Posted on Leave a comment

>“Individual AMT Repeal Act of 2009”

>Dear Friends,
Last week, I introduced the “Individual AMT Repeal Act of 2009” bill, which ends the stealth tax on American families. In previous years Congress has “patched” the AMT, but this method leaves many taxpayers uncertain about whether they will fall into the AMT trap each year.

According to the Urban Institute/Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, if Congress fails to act, in 2010, the AMT will ensnare 33.4 million taxpayers, or roughly 35 percent of all individual filers who pay income tax. This is an 854% increase in the number of taxpayers affected by the AMT since 2006. My proposal to repeal the AMT will rescue taxpayers falling victim to a tax created in the 1960s to target the wealthy who were using loopholes to avoid paying any taxes. I think most Americans will agree that they are paying their fair share in taxes, thus making an arcane ‘gotcha tax’ duplicative and irrelevant for millions of Americans.

Rather than reform the tax code to insure that the wealthiest taxpayers paid into the system, Congress created a parallel tax structure and never indexed it for inflation, adding hundreds of pages of complexity to an already convoluted process. Since 2001, Congress has recognized the devastating effect this tax has on American families, and has moved to ‘patch’ the AMT. I propose we eliminate this tax completely to provide permanent relief for taxpayers.

The 5th District of New Jersey is a prime case study of how the AMT affects Americans. According to the most recent tax statistics on the number of taxpayers burdened by the AMT, our district ranks 7th out of 435 congressional districts.

Throughout my tenure in Congress, I have consistently fought for tax relief. I am continuing this fight in the 111th Congress. This tax relief legislation will put more money back into the hands of American workers to further create jobs and promote economic growth, which we can all agree is essential in the current economic climate.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett

Member of Congress

Posted on Leave a comment

>So here is the spin on Dr. Stotsky from Laurie Goodman

>

Did you hear the one about the math expert who wasn’t invited to the party?

I understand a few folks are riled up about a Harvard-educated math person, Dr. Stotsky, who supposedly “offered” her services to the District in our math quest. There’s an email circulating with plenty of misinformation and spin. Here’s my PERSONAL take on, and clarification of, the situation. (And, just so we’re clear, by “personal” I mean these are my opinions and perspectives only and I am in no way speaking for the Board.)

1) We are pretty far into the process (as the email writer says, 2 years) and the administration may feel that to bring in new participants now might bog things down, require backtracking, etc. I can understand that. We need to keep moving forward, the community has waited long enough.

2) The Math Planning Team’s experts are also learned and experienced. One could argue that they may be more math-focused than Dr. Stotsky, as my quick read of her background shows an emphasis also on reading/language. But I’ll agree that she’s at least “as expert” as the others. (And BTW, the more I learn about the politics involved in the National Math Panel, the less I view its report as the 10 Commandments, nor its participants as the high priests of math…sorry, not sure why I veered into religious terminology!)

3) Dr. Stotsky should not be characterized as a somehow “more objective” observer. Like many mathematics experts, she is also a consultant to a textbook company (Sadler-Oxford Mathematics). I have no idea if that company’s programs are being considered in Ridgewood, but the point is, everyone has a point of view; seems to me there is no such thing as a truly objective expert.

4) Dr. Stotsky did not benignly “learn of” our internal math divisions but rather was actively recruited by a parent with an agenda and admitted desire to undermine the administration. It would not surprise me if District personnel were at least suspect of the motivations. (This is my guess; no one said this to me.)

5) There has been no direct communication between Dr. Stotsky and the District administration. She did not approach, write, call or email the District.

6) The misinformation email says there’s “no end in sight” in our math effort. That’s not true. The Team is working according to a publicized schedule/plan and the end is certainly within sight.

7) The email mentions Dr. Stotsky’s involvement in Massachusetts’ high scores in the TIMMS test, and that Mass is “one of only two U.S. states to receive top scores in the international TIMMS tests, scores that rank them near the Asian countries that lead the TIMMS every year.” The truth of Massachusetts’ TIMMS performance should be taken with a grain of salt — there were only a few states who even participated in the tests as states. New Jersey did not. (It’s my understanding that any state or group of schools can pay to be scored as a group). The test mainly measures countries’ performance. Also, Massachusetts is not New Jersey (in a nutshell). (And as an aside, isn’t Massachusetts the home of TERC/Investigations? Aren’t they using it in a lot of schools there? What does that mean?. Kind of ironic, at the very least!)

You know what, Mr. Misinformation? This is not helping. (And by “this” I don’t mean talking about math. Talking and sharing are good. I welcome your comments. What’s not helpful is spreading misinformation and trying to fan the flames.) We have a plan. We have smart Ridgewood educators working on the plan. We have experts advising our educators. I’m looking forward to seeing what the Team comes up with and asking my questions at that time.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Could this happen in Ridgewood?

>Budget ax landing on public employee

THE RECORD

Monday, January 12, 2009

BY MERRY FIRSCHEIN AND DEENA YELLIN

Many North Jersey municipalities are considering drastic cost-cutting measures as they face skyrocketing expenses amid shrinking revenues and a faltering economy.

Among the areas to be targeted, according to local officials, are municipal personnel, capital improvement projects and non-essential services. As a result, residents may find some local roads unpaved, higher fees at borough hall and fewer municipal employees.

“These are not popular decisions,” Paramus Borough Administrator Anthony Iacono said. “But we all have to bear down and make them.”

Fort Lee will continue a hiring freeze instituted last year, “except those new hires needed to operate government in an efficient manner,” Mayor Mark Sokolich said. The borough has not created any new positions, and some municipal positions were eliminated, such as the attorney for economic development.

Hillsdale staff will be reviewed for possible layoffs and a recently retired DPW foreman will not be replaced, said Borough Administrator Harold Karns, who is retiring from his position. A replacement for Karns has not yet been named.

Jobs currently performed by full-time employees, such as janitorial services and garbage services, may be outsourced, which would yield a significant savings, Karns said.

In Paramus Borough Hall, offices may empty out.

“As people leave positions through retirement or resignations, prior to [those positions] being filled, we are making efforts to reevaluate the position,” said Iacono. “Some will clearly and definitely not be replaced.”

And although layoffs of municipal employees have not yet been discussed in Norwood, the borough will replace a full-time Board of Heath secretary with a part-time employee.

“There’s a lot of belt-tightening,” Westwood Mayor Joe Birkner said. “Our pencils will be very sharp as we go through our budgets line by line to see where we can make cuts.” Westwood has opted not to replace some employees who left or retired, asking other employees to assume their duties.

Westwood also is saving money by renegotiating contracts at lower rates and canceling a contract with a pesticide company, said Borough Administrator Robert Hoffmann.

In some towns, the financial woes are extending into employee pockets and wallets.

Fort Lee’s mayor, council members, borough planner, engineer, auditor, accountants and other professionals will take a 5 percent pay cut this year, Sokolich said.

Garfield’s professionals will not receive any raises this year, the same as in 2008, said City Manager Thomas Duch. The mayor and council members have not received an increase in at least five years, Duch said.

In Paramus, the mayor and council will make contributions to their health benefits, Iacono said. Teamsters union members will now have a health insurance co-payment, he said.

Hillsdale has finalized contracts with the police, Teamsters and office associations requiring contributions from employees towards health insurance for the first time: Police will contribute $780 per year, Teamsters $520, and office staff $260 annually.

“We will be looking for contributions to medical benefits and we will be looking to a lower percentage in their yearly salary increase than the previous year’s 3 percent,” Borough Administrator Lorraine McMackin said.

Some communities, such as Paramus and Midland Park, are considering price hikes on various local fees such as animal licenses and permits.

Midland Park is looking at existing fees “with the sense of not to jump it up, but to examine what we charge and change it to what is fair for the market for the service,” Borough Administrator Michelle Dugan said.

Hillsdale officials will raise construction fees and other municipal charges are being reviewed for possible increases, Karns said. In Garfield, officials will look at increasing revenue through raising penalties on what Duch termed “quality of life” ordinances.

Other towns are delaying capital improvement projects until their financial outlook appears brighter.

Hillsdale will not embark on any projects, except for small essential jobs, such as repaving a damaged street and replacing leaking roofs.

Several capital improvement projects in Northvale have been delayed and some road resurfacing projects are likely to be put off as well.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Sign of the Times!

>1

New Ridgewood Police Chief John LiPuma has ordered the deployment of this electronic billboard to stem the rising tide of pedestrian vs. motor vehicle accidents in Ridgewood’s Central Business District.

The sign is located near the intersection of East Ridgewood Avenue and North Maple Avenue.

Way to go Chief!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Latest $$ Total for Blogging Out Hunger Campaign

>Hi Everyone,

The Community FoodBank just informed me that they’re now attributing $7,000 in donations to our Blogging Out Hunger efforts! They also reported 1,010 click throughs to their Web site from the blogs!

This is especially helpful since the demand for food is still increasing! Please keep the message out there. I will send you all the new banner hopefully this weekend.

I have not sent a blogroll out yet because JerseyBites is being redesigned and I’m waiting for that to happen (end of Jan.) and I’m also in search of a widget that I can use to build a blogroll. If you know of a good tool, please pass that along.

Thanks again for everything. I think a goal of $10,000 next year is very attainable. Maybe we’ll have to shoot for $15,000.
Have a great Weekend.

Deb Smith
JerseyBites.com
This Week on JB, Win a Free Pizza from Pizza Hut
Follow me on Twitter @jerseybites

Posted on Leave a comment

>NJ Transit Jeopardizes Employee & Passenger Safety to Maintain On-Time Performance

>The Fly has learned that NJ Transit’s Rail Operations Division routinely jeopardizes employee and passenger safety by keeping trains moving despite the existence of on-board medical emergencies or unruly passengers.

Trains are not halted at the closest station stop because NJ Transit does not want to block tracks and prevent any following trains from continuing on schedule. Instead, NJ Transit train dispatchers are instructed to route trains requesting police or emergency medical (EMS) personnel response to the nearest station with “passing track” capability.

The Ridgewood station has a passing track; our police and EMS units are frequently dispatched to meet trains with unruly passengers, or those with persons requiring emergency medical assistance.

One such incident happened on the evening of Thursday, January 8th, at approximately 8:18 PM, when four (4) Ridgewood police officers were dispatched to meet NJ Transit Train #65, for assistance in removing two (2) unruly passengers from the train.

Train #65 (express from Secaucus Junction to Suffern) left Hoboken at 7:57 PM with a Secaucus Junction station stop recorded at 8:07 PM. Two (2) passengers became unruly near the Rutherford station. The train crew was instructed to continue operating the train through to Ridgewood’s passing track, where they would be met by uniformed Ridgewood PD and NJ Transit PD officers.

Why wasn’t the train stopped at the station just beyond Rutherford? What if the two (2) unruly passengers had been armed and began using their weapons in Rutherford? If a passenger had collapsed with a heart attack in Rutherford, would NJ Transit have also continued the train up to Ridgewood?

The Fly believes NJ Transit must place the goal of passenger and employee safety ahead of on-time performance.

IdentityTruth Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Distribution of Affordable Housing Units within Village of Ridgewood

>Data obtained from documents submitted to COAH, and posted on official Village of Ridgewood website.

7-11 Ridge Road – 129 units

46-50 Leonard Place – 4 units

308-316 South Broad Street – 4 units

296 Prospect Street – 5 units

234 South Broad Street – 2 units (proposed change to 10 units, pending approval of new construction)

130 Prospect Street – 14 units

100-200 South Broad Street – 20 units proposed, pending agreement with developer and approval of new construction

Total units (following approval of 2 proposed plans) = 186

As noted above, with the exception of units located at 7-11 Ridge Road, all other affordable housing units are concentrated within one neighborhood of the Village.

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Nothing scares misbehaving policians more than the public space and the light of day

>After being elected and depending on the Ridgewood Chamber of commerce’s members for tax income, it’s only logical for Ten Hoeve and Zussy to play little dictators to the Chamber of Commerce: Take their money, and throw it in the garbage. Isn’t this what power means?

But if we’re to have an effective government and be pro-active, the Chamber of Commerce and whoever was against it should have said something when it happened.

I know, I know in this day and age, when budgets are slashed, and localities’ credit ratings are in play, the mayor and others have better things to do than worry about decorations, but the Chamber of Commerce should have said: ” If you’re going to decorate in this way, use your money, not ours. ” I’m sure that the merchants and other ChoC members have worked hard for that money? Don’t let yourself be bullied! Let the bullies know that you will not be intimidated, and you will call them on it publicly!

You’re not uncouth, unfair, etc. if you tell a politician that HE can’t make a mockery of YOUR hard-earned money (in general) or cherished tradition that have great meaning to all, in this particular case. And if you don’t see the charm of garbage-on-a-string, then you, the payer should get what YOU want.

Also, do it when it happens, not a month later: If you paid for a new car (and with $15,000 you can buy a new car) and they gave you a banged-up car full of garbage would you ever drive the thing off the lot and complain a month later? I don’t think so, so don’t do it again! They (despot-politicians) take this as a sign of weakness.

Nothing scares misbehaving policians more than the public space and the light of day, so call them on it, and if they don’t stop, SHOUT!

Microsoft Store

Posted on Leave a comment

>Chris Christie files papers for Governors Race

>Dear Friend,

This morning I am filing papers to begin the process to become a candidate for the Republican nomination for Governor of New Jersey.

I did not take this step lightly. It was only after careful consideration and consultation with my family that I decided to become a candidate.

New Jersey is broken. New Jersey’s taxes have become so unaffordable that more families are leaving our state than moving here. Our state’s business tax climate is ranked 50th in the nation and has become so unattractive to employers that only government jobs are growing in New Jersey. Yet nothing in Trenton gets done to fix these problems.

We can change this. We can solve these problems if we’re willing to make the tough decisions.

In my seven years as your United States Attorney, I didn’t shy away from any of the tough decisions. I took on corporate greed, political corruption, terrorism and environmental polluters. Public officials from both parties were prosecuted for corruption – more than 130 were convicted, and not one was acquitted. Corporate executives who cheated their companies and hurt their workers were successfully prosecuted. Terrorist plots were disrupted; polluters punished.

Many didn’t believe we could win these battles. We did, and with strong leadership we will win the fight for Governor and change this state for the better.

My formal announcement for Governor will come in the first week in February and I hope you will join us (I will email you the details). With strong leadership now, we can fix our broken state and make it more affordable for all New Jersey families.

Sincerely,

Chris Christie

PS. Our website is still in formation, but please visit, https://www.christiefornj.com/
, to sign up for email updates and details about our announcement.

Posted on Leave a comment

>111th Congress Convenes This Week

>Dear Friends,
Yesterday, I took the oath of office to begin serving my fourth term in the United States Congress as your representative from the 5th District of New Jersey.

I’m deeply honored for the faith and trust that the people of northern New Jersey have again placed in me to serve as their voice in Washington, and I would like to take this time to reiterate my commitment to serving you.

While we face many challenges in the coming days, including mending our economy and combating unemployment, I look forward to working with Members from both sides of the aisle to reach consensus that will best serve the American people.

Upon his inauguration in 1985, Ronald Reagan said, “In this blessed land, there is always a better tomorrow…Let history say of us, ‘There were golden years – when the American Revolution was reborn, when freedom gained new life, when America reached for her best.”

My friends, what will history say of us? President Reagan challenged America to make the future worthy of the past. We too must undertake this great test. How can we make our future worthy of our past? We must rehabilitate our economy by helping small businesses to promote growth. We must protect our environment by searching for renewable energy sources and promoting conservation. We must shrink our mountainous debt by reducing wasteful government spending. And we must preserve and protect the individual freedoms of the American people.

As the 111th Congress begins, I will keep these challenges firmly in mind as I continue my work as your advocate in Washington. Thank you, and God bless America.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett

Member of Congress

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Calls Grow to Cap Property Taxes

>NA AV067 PROPTA NS 20090104181214

By JENNIFER LEVITZ
Support for property-tax rollbacks is building from Arizona to New York, fueled by angry homeowners in some locales who are seeing rising tax bills despite plunging home prices.

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123111472983052521-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAxNzEwMTc0Wj.html

Seacoast Online Media Group
Protesters angered by rising property-tax assessments in Hampton, N.H., release tea into the wind in a re-enactment of the Boston Tea Party.
Legislatures in New York, Georgia, Oklahoma and Wyoming are considering taking up proposals to curb property taxes in their 2009 sessions. In Indiana, a cap on property taxes enacted last year became effective Jan. 1, and lawmakers are planning to vote this year on whether to put before voters a constitutional amendment that would cap taxes permanently at 1% of a property’s value.

In recent months, citizen groups in Montana, Nevada and Arizona have organized to get property-tax-relief measures on state ballots. Florida voters last year amended the state’s constitution to increase a number of property-tax exemptions, lowering their assessments.

“We just can’t afford these increases in property taxes,” said Lynne Weaver, a 59-year-old retired swimsuit saleswoman in Phoenix, who said her investment nest egg “has pretty well been cut in half” by market declines. She is a leading volunteer for Prop. 13 Arizona, an organization collecting signatures seeking a 2010 ballot measure that would roll back home valuations to 2003, before the boom that preceded the bust in home prices, and which would also cap annual property-tax increases at 2% of home value.

New York City boosted property taxes by 7% effective Jan. 1, and other towns in the state are also sending out higher bills, even as Gov. David Paterson and some legislative leaders are supporting a recent report that recommended a 4% statewide cap in property-tax increases. A commission empaneled by Gov. Paterson’s predecessor called for the cap in response to concern that the state’s levies — among the highest in the nation on property — were curbing growth and encouraging migration.

Taxes can go up when prices decline because assessed values lag behind market realities. The values that cities and towns use to calculate tax bills are often based on house sales a year or more before the bills are issued. That means that many recent bills don’t take into account the meltdown of 2008, when house prices fell by an average of about 20% across the country.

In addition, cities and towns are facing a barrage of recession-related financial pressures, including cuts in state aid and investment losses. That is tempting many to look for added revenue from property taxes, one of the few revenue sources they control.

That has set the stage for more tension between taxpayers and municipal officials hard-pressed to pay bills.

“It’s pretty hard not to institute some increase in property taxes,” said Stephen Altieri, town administrator of Mamaroneck, N.Y., whose town board voted Dec. 17 to raise the town property-tax rate in a main part of the New York City suburb to $14.25 per $1,000 in assessed home value, from $10.20. Mr. Altieri said Mamaroneck is facing a “sort of a perfect storm” because of declining investments, and falling revenue from a 1.3% tax it receives on the value of new mortgages. Along with raising property taxes, the town is also trimming its own spending, he says.

In Evans, N.Y., outside Buffalo, October assessments reflected strong home prices through July 1, 2007, and residents were so irked that they picketed Town Hall, started a Web site, and presented the town clerk with a petition calling for the assessments to be thrown out. The town declined to do that, but it says it has been hearing individual appeals.

Parts of the country that felt the real-estate bust early have seen some reductions in property taxes, but some residents in communities that were hit by the downturn later are in shock.

“Disbelief” is how 55-year-old John Kane, a financial adviser, describes his reaction to the assessed value of his home in Hampton, N.H., which soared 55% to $850,200 recently, from $549,300 in 2007. His annual taxes jumped 30%, to nearly $14,000. “We see empty houses, for-sale signs,” Mr. Kane said. “And they value our houses like this?”

About 100 Hampton residents formed a group called the Coalition for a Fair Assessment, and staged a protest at Hampton Harbor, waving tea bags in a mini re-enactment of the Boston Tea Party. The group urged local homeowners to appeal their bills — which many are doing. They also got on the Town Council’s agenda on Monday to advocate a reassessment that reflects the real-estate slump.

In Louisiana’s St. Tammany Parish, north of New Orleans, tax assessor Patricia Schwarz Core said 15,000 residents have requested a formal review of their 2008 revaluations, compared with 500 in a typical revaluation.

On his Web site, Louisiana state Rep. Kevin Pearson, a Republican, calls the 2008 revaluations in St. Tammany ridiculous and says some residents saw their assessed values jump 150% since the revaluation four years ago. In an interview, he said he is working with other legislators to craft an agenda for the next session that may include limits on increases in tax bills and more oversight of local taxing entities.

In Wyoming, rising property assessments have “stirred up some problems, especially for fixed-income people,” said state Rep. Rodney Anderson, a Republican who is chairman of the Wyoming House of Representatives’ revenue committee. Last month, Mr. Anderson was part of a joint committee of legislative leaders that endorsed a bill that would exempt part of a home’s value from property taxes.

“People are just astounded that this year, of all years,” the assessed value “of their property has increased,” said Georgia Rep. Larry O’Neal, a Republican and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee of the state’s House of Representatives. Mr. O’Neal said he supports a bill that would bar communities from raising taxes by increasing assessed values, eliminating what he calls “the back-door tax increase.” If it passes, entities would have to go through the public — and often difficult — process of raising rates to increase revenue. He expects the bill will be taken up by the legislature this year.

Write to Jennifer Levitz at [email protected]

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123111472983052521-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAxNzEwMTc0Wj.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>New N.J. Law Exempts Corporate Earnings Out of State From Tax

>https://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202427279972

Charles Toutant
New Jersey Law Journal
January 8, 2009

Gov. Jon Corzine has signed a bill that exempts New Jersey corporations from tax on income earned in other states, a measure designed to keep existing businesses in the state and to attract others to come here.

The bill, A-2722/S-3 , undoes a 2002 amendment that assesses corporate income tax based on a formula that includes income not taxed by other states.

At present, a company’s tax rate is determined through a series of weighted fractions — 50 times the amount of New Jersey sales over total sales, plus 25 times the amount of New Jersey payroll over total payroll and 25 times the amount of New Jersey real property over total real property.

But sales in other states that do not impose a corporate tax are excluded from the denominator of the sales fraction, resulting in higher taxes. The bill signed by Corzine eliminates that provision.

Businesses have criticized the exclusion as contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s Due Process and Commerce clauses because it results in taxation of activity that has no substantial nexus to the taxing state.

“During a time of national recession and economic uncertainty, this overhaul should be a welcome relief to businesses, particularly those that are struggling,” says Senate President Richard Codey, D-Essex, a prime sponsor.

The bill also permits corporations with no offices outside the state to use the same formula that will be permitted under elimination of the exclusion scheme. Currently, under what’s known as the regular-place-of-business rule, a company with a presence outside the state must attribute 100 percent of its income to New Jersey.

The Treasury Department estimates the state will lose $149 million in tax revenue each year for the first two fiscal years, under the legislation.

Even though the state has repealed the exclusion rule, an appeal by a group of multistate corporations will continue. Last May, the state Tax Court rejected the constitutional challenge in Pfizer v. Director, Division of Taxation, No. 000055-2006.

The Appellate Division refused to hear an interlocutory appeal, but on Oct. 30 the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and summarily remanded the case to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on its merits.

The case is still active because the plaintiffs want to recoup taxes paid from 2002 until the new law takes effect, says Paul Frankel of Morrison Foerster in New York, who represents Whirlpool Properties Inc. and Macy’s in the case.

The bill’s prime Assembly sponsors were Democrats Joseph Vas of Middlesex, Louis Greenwald of Camden and Albert Coutinho of Essex.

The bill, signed on Dec. 19, takes effect on July 1, 2010.

https://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202427279972

Posted on Leave a comment

>Sandra Stotsky Speaks with Village Resident

>I had the privilege of speaking with Dr. Sandra Stotsky this morning. She has indeed offered her services to the district and has offered them pro bono requesting that only her traveling expenses be covered. She has not however received an invitation from our district to participate in the process to unify our K-5 math program. Dr. Stotsky has not withdrawn her offer and reiterated to me that she would be pleased to serve in this capacity if asked.

According to Sheila Brogan, the district has budgeted $20,000 to facilitate this process. The modest amount required to bring Dr. Stotsky to Ridgewood should be available. Daro was paid $2500 plus traveling expenses from California and Schultz is receiving $200 per work session for approximately 10 work sessions. Posamentier and Rosenstein are going to make only a token 30 minute visit to the math planning team without compensation.

It is not too late for our administrators to bring someone of Dr. Stotsky’s caliber to help ensure the very best outcome for our children.

Sarah-Kate Maskin

show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=97526

Posted on Leave a comment

>"SUPPORT OUR TROOPS THIS HOLIDAY SEASON"

>Christian Russo has left a new comment on your post “SUPPORT OUR TROOPS THIS HOLIDAY SEASON”:

On behalf of my colleagues at Pitney Bowes (https://www.pb.com) and the American Red Cross, thank you for all of your support in helping to spread the word about the “Holiday Mail for Heroes” program.

We would like you to know that we’ve not only reached the goal of delivering one million cards to US service members, veterans and military families, but we surpassed it! And it’s all because people like you and your blog readers who got involved. View the following video for more details and a personal message of thanks from all of us: https://blip.tv/file/1643672/.

We could not have done it without you.