Posted on 2 Comments

Purchasing health care a pig-in-a-poke process, which is no way to run a railroad

10407711_10204685141440448_3931753339455986992_n-169x300

10407711_10204685141440448_3931753339455986992_n-169x300

Purchasing health care a pig-in-a-poke process, which is no way to run a railroad

Posted by Scott St Clair On January 30, 2015 0 Comment

By Scott St. Clair | The Save Jersey Blog

Sometimes an isolated incident can offer profound insight into a large problem such as the exorbitant cost of health care in America. This week I experienced one that took an abstract academic argument down to a human level where that human was in pain and forced to make a crap-shoot medical decision.

Tuesday evening, I was forced to go to the emergency room of an Essex County hospital because I was in incredible pain. Now, I had a good idea what prompted the pain since I went to the same Essex County hospital four years earlier for the same thing.

My trip to the hospital was revealing!

Turned out then that I was diagnosed with some nerve issues in my lower spine that cause sciatica and blah, blah, blah because who cares about my problems.

Suffice to say that the pain was as severe as I have ever experienced.

While in the ER, the attending physician’s assistant wanted to give me morphine for the pain and an anti-inflammatory for whatever it is that anti-infammatories do – I don’t know since I’m a liberal arts grad.

She gave me the choice of receiving them, of which I wasn’t in doubt because at that point if I was a horse you’d shoot me, either through an IV drip or two injections.

I asked her, “Since it’s early in the year and everyone’s health insurance has kicked over into another $2 trillion worth of co-pays and deductibles, which method is cheaper?”

She good-naturedly laughed and responded saying, “I have no idea!”

And therein, dear readers, lies the rub.

In a common commercial transaction and necessary to create a binding contract, the buyer or consumer and the seller of goods or services must agree upon a price before the deal can be sealed. You’re not going to buy anything from a can of cat food to a new car without knowing what you’ll be paying. Generally, the seller won’t sell it to you without knowing what it cost him and how much he must sell it for in order to make a profit sufficient to keep the doors open.

Not so in health care where pig-in-a-poke purchasing is the norm.

Exactly what is your health care provider’s bottom line? What’s his cost for each hit of aspirin, each bandage, each whatever it is that he sells you that, at that moment in time, you don’t realize you’re buying?

In the hospital, what is the price differential between an IV drip and two injections, which I opted for in the end, and it was in the end that I received one of them because the nurse who gave it to me said the needle was very, very long, and she needed a very, very fleshy place in which to stick it?

I doubt if I’ll ever learn the answer, but had I the answer, I could have made a better-informed decision.

Assuming, as I did, that the medications were vital to my survival – at that point, were I a horse, I’d shoot me – and taking them wasn’t the issue, wouldn’t it have been helpful to choose the cheaper of the two alternatives since in either case I’d get what I needed and wanted?

Health care consumers and providers mostly grope in the dark when it comes to cost and price without any resort to arm’s-length bargaining for products and services. When you leave out this key factor, you lose any ability to control it through negotiation, opting for a less-expensive alternative or deciding to forego treatment altogether.

Prices are then left uncontrolled, and it’s up to the insurance company to cover the tab after you’ve satisfied that $2 trillion deductible. Is that any way to run a railroad?

This isn’t a new issue – it’s been talked about for years. But it hit home with me because I was confronted with it. I walked away – limped, actually – more convinced than ever that we’ll never get a real handle on health care costs in this country so long as consumers and vendors are ignorant as to the cost of the goods and services they’re buying and selling and not transacting health care business at an arm’s-length basis.

https://savejersey.com/2015/01/purchasing-health-care-a-pig-in-a-poke-process-which-is-no-way-to-run-a-railroad/

Posted on 50 Comments

Readers debate long term sustainability on the Village Budget of employee wages, pensions and healthcare

imgres-11

Readers debate long term sustainability on the Village Budget of employee wages, pensions and healthcare 

Lets focus on the numbers , the problem and the solutions , not attacking unions or employees

When less than a 100 current employees and retirees consume over 50% of the Village’s annual budget in wages, pensions and healthcare, you have to question whether that’s an appropriate trade-off in a Village with only 25,000 people ? The BoE is similar, why should under 1,000 teachers and administrators (less than 4% of our Village population) consume 65% of our annual property taxes? It’s only going to get worse.

I was able to find a copy of the Village Budget Newsletter for the 2014 budget at the following link.

https://mods.ridgewoodnj.net/pdf/manager/2014BudgetNews.pdf

According to this document, which is provided by our Village Manager, the Village has a combined total annual budget of $46.2 million. Out of the $46.2 Million, the Police Department budget expenses are $9.6 Million (20.78%) and the Fire Department is $8.2 Million (17.5%). Combined, Public Safety amounts to $17.8 Million dollars or 38.529% of the annual budget. I can’t help but wonder why you chose to exclude the Debt Service of $4.8 Million from your calculations. By doing so you create the illusion that the overall costs for Public Safety are higher than they actually are in reality.

If you’d read the Budget Newsletter you would have noticed that, excluding the $4.8mn in debt service which we have to pay as a Village in 2014, police, fire and emergency service wages & benefits consumes $19mn of what’s left of the Village budget, or half of the budget… spent on less than 100 active employees plus retirees. The Village municipal employees and retirees number far more than just public safety employees and retirees, and yet Public safety contractual salary increases represent more than half of total salary increases of $900K+ in 2014, and that doesn’t include unfunded liabilities (future retirement payouts to police & fire) of $7.1M (against a reserve of $479K). We had to lay off 10% of the Village workforce in 2010 just to keep feeding this beast, and that has led to a reduction in Village services for all Villagers. That’s a poor trend for Villagers

Hotwire US

Posted on 1 Comment

Record Number of Americans Put off Medical Treatment Due to Costs

imgres-10

Record Number of Americans Put off Medical Treatment Due to Costs 

Cost Still a Barrier Between Americans and Medical Care
by Rebecca Riffkin

In U.S., 33% have put off medical treatment because of cost
More put off treatment for serious conditions than non-serious
More with private insurance put off treatment in 2014 than 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C. — One in three Americans say they have put off getting medical treatment that they or their family members need because of cost. Although this percentage is in line with the roughly 30% figures seen in recent years, it is among the highest readings in the 14-year history of Gallup asking the question.

Since 2001, Gallup has asked Americans each November if they have put off any sort of medical treatment for themselves or their families in the past 12 months. Last year, many hoped that the opening of the government healthcare exchanges and the resulting increase in the number of Americans with health insurance would enable more people to seek medical treatment. But,despite a drop in the uninsured rate, a slightly higher percentage of Americans than in previous years report having put off medical treatment, suggesting that the Affordable Care Act has not immediately affected this measure.

Among Americans with varying types of medical coverage (including no coverage), uninsured Americans are still the most likely to report having put off medical treatment because of cost. More than half of the uninsured (57%) have put off treatment, compared with 34% with private insurance and 22% with Medicare or Medicaid. However, the percentage of Americans with private health insurance who report putting off medical treatment because of cost has increased from 25% in 2013 to 34% in 2014.

Thirty-five percent of lower-income Americans — those with annual household incomes under $30,000 — report putting off medical treatment in the past 12 months, down from 43% in 2013. More upper-income Americans, on the other hand, report delaying treatment, with percentages rising from 17% in 2013 to 28% this year. The percentage of middle-income Americans who have put off medical treatment remains roughly the same as last year, at 38%.

Americans More Likely to Put Off Treatment for Serious Conditions

Those who indicate that they have put off medical treatment in the past 12 months are asked to rate the seriousness of the underlying condition or illness. This year, 22% of Americans say they have put off medical treatment for a “very” or “somewhat serious” condition. This is double the 11% who say they have put off treatment for a non-serious condition. Furthermore, the percentage who have put off treatment for a serious condition has increased slightly since 2013.

https://www.gallup.com/poll/179774/cost-barrier-americans-medical-care.aspx

 

 

 

Posted on 5 Comments

Unable to Meet the Deductible or the Doctor (Gee Wiz)

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

Unable to Meet the Deductible or the Doctor  (Gee Wiz)

By ABBY GOODNOUGH and ROBERT PEAROCT. 17, 2014

Patricia Wanderlich got insurance through the Affordable Care Act this year, and with good reason: She suffered a brain hemorrhage in 2011, spending weeks in a hospital intensive care unit, and has a second, smaller aneurysm that needs monitoring.

But her new plan has a $6,000 annual deductible, meaning that Ms. Wanderlich, who works part time at a landscaping company outside Chicago, has to pay for most of her medical services up to that amount. She is skipping this year’s brain scan and hoping for the best.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/18/us/unable-to-meet-the-deductible-or-the-doctor.html?src=twr&_r=0

Posted on Leave a comment

On its one-year anniversary, ObamaCare gets an ‘F’

imgres-10

On its one-year anniversary, ObamaCare gets an ‘F’
By Michael D. Tanner
September 28, 2014 | 12:00am


This Wednesday will mark one year since enrollment in ObamaCare began. What began with the disastrous rollout of healthcare.gov has ended with the health law’s supporters claiming victory.

It is true that some of the worst predictions have not yet come true. Yet. But in the last year we’ve also seen plenty of bad news for consumers, providers, employers and taxpayers.

A report card:

The Uninsured:Earlier this month, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services director Marilyn Tavenner testified that roughly 7.3 million people signed up for insurance through the exchanges. That’s down from early estimates of 8.1 million, because nearly 800,000 of those who initially enrolled have stopped or never paid their premiums. A bigger question is how many enrollees were previously insured and were just changing plans. Overall, the best estimates suggest that roughly 8 million people gained insurance under ObamaCare, but roughly half of those were enrolled in Medicaid (outside of the exchanges), which isn’t really health-care reform so much as adding people to government welfare. And it still leaves 41 million American adults uninsured. We spent billions to move the needle a tick.
Grade: C

Your Plan : Despite the president’s assurances to the contrary, roughly 6 million Americans were kicked off their insurance because their plans failed to offer a lengthy-enough maternity stay, didn’t provide sufficient drug and alcohol rehabilitation benefits or otherwise fell short of the insurance that federal bureaucrats thought that they should have. This includes more than 100,000 New Yorkers. Nearly all eventually found other insurance, but a new study from the National Center for Public Policy Research found that, on average, ObamaCare plans were worse than the plans they replaced, in terms of both providers covered and cost-sharing. A new wave of cancellations is about to begin as well. Those New Yorkers who managed to renew their noncompliant plans prior to the effective start date for ObamaCare last year should start receiving cancellation notices any day now. Some people may not even be able to keep the plans that replaced the plans they couldn’t keep the first time. In several states, insurers have dropped plans that they offered on the exchanges or even withdrawn from the market altogether. And if that was not bad enough, Americans with employer-based insurance may find out their insurance has to be changed starting next year.
Grade: F

Premiums: If judged against President Obama’s promise that health-care reform would save us all at least $2,500 through lower premiums, ObamaCare deserves an F. But premium increases have been less bad than expected, especially in states like New York that already had highly regulated insurance markets. Last year, New Yorkers in the individual market saw a reduction in their premiums, but only because the individual market was already in such terrible shape. In states where the individual market was not already dysfunctional, there were significant premium increases. This year, New Yorkers can expect premium increases averaging roughly 6 percent for individual plans and almost 7 percent for small business.
Grade: C+

https://nypost.com/2014/09/28/on-its-one-year-anniversary-obamacare-gets-an-f/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_medium=SocialFlow

Posted on 5 Comments

Ridgewood High School program points alumna toward career in healthcare

081514-rn-rahp1
PHOTO COURTESTY OF VALLEY HOSPITAL
Ridgewood High School (RHS) graduate Hayley Clark was recently hired as a labor and delivery nurse at Valley Hospital.

Ridgewood High School program points alumna toward career in healthcare

AUGUST 20, 2014    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20, 2014, 5:05 PM
BY LAURA HERZOG
STAFF WRITER

Valley Hospital employees can’t help swelling with pride as they welcome their latest labor and delivery nurse, Hayley Clark.

The 2009 Ridgewood High School (RHS) graduate is Valley’s first employee to come from RHS’ Ridgewood Academy of Health Professions (RAHP).

The Valley-RHS partnership, which began in 2005, has offered many students the opportunity to learn about the varied health-related professions.

The program begins sophomore year, so Clark was a member of the second RAHP class.

“It was really exciting to hear back from Valley, because it was where I grew up,” Clark said during a recent interview. “It has such a community feel, right when you walk into the hospital.”

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/education/ridgewood-high-school-program-points-alumna-toward-career-in-healthcare-1.1070230#sthash.XcWTgSpO.dpuf

Posted on 1 Comment

Race Is On to Profit From Rise of Urgent Care

Vincent_Edwards_Ben_Casey_1963

Race Is On to Profit From Rise of Urgent Care

By JULIE CRESWELLJULY 9, 2014

NORWALK, Conn. — Start in Room 4, just beyond the reception area: A man is having blood drained from a bruised finger. Over in Room 1, a woman is being treated for eye trouble. Next door, in Room 2, a boy is having his throat swabbed.

For more than eight hours a day, seven days a week, 52 weeks a year, an assortment of ailments is on display at the tidy medical clinic on Main Avenue here. But all of the patients have one thing in common: No one is being treated at a traditional doctor’s office or emergency room.

Instead, they have turned to one of the fastest-growing segments of American health care: urgent care, a common category of walk-in clinics with uncommon interest from Wall Street. Once derided as “Doc in a Box” medicine, urgent care has mushroomed into an estimated $14.5 billion business, as investors try to profit from the shifting landscape in health care.

The office here is part of PhysicianOne Urgent Care. Bankrolled by two private investment companies, PhysicianOne has grown into an eight-clinic operation, the largest of its kind in Connecticut, with plans for even greater expansion.

But what is happening here is also playing out across the nation, as private equity investment firms, sensing opportunity, invest billions in urgent care and related businesses. Since 2008, these investors have sunk $2.3 billion into urgent care clinics. Commercial insurance companies, regional health systems and local hospitals are also looking to buy urgent care practices or form business relationships with them.

The business model is simple: Treat many patients as quickly as possible. Urgent care is a low-margin, high-volume proposition. At PhysicianOne here, most people are in and out in about 30 minutes. The national average charge runs about $155 per patient visit. Do 30 or 35 exams a day, and the money starts to add up.

Urgent care clinics also have a crucial business advantage over traditional hospital emergency rooms in that they can cherry-pick patients. Most of these centers do not accept Medicaid and turn away the uninsured unless they pay upfront. Hospital E.R.s, by contrast, are legally obligated to treat everyone.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/10/business/race-is-on-to-profit-from-rise-of-urgent-care.html?partner=socialflow&smid=tw-nytimesbusiness&_r=0

Posted on 2 Comments

A Doctor’s Declaration of Independence

1379441947-obamacare3-300x277

A Doctor’s Declaration of Independence

It’s time to defy health-care mandates issued by bureaucrats not in the healing profession.

By
DANIEL F. CRAVIOTTO JR.
Updated April 28, 2014 7:34 p.m. ET

In my 23 years as a practicing physician, I’ve learned that the only thing that matters is the doctor-patient relationship. How we interact and treat our patients is the practice of medicine. I acknowledge that there is a problem with the rising cost of health care, but there is also a problem when the individual physician in the trenches does not have a voice in the debate and is being told what to do and how to do it.

As a group, the nearly 880,000 licensed physicians in the U.S. are, for the most part, well-intentioned. We strive to do our best even while we sometimes contend with unrealistic expectations. The demands are great, and many of our families pay a huge price for our not being around. We do the things we do because it is right and our patients expect us to.

So when do we say damn the mandates and requirements from bureaucrats who are not in the healing profession? When do we stand up and say we are not going to take it any more?

https://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304279904579518273176775310?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304279904579518273176775310.html

Posted on 4 Comments

Readers debate State worker give backs on pensions and healthcare Readers debate State worker give backs on pensions and healthcare

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog.net_-1

Readers debate State worker give backs on pensions and healthcare 

The pensions and benefits for the officials and employees has already been reduced by the legislature, the costs of health benifits should be curbed by the legislature as well, but for the health care providers to raise costs they should have to go before the board of public utilities regarding tax funded health care costs. Why come after the worker when the health care vendors are milti-billion dollar enterprises, I’ll tell you why, too many politicians at all level of Govt. own stock in these companies and that kind of legislation might affect the stock prices.

Hummm , well in the Private sector I used to pay over $600 per month for health insurance for a single person working in finance  and now I have a consulting contract  were as part of the deal I pay a bit over $400 per month for insurance (up over 25% since Obamacare)  So for the record how much do you really pay in??

Deal Zone_125x125show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=205477

Posted on Leave a comment

Healthcare Rationing Begins : Mammograms

>
Mammography outcry points to trouble for healthcare reform
Some Republicans say the new recommendations are an example of ‘rationing’ that would take place under Obama’s plan to save money by basing treatment on experts’ advice.
By Noam N. Levey

https://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-na-health-evidence18-2009nov18,0,3113676.story

November 18, 2009

Reporting from Washington

Continue reading Healthcare Rationing Begins : Mammograms