November 1,2015
the staff of the Ridgewood
Ridgewood Nj, Is the latest controversy over the so called Historic Preservation Commission Endorsement letter of the downtown parking garage enough to derail the entire project ?
“Any endorsement from the Village of Ridgewood Historic Preservation Commission will have great influence on Village residents. Hence, to ensure its integrity, such a letter must be held to the highest standard of accuracy. Mr. Parrillo’s 10/23 letter is not reflective of any discussion amongst HPC members during the October 2015 meeting. The October 8 meeting was merely a courtesy review. Members reflected on the appropriateness of the structure in the Historic Central Business District. Discussion topics included size, height, mass, cantilevers, sconces, arches, parapets and more. At no time was there any talk of “approval” nor was there any discussion about encouraging residents to vote “yes” on November 3. It never happened. Mr. Parrillo certainly could have composed a letter reflecting his own views. I wish he had chosen to do so.” Councilwomen Susan Knudsen.
“I believe that it is highly inappropriate for any elected official to so openly and blatantly work so diligently to promote a project that they themselves have arranged to be voted on in a public election. We need to carefully consider the information available and show the public that their input matters. Promoting a yes vote shows residents that your mind is made up regardless of available information or opinions reducing the referendum to a sham.
To your point on the Historic Preservation Commission’s endorsement letter, it is unfortunate that that committee’s integrity has been compromised, and it has basically been reduced to the council majority’s sounding board. With all of the other parking propaganda floating around the chair of that committee should have just wrote a letter supporting the project as a resident without dragging the HPC into all of this noise. ” Councilmen Michael Sedon
And the insanity continues . . .
The 3 Amigos are pushing this because someone stands to make a lot of money (FOLLOW THE MONEY). The big question is who exactly will gain the most financially from this project?
Can be an exchange of favors, not always actual dollars.
Suddenly it is not about the garage in the Walker report. Where did people get the idea that the garage on the poster board was what they wanted? The mayor wants us to approve “A” garage. We should trust him and his friends to do the right thing.
And he wants us to believe that even though they do not exactly know how big the garage will be it will absolutely make money. For that we should refer to the Walker report, just skip the part that talks about size. Ignore that part, just read the part that says it will make money.
They are desperate and not to be trusted. If we vote “yes” they will build the biggest garage they can. And they will throw it back in our faces and say that it was the will of the electorate.
VOTE NO!
Instead of investigating who made the anti-garage flyer he should investigate the anonymous person who contacted Mike Sedon’s employer about his run for council. How is that investigation going?