer spending.

The vacancy rate along a 15-mile stretch of Route 17 experienced the most dramatic increase in North Jersey. In a survey of 141 properties, |R.J. Brunelli & Co., a real estate brokerage in Old Bridge, found a vacancy rate of 7.3 percent in November, up from 4.5 percent in the weeks following New Year’s 2007. It was the highest vacancy rate found in the ­survey for Route 17 since at least 1999.

The survey also found the vacancy rate along Route 4 was 10 percent, a 0.1 percent drop from early this year. The retail hub has been hard hit by closures of stores specializing in home furnishings, said Richard Brunelli, the firm’s president.

Increased retail vacancies are further evidence of a recession and do not bode well for the holiday shopping season, when consumer spending – which accounts for 70 percent of the American economy — is highest.

Brunelli expects vacancy rates to increase a percentage point early next year, as more stores go bankrupt because of sales shortfalls. Typically, he said, stores have filed for bankruptcy in January and vacated properties in February and March.

He said Routes 4 and 17 may be hit particularly hard because of their high concentration of stores selling home furnishings and decorations. Those stores, he predicted, will fold because of the downturn in the housing market.
“I hate to be the bearer of projected bad news, but I think Routes 4 and 17 may feel a disproportionate amount of pain that we’re going to feel in 2009,” he said.

While the increase in vacancies may be bad news for landlords and their mortgage lenders, they will likely be a boon to businesses that can afford to expand. An increased supply of space will likely push down already depressed rental rates. In February, the average rent for retail space at shopping centers in northern New Jersey was $21 to $22 a square foot, according to a report by NAI Global, a commercial real estate services firm. (The figure excludes malls and downtowns.)

“They’re going to make some great deals in the next six months,” he said. “Landlords are just caving in and making deals they never would have made before.”

North Jersey has fared better than central Jersey, according to Brunelli’s survey, and better than the national average. The vacancy rate for retail space in central Jersey ticked up to 6.6 percent in November, from 4.7 percent earlier this year. The survey does not include enclosed malls.

A national report in September by Marcus & Millichap, a real estate brokerage and investment firm based in California, said the average retail vacancy rate for 2008 nationwide is expected to be 11.1 percent.

Posted on Leave a comment

>I have long been a vocal advocate for religious freedom and protection of human rights around on the world.

>Dear Friends,

This week, I have the distinct honor of addressing a gathering of United Nations Ambassadors on human rights and religious freedom during the Interfaith Cooperation and the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity Conference.

As many of you know,I have long been a vocal advocate for religious freedom and protection of human rights around on the world. Simply talking about human rights is not enough; I believe the U.N. must show a stronger commitment to promoting basic human rights around the world. I have called for U.N. reform on many occasions, taking the following actions during the 110th Congress:

• Cosponsored H.R. 225, legislation to withhold United States funding from the U.N. Human Rights Council
• Cosponsored H.Res. 557, condemning the U.N. Human Rights Council
• Introduced H.R. 937, withholding funds from the U.N. Development Program
• Wrote a letter to U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon regarding support for U.N. reform
• Signed a letter to Secretary Rice regarding interface with the Taiwan U.N. referendum
• Cosponsored H.Res. 939, condemning Anti-Israel sentiment at the U.N.
• Introduced H.R. 5847, the Durban II Conference Funding Prohibition Act
• Cosponsored H.R. 2712, the U.N. Transparency, Accountability, and Reform Act

Today, President-Elect Obama announced his choice of Sen. Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice for the positions of Secretary of State and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. I hope that as the new U.S. administration assumes power in January that U.N. reform will be at the top of the agenda.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett
Member of Congress

Posted on Leave a comment

voters as being potentially dangerous?

>We couldn’t help but notice that he refers to voters as “strangers” and later, anyone entering the schools as “visitors.” Is there something here that betrays a view of voters as being potentially dangerous?

THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS
Superintendent’s Corner
November 2008
by
Daniel Fishbein, Ed.D.

The Superintendent’s Thanksgiving Proclamation
Garlic potatoes! Those two words sum up Thanksgiving for me. Year after year this one concern defines the holiday in our household: Who’s making the garlic potatoes this year? Who makes them the best? Who really makes them the best?
Thanksgiving! There’s nothing better than spending time at home with family and friends, or visiting others to share good cheer and food. The pressures associated with gifts and other holiday trappings are absent, leaving only simple worries, such as whether the garlic potatoes make it to the table. Thanksgiving is a holiday that is casual in dress, yet rich in conversation and spirituality. My Thanksgiving Day always begins with a traditional Turkey Day run with former high school track teammates. We may all be getting older, but we would never dare complain to each other about our aches and pains (that’s what families are for). Later we enjoy the three standard Thanksgiving football games: the Ridgewood High School game in the morning, our family game on the front lawn, and finally, the Dallas Cowboys on TV later in the day. (Yes, I did write the Dallas Cowboys!) This wonderful, long holiday weekend is an ongoing celebration of family, friends, food, and home — all the things that make us feel safe.

The Ridgewood Public Schools are our children’s “home away from home” each day of the school year, and this reassuring sense of place is sustained by district policies and procedures designed to make our buildings and facilities as secure and safe as possible. This fall our district has dealt with trespassers in two of our buildings, two precautionary evacuations due to the smell of gas at another, and concerns about strangers entering our schools to vote on Election Day. In each of these situations, good decisions were made in accordance with the high value we place on the safety of each and every child and employee. These instances also presented opportunities to test and fine-tune our district’s safety procedures. Election Day, in particular, provided a unique living history lesson for our students as they observed our neighbors at the voting booths. Every child had the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to witness both democracy in action and history being made as the country elected our first African-American president.
We want our buildings to be a welcoming place for our children and visitors alike. It is especially important that visitors – including parents and guardians – can enter our buildings and see the enormity of the education process and the excitement and wonder in learning that happens inside. Every day, dozens of times, we welcome visitors as part of the valuable partnership we have with the Ridgewood community.
To safeguard this partnership, parents, guardians, residents and all others are asked to respect and follow the district’s simple but safety-minded procedures when visiting our schools.

Everyone, except our students and school staff members, must be buzzed into the school buildings and report to the respective main offices to sign in and obtain visitors’ badges. We cannot achieve our safety goals without the assistance and support of everyone working in the district, as well as the community at large.
Our district has three important communication avenues in place to contact family members, guardians and caretakers in the unlikely event of a weather-related, or other safety-related, emergency during school hours. The first is our Swift911 system, which was established last year to facilitate rapid contact with parents and guardians about emergency situations, school closings, early dismissals or other important issues affecting our students. This system allows us to send personalized messages to a home phone, cell phone, work phone or e-mail, and to reach the entire Ridgewood Public Schools family within minutes. Parents and guardians should take time to make sure that emergency contact information is up to date. The Community Pass system is the venue for reviewing that data.

In addition to Swift911, any urgent communications will be posted on the home page of the district’s website, where links to the pages on Emergency Closings and the Emergency Response Plan can also be found. Finally, for those who haven’t already done so, please sign up for the free rps.eNews service, which provides up-to-date district news via e-mail. In the event of an emergency closing or other urgent situation, an e-mail bulletin will be sent to all subscribers. Links for subscribing to rps.eNews, editing emergency contact information using Community Pass, and reviewing the District Emergency Information pages can all be found on the home page of the RPS website at www.ridgdewood.k12.nj.us.

Finally, if you are a parent and hear rumors that concern you, please reach out to your child’s Principal. Borrowing from a post-9/11 radio ad: If you see something, say something.

As you celebrate Thanksgiving this year, I hope you find time to relax and enjoy the simple pleasures with family and friends. Whether it is garlic potatoes or some other favorite recipe, may it be sweet and delicious. I hope this Thanksgiving brings you all the hope and happiness that it brings me each and every year.

Posted on Leave a comment

>The result has been an absolute financial catastrophe for New Jersey.

>Just over five years ago, the New Jersey Supreme Court decided on two of the most important cases in the state’s fiscal history– Lonegan vs. State I 174 NJ 435 (2002) and Lonegan vs. State II 176 NJ 2 (2003).

A disappointing loss in Lonegan I allowed Republican Governor Whitman’s plan to borrow $8.6 billion without voter approval to construct schools in 28 urban districts as ordered by the Supreme Court in Abbot vs. Burke. The Supreme Court would not allow voters to reject something it had mandated, no matter how costly or destructive.

But the court claimed it was troubled by the method used to borrow money without voter approval as required by Article VIII of the NJ Constitution. A “shell entity,” also known as a straw man, the NJ Economic Development Authority, issued bonds to borrow the money—even though it had no income. Then the state made contracts to pay all obligations on those bonds with tax revenues for the next 30 years. The problem is that there is no guarantee that future payments will be made. These annual payments are subject to approval by the legislature and conceivably can be voted down. Most purchasers of this contract debt are not aware of this risk, but investment firms continue to sell these bonds as if they are risk free.

Supreme Court Justice Stein, writing in 2002, was alarmed that this gimmick had been used to borrow $10.8 billion, 75 percent of the state’s bonded debt, without voter approval. He urged the Court to agree with my assertion and end the practice.

But the Supreme Court delayed that part of the decision until after Justice Stein, clearly sympathetic to my case, had reached the mandatory retirement age, and was replaced by Justice Albin, appointed by Governor McGreevey.

In Lonegan II, the Supreme Court in a heart breaking 4-3 decision approved all state borrowing for any purpose without voter approval—as long as a shell entity did the borrowing without pledging the full faith and credit of the state. In essence, the State Supreme Court is complicit in what could be the largest consumer fraud scheme by any state in the country-selling bonds as if they have been approved by voters.

The result has been an absolute financial catastrophe for New Jersey. In his 2008 State of the State Address, Corzine blamed Supreme Court decisions for “the sharp deterioration of our State’s finances,” which included $32 billion in bonded debt, only $3 billion of which was approved by voters. I agree with the Governor’s statements. But Governor Corzine’s actions do not follow his words. Six months after criticizing New Jersey’s “credit card culture” that ignored our Constitution, Governor Corzine approved using the old gimmicks to borrow $3.9 billion more without voter approval.

There are other reasons to reconsider and overrule the previous Lonegan decisions. First, Lonegan II relied on bad history. It claimed that New Jersey’s 1844 Constitution, which first required voter approval of new state debt, was framed to prevent states from defaulting on debts backed by the “full faith and credit” of taxpayers.

However, many scholars today, like University of Maryland Professor of Economic History John Joseph Wallis, take a different view. They suggest that the 1844 framers wanted to end “systematic corruption” where politicians had too many opportunities to get bribes and political support by favoring some businesses at the expense of others. The framers of 1844 reduced those opportunities by requiring voter approval of new state debt. Other reforms in that 1844 Constitution time included uniform laws that took the politics out of forming new corporations and local governments.

Second, Lonegan II put way too much faith in Wall Street.

“(T)he state has responded to changes in the financial markets that reflect modern economic realities. .
yesterday’s speculation has become ‘sound and economical current business practice. . . “ Lonegan,
supra, 176 NJ at 14.

In his October 23, 2008 testimony to Congress, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan showed the framers of New Jersey’s Constitution to be far more reliable than today’s Wall Street “geniuses.”

“In recent decades, a vast risk management and pricing system has evolved, combining the best
insights of mathematicians and finance experts. . . The whole intellectual edifice, however, collapsed
in the summer of last year because the data inputted into the risk management models generally
covered only the past two decades, a period of euphoria. . .”

Finally, last November 4, 2008, New Jersey voters approved amendments to Article VIII of New Jersey’s Constitution which prohibits this type of borrowing without voter approval. But this case is far from moot. The Amendment only applies to future borrowing.

Also, the new Amendment has this troublesome language, which did not appear in the ballot question:

“No voter approval shall be required for. . . refinancing of all or a portion of any outstanding debts or
liabilities of. . . an autonomous public corporate entity…”

Does that mean the state can refinance NJ’s $29 billion of old “contract debt” with new debt backed by the full faith and credit of the state—without voter approval? Future litigation may be needed to decide that issue. But in the meantime, there are many reasons to reconsider and reverse Lonegan I and Lonegan II, and the future fiscal health of New Jersey will rest on this decision.

Steve Lonegan
State Director
Americans For Prosperity

Posted on Leave a comment

>Homes In Ridgewood Retain Higher Values Due To Train Service

>A route to higher home values
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Jennifer V. Hughes
THE RECORD

And, yes, it is an oncoming train.

But in this real estate market — more than any other — that’s a good thing.

Homes in towns with rail stations at their heart or nearby fare much better than those in any other market, said real estate guru Jeffrey Otteau, who has been analyzing New Jersey real estate for 30 years.

“It’s not enough to have a rail station,” Otteau said. “But it’s a really good start.”

In an October report, Otteau found that nine of the top 10 New Jersey housing markets either have a train station or are less than a mile away from a rail stop. In Bergen County, Midland Park and Ridgewood made the list.

That top designation was determined by how long it would take to sell out the homes currently on the market, Otteau said. Statewide, the figure is 13 months; in rail-friendly towns it ranges from two to five months.

Homes near train stations are also worth more. In a 2005 survey of towns in Essex, Union, Somerset and Morris counties, Otteau found that homes within walking distance of a rail station sold for 5 percent more than those houses where residents would have to drive to the station.

Those increased values were even more evident in a slow market. This year Otteau revisited that survey, in central New Jersey, and found that homes within walking distance had values 10 percent higher than their counterparts’. Otteau said the findings would “certainly” hold true for Bergen County rail towns.

“This is true in the northern half of New Jersey,” he said. “The closer you get to Manhattan, the greater the effect.”
Martin Robins, senior fellow at the Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center at Rutgers University, said if not for a shaky financial climate, transit-oriented development “would be a runaway market.”

One thing slowing things down is that people who might want to downsize into smaller homes or condos near transit can’t sell their current homes.

“People want to sell and move now but they can’t,” Robins said.

As for demand, Robins cited an example of a new condo development that opened up two years ago on the Raritan Valley line at Cranford. More than 1,300 applications were put in for 80 units.

The center also studied the Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Line, focusing on five stations in Hoboken, Jersey City and Bayonne. It found that the housing boom around those stations has added more than $5 billion in property value to the local tax base, said Jan Wells, an adjunct professor at the Rutgers center.

“For the most part, these were parking lots and brownfields,” said Wells. “You’re putting people there who will support your local businesses, buy new furniture, need groceries.”

There are also so-called Transit Villages, an official designation by the state Department of Transportation. There are 19 Transit Villages built or under construction statewide, including Rutherford, Morristown and Jersey City.

Transit Villages can apply for grants for landscaping, street lights, sidewalk projects and other improvements. In 2008 the DOT spent $1.2 million to fund a bikeway in Pleasantville and a river walk project in Belmar. The budget for 2009 is $2 million.

Transit hubs are thriving because of demographic changes, said Otteau. In the 1940s and 1950s, homebuyers moved westward from the city, creating suburbs bolstered by highway projects, cheap gas and an exodus of jobs from urban centers. Wealth and family size were on the rise, leading to a demand for larger homes.

Now, the two biggest demographic groups are baby boomers and Generation Y-ers — both of whom don’t have young children and crave walkable neighborhoods and transit into New York City.

In his surveys, Otteau has identified markets that have not hit yet, but could. These “investment” markets include several with rail stops, such as Hackensack and Glen Rock.

To encourage rail-friendly projects, towns need to rezone properties to welcome mixed-use development, Otteau said. Also, towns should reexamine whether it is a good idea to have ordinances that mandate a certain amount of parking in new developments. Today’s buyers in transit towns often have fewer cars and use them less often.

Additionally, Otteau said, planners need to realize children are not “toxic.” In the past, planners often shunned multi-unit developments because of a fear that they would attract families with children in numbers that would burden schools. But new demographics show families are having fewer children, or forgoing them altogether.
“What we need to understand is that all the old models don’t work in this new world,” he said.

In Wood-Ridge, construction is beginning on a $500 million project that will bring rental apartments, condos, shops, restaurants and an NJ Transit train station to the former site of Curtiss-Wright’s B-29 bomber factory.

The cost of the $37 million rail station on the Bergen County Line will be split by the developer, Somerset Development, and NJ Transit. It is expected to open in late 2010 or early 2011. The development, Westmont Station, is expected to have about 800 rental and condo units. Ralph Zucker, president of Somerset Development, said planning for the project began six years ago during a very different real estate market.

“We’ve definitely had some sleepless nights,” he said. Originally the company planned to open the project by offering condos. Now, rental apartments will come online first. Could the project have survived without the train station?

“I don’t think so,” Zucker said.

NJ Transit partnered with the developer to boost ridership, which is good for the agency and the state in the long run, said Jack Kanarek, NJ Transit’s senior director of project development.

Kanarek said a national study found that people who live in transit-oriented developments make 44 percent fewer car trips than in non-transit communities. That’s good for roadways and pocketbooks, he said.

Transit-oriented developments should also boom as the new trans-Hudson tunnel project progresses, said Kanarek.

Construction on the $8.7 billion project is expected to begin in 2009 and the tunnel will open in 2017. The rail tunnel is expected to double capacity from New Jersey to New York. It will also enable one-seat rides into Manhattan’s Penn Station on 10 of NJ Transit’s 11 commuter rail lines, including the Pascack Valley and Bergen County lines.

In addition, NJ Transit is considering providing passenger service on an existing freight rail line, offering nine stations from Hawthorne to Hackensack.

Towns with stations should act now to capitalize on demand for rail, Kanarek said.

“If towns plan for transit-oriented development, they can enhance their communities and bring not only a mix of uses but also more vibrancy to their community, because transit is such a permanent part,” he said.

So what does all of this mean for values and selling rates for homes that are not in transit-friendly towns? Otteau said prices there will rise more slowly in a good market and will fall faster in a bad one. His research found that the most expensive homes remained on the market the longest.

“It’s all about price,” said Rutgers’ Wells. “People may not get a price that reflects what they have in the house. You have to decide if you’re going to take the loss or sit there and make it more economic and efficient to get around in the suburban sprawl.”

Realtor Barry Colyer, of ReMax Traditions in Oakland said he thinks there will still always be some buyers who are not demanding homes near train stations. He estimates about 30 percent of his clients want transit as close as possible.

“Buyers who want train access will only look at places with train access,” he said. “If it’s on your list, it’s pretty high up there.”

Posted on Leave a comment

>Wildes: Ensuring stable health care for our region

>Wildes: Ensuring stable health care for our region
Friday, November 28, 2008
BY MICHAEL J. WILDES

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/35207629.html

To build a new facility at the site of the former Pascack Valley Hospital would be a mistake, one that could end up providing worse – not better – care for local residents.

AS MAYOR of Englewood, I strive continuously to ensure that my constituents receive quality services and care in all areas of life here in Bergen County. There is no area where quality is more important than in health care, and for the people of Englewood, having a hospital in our city provides a valuable facility for everyone in our community.

However, as a mayor with a hospital in my community, I can’t limit my concern to what it means to the people of Englewood. I have to look at what it means to the people who come from other parts of Bergen County. Englewood Hospital and Medical Center serves people from all over Bergen County and the financial strength of the hospital is critical to people in our neighboring towns and to Bergen County as a whole.

According to the January 2008 Final Report of the New Jersey Commission on Rationalizing Health Care Resources (also known as the Reinhardt Commission), New Jersey faces an oversupply of hospital beds, a problem that is particularly concentrated in the Hackensack-Ridgewood-Paterson area.

In part because of this oversupply, Pascack Valley Hospital suffered from low occupancy rates, filed for bankruptcy and ultimately closed in November 2007.

Upon Pascack Valley Hospital’s closing, all the hospitals in Bergen County experienced an increase in their respective occupancy rates. This increase confirmed that there had been too many acute care beds in Bergen County. But, more importantly, this change represents progress for the people in the region, as numerous studies, including one by Dr. Elliott Fisher at Dartmouth University, have shown that having an oversupply of acute care beds actually can have the effect of worsening health care.

A mistake

That’s why I believe that Hackensack University Medical Center and its for-profit Texas-based partner, Legacy Hospital Partners, should not be allowed to open a new acute care facility on the former Pascack Valley Hospital site in Westwood.

To open this facility would be a mistake, one that could end up providing worse – not better – care for local residents.

Make no mistake: Having more emergency facilities in the region is never harmful, and in this case would be a welcome addition to the region. It’s when you add the infrastructure of an acute care facility, complete with all of the administration, overhead and equipment required, that resources become redundant and health care quality can be compromised.

Recently, one of my colleagues asserted that the closing of Pascack Valley Hospital was a devastating financial loss to the town of Westwood, both in terms of commerce and jobs lost.

As a fellow mayor, I certainly understand the challenges that take place when a community faces a hospital closing. But I believe it is vital that we not exacerbate those negative effects by starting a new hospital. A new for-profit hospital in the region could destabilize the entire region’s health care system, and could cause additional hospitals to close. We’d be confronting the same issues that Westwood recently experienced, only in a different municipality.

With today’s economic conditions, we cannot afford instability; we must do everything to keep our hospitals, as well as our businesses, stable.

Additionally, the proposed facility is to be a for-profit hospital, and those types of institutions often do not have the interests of the community at heart. The non-profit hospitals in this region invest in the community and are not beholden to out-of-state investors.

Additionally, our local hospitals take all patients – including charity, Medicare and privately insured patients, which I feel is better for the community.

Replacing the old Pascack Valley Hospital with a similar institution runs counter to the Reinhardt report and could undo some of the benefits that the closing of Pascack Valley provided Bergen County’s residents.

Won’t benefit the people

The introduction of new hospital beds at a location where hospital beds were removed less than nine months ago does not seem to benefit the people of this region. There are seven full-service hospitals less than 15 miles from that site.

All the hospitals in Bergen County support the new emergency facility opened by Hackensack Medical Center at the Pascack Valley site. To add a full-service acute care hospital might be detrimental to the care of the region’s residents and could greatly diminish the continued operational effectiveness and quality of northern New Jersey’s hospitals.

The Reinhardt report should be given a chance to work, to show that the public policies in place are correct and that financially stable hospitals are good for all the people of Bergen County, not just Englewood.

Michael J. Wildes, mayor of Englewood, is an immigration attorney and has been an emergency medical technician for more than 15 years.

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/35207629.html

Posted on Leave a comment

The Great Thanksgiving Hoax

>Daily Article by Richard J. Maybury Posted on 11/20/1999

Each year at this time school children all over America are taught the official Thanksgiving story, and newspapers, radio, TV, and magazines devote vast amounts of time and space to it. It is all very colorful and fascinating.

It is also very deceiving. This official story is nothing like what really happened. It is a fairy tale, a whitewashed and sanitized collection of half-truths which divert attention away from Thanksgiving’s real meaning.

The official story has the pilgrims boarding the Mayflower, coming to America and establishing the Plymouth colony in the winter of 1620-21. This first winter is hard, and half the colonists die. But the survivors are hard working and tenacious, and they learn new farming techniques from the Indians. The harvest of 1621 is bountiful. The Pilgrims hold a celebration, and give thanks to God. They are grateful for the wonderful new abundant land He has given them.

The official story then has the Pilgrims living more or less happily ever after, each year repeating the first Thanksgiving. Other early colonies also have hard times at first, but they soon prosper and adopt the annual tradition of giving thanks for this prosperous new land called America.

The problem with this official story is that the harvest of 1621 was not bountiful, nor were the colonists hardworking or tenacious. 1621 was a famine year and many of the colonists were lazy thieves.

In his ‘History of Plymouth Plantation,’ the governor of the colony, William Bradford, reported that the colonists went hungry for years, because they refused to work in the fields. They preferred instead to steal food. He says the colony was riddled with “corruption,” and with “confusion and discontent.” The crops were small because “much was stolen both by night and day, before it became scarce eatable.”

In the harvest feasts of 1621 and 1622, “all had their hungry bellies filled,” but only briefly. The prevailing condition during those years was not the abundance the official story claims, it was famine and death. The first “Thanksgiving” was not so much a celebration as it was the last meal of condemned men.

But in subsequent years something changes. The harvest of 1623 was different. Suddenly, “instead of famine now God gave them plenty,” Bradford wrote, “and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God.” Thereafter, he wrote, “any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day.” In fact, in 1624, so much food was produced that the colonists were able to begin exporting corn.

What happened?

After the poor harvest of 1622, writes Bradford, “they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop.” They began to question their form of economic organization.

This had required that “all profits & benefits that are got by trade, working, fishing, or any other means” were to be placed in the common stock of the colony, and that, “all such persons as are of this colony, are to have their meat, drink, apparel, and all provisions out of the common stock.” A person was to put into the common stock all he could, and take out only what he needed.

This “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” was an early form of socialism, and it is why the Pilgrims were starving. Bradford writes that “young men that are most able and fit for labor and service” complained about being forced to “spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children.” Also, “the strong, or man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes, than he that was weak.” So the young and strong refused to work and the total amount of food produced was never adequate.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.

Many early groups of colonists set up socialist states, all with the same terrible results. At Jamestown, established in 1607, out of every shipload of settlers that arrived, less than half would survive their first twelve months in America. Most of the work was being done by only one-fifth of the men, the other four-fifths choosing to be parasites. In the winter of 1609-10, called “The Starving Time,” the population fell from five-hundred to sixty.

Then the Jamestown colony was converted to a free market, and the results were every bit as dramatic as those at Plymouth. In 1614, Colony Secretary Ralph Hamor wrote that after the switch there was “plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth procure.” He said that when the socialist system had prevailed, “we reaped not so much corn from the labors of thirty men as three men have done for themselves now.”

Before these free markets were established, the colonists had nothing for which to be thankful. They were in the same situation as Ethiopians are today, and for the same reasons. But after free markets were established, the resulting abundance was so dramatic that the annual Thanksgiving celebrations became common throughout the colonies, and in 1863, Thanksgiving became a national holiday.

Thus the real reason for Thanksgiving, deleted from the official story, is: Socialism does not work; the one and only source of abundance is free markets, and we thank God we live in a country where we can have them.

* * * * *
Mr. Maybury writes on investments.

This article originally appeared in The Free Market, November 1985.

https://mises.org/story/336

Posted on Leave a comment

>Pension chief vows to map investments

>Amid legislators’ flak over losses, director promises transparency

https://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-12/1227591370311770.xml&coll=1

Tuesday, November 25, 2008
BY CLAIRE HEININGER
Star-Ledger Staff

Under fire from lawmakers who criticized their actions as too secretive, managers of New Jersey’s pension fund will now disclose any emergency investments immediately, even if they fall below the $50 million threshold for public review, officials said yesterday.

The change comes after three such deals were not revealed in October, sparking frustration at the Statehouse as the financial crisis focused a bigger spotlight on the embattled pension fund.

During wide-ranging testimony that also touched on an ill-fated Lehman Brothers investment, state pension director William Clark told the Senate Budget Committee he would increase transparency on future deals.

Clark said he and his staff will still be able to make such investments without prior review by the state investment council — which is required for investments of more than $50 million — but will make them public right away on the state website, rather than waiting for the next monthly council meeting.

He also defended the state’s controversial strategy of alternative investments, which allows the pension fund to buy into hedge funds, private equity and real estate as well as stocks and bonds. The pension system covers 700,000 public workers and teachers.

The strategy came under fire at the hearing.

“I believe firmly that the alternative investment program has gone too far, too fast,” said Jim Marketti, who represents the AFL-CIO on the investment council.

The pension fund, which started the year worth $81.3 billion, has lost $23 billion in value amid the markets’ collapse.

But Clark said that without the alternative investments, the fund could have lost about $2 billion more. He said hedge funds are down 20 percent this fiscal year, compared to 37 percent for the U.S. stock market.

“We’re not making the argument that hedge funds are no risk, we’re making the argument they’re lower risk,” Clark said.

Last month, the state put $49.5 million apiece into three hedge funds: Canyon Special Opportunities Fund, GoldenTree Credit Opportunities Fund and the BlackRock Inc.-managed Credit Investors Co-Investment Fund. The state initially invested in the funds in September 2007, with $100 million for each. He said they needed the new infusions quickly to protect New Jersey’s existing investments, and to create the potential for lucrative returns.

“There was no attempt to hide anything here,” he said.

But prominent lawmakers, including Senate President Richard Codey (D-Essex), said the $49.5 million figure sent up a red flag.

“On its face, the infusion of capital just below the threshold amount raises the specter of an opaque, secretive process,” said committee chairwoman Barbara Buono.

Afterward, Buono (D-Middlesex) said she needed time to evaluate the step announced by Clark before deciding whether the new disclosure goes far enough.

“I believe that we have to give the division enough discretion to be able to do their job effectively, but you have to balance it against the need for transparency,” she said.

Republicans on the panel zeroed in on the state’s June investment in Lehman Brothers, the bank that has since filed for bankruptcy. New Jersey lost $115.5 million on a $180 million Lehman stake in less than four months.

Sens. Steven Oroho (R-Sussex) and Kevin O’Toole (R-Essex) asked whether there was a conflict of interest, since two members of the investment council were Lehman employees and one member was a former Lehman employee at the time of the investment.

Clark said the division made the decision to invest in Lehman without council input and there was no conflict. He said the state will soon decide on whether to sue Lehman officials to recoup some of its losses. “Obviously, I wish we had that one back,” he said.

Gov. Jon Corzine said he believes the pension investments “were made entirely on merit” and not personal relationships.

Staff writer Tom Hester contributed to this report.

https://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-12/1227591370311770.xml&coll=1

Posted on Leave a comment

>Village Council Directs Village Manager and Village Attorney to Investigate Legality of Recent Cablevision Decision

>The Ridgewood Village Council recently directed Village Manager James Ten Hoeve and Village Attorney Matthew S. Rogers to investigate the legality of Cablevision’s recent decision that requires their subscribers to obtain, and in some cases pay for, digital cable boxes to receive public access channels (including Channel 77, where Village Council and Board of Education meetings are broadcast).

Here’s what officials in Yonkers, NY have to say about Cablevision’s actions:

September 26, 2008

Mayor Blasts Cablevision for Limiting Public Access Channels

Yonkers Suggests Cablevision May Have Violated Federal Law in Placing on Availability Restrictions on Public, Education and Government Access Channels

City May Seek Injunction Against Cablevision to Protect Residents’ Rights

YONKERS, NY — Mayor Phil Amicone is blasting Cablevision for moving unilaterally earlier this month to limit the availability of public, education and government access channels to many of its subscribers in the City of Yonkers, and is now threatening legal action if the company does not immediately remove those limits.

Public, education and government access channels, or PEG channels, are public amenities provided for by franchise agreements between cable companies and municipalities like Yonkers. It is standard in those agreements for the franchisee, in this case Cablevision, to provide those channels free of charge to all subscribers including those on its most basic cable service package.

However, on September 16, 2008, Cablevision began requiring its customers to obtain, and in some cases pay, for digital cable boxes in order to receive PEG channels, a move Yonkers believes is in violation of federal law.

“Access to PEG channels has always been a basic right of the cable-viewing public and should continue to stay that way. We believe that what Cablevision has done in limiting access to and in some cases charging its subscribers additional fees for these channels is not only wrong, it may in fact be a violation of federal law. I have directed our Corporation Counsel to notify Cablevision of our intent to use any and all legal means available in order to ensure that the public’s access to these important informational channels will continue unfettered,” Mayor Amicone said.

Amicone said that although Cablevision has a limited offer of one free digital cable box for its analog customers (those without digital boxes), the move effectively limits access to PEG channels in several ways:

1) The free digital box offer lasts only 60 days;

2) Only one digital box is included in the offer, limiting PEG channel availability to one TV set per household; and

3) Cablevision may begin pushing hidden charges once digital boxes are installed.

The mayor said that even more troubling was the fact that Cablevision’s began imposing these limits unilaterally and without approval from the City of Yonkers, the NYS Public Service Commission or the Federal Communications Commission.

The issue is an important one since PEG channels offer informational programming about the public school system and city government, allow officials to communicate with their constituency, televise important public meetings and provide the public at large with an opportunity to disseminate information over cable airwaves.

The city notified Cablevision of its demand to immediately remove the new limits in a letter dated today. The letter cites specific requirements provided by federal law requiring cable companies to provide PEG access to subscribers without restriction and free of charge, and warns the company of the city’s intent to pursue legal remedies if the limits are not removed.

A copy of the letter is below:

Cablevision maintains in an August 12, 2008 letter to the city that it would only affect a small number of customers and that the move was part of an ongoing effort to improve service through the ongoing transition to digital technology.

But with more than 40,000 subscribers in City of Yonkers, even the approximately 10% of its subscribers who Cablevision estimates are affected by the new restrictions still amounts to thousands of customers.

Mayor Amicone also acknowledged that technology upgrades are a normal part of doing business for service companies like Cablevision and expressed his support for Cablevision’s efforts to augment service quality.

“We understand that technology upgrades are a necessary and even a welcomed part of doing business. But we can’t allow ordinary customers who have been loyal for years and have paid their bills on time to be left behind at the whim of a corporation. Safeguards must exist for the average consumer, and in this case city government as administrator of the franchise agreement is that safeguard. We will therefore do everything within our power to make sure Cablevision provides PEG access to all its customers free of charge,” Amicone concluded.

Below is a copy of the city’s letter to Cablevision…

September 26, 2008

Mark Weingarten, Esq.
DelBello, Donnellan, Weingarten, Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP
1 North Lexington Avenue
White Plains, New York 10601

Robert Hoch, Director, Government Affairs
Cablevision
Six Executive Plaza
Yonkers, NY 10701

RE: City of Yonkers Objection to Cablevision Transition of PEG Channels to Digital Tier of Programming

Dear Mr. Weingarten and Mr. Hoch:

Cablevision Systems, Westchester Corporation (“Cablevision”) informed the City of Yonkers, New York (“City”) on August 12, 2008, that it intends to shift all public, educational and government channels (“PEG”) to digital transmission, thereby effectively creating a second basic tier of service. This action will require City residents to acquire set-top boxes in order to access City programming. Cablevision created this second basic tier on September 16, 2008, and did so without the permission of the City. Cablevision’s unilateral action is in violation of federal law and is a material breach of the existing franchise between the City and Cablevision entered into on December 17, 1985 (“Franchise Agreement”). Accordingly, the City objects to Cablevision’s action and demands that it reinstate transmission of PEG channels to a single basic tier of service available to all subscribers in the City of Yonkers without need for a set-top box.

The Franchise Agreement requires Cablevision to “comply with all laws, rules and regulations of the local, state and federal governments and their regulatory agencies or commissions which are now or may hereafter be applicable to the construction and operation authorized herein.” (Section 6). In addition, the Franchise Agreement requires that Cablevision’s provision of PEG channels is “[s]ubject to the applicable Rules and Regulations of the FCC and Commission” (Section 15).

The FCC requires cable providers to provide PEG channels on a single basic service tier. See In the Matter of the Section of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd 5631, 5644 (1993) (1992 Cable Act contemplates that each cable operator must offer only one basic tier); Time Warner v. FCC, 56 F.3d 151, 199 (D.C. Cir. 1995) (finding single basic tier requirement consistent with statute). Further, a basic tier is presumed to be in analog, unless the cable system is fully digital. In the Matter of Implementation of Section 3 of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, 20 FCC Rcd 2718, 2720 (2005). Cablevision’s division of its Broadcast Basic tier into channels that do, and do not, require a digital converter box creates a dual basic tier in violation of law. Further, the dual tier evidences that Cablevision is not operating a fully digital system at this time.

In addition, Cablevision may not place PEG channels on what is effectively a higher level of basic service without the City’s explicit permission, which has not been provided. See 47 U.S.C. § 543(a)(7); In the Matter of the Section of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 Rate Regulation, 8 FCC Rcd at 5737-38 (cable provider required “to carry PEG channels on the basic tier unless the franchising authority explicitly permits carriage on another tier” ).

Cablevision’s shift of its transmission of PEG channels to a second basic tier, without the City’s explicit consent, is in violation of federal law and is a material breach of the Franchise Agreement. Therefore, the City demands that Cablevision revert its transmission of the PEG channels to a single, non- digital basic service tier no later than 5:00 p.m. on October 10, 2008, and to inform this office immediately upon taking this action. If Cablevision fails to take the demanded action, the City intends to enforce its rights in an appropriate forum.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely, Frank J. Rubino

cc: Mayor Philip A. Amicone
Deputy Mayor William Regan
Chief of Staff Lisa Mrijaj
City Council President Chuck Lesnick
Majority Leader Sandy Annabi
Minority Leader Liam McLaughlin
Council Member Patricia McDow
Council Member Joan Gronowski
Council Member John Murtagh
Council Member Dee Barbato
Mark Blanchard, Deputy Corporation Counsel
William Derasmo, Troutman Sanders, Special Counsel
Honorable Jaclyn Brilling, Secretary, NYS Public Service Commission

SOURCE: Press Release

Posted on Leave a comment

>Budget worries lead to rifts at League of Municipalities convention

>https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/budget_worries_lead_to_rifts_a.html

Posted by cjrothma November 19, 2008 16:54PM

Frustration over tough budget times spilled over today at the normally placid League of Municipalities Convention in Atlantic City, where a critic of Gov. Jon Corzine provoked a testy exchange with members of the Cabinet.

Former Glen Ridge Mayor Carl Bergmanson, who waged an unsuccessful effort to recall Corzine from office earlier this year, drew cheers from attendees at a mayors’ luncheon when he used an expletive to say the administration was punishing small towns by blaming them for high property taxes.

State Treasurer David Rousseau and Community Affairs Commissioner Joseph Doria called the criticism unfair and insisted they are doing their best to cut costs in a bleak economy.

That left league officials to play referee, with the president, East Orange Mayor Robert Bowser, cutting off the back-and-forth to boos from the crowd.

William Dressel, the league’s executive director, spent the moments before the lunch disposing of anti-Corzine bumper stickers that appeared beneath the mayors’ sandwiches and potato chips.

The unrest came during a stressful time for state and local officials, who are struggling to predict the New Jersey consequences of the economic downturn. Last week, Corzine and Rousseau announced the state faces a $1.2 billion shortfall in its current budget and a hole of $5 billion for the next fiscal year.

As Rousseau combs the budget line-by-line for savings, local officials said they are concerned about the impact on municipal aid and their own finances.

“There’s considerable frustration and anxiety,” Dressel said. But, he said, “it’s too early to start casting rocks and name-calling and passing out degrading slogans…We’re all in this boat together.”

https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/budget_worries_lead_to_rifts_a.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Town debt to be deferred under a plan of Corzine’s

>Thursday, November 20, 2008
BY CLAIRE HEININGER
Star-Ledger Staff

https://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-12/122715830525100.xml&coll=1

In a move aimed at avoiding big property tax increases during the economic downturn, Gov. Jon Corzine today will offer municipalities a half-billion-dollar break on their payments into the state pension system, an administration official said last night.

Local governments would be able to defer half the amount they are scheduled to submit in April and pay it back gradually over the next three years, under the plan Corzine will present at the state League of Municipalities Convention today in Atlantic City. The proposal would require approval by the Legislature.

Corzine also will stress that towns should consider consolidation and sharing services to cut costs, according to a senior administration official familiar with his plan. The official spoke anonymously last night to avoid upstaging Corzine in advance of his speech to the annual gathering of local officials.

In recent weeks, municipal officials aired their concerns that skyrocketing local pension obligations would force them to break the state’s 4 percent cap on annual property tax increases to balance their budgets.

Local governments and counties are scheduled to pay about $1.1 billion into the pension system in April, according to information the state recently provided to the Transportation Trust Fund’s prospective bond-holders. Corzine’s proposal would allow the towns to defer at least half that amount.

William Dressel, executive director of the state League of Municipalities, said he had not heard full details of Corzine’s proposal and would need to see specifics before judging how much it will help. But he said municipalities will be in deep trouble without some boost.

“There’s not a lot of options out there,” Dressel said. “Clearly if we don’t get some kind of relief, that would be catastrophic for local budgets.”

Dressel testified last week before a state finance board that the property tax cap should be raised to make room for the rising bills of police and firefighter pensions. Instead, the governor plans to tell towns to stay within the 4 percent limit now that the pension payments can be partially deferred.

‘STRONG RESERVATIONS’

Anthony Wieners, president of the New Jersey State Policemen’s Benevolent Association, said his organization has “strong reservations about any deferment of the obligations to the police and firefighters of New Jersey.”

Deferring pension payments does have a long-term cost, because the bills must be paid eventually. The local governments’ pension funds currently have $9 billion less than actuaries say they need to meet their long-term cost, and postponing part of April’s payments would add to that debt.

Corzine’s speech was foreshadowed earlier yesterday at the league convention, when a mayor speaking at a luncheon asked members of the governor’s cabinet whether the local pension contributions could be phased in to lighten the financial load. The officials demurred, saying they’d talk it over with Corzine.

Frustration over the tough budget times spilled over at the normally placid convention when a Corzine critic provoked a testy exchange with the cabinet members.

Former Glen Ridge mayor Carl Bergmanson, who waged an effort earlier this year to recall Corzine from office, drew cheers at the mayors’ luncheon when he used an expletive to say the administration was punishing small towns by blaming them for high property taxes.

State Treasurer David Rousseau and Community Affairs commissioner Joseph Doria called the criticism unfair and insisted they are doing their best to cut costs in a bleak economy.

That left League of Municipalities officials to play referee, with the president, East Orange Mayor Robert Bowser, cutting off the back-and-forth to boos from the crowd.

Dressel also spent the moments before the lunch disposing of anti-Corzine bumper stickers that showed up underneath the mayors’ sandwiches and potato chips.

Last week, Corzine and Rousseau announced the state faces a $1.2 billion shortfall in its current budget and a hole of $5 billion for the next fiscal year. As Rousseau combs the budget, line by line, for savings, local officials said they are concerned about the impact on municipal aid and their own finances.

“There’s considerable frustration and anxiety,” Dressel said. But, he said, “it’s too early to start casting rocks and name-calling and passing out degrading slogans. … We’re all in this boat together.”

Staff writers Dunstan McNichol and Josh Margolin contributed to this report.

https://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-12/122715830525100.xml&coll=1

Posted on Leave a comment

>Court rejects Corzine’s bid to end N.J. schools case

>Posted by pcox November 18, 2008 15:46PM

https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/njs_top_court_rejects_corzine.html

The state Supreme Court today rejected Gov. Jon Corzine’s request to pull the plug on the long-running Abbott v. Burke court case, a case that has forced a succession of governors to steer billions of dollars in special state aid to Newark, Camden and 29 other needy communities.

Instead of closing the case, the court opted to set up a special set of hearings where Corzine will be given the chance to prove to a “special master” whether his new formula for distributing $7.8 billion in state school aid eliminates the need for the special consideration the court has demanded for the so-called “Abbott” communities. The court named Superior Court Judge Peter Doyne as the Special Master.

The text of the opinion is available online.

Tony Kurdzuk/The Star-Ledger Supreme Court Justice Jaynee LaVecchia during arguments in the Abbott v. Burke case at the Hughes Justice Complex in September.
“Until the State demonstrates to our satisfaction that a constitutionally adequate education can be provided to Abbott district students through the funding that will be provided via SFRA (the school funding formula), the State is bound to comply with the prior remedial orders and decisions respecting the plaintiffs in Abbott districts,” the court said in its 5-0 opinion.

The court declared the level of funding included in the current state budget for the Abbott communities to be adequate. However the court required that Abbott communities who feel they need additional funds for supplemental services must be given the chance to apply for them.

The court ordered that hearings before the special master, who will be appointed by the court, be expedited and that they be limited to the question of whether Corzine’s funding for Abbott communities and special needs students are adequate.

https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/11/njs_top_court_rejects_corzine.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Police Charge Local Minister In Sunday Evening Pedestrian Accident

>Car grazes stroller; motorist cited

By Tom Davis

THE RECORD

Monday, November 17

RIDGEWOOD – A 61-year-old woman was charged Sunday with failing to stop at a crosswalk after her car grazed a stroller carrying a 1-year-old girl, police said.

The girl, Maria Semenchenko, and her mother, Irena, both of Ridgewood, were not injured in the incident, which occurred around 5 p.m. at Godwin Avenue and Sherman Place, police said.

Elizabeth Searle of New York was driving through the intersection when she skimmed the front end of the stroller as Irena Semenchenko was pushing it across Godwin Avenue.

Police said they responded to the scene but no one required medical attention.

**********

More information from The Fly: Elizabeth Searle is the Rector of Christ Episcopal Church, located at 105 Cottage Place in Ridgewood. Reverend Searle has resided in a Church owned home on South Pleasant Avenue for at least the past 2 years. The Fly fails to understand why the Rector told police that she lives in New York, although her personal automobile still has New York State license plates affixed. Isn’t it a violation of NJ State motor vehicle laws to live in NJ, but yet maintain that you officially reside in another state, and not change your driver’s license and registration?

Posted on Leave a comment

>Hospitals fight plan for N.J. center

>https://www.lohud.com/article/2008811160377

Jane Lerner
The Journal News

WESTWOOD, N.J. – Leaders of both of Rockland’s acute-care hospitals are opposing a plan for a new for-profit facility just over the county line in Bergen County, N.J., where Pascack Valley Hospital operated until it went bankrupt a year ago.

Both David Freed, chief of Nyack Hospital, and Michael Schnieders, executive vice president of Good Samaritan Hospital in Suffern, have written to New Jersey officials urging them not to approve a plan by Hackensack University Medical Center and a private Texas company to open a new, for-profit hospital at the Pascack location.

Both maintain that a new, 128-bed hospital just miles from the Rockland border is unnecessary and will make it harder for the Rockland hospitals and other area facilities to provide care in an increasingly difficult and competitive financial environment.

“I strongly believe that patients are not well served by opening a new hospital in Westwood,” Freed wrote in his letter to the New Jersey health commissioner. “It will only exacerbate the regional oversupply of hospitals and hospital beds and, in turn, negatively affect the quality of health care delivery throughout Bergen and Rockland counties.”

In its plan submitted to New Jersey regulators, Hackensack denies that its plans for a new hospital will have an impact on other hospitals competing for the same patients.

The new hospital, “will serve the 14 communities immediately surrounding the hospital, while at the same time ensuring that there will be no negative impact on other existing hospitals in Bergen County,” Hackensack wrote in its application to the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services.

Hackensack said that its joint venture with Legacy Hospital Partners of Plano, Texas, will enable the new hospital to be run without any public funding.

In documents, Hackensack said it will be able to make a financial success of the proposed hospital and maintains that the old Pascack Valley Hospital went out of business because of poor management and overexpansion.

The proposal does not mention the effect on Rockland.

Before it declared bankruptcy and closed a year ago, Pascack Valley Hospital was a popular choice for Rockland residents – especially people living in the southern part of the county.

During its last full year of operation, the hospital treated 1,100 New Yorkers, most of them from Rockland.

Haverstraw resident Sonia Serrano was one of them.

She gave birth to her daughter in Pascack’s obstetrical department last year.

“I’d love to see that hospital reopen,” she said. “It was a great place – so convenient. I’d go there again.”

But Rockland hospital officials want to keep patients like her at the county’s two hospitals. They maintain that they are more than able to do that.

Schnieders told New Jersey officials that in the year since Pascack Valley closed, Good Samaritan Hospital in Suffern had treated many patients who once used the Bergen County hospital and hoped to continue to do so.

“With our occupancy rate of 81 percent, we look forward to continuing to serve patients from Pascack communities for years to come,” Schnieders wrote.

Both Freed and Schnieders pointed out that separate studies done in both New York and New Jersey have shown that there are too many hospital beds, which makes it harder for all hospitals to have enough patients to make enough money to survive.

New Jersey hospitals are also fighting the proposal. Two of them, Englewood Medical Center and Valley Hospital in Ridgewood, have hired a public relations firm to launch a campaign against the proposal.

Both New Jersey hospitals are in the midst of expanding their services. Englewood is building a new emergency department and Valley Hospital is trying to expand its campus and replace two of its buildings.

But Anthony S. Cicatiello, who was hired by the two hospitals to fight the Hackensack proposal, said expanding services is not the same as opening a new hospital.

“The market has already determined that there was no need for Pascack Valley Hospital,” he said. “Other hospitals, including the ones in Rockland, stepped in to take those patients.”

Adding a new 128-bed hospital to the region goes against the recommendations of both New York and New Jersey regulators, who have called for fewer hospital beds, he said.

But other people wonder why the hospitals are fighting the new proposal so strongly.

“Why are they so afraid of a little competition?” asked Tomkins Cove resident Jay Hirsch. “Competition is good for the patients – it gives us more of a choice.”

It is unclear how much of an effect the new hospital would have on Rockland.

Hackensack Medical Center last month opened an emergency room in the old Pascack building, which it bought at a bankruptcy auction.

Ray Florida, head of Rockland Paramedic Services, which provides paramedic services for the entire county, said he had heard that Pascack Valley’s emergency room was open again.

“But we never received any kind of formal notification,” Florida said.

In the past month, no Rockland residents served by paramedics have asked to be taken to the Pascack ER, he said.

“No one’s asking about it,” he said. “It doesn’t seem to be having much of an impact at all.”

Posted on Leave a comment

>NEW PARKING COMMITTEE TO BE FORMED – Submit Letter of Interest by Nov. 25

>The Ridgewood Village Council is looking for people to serve on a Parking Committee, with a membership from the following groups: commuters; property owners; tenants, and employees in the Central Business District; as well as shoppers and those who frequent the restaurants in the Village of Ridgewood.

All persons wishing to be involved with the Parking Committee should submit a letter of interest, indicating which group listed above they represent, no later than November 25, 2008 to: Mayor David Pfund, Village of Ridgewood, 131 North Maple Avenue, Ridgewood, NJ 07451

Examples of topics to be covered are: Rate Changes and Redesign; Multi-Space Meters; Long-Term Parking; Stacked & Attended Parking; Public & Private Parterships; Permit Parking; Hours of Meter Operations; Easy Park Devices; Parking Garage or Decks; Financial Stability of the Parking Utility; Way-Finding Signage.