Posted on

Purchasing health care a pig-in-a-poke process, which is no way to run a railroad

10407711_10204685141440448_3931753339455986992_n-169x300

10407711_10204685141440448_3931753339455986992_n-169x300

Purchasing health care a pig-in-a-poke process, which is no way to run a railroad

Posted by Scott St Clair On January 30, 2015 0 Comment

By Scott St. Clair | The Save Jersey Blog

Sometimes an isolated incident can offer profound insight into a large problem such as the exorbitant cost of health care in America. This week I experienced one that took an abstract academic argument down to a human level where that human was in pain and forced to make a crap-shoot medical decision.

Tuesday evening, I was forced to go to the emergency room of an Essex County hospital because I was in incredible pain. Now, I had a good idea what prompted the pain since I went to the same Essex County hospital four years earlier for the same thing.

My trip to the hospital was revealing!

Turned out then that I was diagnosed with some nerve issues in my lower spine that cause sciatica and blah, blah, blah because who cares about my problems.

Suffice to say that the pain was as severe as I have ever experienced.

While in the ER, the attending physician’s assistant wanted to give me morphine for the pain and an anti-inflammatory for whatever it is that anti-infammatories do – I don’t know since I’m a liberal arts grad.

She gave me the choice of receiving them, of which I wasn’t in doubt because at that point if I was a horse you’d shoot me, either through an IV drip or two injections.

I asked her, “Since it’s early in the year and everyone’s health insurance has kicked over into another $2 trillion worth of co-pays and deductibles, which method is cheaper?”

She good-naturedly laughed and responded saying, “I have no idea!”

And therein, dear readers, lies the rub.

In a common commercial transaction and necessary to create a binding contract, the buyer or consumer and the seller of goods or services must agree upon a price before the deal can be sealed. You’re not going to buy anything from a can of cat food to a new car without knowing what you’ll be paying. Generally, the seller won’t sell it to you without knowing what it cost him and how much he must sell it for in order to make a profit sufficient to keep the doors open.

Not so in health care where pig-in-a-poke purchasing is the norm.

Exactly what is your health care provider’s bottom line? What’s his cost for each hit of aspirin, each bandage, each whatever it is that he sells you that, at that moment in time, you don’t realize you’re buying?

In the hospital, what is the price differential between an IV drip and two injections, which I opted for in the end, and it was in the end that I received one of them because the nurse who gave it to me said the needle was very, very long, and she needed a very, very fleshy place in which to stick it?

I doubt if I’ll ever learn the answer, but had I the answer, I could have made a better-informed decision.

Assuming, as I did, that the medications were vital to my survival – at that point, were I a horse, I’d shoot me – and taking them wasn’t the issue, wouldn’t it have been helpful to choose the cheaper of the two alternatives since in either case I’d get what I needed and wanted?

Health care consumers and providers mostly grope in the dark when it comes to cost and price without any resort to arm’s-length bargaining for products and services. When you leave out this key factor, you lose any ability to control it through negotiation, opting for a less-expensive alternative or deciding to forego treatment altogether.

Prices are then left uncontrolled, and it’s up to the insurance company to cover the tab after you’ve satisfied that $2 trillion deductible. Is that any way to run a railroad?

This isn’t a new issue – it’s been talked about for years. But it hit home with me because I was confronted with it. I walked away – limped, actually – more convinced than ever that we’ll never get a real handle on health care costs in this country so long as consumers and vendors are ignorant as to the cost of the goods and services they’re buying and selling and not transacting health care business at an arm’s-length basis.

https://savejersey.com/2015/01/purchasing-health-care-a-pig-in-a-poke-process-which-is-no-way-to-run-a-railroad/

Posted on

5 Takeaways from the CBO’s Report on Obamacare

imgres-10

imgres-10

5 Takeaways from the CBO’s Report on Obamacare

Melissa Quinn / @MelissaQuinn97 / January 27, 2015

A nonpartisan entity of the federal government has found that the Affordable Care Act will cost the government less than expected. However, the reduction in the law’s price tag comes among findings that millions of Americans could lose their employer-provided health insurance.

The Congressional Budget Office came out with a report yesterday revising the costs and budgetary effects of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

Though the agency found that the health care law is projected to cost the government less than originally thought, the CBO projected enrollment in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) will continue to increase.

The CBO attributed the drop in Obamacare costs to lower-than-expected enrollments and subsidies given to those who are eligible.

Subscribe to updates and alerts

The number of consumers receiving subsidies could decrease even further following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the court case King v. Burwell. The high court will decide whether Americans purchasing health insurance on the federal exchange, HealthCare.gov, are eligible for subsidies.

The CBO found that Obamacare will cost the government less than expected, but up to 10 million will lose their employer-based coverage.

Here are five takeaways from the CBO’s report:

Obamacare provisions related to health insurance will cost the federal government $571 billion through 2019, a 20-percent reduction from the CBO’s projections in 2010.
Up to 10 million Americans will lose employer-based coverage.
Beginning in 2018, up to 16 million more Americans will have health insurance coverage through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Medicaid and CHIP will cost the federal government $59 billion more than previously estimated.
About 31 million people will remain uninsured by 2025.

https://dailysignal.com/2015/01/27/5-takeaways-cbos-report-obamacare/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thffacebook01272015

Posted on

Congressional Budget Office : Obamacare will cost $50,000 per person

imgres-10

imgres-10

Congressional Budget Office : Obamacare will cost $50,000 per person
JANUARY 26, 2015 6:56 PM
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, the UK Daily Mail is reporting ,that buried in a 15-page section of the nonpartisan organization’s new CBO ten-year budget outlook that the government will spend $1.993 TRILLION over a decade and take in $643 BILLION in new taxes, penalties and fees related to Obamacare .

The $1.35 trillion net cost will result in ‘between 24 million and 27 million’ fewer Americans being uninsured costing taxpayers, $50,000 for every person who gets health insurance under the Obamacare law, the Congressional Budget Office revealed on Monday.

The ACA will still leave ‘between 29 million and 31 million’ nonelderly Americans without medical insurance

These numbers assume Obamacare insurance exchange enrollment will double between now and 2025.

The best-case scenario described by the CBO would result in ’between 24 million and 27 million’ fewer Americans being uninsured in 2025, compared to the year before the Affordable Care Act took effect.

MrBeer Home Brewing Kits - Make a great gift!  Free shipping on select kits throught Christmas.

Posted on

Obamacare penalty may come as shock at tax time

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

Obamacare penalty may come as shock at tax time

By Tom Howell Jr. – The Washington Times – Sunday, January 18, 2015

Those Americans who didn’t get health insurance last year could be in for a rude awakening when the IRS asks them to fork over their Obamacare penalty — and it could be a lot more than the $95 many of them may be expecting.

The Affordable Care Act requires those who didn’t have insurance last year and didn’t qualify for one of the exemptions to pay a tax penalty, which was widely cited as $95 the first year. But the $95 is actually a minimum, and middle- and upper-income families will actually end up paying 1 percent of their household income as their penalty.

Read more: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/18/obamacare-penalty-may-come-as-shock-at-tax-time/#ixzz3PGuVeKXu

Posted on

Need help filing out your tax return? Don’t call the IRS

1379441947-obamacare3-300x27721

1379441947-obamacare3-300x27721

Need help filing out your tax return? Don’t call the IRS

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON (AP) — Filing a federal tax return is about to get more complicated for millions of families because of President Barack Obama’s health law. But they shouldn’t expect much help from the Internal Revenue Service.

Got a question for the IRS? Good luck reaching someone by phone. The tax agency says only half of the 100 million people expected to call this year will be able to reach a person.

Callers who do get through may have to wait on hold for 30 minutes or more to talk to someone who will answer only the simplest questions.

“Taxpayers who need help are not getting it, and tax compliance is likely to suffer over the longer term if these problems are not quickly and decisively addressed,” said a report Wednesday by agency watchdog Nina E. Olson.

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen says budget cuts are forcing the agency to reduce taxpayer services and other functions. The number of audits will decline, technology upgrades will be delayed and the agency might be forced to shut down and furlough workers for two days later this year, Koskinen said.

https://news.yahoo.com/irs-cuts-taxpayer-services-filing-returns-gets-harder-150035056–finance.html

Posted on

Tax time brings sobering surprise as health care act’s penalties kick in

imgres-10

Tax time brings sobering surprise as health care act’s penalties kick in

JANUARY 10, 2015, 11:58 PM    LAST UPDATED: SUNDAY, JANUARY 11, 2015, 12:03 AM
BY LINDY WASHBURN
STAFF WRITER |
THE RECORD

First the carrot, now the stick.

Insurance information needed for taxes

For every member of the household included on a tax return, ask:

Did you have health coverage for all of 2014? If not, was there a gap of more than three months?
 
Did you get insurance through the federal marketplace for New Jersey, HealthCare.gov? If yes, watch for an IRS Form 1095-A, which should arrive in the mail by the end of January. It provides information about your estimated income and subsidies, which you will need to reconcile with your actual income to determine whether your subsidies were too low or too high. Those who received subsidies will need to file a Premium Tax Credit form (8962), new this year.
 
If you did not have insurance, or had a gap in coverage longer than three months, consider whether to apply for a hardship exemption. More information, along with detailed instructions for applying for such an exemption, is available at HealthCare.gov.

Important dates

Feb. 15 is the last day to apply on the federal marketplace for New Jersey, HealthCare.gov, for coverage that starts on March 1.
 
April 15 is the deadline for filing federal income taxes.

The Affordable Care Act rolled out last year with the promise of health coverage for those who hadn’t been able to get it before. That was the good part. Now comes the penalty phase: Those who didn’t have health coverage in 2014 will probably owe the Internal Revenue Service money this year.

As tax-filing season opens, Americans are beginning to realize that President Obama’s signature health-reform law was as much about taxes as health insurance. Experts estimate that as many as 30 million Americans — 10 percent of the population – will be affected by the changes it made in the tax code this year.

How that shakes out – how many will pay penalties or be exempted from them, how many will see their tax refunds increased or decreased by the filing day of April 15 — remains to be seen. But as ignorance and confusion give way to surprise at the law’s impact on consumers’ pocketbooks, the political repercussions could be significant.

“I’m afraid this is going to be the third strike,” said Linda Schwimmer, vice president of the New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute. First was the discovery, in the fall of 2013, that those who liked their current insurance coverage wouldn’t necessarily be able to keep it – despite President Obama’s promise to the contrary. Next was the debacle, during the first open-enrollment period, of HealthCare.gov’s computer problems. Now comes the collision of the health law and income taxes.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/tax-time-brings-sobering-surprise-as-health-care-act-s-penalties-kick-in-1.1190382

Posted on

Anti-Growth Policies Continue To Slow Jobs Creation

0a

Anti-Growth Policies Continue To Slow Jobs Creation

https://www.business-superstar.com/words-of-wisdom/antigrowth-policies-continue-to-slow-jobs-creation/

PETER MORICI | 01.09.2015 | WORDS OF WISDOM

The economy added 252,000 jobs in December, down from 353,000 in November. With GDP growth slowing, prospects for jobless Americans are worsening.

The unemployment rate fell to 5.6 percent, but only because so many working age Americans quit looking for work and are no longer counted in the official jobless tally. If the same percentage of adults were in the labor force today as when Presidents Obama took office, the jobless rate would be about 9.9 percent

The Administration alibis Baby Boom retirements are driving down adult participation. However, nearly one in six men between ages 25 and 54 — too old for college and too young to retire — are jobless. Many are simply sitting at home watching ESPN, playing video games and relying on relatives, friends and government benefits for support.

The Obama recovery has managed only 2.3 percent GDP annual growth, and the economy has added only 6.4 million new jobs on his watch. Whereas during the Reagan recovery, the pace of economic growth was 4.8 percent, and 9.5 million jobs were added through the end of his sixth year.

America has not lost its capacity to innovate and create new products and industries but in a globalized economy, poor government policies block Americans from playing their strengths.

The nation still enjoys strong comparative advantages in manufacturing, but President Obama refuses to confront China, Japan and Germany about exchange rate and monetary policies that purposefully undervalue their currencies and artificially underprice their exports. And now it seems the president is intent on jamming through congress new free trade agreements that would further open U.S. markets to foreign competition, while countenancing continued currency manipulation and mercantilism abroad.

Restrictions on offshore drilling and onshore pipeline construction continue unnecessary U.S. dependence on foreign oil, divert billions of consumer dollars abroad and rob Americans of millions of jobs.

The cost of hiring workers is greatly increased by Obamacare health insurance mandates, minimum wages above the federal standard in 29 states and needlessly cumbersome business regulations. Along with threats of government-inspired litigation, those accelerate automation.

Amazon recently purchased Kiva Systems, which makes robots that will permit it to eliminate thousands of jobs at its fulfillment warehouses. Those systems are already at retailers including Crate and Barrel and Gap.

Administration polices have encouraged monopolization in key industries that are major contributors to the Democratic machine — greatly slowing growth and jobs creation.

Dodd-Frank lending regulations have proven too costly for smaller banks, and many have sold out to larger banks. Deposits are even more concentrated among “too big to fail” Wall Street banks, who often are not much interested in lending to Main Street businesses and homebuyers.

Cable companies enjoy considerable freedom to raise Internet and TV rates, and have taken the profits to acquire media companies and other businesses instead of enhancing service. For example, Comcast, whose CEO often hosts Obama fundraisers, has used monopoly profits from high cable rates to purchase NBC, where it underwrites political activists like Al Sharpton, instead of investing in systems that could raise Internet speeds and support more web-based businesses.

Major airlines, which are well represented in Washington, have consolidated to individually lock up many inter-city routes. Instead of passing along lower fuel prices by trimming ticket prices and adding flights, airline shareholders and employees are feasting on windfall gains. American Airlines is urging its pilots to accept a union contract that raises pay more than 20 percent — more than arbitrators awarded.

Obama’s lax immigration enforcement and amnesty are increasing competition for jobs. A study by the Center for Immigration Studies, released last June, found foreign born workers are taking the lion share of new jobs, especially those going to prime working age adults between the ages of 16 and 65.

Those forces combine to push down wages. Average family income, adjusted for inflation, has fallen from about $57,000 in 2000 to $52,000.

Peter Morici is an economist and business professor at the University of Maryland, and a national columnist. He tweets @pmorici1

https://www.business-superstar.com/words-of-wisdom/antigrowth-policies-continue-to-slow-jobs-creation/

 

Posted on

Yes-We-Can president faces twilight of maybes

azozy5

Yes-We-Can president faces twilight of maybes

December 28, 2014, 6:58 PM    Last updated: Sunday, December 28, 2014, 6:58 PM
By JULIE PACE and NANCY BENAC
Associated Press

WASHINGTON   — It was supposed to be a joke. “Are you still president?” comedian Stephen Colbert asked Barack Obama earlier this month.

But the question seemed to speak to growing weariness with the president and skepticism that anything will change in Washington during his final two years in office. Democrats already are checking out Obama’s potential successors. Emboldened Republicans are trying to push aside his agenda in favor of their own.

At times this year, Obama seemed ready to move on as well. He rebelled against the White House security “bubble,” telling his Secret Service detail to give him more space. He chafed at being sidelined by his party during midterm elections and having to adjust his agenda to fit the political interests of vulnerable Democrats who lost anyway.

Yet the election that was a disaster for the president’s party may have had a rejuvenating effect on Obama. The morning after the midterms, Obama told senior aides, “If I see you moping, you will answer to me.”

People close to Obama say he is energized at not having to worry about helping — or hurting — Democrats in another congressional election on his watch. He has become more comfortable with his executive powers, moving unilaterally on immigration, Internet neutrality and climate change in the last two months. And he sees legacy-building opportunities on the international stage, from an elusive nuclear deal with Iran to normalizing relations with Cuba after a half-century freeze.

“He gained some clarity for the next two years that is liberating,” said Jay Carney, who served as Obama’s press secretary until this spring. “He doesn’t have as much responsibility for others.”

https://www.northjersey.com/news/yes-we-can-president-faces-twilight-of-maybes-1.1182564

Posted on

As Medicaid Rolls Swell, Cuts in Payments to Doctors Threaten Access to Care

obamacare

As Medicaid Rolls Swell, Cuts in Payments to Doctors Threaten Access to Care

WASHINGTON — Just as millions of people are gaining insurance through Medicaid, the program is poised to make deep cuts in payments to many doctors, prompting some physicians and consumer advocates to warn that the reductions could make it more difficult for Medicaid patients to obtain care.

The Affordable Care Act provided a big increase in Medicaid payments for primary care in 2013 and 2014. But the increase expires on Thursday — just weeks after the Obama administration told the Supreme Court that doctors and other providers had no legal right to challenge the adequacy of payments they received from Medicaid.

The impact will vary by state, but a study by the Urban Institute, a nonpartisan research organization, estimates that doctors who have been receiving the enhanced payments will see their fees for primary care cut by 43 percent, on average.

Stephen Zuckerman, a health economist at the Urban Institute and co-author of the report, said Medicaid payments for primary care services could drop by 50 percent or more in California, Florida, New York and Pennsylvania, among other states.

In his budget request in March, President Obama proposed a one-year extension of the higher Medicaid payments. Several Democratic members of Congress backed the idea, but the proposals languished, and such legislation would appear to face long odds in the new Congress, with Republicans controlling both houses.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/28/us/obamacare-medicaid-fee-increases-expiring.html?_r=0

Posted on

Gruber is echoing a common sentiment among the American Left: You are too stupid to run your own life.

Jonathan Gruber

Gruber is echoing a common sentiment among the American Left: You are too stupid to run your own life.

Jim DeMint / @JimDeMint / December 15, 2014

Key Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber has been under a hot spotlight recently for disparaging comments he made about his fellow citizens.

In a series of videos taken at various conferences and lectures between 2010 and 2013, Gruber claimed that the effects of Obamacare had to be hidden from Americans because of “the stupidity of the American voter.” The Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor said that “lack of transparency is a huge political advantage” in writing such legislation and likened its critics to “my adolescent children.”

Gruber was echoing a common sentiment among the American Left: You are too stupid to run your own life.

Adding, well, injury to the insult, it’s been discovered that Gruber received almost $6 million in taxpayer dollars for his various services in designing and consulting on Obamacare.

This rolling disgrace culminated Tuesday in a particularly stern hearing by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which gave the penitent Gruber a thorough dressing-down.

Ouch.

While I hate to disagree with the formidable Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.,  I think Gruber should be given a medal for honesty!

Don’t get me wrong: Gruber’s erstwhile opinions about his fellow Americans are despicable. But he was only echoing a common sentiment among the American Left: You are too stupid to run your own life. It’s just rare that they tell us directly.

The attitude of the Washington political establishment in general—and liberal elites in particular—is that Americans aren’t smart enough to make their own decisions. The public must be cajoled, misled, threatened and flat-out lied to in order to achieve the greatest good.

Take, for example, Gruber’s assessment of the tax/fee argument at the heart of Obamacare’s passage and later Supreme Court fight:

This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure CBO [the Congressional Budget Office] did not score the mandate as taxes. If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. Ok, so it was written to do that.

This is absolutely true. Everyone in Washington—on both sides of the aisle—knows that this was a key maneuver in getting Obamacare passed. The scandalous thing here is not what Gruber said, but that he dared to admit it.

He follows in a grand tradition of progressives who posture themselves as champions of the common man, only to realize that the common man doesn’t necessarily share the same goals. Thus, regular Americans must be duped into acting a certain way. It’s for their own good, don’t you know!

This is a profoundly undemocratic mindset but all too common amongst those in power. Earlier this year the Associated Press recognized the Obama administration as the least transparent in history. This administration has prosecuted whistleblowers, attacked journalists and had the IRS put the squeeze on activist groups. It excuses this behavior with a “father knows best” attitude.

If you assume that your political opponents merely “cling to guns or religion” out of bitterness, it’s much easier to rationalize impinging upon the First and Second Amendments. If you’re convinced that folks couldn’t possibly live a healthy lifestyle on their own, you end upmicromanaging their lunches or downsizing their beverages.

You might even be tempted to mandate their healthcare options.

Thinking you know what’s best for the American people—better than they do, in fact—leads to a far greater violation of their best interests: taking away their freedom to decide for themselves.

Unfortunately, there are a lot more people in government who think like Jonathan Gruber.

https://dailysignal.com/2014/12/15/gruber-reflects-undemocratic-left/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Posted on

Gruber subpoenaed over ObamaCare contracts

jonathan_gruber_0

Gruber subpoenaed over ObamaCare contracts

ObamaCare consultant Jonathan Gruber has been subpoenaed for documents related to his work on the healthcare law after refusing to give details about his compensation to House lawmakers.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) issued the order late Thursday, asking for a full account of Gruber’s contracts with federal and state health insurance exchanges.

The decision follows a tense hearing earlier in the week in which Gruber, infamous for his comment that the “stupidity of the American voter” helped ObamaCare to pass, repeatedly declined to say how much he was paid as a consultant on the law.

Issa vowed to follow through with a subpoena and to possibly bring Gruber back to testify. The California Republican will be replaced as chairman in January by Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah).

“As one of the architects of ObamaCare, Jonathan Gruber is in a unique position to shed light on the ‘lack of transparency’ surrounding the passage of the President’s health care law, however he has so far been unwilling to fully comply with the Oversight Committee’s repeated requests,” Issa said in a statement Friday.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/226926-jonathan-gruber-hit-with-subpoena-for-contract-details

Posted on

Study finds dramatic jump in N.J. heart attacks after Superstorm Sandy struck

imgres-9

Study finds dramatic jump in N.J. heart attacks after Superstorm Sandy struck

DECEMBER 11, 2014, 11:12 PM    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2014, 11:16 PM
BY LINDY WASHBURN
STAFF WRITER |
THE RECORD

Superstorm Sandy ripped houses from their foundations, reshaped the Jersey Shore and shuttered countless businesses in October 2012, but now researchers at Rutgers University tell of another devastating consequence: It increased the rate of heart attacks and stroke among people grappling with the disaster, leading to many additional deaths.

In one of the first studies of its kind to look at the health effects of an extreme weather event, a team at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School compared heart attacks and strokes and the deaths they caused in the two weeks following the unprecedented storm with the same two-week period in five previous years.

In the most dramatic finding, researchers found a 22 percent increase in heart attacks — and a 31 percent higher death rate for those patients within a month of being stricken.

“Overall, Sandy likely added 125 cases of MI [myocardial infarctions, or heart attacks] and nearly 70 additional deaths,” the study concluded. “It also likely contributed 36 additional strokes in the most severely hit areas.”

Eight counties — Hunterdon, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Somerset, Sussex and Union — were included in the high-impact area for the analysis.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/study-finds-dramatic-jump-in-n-j-heart-attacks-after-superstorm-sandy-struck-1.1151952

Posted on

Elijah Cummings Savages Gruber: ‘Absolutely Stupid,’ ‘Incredibly Disrespectful’

9bb24294abafac8a16db9608a1bff58a

Elijah Cummings Savages Gruber: ‘Absolutely Stupid,’ ‘Incredibly Disrespectful’

By Brendan Bordelon
December 9, 2014 10:19 AM

Democratic congressman Elijah Cummings tore into MIT professor and Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber on Tuesday for his remarks on American voters and the passage of the Affordable Care Act.

The ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee made GOP chairman Darrell Issa’s opening statement sound tame by comparison.

“As far as I can tell, we are here today to beat up on Jonathan Gruber for stupid — I mean absolutely stupid — comments he made over the last few years,” he began, staring angrily at the hapless professor.

“Let me be clear, I am extremely frustrated with Dr. Gruber’s statements,” Cummings continued. “They were irresponsibly, incredibly disrespectful, and did not reflect reality. And they were indeed insulting.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/394270/elijah-cummings-savages-gruber-absolutely-stupid-incredibly-disrespectful-brendan

Posted on

Dark days ahead for ObamaCare

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

Dark days ahead for ObamaCare

By Elise Viebeck – 11/29/14 06:13 AM EST

The Obama administration is facing a slew of healthcare challenges as the winter holidays approach.

While this fall has been a far cry from last year, when HealthCare.gov was melting down, 2014 has brought wholly unexpected problems to the fore for federal health officials and the White House.

Take the conflict surrounding Jonathan Gruber, the ObamaCare consultant whose suggestion that a “lack of transparency” and voters’ “stupidity” helped the law pass, went viral.

Though Democrats have sought to distance themselves from Gruber, his remarks have become a new flashpoint in debate over healthcare reform, invigorating GOP critics as the party prepares to take control of the Senate.

Gruber has agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee on Dec. 9, in a final hearing for outgoing chairman and relentless administration antagonist Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.).

The gathering, also set to include Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Marilyn Tavenner, is sure to prove a distraction for the White House as officials try once again to keep a lid on opposition to the law.

Here are four additional challenges that the administration faces on healthcare this winter.

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/225348-dark-days-ahead-for-obamacare

Posted on

U.S. CEOs threaten to pull tacit Obamacare support over ‘wellness’ spat

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

U.S. CEOs threaten to pull tacit Obamacare support over ‘wellness’ spat

By Sharon Begley 4 hours ago

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Leading U.S. CEOs, angered by the Obama administration’s challenge to certain “workplace wellness” programs, are threatening to side with anti-Obamacare forces unless the government backs off, according to people familiar with the matter.

Major U.S. corporations have broadly supported President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform despite concerns over several of its elements, largely because it included provisions encouraging the wellness programs.

The programs aim to control healthcare costs by reducing smoking, obesity, hypertension and other risk factors that can lead to expensive illnesses. A bipartisan provision in the 2010 healthcare reform law allows employers to reward workers who participate and penalize those who don’t.

https://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-u-ceos-threaten-pull-tacit-obamacare-support-120556143–sector.html