Posted on

Reader says Don’t blame the State Workers on Pensions

money-growing-on-tree-image-8

Reader says Don’t blame the State Workers on Pensions 

NJ Gov. Chris Christie’s pension moves cost taxpayers and retirees billions
Aug 25th 2014 3:05PM

By RYAN GORMAN

Embattled New Jersey Governor Chris Christie faces another possible scandal – this time for possibly costing tax payers nearly $4 billion after diverting state pension funds to Wall Street firms.

Wall Street mega firms Blackstone, Third Point, Omega Advisors, Elliot Associates and The Carlyle Group have reportedly pocketed $3.8 billion dollars in fees since 2010 at a rate triple what was paid to pension fund managers prior to Christie assuming office.

Christie advisor Robert Grady notably had a long career at The Carlyle Group prior to joining the government, according to the International Business Times.

The switch was made in 2010 to give the state “diversified portfolio and maximize returns while appropriately managing risk,” Grady told the trade publication Institutional Investor in a report headlined “New Jersey ups the ante.”

The Carlyle Group has received $450 million in state pension funds while ranking among the top fee earners on Wall Street, according to state disclosure documents.

All management fees paid to firms by the pension have skyrocketed from only $125.1 million in 2009 to nearly $400 million in 2013, according to the New Jersey State Investment Council, which oversees the pension.

Those higher fees coupled with underperforming assets have left the pension with a benefits gap bigger than the state’s entire education budget.

This while the pension eked out a return of only 11.8 percent last year while similar funds average nearly a full percent higher, according to the IB Times.

Both pension funds used by teachers in California saw returns well over 18 percent in June alone, the Associated Press reported. They had expected returns of only 7.5 percent for the whole year.

New Jersey’s fund is also invested at a rate of just over 25 percent in financial firms, according to the NJSIC, more than double any other sector.

At least one person voted against Christie’s diversion plan, and he told the IB Times this outcome was inevitable.

“All the leading players on the [New Jersey State Investment Council] were from the alternative universe and all of their decisions were driven by a political agenda and an investment ideology which had no relationship to facts on the ground,” said Jim Marketti.

“And the facts were that you simply couldn’t justify these investments on the basis of what they cost in fees to generate a dollar of new returns.”

A New Jersey official defended the moves, saying that the state’s pension has earned a return this year of 15.9 percent.

Similar funds are averaging returns of well over 17 percent, according to the IB Times.

This is just the latest in a series of bizarre scandals for Christie that have included the “Bridgegate” traffic tie-up at the George Washington Bridge, the possible bullying of at least one high-profile mayor (Hoboken’s Dawn Zimmer) over Superstorm Sandy recovery funds and scrutiny of real estate deals around the state.

The questionable quandries have put a dent in his reported presidential ambitions as Christie defends the pension problems by saying they are proof retirement benefits to retirees – earned through decades of service to the Garden State – need to be cut.

There’s no word on whether “The Governor” would also demand fees paid to Wall Street also be cut.

https://www.aol.com/article/2014/08/25/nj-gov-chris-christies-pension-moves-cost-taxpayers-and-retire/20952169/

 

The problem with this article is it fails to mention all the graft of prior administrations , looking to blame only Christie while both Corzine and Mac Creepy ( and most of them since Whitman)  have far worse records managing the state pension funds ,Mac Creepy even hired non wall street totally unqualified advisors to manage money . 

Remember large returns come at a price and you get what you pay for . If they are over charging  well that typical politicians ,but the real issue is simple math , while you cant blame most of the workers for taking the checks , you can blame politicians looking for those union contributions to their political campaigns ,while the taxpayer has no representation  at the bargaining table ,its a very significant conflict of interest. 
The crux of the issues is with all pension systems is that it takes 10 or more  workers paying in to take care of every retiree, but productivity and technology continue to shrink the work force  .Less workers equal less money being paid in . To make up we increase salaries and hire more people than we should .
Thus a lot of unproductive dead wood . The private sector found this out a long time ago with US Steal, Bethlehem Steal and the auto industry .

After a certain point you read the law of diminishing returns  and for the tax base it becomes totally unsustainable ,.

For example in 1900 it took 5000 people to make 1 ton of steal , in 1980 it took 50 , so now the 50 were paying the pensions for 4950 people…ouch .

States like New Jersey are well past the breaking point  ,with companies and taxpayers high tailing it out of here , leaving fewer and fewer people to pick up the tab .

Depending on huge returns on wall street for prolonged periods of time is foolish and very dangerous  as the article points out fees need to be cut , money borrowed needs to be returned with interest,and retirees living out of state need to be taxed on their pension at a higher rate  as well as current state employees need to pay a far
larger share for their benefits.
Posted on

Reader says the chickens are coming home to roost on NJ Pensions and Healthcare !

CapitolBuildingofNewJersey-TrentonN

Reader says the chickens are coming home to roost  on NJ Pensions and Healthcare !

Our state’s employee health benefit program is $47 billion in the red because GOVERNORS and the legislatures have stolen funds from the health care and pension funds each and every year since Gov. Whitman. We are talking Billions of dollars in lost contributions and Billions of dollars in lost earnings on investments.

Doesn’t mention that FACT since he benefited by the theft from the health benefits program and pension system since the Governors didn’t need to increase their income taxes to raise the money to fund their pet programs. It was a win/win for the Governors, just take the money from the government employees health care fund and pension fund and say your not raising income taxes during your terms in office.

Well now those chickens are coming home to roost !

we pay as bills are incurred. We haven’t reserved anything against the future cost of all of the public sector healthcare bills because it’s a PAYGO system where we pay-as-you-go. That’s like a family running a $47 billion credit card bill with nothing saved in the bank to pay for it. So it will come out of our future wages, i.e. state & local taxes every year, which is why politicians are bending over backwards trying to get the current system to pay for current & retired public employees at the expense of everyone else. Nice sleight of hand, too: you act like you just deserve Rolls-Royce healthcare, like its your right, without even questioning how much it’s cost hardworking New Jerseyans. Classic “Me first!” greed.

TaylorMade RBZ Stage 2show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=205477

Posted on

Christie creates special commission to study pension problems

14405_trenton_new_jersey_s_state_house_capitol_in_trenton

Christie creates special commission to study pension problems

AUGUST 1, 2014, 1:38 PM    LAST UPDATED: SATURDAY, AUGUST 2, 2014, 12:36 AM
BY JOHN REITMEYER AND MICHAEL PHILLIS
STATE HO– USE BUREAU
THE RECORD

Governor Christie has become the latest governor to call for a commission to study New Jersey’s pension problems, creating a non-partisan panel to provide him with options as he continues a public campaign that focuses on cutting benefits for public workers.

Christie signed an executive order on Friday at an event in Parsippany. It calls for the creation of a panel he says will be non-partisan and include at least five members. Its task will be to review New Jersey’s public employee benefits, which he says have become difficult for the state to afford.

“The study commission’s charge is to think long term,” Christie said. “No idea is off the table.”

Christie said the call for a study commission will not cut short his No Pain, No Gain publicity campaign, in which his focus is on a need to cut benefits rather than raise taxes to make them more affordable.

“I’m going to continue to travel across the state and talk about the problem,” Christie said on Friday. “The problem doesn’t change.”

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/christie-creates-special-commission-to-study-pension-problems-1.1061087#sthash.KpaPrpNr.dpuf

Posted on

New Jersey’s Chris Christie Vows to Persevere on Pension Reform

Honda-Civics-collide-Ridgewood-Police-Ridgewood-Fire-Deparrtment

file photo by Boyd Loving

New Jersey’s Chris Christie Vows to Persevere on Pension Reform

Gov. Chris Christie said he would propose an overhaul to the state’s pension and health benefits system later this summer, revisiting an issue that burnished his national political image in 2011 but challenged him this spring when he scaled back promised funding. (Dawsey, Haddon/The Wall Street Journal)

https://online.wsj.com/articles/new-jerseys-chris-christie-vows-to-persevere-on-pension-reform-1404188010

Posted on

Judge: Christie can cut pension contribution payment

Gov. Chris Christie Discusses Candidates For Sen. Lautenberg's Seat

Judge: Christie can cut pension contribution payment

JUNE 25, 2014, 12:32 PM    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 2014, 11:06 PM
BY MELISSA HAYES AND JOHN REITMEYER
STATE HO– USE BUREAU
THE RECORD

Governor Christie won in court Wednesday, but the victory will likely be short-lived as he heads for a showdown with the Legislature over pensions and taxes today, a fight likely to go right back before the same judge.

POOL
Superior Court Judge Mary C. Jacobson asks a question arguments Wednesday, June 25, 2014, in Trenton.

At stake is the security of the state pension system, tax rates for New Jersey’s wealthiest residents and the viability of the next state budget. This fight between Christie, a Republican, and Democrats who control the Legislature comes as both have struggled to move the state out of a sluggish economy and have seen New Jersey’s credit rating downgraded six straight times.

The Legislature is readying today to advance a new state budget — supported by revenue from tax hikes that Christie opposes — that would make a bigger state payment into the pension fund and one that Christie has threatened to reject with his veto pen.

That could send the issue right back to state Superior Court Assignment Judge Mary C. Jacobson of Mercer County, who said Wednesday that Christie is allowed to reduce the pension contribution in the current fiscal year, which ends midnight Monday, by nearly $900 million to help close a $1 billion revenue shortfall.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/judge-christie-can-cut-pension-contribution-payment-1.1041080#sthash.wpBMsAVf.dpuf

Posted on

Pensions center stage today for Christie in court

Gov. Chris Christie Discusses Candidates For Sen. Lautenberg's Seat

Pensions center stage today for Christie in court

Wednesday, June 25th, 2014, and though Gov. Chris Christie is talking pension reform, the most vital pension conversation, at least in the short term, is being held in a Trenton courtroom this afternoon. (Symons/The Asbury Park Press)

https://www.app.com/story/news/politics/capitolquickies/2014/06/25/pensions-center-stage-today-for-christie-and-in-court/11345877/

Posted on

Stuart Rabner Enabler of statewide economic failure reappointed as Chief justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court

051014rabner

Stuart Rabner Enabler of statewide economic failure reappointed as Chief justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court

The state Senate this week overwhelmingly officially re-upped the appointment of the chief justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court despite the protests of some Republicans in the senate, including state Sen. Joe Kyrillos (R-13), who characterized Rabner as an enabler of statewide economic failure. (Politicker Staff)

https://www.politickernj.com/75006/winners-and-losers-week-june-16th

Posted on

Pension payment cuts in response to fiscal emergency, Christie administration says in court papers

New-Jersey-State-Capitol

Pension payment cuts in response to fiscal emergency, Christie administration says in court papers

Governor Christie cut payments to the state pension fund because New Jersey is in a fiscal emergency, his administration claimed Wednesday in a challenge to unions trying to block the move. That fiscal emergency, which could not have been predicted, allowed Christie to take direct action and cut part of his planned pension payment, the Attorney General’s Office said in court papers filed as part of the union lawsuit. And if the courts do get involved, that would hinder a budgetary process that was assigned to the Legislature and executive branch and be an action beyond the court’s authority, the administration said. (Phillis/The Bergen Record)

https://www.northjersey.com/news/pension-payment-cuts-in-response-to-fiscal-emergency-christie-administration-says-in-court-papers-1.1037240

Posted on

Trenton’s Broken Record

New-Jersey-State-Capitol

Trenton’s Broken Record
Jun. 19  
By Joe Sinagra | The Save Jersey Blog

“This plan is not only a matter of fairness and responsibility with pension payments, it is really about the full range of government services and opportunities, including such things as property tax relief, college affordability, public schools, law enforcement, transportation and many more priority needs,” NJ Senate President Steve Sweeney said on Wednesday as he rolled out his counter-proposal to Governor Chris Christie’s budget. “We have to maintain the state’s commitment to all New Jersey residents by meeting all of our commitments. This is a fair and responsible plan that will help meet those needs as it restores balance to the budget in a fiscally responsible way.”

So in all the years and administrations prior to Christie being governor, the 154 tax increases, raising the state sales tax from 6% to 7%, a 4% corporate tax surcharge, a 25% increase in liquor taxes, increased taxes for the citizens of New Jersey by over $10 billion dollars, an increase in the Realty Transfer Tax of $62 million on the state level, another $22 million on the county level, along with another $8 million tax on the lottery. . . Senator Sweeney now suddenly believes we need a fair and responsible plan?

What happened to all of the revenue that was already collected?

Even the promised tax rebate disappeared. On average, property taxes went up 55 percent statewide from the prior seven years before Corzine and another 20 percent when Corzine took office, and Corzine left us a $2.2 billion shortfall that existed when Christie took office on Jan. 19, 2010.

And Senator Sweeney decides now is the time to meet the commitments of the residents? Why is it that more is never enough in this state?

– See more at: https://savejersey.com/2014/06/new-jersey-budget-sweeney/#sthash.VrJfTZ1d.dpuf

Posted on

Christie says NJ government won’t shut down if judge rules against pension plan

New-Jersey-State-Capitol

Christie says NJ government won’t shut down if judge rules against pension plan

Gov. Chris Christie tonight said his administration would likely appeal if a state judge rules that he cannot go through with a controversial plan to reduce payments to New Jersey’s public worker pension system to help balance the troubled state budget. (Johnson/The Star-Ledger)

https://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/06/christie_says_he_has_no_idea_how_to_balance_nj_budget_if_judge_rules_agaisnt_penion_plan.html#incart_river

Posted on

Public pensions: The big bill

VillageHall_floods_theridgewoodblog.net_

file photo Boyd Loving

Public pensions: The big bill

Jun 10th 2014, 16:25 by Buttonwood

STOCKMARKETS may be close to all-time highs but that hasn’t eliminated final salary pension deficits. In the corporate sector, Mercer says US schemes are just 84% funded, while in Britain, the Pension Protection Fund estimates the number at 91%. Assets may have risen, but so have liabilities, thanks to low interest rates.*

The remarkably-productive folks at the Centre for Retirement Research in Boston havererun the numbers for state and local pension schemes. They find that the average scheme is just 72% funded, despite buoyant equity markets in 2013; back in 2001, the average scheme was 103% funded. On the plus side, the ratio may go up a bit. Up until last year, asset prices were smoothed over five years, which means 2009 is still dragging down the numbers; as it drops out, the funding ratio may rise.

But that is small comfort, because the liabilities are calculated by discounting future pension promises at the assumed rate of return, currently 7.7%. Even if one accepted the argument that this is the right way to discount a bill (the riskier your portfolio, the lower your pension bill appears to be, so the problem disappears if you put all your money in Venezuelan bonds), this seems a bit odd. In a world where 10-year treasuries yield 2.6%, 7.7% is a stretch.

The CRR calculates that the pension shortfall, on the states’ assumptions, is $1.1 trillion. A more realistic 5% discount rate pushes that up to $3 trillion, and 4% would make it $3.8 trillion. One could, of course, use a Treasury bond yield as the discount rate on the grounds that the liabilities are guaranteed but as the CRR has shown elsewhere, that doesn’t seem to be the case; states have been cutting benefits, mainly though skimping on inflation-linking.

Assuming too high a return eventually catches up with you. Returns fall short of assumptions so the deficit grows, and schemes must put in more money. The CRR shows that the required contribution rate has more than doubled from 6.7% of payroll in 2001 to 17.6% this year. Even then, the average state is only paying around four-fifths of the required rate sot the bill is merely being postponed.

https://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2014/06/public-pensions?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/thebigbill

Posted on

Readers say Public Sector Pensions Have Become Nothing more than well-organized defrauding of taxpayers

Ridgewood_-Village_Hall_theridgewoodblog.net_17

Readers say Public Sector Pensions Have Become Nothing  more than well-organized defrauding of taxpayers

This is nothing more than well-organized defrauding of taxpayers. The unions have full time officials and lawyers looking for every way possible to way to increase benefits whether they are sustainable or not. It’s easy to spend other people’s money through these generous contracts; until it runs out. Then you become Detroit or Stockton.

It worked when Public Sector salaries were a fraction of Private Sector salaries and people’s life expectancy was 65 years or less and our country was growing consistently and robustly. Now that the Public Sector has enjoyed tremendous growth both in the number of people employed by all levels of governement as well as dramatically increased salaries, life expectancy continues to improve, and growth in the US is slowing and maturing it is not sustainable. Simple economics tells you that fewer people (private sector) can not support more people (public sector) indefinitely. It just can’t. If I was a public employee I would be very diligent in keeping my eye on what is already happening around the country with towns, cities, and even counties declaring bankruptcy and eliminating all previously given retirement benefits. The courts have ruled that it can be done and it has been done and will continue to be done as the benefits burden simply overwhelms town, city, county, and state budgets.

Life expectancy is now +80 years, not 65 years or less. That means a private sector employee who retires at 65 has an average retirement of 15+ years. For a public safety official retiring at 52, or a teacher retiring at 61, they collect benefits for many more years than that (20-30 years) now despite the fact that they haven’t contributed as much as they end up taking out of the system. The benefits are either too generous, or should start after 65 years so as not to incent these workers or their municipal employers to just put in extra time on the job to get their full pension.

The model is no longer practical. Can we convert them to 401k? Give them what should have been paid in to a retirement plan and let them manage it. They are the ones who should be responsible for making the money last till they are 90.

One local resident might have 45 years or pension based on 22 years of service.

Father's Day Gifts! Save 15% on Truly Original Gifts at 1800flowers.com! Use Promo Code: FTHR14 (Offer Ends 06/15)show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=216823

Posted on

Village of Ridgewood “Unfunded liabilities (retirement payouts) reach $7.1M

VillageHall_floods_theridgewoodblog.net_

Village of Ridgewood “Unfunded liabilities (retirement payouts) reach $7.1M

Now Look at the Village of Ridgewood 2014 Budget Newsletter: “Unfunded liabilities (retirement payouts) are $7.1M (against a reserve of $479K)”…https://mods.ridgewoodnj.net/pdf/manager/2014BudgetNews.pdf
Why should anyone get a FULL, risk-free pension immediately after only 25 years of work ? The average retirement age of our public safety officials is 52.4, and they immediately start their full pension. In addition to that, on retirement they get up to six months of accumulated sick leave, paid out at their FINAL comp rate (salary + 10% longetivity pay) instead of at the rate when the leave was awarded earlier in their career. Most private sector workers don’t carry over sick leave from year to year, and don’t use it always – good health itself is reward enough. Yet municipal workers see this as a retirement perk, and this is very clearly being abused as per the article above.
Posted on

New Jersey’s warning for New York

CapitolBuildingofNewJersey-TrentonN

New Jersey’s warning for New York

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has faced heavy criticism since he announced that he’s deferring payments to the state’s pension system to balance his budget. But so far no one’s offering a real way out of Jersey’s pension dilemma.

Democrats blasted Christie for reneging on reforms passed in 2010 and 2011 to address the state’s massively underfunded pensions.

But they volunteer no reasonable alternatives to Jersey’s pension problems: Even more taxes on the rich don’t come near to fixing the mess.

Getting Jersey’s retirement system healthy is impossible without new ways of thinking about government in the Garden State — something that few in Trenton acknowledge.

Independent analysts rate the system as among the nation’s worst-funded, thanks to mismanagement and politically motivated self-dealing among politicians and union leaders dating back to the early 1990s.

The actual cost of beginning to pay down the state’s pension debt requires annual contributions of about $5 billion. But Jersey only collects about $32 billion a year in revenues.  (Malanga/New York Post)

https://nypost.com/2014/06/05/new-jerseys-warning-for-new-york/