Posted on Leave a comment

>Ridgewood’s very own “Brooklyn’s Brick Oven Pizzeria” rated best pizza in Bergen County in Bergen Health & Life Magazine’s October issue.

>WE ARE SHOCKED TO READ THIS OUR EXPERIENCE WITH BROOKLYN PIZZA HAS BEEN LESS THAN SATISFACTORY ! THE SERVICE WAS POOR THE MUSIC WAS LOUD AND AWFULL AND THE PIZZA WAS SO SO AT BEST SO WAS IT A BAD DAY OR ? AND YES OUR EXPERIENCE WAS THAT BAD …

In this town with all the great pizza places the Ridgewood blog wants to know what you think ?

from the blog :https://ridgewoodfrontporch.com/2008/09/27/brooklyns-brick-oven-pizzeria-in-ridgewood-nj-named-best-pizza-in-bergen-county/#comment-327

brooklyns pizza small1

Ridgewood’s very own “Brooklyn’s Brick Oven Pizzeria” rated best pizza in Bergen County in Bergen Health & Life Magazine’s October issue.

For once, a review I can agree with. My family gets take out from Brooklyn’s Pizza in Ridgewood all the time. They have a great menu and the pizza and fresh toppings are excellent. They also make a great garlic bread that actually comes in the shape of a pizza pie, as opposed to a loaf of Italian Bread with butter and garlic salt that you get in most pizzerias. My 2 boys love the mozzarella sticks which also have a unique shape. In fact, they are not “sticks” at all. They are triangle shaped and they are the best mozzarella sticks triangles I have ever tasted.

I do agree that Brooklyn’s is the best pizza in Bergen County but they do have one fatal flaw – they don’t deliver.

In the interest of full disclosure, Brooklyn’s Pizza did tie for the #1 spot with Kinchley’s Tavern in Ramsey. I have heard great things about Kinchley’s but I have never been there. I have heard tales of long lines at Kinchleys, and since I know what I am getting right here in Ridgewood, I have never bothered to take that long 10 minute drive to Ramsey.

If you live in Ridgewood and don’t want to get up off the couch to pick up your pizza, I would also recommend Renato’s and Puzo’s. They both deliver.

Click the link below for info on the best Ice Cream in Ridgewood.

4 Great Things to do in Ridgewood this Summer
If you like what you are reading, why not subscribe to this blog?

Posted on Leave a comment

>Status of Reported Mold Infestation at Emergency Services HQ, 33 Douglas Place?

>On December 12, 2007, Village Council members unanimously awarded a $27,885 professional services contract to Langan Engineering and Environmental Services of Elmwood Park, NJ.

Langan was contracted to perform an investigative engineering analysis of reported microbial conditions (mold infestation) within the Village owned building that houses Ridgewood’s Emergency Services and Emergency Medical Services volunteers.

The Fly would like to know what the results were of that $28K study. Is the building completely infested with mold as taxpayers were originally led to believe, or was an “all clear” issued? If there’s mold present, why was there no subsequent contract issued to remediate the problem?

And it there any truth to the rumor that a second floor building addition, containing several conference rooms and lush private offices, is now being planned for Douglas Place? Is the Village deliberately delaying remediation of a condition that could potentially affect the health of its most prized group of volunteers to save a buck by doing all construction related work at the same time?

Who knows what the real story is at Douglas Place?

show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=56753

Posted on Leave a comment

>Surprise, Surprise! Council set to approve Bolger’s request for a “Major Soil Movement Permit”

>On October 8th, Village Council members are expected to unanimously approve real estate tycoon David Bolger’s request for a “Major Soil Movement Permit” in conjunction with his planned construction of a 62,000 square foot self-storage facility on Chestnut Street.

Approval of the permit was recommended by members of the Planning Board.

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

>Holiday Tree Lighting Ceremony to be Relocated

>At the insistence of Deputy Mayor Keith Killion, a plan to move the Village’s annual holiday tree lighting ceremony to Van Neste Park has been revitalized.

A live tree will be planted within the park, which will eliminate the requirement for street closures and the need to cut a tree down every year.

Village Manager James Ten Hoeve advised Council members that this new plan would pay for itself in just two (2) years by cutting associated tree removal costs, transportation costs/logistics, and personnel overtime. It would also result in Ridgewood Avenue and North and South Broad Streets remaining open for the free flow of traffic. It is not known whether Van Neste Square would be closed for the event.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Overnight Parking at Ridgewood Train Station Will Be Banned

>Village Council members will soon enact an ordinance that bans overnight parking at the Ridgewood train station.

Overnight parking by local apartment dwellers is said to interfere with the availability of early morning parking for commuters.

Overnight parkers in the area will be instead directed to parking spaces situated in “The Hole,” which is located at the west end of East Ridgewood Avenue, just west of North/South Broad Street.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Council set to approve 10% trip surcharge for Ridgewood Taxi

>At their scheduled October 8th Public Meeting, Village Council members will officially approve Ridgewood Taxi’s request for the addition of a 10% fuel surcharge on all taxi rides regulated by local ordinance.

The taxi company had originally requested a flat $1.00 fuel surcharge on all regulated rides. This plan was flatly rejected by Council members last month on fears that the $1.00 surcharge would negatively impact senior citizens that take very short rides.

Users of the Village sponsored discount ride program will be excluded from the 10% fuel surcharge fee.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Same Old Story :The arrogance of the school board

>https://www.gazette.net/stories/09182008/fredlet144336_32473.shtml

The comments by Bonnie Borsa, vice president of the Frederick County Board of Education, in The Gazette’s Sept. 4 article, “Parents call for ethics probe into math book decision,” that the public outcry against TERC math was “grasping at straws” was for me the final straw.

It takes incredible arrogance to dismiss this level of parent concern as “just another attempt to overturn a decision they are not happy with.”

Just for the record, being parents does not make us stupid.

As much as Frederick County Public Schools likes to vilify parents as irresponsible hedonists who can’t teach our own children the “pillars of character” or remember to feed them a good breakfast on standardized test days, the response to TERC has been driven by parents who are taking the time to research the program and materials thoroughly and voice real concerns for the future of their children.

To presuppose that parents won’t understand the board’s interpretation of “pilot program” versus “field test” is insulting and disingenuous at best.

They are not talking about product improvements to casual investors here. These are our children. We have a legitimate right to be concerned for their futures, a legitimate right to question the board’s decision based on the available data in regard to TERC all over the Internet for those who both to seek it out, and a legitimate right as taxpayers who are paying for this to hear the board defend its choice.

The TERC decision by FCPS incorporates more than a pure choice of math curriculum.

When TERC was first announced, the decision was said by FCPS itself to be primarily based on the textbook and materials. A catchy textbook and lots of handouts to keep swifter learners busy while kids who have more difficulty grasping the material catch up is a necessity in FCPS’ vaunted (and deeply flawed) heterogeneous classroom system (kids grouped together in all subjects regardless of proficiency). Textbooks and material do not make a solid math program if the teaching method behind them is not effective. The biggest problem of all is that the shortcomings of the TERC program are cumulative; the data that parents are most concerned about is how the program falls shortest as kids reach high school and college math courses already profoundly behind.

Ms. Borsa’s secret pilot program data from Lincoln Elementary is not likely to be able to address that. It’s time to get down off her high horse and acknowledge Frederick County’s intelligent, well-informed parents seeking quality education for their tax dollars before we vote her off it.

Karen Lindsay, Middletown

Posted on Leave a comment

>Cost to build parking garages soars

>From The Record

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

BY ANDREW TANGEL
STAFF WRITER

When Mountain Development Corp. moved into its Clifton headquarters in early 2002, the company estimated it would pay about $12,000 for each space in a new parking garage. A new garage could have added as many as 300 spots.

Since then, Mountain Development has brought more tenants into its seven-story building at 100 Delawanna Ave. So when the company again considered building a garage late last year, executives were shocked at the new estimates: costs would range from $22,000 to $28,000 a space, said Michael Seeve, the firm’s president.

“The cost has gotten totally out of control,” Seeve said. Mountain Development decided to stick with surface parking for now and attract tenants that require fewer spaces.

The costs of steel and concrete – the main materials of parking garages – have soared in recent years, fueled by rising demand in rapidly developing countries such as China and India. Prices for products made at steel mills, meanwhile, shot up 34 percent in 2004 alone. Following further annual increases, the cost has risen more than 20 percent so far this year, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The gains are reflected in estimates provided by Walker Parking Associates, an industry consulting firm. A parking space in a garage in New York City, which most closely approximates the New Jersey market, cost about $14,600 to build in 2000, according to Walker’s estimates. This year, an average parking space in New York City runs about $20,100. The price includes costs for financing and engineering, but not land.

The expenses are posing challenges to developers. For builders of office properties, particularly those in suburban areas such as Bergen County, the soaring costs of constructing parking garages pose a dilemma, Seeve said. Developers have treated parking garages as sunk costs, meaning they didn’t intend to pass them on to tenants, he said.

“When you rent space, and tenants compare buildings, they don’t really pay you more because you’ve spent the money on structured parking,” Seeve said. “But if you don’t spend the money on structured parking and you don’t have the requisite parking to lease office space, people just aren’t going to take the space.”

And, he added: “If your employees can’t park when they have to be there, then the building doesn’t work for you.”

The costs also pose problems for developers in urban areas, where space is scarcer and more expensive, and where many tenants often rely on cars even if mass transportation is more available.

“It’s nearly impossible to look at urban development without having a parking deck of some size,” said Russell Tepper, vice president of development at Matrix Development Group in Cranbury.

With pollution remediation and features such as retail space built into the decks, parking garages can wind up costing as much as $35,000 a space in urban areas or more, said Richard Johnson, a senior vice president at Matrix.

For developers to break even on a project, with traditional financing arrangements – for example, an 8.5 percent interest rate for a mix of a bank loan and equity over seven to 10 years – each space would need to generate revenue of nearly $300 a month, Johnson said. That’s generally too expensive for markets in New Jersey.

Parking garage authorities, which can issue bonds that have a lower interest rate over a longer period of time, need to generate roughly $140 a space per month, said Leonard Bier, executive director of the New Jersey Parking Institute, an agency whose primary members are the cities and parking authorities that run garages.

As construction costs for parking garages increase, so too do the prices drivers pay to park. Five years ago, parking authorities needed to generate about $125 a space per month, Bier said.

“There’s an obvious cause and effect” between higher construction costs and more expensive parking, Bier said.

Garage operators must service the debt they incurred when issuing bonds, as well as pay for operating costs and set aside some funds for future improvements, he said.

As garage costs climb, developers have sought tax credits to offset the rising expenses. Johnson said Matrix has sought to reclassify the garages as infrastructure and not real estate, which underwriters expect to pay for itself in relatively few years.

Also, developers have struck public-private partnerships with parking authorities, Bier said. Developers may provide the land, for example, but parking authorities may seek the financing because they typically can issue bonds at lower rates.

On the construction side, engineers have sought to minimize the use of steel in parking garages. One technique involves stretching steel strands, pouring concrete over the steel and then releasing the stress, making the concrete very stiff.

“Almost nobody will build a parking garage unless they have to,” said Greg Neiderer, director of operations in Walker Parking’s mid-Atlantic office in Wayne, Pa. Garages often cost 25 percent of a development, he added.

“The deal might make sense or might not make sense based on the garage,” Neiderer said. “For developers, parking can kill a deal. I see it somewhat often. We have some developers who come to us over and over again to try to salvage a project.”

Posted on Leave a comment

>Donna MacPhee ’89CC Named University Vice President of Alumni Relations

>CUFFOXCOKYRBYKB 20080922170945Photo Credit: Columbia University Athletics/Mike McLaughlinDonna MacPhee ’89CC received the 2008 Varsity C Athletics Alumni Award from Chris Young ’90CC.

Donna MacPhee ’89CC Named University Vice President of Alumni Relations
Written by: Columbia University Athletics
Release: 09/22/2008

NEW YORK – Donna MacPhee, a 1989 alumna of Columbia College, former women’s tennis student-athlete, former Varsity C Club president and one of the founders of the Columbia Athletics Women’s Leadership Council, has been named vice president for alumni relations and president of the Columbia Alumni Association, University President Lee C. Bollinger announced today.

A member of the Varsity tennis team as an undergraduate, MacPhee has remained involved in Columbia Athletics over the years as an alumna, serving on numerous committees and co-founding the Women’s Leadership Council. This year MacPhee was chosen as one of Columbia’s 25 most influential athletic alumnae.

After earning her Bachelor’s degree from Columbia College as one of the College’s first female graduates, MacPhee went on to earn an MBA from NYU’s Stern School of Business and then dedicated her career to companies related to professional athletics, including managing finances for various departments of the National Hockey League.

For the past 10 years she served as co-founder and manager of Event Management Associates, a company that provided event and meeting planning services to a broad range of both not-for-profit and corporate clients.

MacPhee joins the Columbia Alumni Association at a promising time. Now in its fourth year, the Association continues to develop as an organization representing alumni from all of Columbia’s schools worldwide. The University also is poised to welcome alumni to a brand new Columbia Alumni Center opening in early 2009.

MacPhee lives in Ridgewood, N.J., and is married to men’s basketball alumnus John MacPhee ‘89CC. They have two daughters, Larissa, 12, and Alexa, 10.

Posted on Leave a comment

>’Star-Ledger’ Publisher Threatens January 2009 Shutdown

>By Joe Strupp

Published: September 16, 2008 1:55 PM ET

NEW YORK Publisher George Arwady of The Star-Ledger in Newark, N.J., has told employees that the paper will close on Jan. 5, 2009, if 200 buyouts and several union concessions are not met, or if the paper cannot be sold.

The e-mail, obtained by E&P, sent to workers today is posted below. It comes about a month and a half after the paper announced it would need 200 employees to take buyouts — and the drivers and mailers unions to renegotiate contracts — or the newspaper could be sold. In recent weeks, Arwady has indicated to staffers in other e-mails that the number of newsroom buyout takers has fallen short.

Editor Jim Willse and Arwady have not commented on how many staffers have applied for the buyouts first offered July 31. Calls to them were not returned today. Buyout applications are due Oct. 1.

Several staffers have said the overall 200-person buyout number may have been met, but the unofficial call for about 100 newsroom staffers is not being reached.

“At this time I have no update to give you on our buyouts thus far, except to tell you that the newsroom has a long way to go to reach the goal that Jim announced,” Arwady wrote to a reporter in an e-mail earlier this month.
*
*

To: All Star-Ledger Employees
From: George Arwady
Date: September 16, 2008
Re: Update

As I have previously told you, there are three conditions that must be met in order for The Star-Ledger to remain in business under its current ownership. Although we are making progress toward meeting two of our three conditions (the Mailers have a ratification vote scheduled for September 22), we still are far from an agreement with the Drivers’ union.

Accordingly, since it is doubtful that the Drivers will ratify an agreement by October 8, 2008, we will be sending formal notices to all employees this week, as required by both federal and New Jersey law, advising you that the Company will be sold, or, failing that, that it will close operations on January 5, 2009.

It is most unfortunate that we have to send out this notice, but the Drivers have left us with no choice.

George Arwady, Publisher

Posted on Leave a comment

>Ridgewood Blog Poll : Despite the Recent Security Issues Readers believe Soccer Moms driving on Cell Phones Pose the Greatest Risk to their Children

>
School Stalkers 7 (4%)

Turf Toe 1 (0%)

Dumb Dumb Math 36 (25%)

Geese Crap 6 (4%)

Soccer Moms driving while on cell phones 92 (64%)

Votes so far: 142
Poll closed

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

>The most persuasive person in Ridgewood is:

>Mr. Arthur Wrubel, Chairman of Ridgewood’s Historic Preservation Commission.

No change to any building facade, lighting, signage, sidewalk, street, curb, roof, gutter, chimney, window, door, etc. within Ridgewood’s Central Business District may be made unless Mr. Wrubel and his Commission approve it.

The Fly asks: is this too much power placed in the hands of one person?

§ 29-10. Responsibilities.

The Historic Preservation Commission shall have the following duties and responsibilities:

A.
To identify, record and maintain a system for survey and inventory of all buildings, sites, places, landmarks and structures of historical or architectural significance based on the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation (Standards and Guidelines for Identification) and to aid the public in understanding their worth, methods of preservation, techniques of gathering documentation and related matters.

B.
To advise the Planning Board on the relationship of the Historic Preservation Plan Element of the Master Plan to other Master Plan elements.

C.
To advise the Planning Board on the inclusion of historic sites and landmarks in the recommended Capital Improvement Program.

D.
To advise the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment on applications for development pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-110.

E.
To provide written reports pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-111 on the application of the Zoning Ordinance provisions concerning historic preservation.

F.
To carry out such other advisory, educational and informational functions as will promote historic preservation in the municipality.

G.
The Commission shall have all of the responsibilities detailed in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-109 and as the same may hereafter be amended and supplemented.

§ 29-11. Report.

A.
A report of the Historic Preservation Commission issued by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be required before a preservation permit is issued for any of the following or before work can commence on any of the following within a historic district or on a historic site:

(1)
Demolition of all or part of any building, improvement, site, place or structure.

(2)
Relocation of any building, improvement, site, place or structure.

(3)
Change in the exterior appearance of any building, improvement, site, place or structure by addition, reconstruction, alteration, partial demolition or dismantling or repair, which change is visible from a public street. Exterior change for all primary and accessory structures shall include but is not limited to removal, repair or replacement of windows, doors, surfaces, facades, attachments, stairs, steps, porches, signs, walls, fences, antennas, solar panels, lighting and sidewalks, including sidewalks located within the public right-of-way, where work is being performed by a private property owner.

(4)
Any addition to or new construction of a principal or accessory building or structure.

B.
A report of the Historic Preservation Commission shall not be required before a preservation permit is issued by the Administrative Officer for the following:

(1)
Changes to the interior of structures.

(2)
Repair or exact replacement to any existing improvement, provided that the work does not alter the exterior appearance of the structure. In the event, however, that repair work is being undertaken on a building with previously installed noncontributing or disharmonious features, the provisions of this subsection shall not apply. The following are the types of activities permitted under this exemption:

(a)
Identical replacement of existing windows and doors.

(b)
Repairs of existing windows and doors and the installation of storm doors and windows that do not change their design, scale or appearance.

(c)
Maintenance and repair of existing roofing materials involving no change in the design, scale or appearance of the structure.

(d)
Structural repairs which do not alter the exterior appearance of the structure.

(e)
Maintenance, repair or replacement of existing clapboards, shingles or other siding with identical material.

(f)
Exterior or interior painting.

3balls Golfshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=149749

Posted on Leave a comment

>For the record, I wasn’t barefoot, just wearing gold sandals.

>
Hi Everyone. It’s Annie here. For the record, I wasn’t barefoot, just wearing gold sandals. Amused by the hillbilly remark. For the record, a hillbilly wearing Diane von Furstenburg and Marc Jacobs. And when someone says it’s time to get to work I get to work. Especially if it involves digging in soil (I’m a gardener). Bestest …

J&R Computer/Music World

Posted on Leave a comment

>Breaking Ground on the Pease Renovation

>weddingad
pease

Mr. Boldger and Village Council with Shovels In Hand
For the Pease Library Renovation and Improvement
Project is being completed with $750,000 grant from Mr. Bolger. An additional $1,000,000 is expected over the next 10 years. The proceeds from office space will go to the Library.

Posted by Dom Nizza

Posted on Leave a comment

>Maybe there is something to this new math afterall

>NATALIE ANGIER Basics SEP. 16, 2008

Gut Instinct’s Surprising Role in Math

You are shopping in a busy supermarket and you’re ready to pay up and go home. You perform a quick visual sweep of the checkout options and immediately start ramming your cart through traffic toward an appealingly unpeopled line halfway across the store. As you wait in line and start reading nutrition labels, you can’t help but calculate that the 529 calories contained in a single slice of your Key lime cheesecake amounts to one-fourth of your recommended daily caloric allowance and will take you 90 minutes on the elliptical to burn off and you’d better just stick the thing behind this stack of Soap Opera Digests and hope a clerk finds it before it melts.

One shopping spree, two distinct number systems in play. Whenever we choose a shorter grocery line over a longer one, or a bustling restaurant over an unpopular one, we rally our approximate number system, an ancient and intuitive sense that we are born with and that we share with many other animals. Rats, pigeons, monkeys, babies — all can tell more from fewer, abundant from stingy. An approximate number sense is essential to brute survival: how else can a bird find the best patch of berries, or two baboons know better than to pick a fight with a gang of six?

When it comes to genuine computation, however, to seeing a self-important number like 529 and panicking when you divide it into 2,200, or realizing that, hey, it’s the square of 23! well, that calls for a very different number system, one that is specific, symbolic and highly abstract. By all evidence, scientists say, the capacity to do mathematics, to manipulate representations of numbers and explore the quantitative texture of our world is a uniquely human and very recent skill. People have been at it only for the last few millennia, it’s not universal to all cultures, and it takes years of education to master. Math-making seems the opposite of automatic, which is why scientists long thought it had nothing to do with our ancient, pre-verbal size-em-up ways.

Yet a host of new studies suggests that the two number systems, the bestial and celestial, may be profoundly related, an insight with potentially broad implications for math education.

One research team has found that how readily people rally their approximate number sense is linked over time to success in even the most advanced and abstruse mathematics courses. Other scientists have shown that preschool children are remarkably good at approximating the impact of adding to or subtracting from large groups of items but are poor at translating the approximate into the specific. Taken together, the new research suggests that math teachers might do well to emphasize the power of the ballpark figure, to focus less on arithmetic precision and more on general reckoning.

“When mathematicians and physicists are left alone in a room, one of the games they’ll play is called a Fermi problem, in which they try to figure out the approximate answer to an arbitrary problem,” said Rebecca Saxe, a cognitive neuroscientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who is married to a physicist. “They’ll ask, how many piano tuners are there in Chicago, or what contribution to the ocean’s temperature do fish make, and they’ll try to come up with a plausible answer.”

“What this suggests to me,” she added, “is that the people whom we think of as being the most involved in the symbolic part of math intuitively know that they have to practice those other, nonsymbolic, approximating skills.”

This month in the journal Nature, Justin Halberda and Lisa Feigenson of Johns Hopkins University and Michele Mazzocco of the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore described their study of 64 14-year-olds who were tested at length on the discriminating power of their approximate number sense. The teenagers sat at a computer as a series of slides with varying numbers of yellow and blue dots flashed on a screen for 200 milliseconds each — barely as long as an eye blink. After each slide, the students pressed a button indicating whether they thought there had been more yellow dots or blue. (Take a version of the test.)

Given the antiquity and ubiquity of the nonverbal number sense, the researchers were impressed by how widely it varied in acuity. There were kids with fine powers of discrimination, able to distinguish ratios on the order of 9 blue dots for every 10 yellows, Dr. Feigenson said. “Others performed at a level comparable to a 9-month-old,” barely able to tell if five yellows outgunned three blues. Comparing the acuity scores with other test results that Dr. Mazzocco had collected from the students over the past 10 years, the researchers found a robust correlation between dot-spotting prowess at age 14 and strong performance on a raft of standardized math tests from kindergarten onward. “We can’t draw causal arrows one way or another,” Dr. Feigenson said, “but your evolutionarily endowed sense of approximation is related to how good you are at formal math.”

The researchers caution that they have no idea yet how the two number systems interact. Brain imaging studies have traced the approximate number sense to a specific neural structure called the intraparietal sulcus, which also helps assess features like an object’s magnitude and distance. Symbolic math, by contrast, operates along a more widely distributed circuitry, activating many of the prefrontal regions of the brain that we associate with being human. Somewhere, local and global must be hooked up to a party line.

Other open questions include how malleable our inborn number sense may be, whether it can be improved with training, and whether those improvements would pay off in a greater appetite and aptitude for math. If children start training with the flashing dot game at age 4, will they be supernumerate by middle school?

Dr. Halberda, who happens to be Dr. Feigenson’s spouse, relishes the work’s philosophical implications. “What’s interesting and surprising in our results is that the same system we spend years trying to acquire in school, and that we use to send a man to the moon, and that has inspired the likes of Plato, Einstein and Stephen Hawking, has something in common with what a rat is doing when it’s out hunting for food,” he said. “I find that deeply moving.”

Behind every great leap of our computational mind lies the pitter-patter of rats’ feet, the little squeak of rodent kind.■