Posted on

>Village Seeks to Limit Its Liability for Homeowners’ Damages Related to Sewer Main Backups

Got Sewer Main Backups? Citing its desire to stop paying out huge claims related to Village maintained sewer trunk failures that in the past caused extensive damage to private residences, on December 13, Village Council members voted unanimously to introduce Ordinance #3036, which would establish a new section under Village Code Article XI entitled: “Damage Claims for Backup of Sewage on Certain Properties.”

If approved, following its scheduled Public Hearing on January, 17, Ordinance #3036 would:

1) Exclude from recognition any claim made by a homeowner who did not have an “accepted” backflow prevention device installed on his/her private sewer line (running from house to connection with Village maintained sewer trunk).

2) Limit claims to individual owners of single family, two family or three family homes who make such premises their primary residence, and who own such premises in their own individual name or names, and from whose insurance coverage the claim is either fully or partially excluded.

3) Any claim partially covered by private insurance would be excluded from coverage to the extent of such private insurance coverage.

4) The Village will compensate a qualifying claim only as follows: cost of removal of sanitary sewerage and of cleaning and sanitizing premises, fixtures and salvageable personal items – 100% to a limit of $1,500.00; the cost of repair to or replacement of damaged structure, fixtures or personal items – 100% to a limit of $2,500.00. Total = $3,500.

5) Any covered persons must notify the Water Pollution Control Facility immediately upon discovery of any backups into the residential structure.

6) Claims must be filed within 5 days of the discovery of damages.

It is rumored that the Village recently paid out several claims in excess of $25,000. It is also rumored that the Village’s sewer system infrastructure, excepting the Waste Water Treatment Plant in Glen Rock, is rapidly decaying; major portions of the subterranean system were constructed in the 1920’s and 1930’s.

5 thoughts on “>Village Seeks to Limit Its Liability for Homeowners’ Damages Related to Sewer Main Backups

  1. >So where has the tax money earmarked for upkeep of the Village’s sewer system been going all these years? What a riot; they can’t take care of the pipes, so now they’re going to transfer liability to homeowners. What balls! How many people are going to wind up having their homeowners’ insurance policies cancelled as a result of a huge claim? Only in Ridgewood . . .

    And if there were several claims filed in excess of $25K, what makes them think that $3500 is going to be sufficient? Pfund is nuts if he supports this.

  2. >This ordinance will go down in flames the moment some smart lawyer gets involved.

  3. >I heard that installation of a backflow prevention device could cost up to $5k. Is this true? If so, why on earth would I spend $5k only to collect a maximum of $3500?

  4. >well lets talk about the plant.shall we we have a big problem with a real with,??????

  5. >o,boy o,boy,o,boy.hum.?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *