Posted on

Reader says one would think it would take a miracle, or at least some extremely fortuitous set of circumstances going Lonegan’s way, to enable him to flip the seat back into republican hands

Lonegan Official 8

The fifth congressional district was recently gradually trending blue, out from under Garrett who was still showing up well for re-election every two years until he was ambushed in 2016 via a disingenuous (but admittedly politically successful) LGBT line of attack. He had all the integrity in the world (particularly compared to the average DC swamp denizen) and yet was ruthlessly trashed because he would not yield to pressure to deviate from his strong sense of traditional personal morality. Say what you want but Garrett was not going to do like Obama did and blatantly flip-flop on his belief regarding marriage only being between one biological man and one biological woman. It’s 2018 now, though, and what with the proportional advantage the Democrats have amassed in terms of affiliated registered voters in the 5th Congressional district (gubernatorial candidate Guadagno found voters living in this district considerably less inclined toward her message than did Christie when he ran twice), one would think it would take a miracle, or at least some extremely fortuitous set of circumstances going Lonegan’s way, to enable him to flip the seat back into republican hands.

Posted on

POLITICO’s list of Top 100 donors of disclosed money tilts leftward

imgres-5

George Soros

Blue billionaires on top

POLITICO’s list of Top 100 donors of disclosed money tilts leftward.

By Kenneth P. Vogel

1/11/15 8:04 AM EST

Democrats spent much of the 2014 campaign castigating Republican big money, but, it turns out, their side actually finished ahead among the biggest donors of 2014 – at least among those whose contributions were disclosed.

The 100 biggest donors of 2014 gave nearly $174 million to Democrats, compared to more than $140 million to Republicans, according to a POLITICO analysis of reports filed with the Federal Election Commission and Internal Revenue Service.

Donors who gave mostly or exclusively to Democrats held down 52 of the top 100 spots, including that of the biggest by far – retired San Francisco hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer, who spent $74 million helping Democratic candidates and groups.

Of course, that edge doesn’t take into account contributions to deep-pocketed non-profit groups that don’t disclose their donors. They heavily favored Republicans, with reports showing conservative secret money non-profits outspending liberal ones $127 million to $33 million. While that’s just a fraction of the overall undisclosed money spent in 2014, it’s indicative of a dramatic imbalance in a type of big money spending that likely would close the gap between Democratic and Republican top donors, if not put Republicans ahead.

For instance, the network of mostly secret-money non-profit groups helmed by the billionaire industrialist Koch brothers was on pace to spend $290 million in 2014. Yet David and Charles Koch, who Democrats worked to vilify as the very personifications of the corrupting effect of big money in politics, ranked as only the 10th and 29th biggest givers of disclosed cash in POLITICO’s analysis.

Nonetheless, the analysis suggests that rich liberals have gotten over any lingering qualms about writing huge checks to unlimited-money groups like those made legal under a pair of 2010 federal court decisions – including Citizens United vs. FEC – that liberals including President Barack Obama had blasted asundermining American democracy.

POLITICO’s analysis is the most comprehensive assessment to date of elite donor spending in the first full midterm election cycle following Citizens United. The analysis relies on FEC data processed by the Center for Responsive Politics (a non-partisan non-profit group), supplemented by IRS data aggregated and made available for downloading by Political Moneyline, covering donations made during the 2014 cycle, including reports filed last month that detail contributions through the final days of the race. The analysis incorporates checks written by donors, their spouses and closely controlled corporations to federal candidates’ campaigns and national party committees, as well as to political action committees and super PACs registered with the FEC. The analysis also covers donations to national non-profit groups established under a section of the tax code – 527 – that allows organizations like the Democratic and Republican governors associations and EMILY’s List to accept unlimited contributions for political spending, provided they disclose their donors to the IRS.

The list contains some familiar names in the world of big political spending from across the political spectrum, including the hawkish Las Vegas casino mogul Sheldon Adelson (who ranked No. 3; with $13.2 million in disclosed donations, but who also donated another $10 million or more in undisclosed money), as well as the liberal financier George Soros and his son Jonathan Soros (Nos. 16 and 38, respectively, giving a combined $5.6 million).

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/blue-billionaires-on-top-114151.html#ixzz3OYai4zh8emocrats spent much of the 2014 campaign castigating Republican big money, but, it turns out, their side actually finished ahead among the biggest donors of 2014 – at least among those whose contributions were disclosed.

Posted on

Sound Familiar : The 20-year Demise of a Blue State

twinpeaksfullbleed_960

Sound Familiar : The 20-year Demise of a Blue State

Rachel Alexander | Dec 22, 2014

I left Washington state about 20 years ago for Arizona. A Washington native, I had become fed up with the left-wing politics of Seattle. A couple of years ago, I moved back to the Pacific Northwest. A lot had changed while I was gone, and very little for the better. The only “improvement” I noticed was more greenery everywhere. The environmentalists had gotten so many restrictions passed on logging and burning dense forestation that the Evergreen State had started to look like a jungle.

Everything else had gone downhill. The roads and traffic had become horrendous, especially in the Puget Sound area around Seattle, since there was no longer enough money to keep up with maintenance and expansion, and the left-wing politicians had prioritized mass transit over road infrastructure and planning. This is despite the fact that Washington has one of the highest gas taxes in the country, resulting in high gas prices. Republican legislators in the state side with the Democrats on many issues, including higher taxes for education and gas. Legislation is now being considered that would tax drivers per mile. Seattle has the eighth worst traffic congestion among large U.S. cities, even though it is only the 22nd largest city. Consequently, drivers have lost their reputation for being the nicest in the nation.

https://townhall.com/columnists/rachelalexander/2014/12/22/the-20year-demise-of-a-blue-state-n1934409/page/full

Posted on

Obama no longer drawing a Jersey crowd

Obama-Golf

Obama no longer drawing a Jersey crowd

OCTOBER 14, 2014, 10:10 PM    LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2014, 11:02 PM
BY CHARLES STILE
RECORD COLUMNIST
THE RECORD

A visit by Barack Obama once had the buzz of Beatlemania.

When he visited New Jersey, crowds were packed with college kids who hoisted cameras and chanted “Yes We Can,” and the stages bulged with Democratic officials eager to bask in his glow.

But as Obama returns to New Jersey today for the first time in 16 months, his popularity is in a tailspin. And instead of headlining a campaign rally in a civic center, he will be escorted into a pricey, closed-door fundraiser in Union County, a visit that is supposed to draw donors and not attention. And the Democrats are more than happy to keep it that way.

U.S. Rep. Bill Pascrell is an eight-term Democrat from Paterson running for reelection against Republican Dierdre G. Paul, a Montclair State University professor, and he said his campaign polling detected a noticeable drop in Obama’s numbers. For Pascrell, the Obama effect has forced him to navigate – keep his distance from Obama on some issues but not abandon him altogether, which could potentially alienate hard-core Democrats who remain loyal to Obama.

“You have a choice if you are a Democratic candidate. You can run away from the president, you can embrace everything he does, or you can say it like it is,” Pascrell said last week while campaigning in Fort Lee. “When I agree with him, I agree with him; when I don’t agree with him, I say so.”

The president who could electrify crowds four years ago is now radioactive. With Obama besieged by multiple foreign policy crises and his popularity in free fall, Democratic candidates around the country are taking measures to separate themselves from the party’s standard-bearer.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/stile-obama-no-longer-drawing-a-jersey-crowd-1.1109223#sthash.ISCIZzSs.dpuf