Posted on 44 Comments

>the fly investigates Reform math (vs) Non reform math

>Which math do you want your child to do? Which math do you want to pay for with your soon to be increasing local taxes?

Reform math

This is a fifth-grade math question from “Investigations,” which deals with number sense and getting students to look at different strategies to solve a problem. The teacher would guide students to think of “sensible” ways to approach this multiplication problem:

Choose any two of these as a first step to complete 14 x 9 =

A. Start by solving 10 x 9 =

B. Start by solving 7 x 9 =

C. Start by solving 14 x 10 =

Students are asked to break the question into numbers that are easier to multiply. For instance, they could solve 10 x 9 = 90, and 4 x 9 = 36. Then they would add both sums together: 90 + 36 = 126. (Alternatively, they could start with 7 x 9 and then multiply the answer by 2, or start with 14 x 10 and then subtract 14.)

Not Reform math

This is a fifth-grade math problem from a Singapore Math textbook:
Solve: 492 x 98 =

The Singapore curriculum introduces multiplication problems in the second grade. The materials teach different strategies for doing these problems, such as memorizing multiplication tables and breaking problems down into smaller numbers. By fifth grade, the materials would assume students have mastered these skills, and would be able to multiply complex numbers.
Examples courtesy of the July 12th, 2007 Seattle Times article: New Math Stirs Passions Among Bellevue Parents, Teachers at https://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003785645_mathwars12e.html

Posted on 5 Comments

>Village now building IT infrastructure to support WIFI and downtown CCTV cameras

>byclcye
Dylan Hansen, the Village’s IT Network Administrator, publicly revealed during last evening’s Village Council Work Session that he is currently building out a technology platform that will support Village-wide WIFI and the use of CCTV cameras in the Central Business District. Hansen also reviewed several of his completed projects, including implementation of increased network security, improved spam filtering, and installation of on-site data servers.

Councilwoman Kim Ringler-Shagin praised Hansen for his efforts, but harshly chastised him for mentioning the possible use of CCTV cameras since she and other Council members have not yet discussed the merits of such an undertaking. Deputy Mayor Betty G. Wiest also thanked Hansen for his efforts in bringing the Village into the 21st Century from a technological standpoint.

Hansen has been employed by the Village since November of 2005. This was his first formal presentation in front of Council members.

Posted on 5 Comments

>New street lights coming to Ridgewood Avenue

>Village Council members last night approved conceptual plans for the installation of approximately 50 new street lights on Ridgewood Avenue, between Maple Avenue and Broad Street. It is anticipated that installation will begin by summer’s end; the project could take until winter to complete.

New, uniform lamp posts (green colored) and globes (with opaque glass) will replace the variety of posts & globes already in place. Total project costs have been estimated at $100K, with work to be performed by an as yet to be named private contractor in conjunction with PSE&G crews. Councilwoman Kim Ringler-Shagin has requested that all removed lamp posts be saved for sentimental purposes (even though they contain lead paint).

Posted on 46 Comments

>Village Council may consider implementing fees for selected services

>Village CFO Dorothy Stikna last night provided Village Council members with a list of possible opportunities to establish revenue streams and/or reduce expenses associated with certain Village provided services. Stikna’s list included:

1)Charging for emergency ambulance transportation
2)Establishing a “voluntary” charge for curbside removal of yard waste
3)Increasing waste water disposal fees for non-residential customers
4)Outsourcing lawn maintenance and landscape services at all VOR owned properties
5)Seeking opportunities reduce expenses at the VOR Central Garage
6)Making changes in the Solid Waste Removal process
7)Examining expenses associated with Fire Prevention services

Posted on 20 Comments

>Stage II Water Restrictions Now In Effect

>Despite yesterday’s drenching rain storm, Village Manager James M. Ten Hoeve announced that Stage II water restrictions are now in effect for all communities serviced by Ridgewood Water.

Stage II conditions permit watering of lawns only on an odd/even basis; no sprinkler use is allowed on Mondays. However, use of hand held hoses will be permitted at any time.

Police departments in the four communities impacted (Ridgewood, Glen Rock, Midland Park, and Wyckoff) are being asked to enforce the Stage II watering policy through the issuance of summonses when necessary.

Posted on 21 Comments

>a Reader questions out door dining rules

>We love the out door dining in town but sometimes I feel like I am walking into someones dinner.

A reader asks how much of the sidewalk are restaurants allowed to take (from the public) for outdoor dining? Fratelli Trattoria on E. Ridgewood between Oak and Walnut has three rows of tables, leaving only about 24 inches of clearance to pass between their tables and a tree.

ORDER FINE ART/ STOCK PRINTS ON-LINE

Posted on 23 Comments

>The Common Ground Report

>Before the Math Professors letters get misrepresented as some kind of incendiary hate speech I wanted to republish the following letters so you can make up your own mind.

Subject: Re: Common Ground Report

Dear Ridgewood Neighbor,

A number of people have attempted to claim that the Common Grounds
document means that we regard programs like TERC’s Investigations as acceptable. Nothing could be further from the truth.
It got to the point that the two mathematicians among the authors, Wilfried Schmid and I, were forced to provide a joint clarifying statement, and I append it below.

Just to be entirely clear, I can’t speak for Wilfried beyond what we say
jointly in our statement below, however my personal view is that TERC is
the second most mathematically illiterate and damaging program I have ever
seen.
The first, MathLand, was one of the main reasons I got involved in
issues of mathematics education, but Investigations is so little better
than that horror that it is scarsely possible to discern the difference
between the results for the students subjected to these programs.

Here is the joint statement that I mentioned above:

The following is a joint statement from
Wilfried Schmid
Professor of Mathematics
Harvard University

and

R. James Milgram
Professor of Mathematics
Stanford University

It has been suggested that our views on K-12 mathematics education have undergone a recent change. Not at all — we have consistently maintained that mathematics education must strive for a proper balance between mathematical reasoning, problem solving, and computational facility.

Mathematical reasoning requires not only accurate definitions, but also examples of precise reasoning with these definitions. In our view, all of the NSF funded curricula fall short of giving students the essential tools to reason accurately.

Basic number skills continue to be vitally important. Beyond the everyday use of arithmetic, these skills provide a crucial foundation for the higher level mathematics essential for today’s and tomorrow’s workplace. The NSF funded curricula generally encourage overuse of calculators, do not give students sufficient support to achieve automatic recall of basic number facts, do not teach algorithms properly, and pay insufficient attention to the arithmetic of fractions. We regard the K-5 program “Investigations in Number, Data, and Space” (TERC) as especially deficient.

R. James Milgram
Wilfried Schmid

Posted on 48 Comments

>Ridgewood lifts ban on signs of hospital critics

>SAVE THE WHALES!

From Saturday’s Record

Ridgewood lifts ban on signs of hospital critics

Saturday, July 7, 2007

By BOB GROVES
STAFF WRITER

Citing the right to free speech, Ridgewood officials have reversed a ban on lawn signs that say “Stop The Valley Hospital Expansion.”

Residents who had posted the yellow signs on their front lawns had received letters from the village ordering them to remove the signs. They were told the signs violated a village zoning ordinance.

But Anthony Merlino, Ridgewood’s construction official and zoning officer, said he changed his mind after he received “many sincere inquiries” and consulted with the village attorney.

“The village will not take any action to have the signs removed,” he wrote in a letter to residents.

A spokeswoman for the hospital declined to comment on Friday.

Many neighbors of The Valley Hospital have protested its proposed $750-million plans to add a one-story parking deck on Linwood Avenue, and to tear down two older buildings and replace them with three new structures up to 80 feet tall. The hospital campus is surrounded by homes and a middle school.

Residents who received notices to remove their signs were only further frustrated with the village. While Valley has presented its plans to town officials several times, opponents were told they must wait until September to argue their case against hospital expansion.

“I’m very upset about the letters,” said Patricia Ciliberti, who lives near the hospital. “They were attacking my free speech. I’m from the protest generation. I’m still upset.”

Despite being told to remove her sign, she never took it down.

Valley was “a small community hospital” when she bought her home in 1991, she said. “I don’t want them to get any bigger,” she said.

Jim Blinn, who lives directly across from the hospital, said he was relieved his sign could stay.

“I thought they had overstepped their bounds,” Blinn said. “I was taken aback. I thought it was intrusive.

“We left our sign up the entire time, to make other members of the village aware of this massive, mind-boggling project,” he said.

The “Stop Valley” signs are protected under non-commercial speech because they address a public issue, said Matthew Rogers, the village attorney. The same laws protect political campaign signs and placards promoting issues such as a local effort to remind residents to “Drive 25,” Rogers said.

“The courts, and a litany of case law on regulating signs in residential areas, have found that non-commercial speech is more protected than commercial speech, [such as] signs talking about a carwash going on,” Rogers said.

The “Stop Valley” signs can remain in place only if they meet certain criteria set by the village, Merlino said. They must not be larger than 18 inches by 24 inches in size, and they are limited to one sign per property, to prevent “visual clutter” in residential neighborhoods, he said.

The signs may not be placed on village property, or in public rights of way, including sidewalks or curb areas, and they must not obstruct the vision of pedestrians or drivers, Merlino said.

Otherwise, “we have to allow them if they’re on private property, and they’re for a cause, like ‘Save the Whales,’ ” he said.

Posted on 8 Comments

Confessions of a Village Merchant

>ballons

Parking is the issue he told the fly, the rents don’t mean anything if you have the traffic and this town needs out of towners to come in and shop in order for the down town to survive, there are just not enough locals shopping. I asked him but do you really think we need a huge garage? Yes if it’s done tastefully and fits into the down town, but I said aren’t you worried about this monster garage will only being used for NJT commuters and not shoppers? Well that could happen but all the down town employees could use the garage for parking .Restaurants employ a lot of people and the garage could get them off street parking and open the streets up for customers. Look there are lots of businesses in town not just retail, restaurants and banks all would benefit if people had easy parking. I don’t have anything against banks and restaurants we just need more parking.

The parking meter money was originally targeted to raise funds to build a garage but then they just pushed it into the general fund.

The village he said should use it efforts to market to stores to get them to move into town but they have to be careful not to make the down town look like any shopping mall.

He said over and over, they should have built the parking when they had a chance in the 1970’s.

Why has there been so many who continue to speak up against the parking garage? Well the Village Hall renovation was a total fiasco and the council has never come clean, the architects, council and the engineers all made a mess of it. The flooding is worse now than ever. This gives them no credibility with any construction projects, people just worry they are going to screw it up.

Posted on Leave a comment

>House Overwhelmingly Passes Garrett Amendment Protecting Small Business

>House Overwhelmingly Passes Garrett Amendment Protecting Small Business
Garrett Amendment is a “Key Vote” for U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed Congressman Scott Garrett’s amendment to the Fiscal Year 2008 Financial Services Appropriations Act, helping small businesses grow and American financial markets thrive, by a strong bipartisan vote of 267- 154.

“Small business is the backbone of our economy and it deserves our help,” said Garrett. “The excessive auditing and reporting requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley law are breaking the backs of public companies and American financial markets and they will surely crush small businesses altogether. Today, the House said with a strong voice that small business is important to our economy and we will protect them from overly-burdensome regulations that keep them from prospering.”

Garrett’s amendment was supported by the American Banking Association, Independent Community Bankers Association, National Taxpayers Union, Citizens Against Government Waste, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which deemed a vote in favor of the Garrett amendment a “key vote” for American small business.

Garrett has also introduced a bill, the Small Business SOX Compliance Extension Act (H.R. 2727), to extend the current small business exemption under Section 404(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley a full year.

Posted on 37 Comments

>Look at the Test Scores

>From the vormath site:

Look at the test scores.

In 2000, Travell was ranked 81st in the state for 4th graders.
In 2006, Travell was ranked (dropped) to 277.

In 2000, Orchard was ranked 47th in the state for 4th grader.
In 2006, Orchard was ranked 174.

Rankings were based upon the aggregate (total) of the advanced, proficient, and partial proficient NJAsk math scores for 4th graders. (Visit psk12.com to see scores from 2000 to now).