Posted on Leave a comment

>Valley Hospital Foundation president dies at 61

>Friday, January 23, 2009
BY MIKE DALY
NorthJersey.com
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

Ann Swenson, president of The Valley Hospital Foundation, died yesterday at age 61.

A resident of Franklin Lakes, Swenson came to Valley in February 1994 as executive director of the foundation, which is the philanthropic arm of The Valley Hospital and Valley Home Care. She was also Valley’s vice president of development, serving as a member of the hospital’s executive staff.

During her tenure, Valley undertook two comprehensive capital campaigns. The first, “Our Next Century of Caring,” raised $17.3 million, and the second, “A Commitment to Health and Hope,” raised $30.6 million. Swenson also was instrumental in securing the largest gift ever given to a New Jersey hospital, when Ridgewood philanthropist David F. Bolger donated $30 million last May toward Valley’s plans to renew its campus.

In a letter to the hospital’s directors and trustees, Audrey Meyers, Valley’s president and CEO, expressed “utmost sadness” at Swenson’s passing and chronicled her many contributions to the hospital and its surrounding community.

“In addition to her many contributions to Valley, Ann will best be remembered for her passion and commitment to the organization, her quick smile, warm laugh, kind heart and gentle demeanor,” Meyers said. “She was a devoted wife and mother. She will be missed by all who were privileged to know her.”

Meyers said Swenson’s family will receive visitors at a casual gathering from 2-6 p.m. Sunday at the Ridgewood Country Club.

Swenson is survived by her husband, Jim; her children, K.C., Tom and his wife Sushene, and Andrea; and a brother, John Nett.

The family requests that in lieu of flowers, contributions be made in Swenson’s memory to The Valley Hospital Foundation, 223 N. Van Dien Ave., Ridgewood, NJ 07450.

Posted on Leave a comment

>(the) town and (the) school system totally dropped the ball for years and years and let our facilities fall far behind

>It is at times almost overwhelming with all of the things that are happening or proposed to happen in the Village and with the BOE. Economically the timing probably could not be worse for many/most of these projects and unfortunately things will probably deteriorate further before improving. However, I think an important thing for people to remember and to think about for the future is the reason all of this is happening now is that we as a town and a school system totally dropped the ball for years and years and let our facilities fall far behind what other towns and school systems were building/renovating. The residents of Ridgewood are not stupid and the level of disrepair has reached such a point that people are demanding the issues be addressed. Many very good, very active, very interested people in town have looked at the facilities and helped to lay out plans that will hopefully result in us having the kind of facilities that the people and children of Ridgewood should have. It is going to be very difficult to figure out how to prioritize the projects and even more difficult to figure out how to pay for them. I think it is important not to place blame on the messengers presenting these plans to the public. If you want to place blame take a look back at the former BOE’s and Villge Council’s who sat on their hands while our facilities crumbled.

If we are going to get anything done, The Village Council and the BOE had better be in constant contact with each other through this process and prioritizing what they each want and need. If the BOE attempts to float a $50 million dollar bond issue at the same time they are laying off teachers and at the Village is looking to spend $25 million (Habernickel, Stedler, Master Plan, Graydon) nothing is going to get approved, nothing will get fixed and 5 years from now our facilities will be that much worse, the costs will be that much higher and everyone will be asking, “Why?”

3balls Golfshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=149749

Posted on Leave a comment

>Schools advised to curb spending

>January 21, 2009

Schools advised to curb spending
https://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/200901210310/NEWS01/901210336

New Jersey’s education commissioner has told the state’s school districts that they should freeze all nonessential spending for the rest of this school year.

Commissioner Lucille Davy, in a recent letter to school districts, said it’s unclear how much state aid will reach local districts for the 2009-10 school year.

Aid to local districts makes up about one-fourth of the state’s overall budget, which is now facing cutbacks.

Posted on Leave a comment

>O’Toole: Davy on The Right Track

>January 20, 2009
Contact: Bill Murray / (609) 292-5199
Senator Kevin J. O’Toole (R-40)
O’Toole: Davy on The Right Track

Unworkable, Expensive, Mandated Programs Must Be Eliminated

Senator Kevin O’Toole, a member of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee, issued the following statement today regarding Education Commissioner Lucille Davy’s comments concerning mandated programs.

“Commissioner Davy’s Comments to the Press of Atlantic City are certainly welcome. She seems committed to identifying and eliminating unnecessary, expensive mandated education programs.

“These programs are certainly one of the primary drivers of local property taxes. Today’s economic environment demands that we implement budget savings wherever possible. I look forward to working with the commissioner and reviewing her recommendations.

“I urge Commissioner Davy to move quickly to implement these changes. However, we must be mindful that any program cuts dot not adversely affect the high quality of education in local school districts.”
Link to Post:

https://www.senatenj.com/index.php/otoole/otoole-davy-on-the-right-track/2089

Posted on Leave a comment

>The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Ac

>Dear Friends,
Last week, I introduced H.R. 470, The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act, an economic stimulus package designed to provide short-term stimulus, while encouraging long-term economic growth.

This legislation, developed in conjunction with the Republican Study Committee (RSC), focuses on broad, growth-oriented, permanent incentives for economic activity across all sectors and industries, with immediate application and sustained, long-term implications. Provisions center around three main themes: support for families through tax relief, economic relief for American businesses and entrepreneurs, and protection for future generations from a crushing debt burden.

The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act, with its emphasis on America’s small business and middle class, is a much-needed jumpstart to our nation’s economy. This bill is a commonsense approach to protecting and preserving American jobs. History has shown that the most effective way to reinvigorate the economy and spur economic growth is to ensure that job creators face a lower tax and regulatory burden. Congress and the Administration must pass an economic package that actually works to stimulate our economy long-term. Protecting and securing America’s jobs is the taxpayer friendly approach to accomplishing this.

We must liberate Americans from their overwhelming tax burden in order to empower individual taxpayers and keep more money in the wallets of American families. We must cease the excessive federal spending that continues to bloat our national debt, and create opportunities for private initiatives to spur economic growth. And we must end the government interference in the marketplace that many experts say have helped create our current economic problems.

Provisions contained in The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act include:

• 5% across the board reduction to individual income tax rates
• Repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax for individuals
• No increase in capital gains and dividends tax rates for individuals
• Increase the child tax credit from $1,000 to $5,000, but it is not refundable
• Permanently repeal the 70.5 distribution requirement on IRAs
• Increase the tax deduction for student loans from $2,500 to $3,750 and increase income limits up to $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for families with no phase out
• Increase the tax deduction for qualified higher education expenses from $4,000 to $6,000 and increase income limits up to $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for families with no phase out
• Temporarily make all withdrawals from IRAs not subject to taxation or penalties for 2009
• Reduce the corporate income tax rate to 25%
• Reduce the alternative capital gains rate for corporations to 15%
• Index capital gains for inflation
• Repeal limitations on expensing allowance (Sec. 179) of depreciable business assets
• Make the R&D tax credit permanent
• Extend the two-year “carryback” period for net operating losses to seven years
• A one percent across the board cut to non-defense discretionary spending

I look forward to an open discussion with Members on both sides of the aisle about the ideas presented in this bill. I am confident that we can work together to find relief for Americans and bring an end to the economic crisis facing our country.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett
Member of Congress

Posted on Leave a comment

>N.J. affordable housing payment plan shifts — again

>https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/post_56.htm

Posted by afriedma January 18, 2009 13:09PM

Just six months after advocates for the poor heralded a new law to create more affordable housing in New Jersey, parts of it may be set aside because of the slumping economy.

Gov. Jon Corzine has called for a one-year moratorium on a fee charged to developers of commercial real estate. He said the moratorium on the fee, used to fund housing for low- and moderate-income people, would spur economic development.

It was expected the 2.5 percent fee, created last year, would generate $160 million per year. But in six months, it’s raised only about $5 million, according to state Sen. Raymond Lesniak, D-Elizabeth.

“It doesn’t work, it hasn’t worked and it’s not working,” Lesniak said. “Two-point-five percent, 10 percent, 20 percent of nothing is nothing.”

Lesniak is crafting a bill that would waive the fee, and a state requirement for each municipality to use money generated by the fee to create affordable housing, for one year. The concept has the support of key legislative leaders in addition to the governor.

For more than two decades, the state had let towns pay other towns to fulfill their affordable housing obligation. Last year, the Legislature ended that practice in a shift that affordable housing advocates saw as a major advance.

Instead, money for subsidized housing was to come largely from the 2.5 percent fee charged to developers of commercial property. Previously, towns had been allowed to set their own fees for developers. Some declined to do so; others charged more than 2.5 percent.

But there’s been a big problem: Since the fee was standardized, real estate development has fallen sharply.

Affordable housing advocates don’t like the idea of suspending the development fee. They say it’s confounding that the state would slow action on providing housing for low- and moderate-income people in a time when there is a growing need for housing.

“We are opposed to a moratorium and don’t understand why this is the first thing to be cut,” said Kevin Walsh, associate director of the Cherry Hill-based Fair Share Housing Center. “Holding steady is one thing, but cutting the resources available to help folks with shelter is bad.”

Affordable housing has been a contentious issue in the state since the state Supreme Court found in a 1975 ruling in Southern Burlington County NAACP v. Mount Laurel that towns could not use their zoning to exclude the poor. Since then, the court has gone further, finding that towns have an obligation to provide for homes for lower-income people.

Posted on Leave a comment

>NJ’s open space fund needs money

>

Newsday.com

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj–xgr-legislativepr0118jan18,0,1413200.story

By ANGELA DELLI SANTI

Associated Press Writer

January 18, 2009

TRENTON, N.J.

Gov. Jon Corzine’s nod to open space in his State of the State address could give new life to stalled efforts to direct long-term funding to the purchase of farmland, green acres and historic sites.

At least two bills already in the Legislature address permanent funding for open space, which environmentalists have long advocated and Corzine said he supports, though he has not said where he thinks the money should come from. Several proposals have come and gone since Corzine was elected in 2005, including a plan to dedicate a portion of the sales tax to open space preservation. A new legislative proposal is being drafted.

“It is my preferred approach that we put in place a long-term funding solution,” Corzine said in the State of the State message Tuesday. “That said, we need, at a minimum, an interim bonding question for November’s ballot to extend the financing the votes approved in 2007.”

Voters approved an emergency $200 million bond referendum in 2007, the same year they rejected borrowing for stem cell research and dedicating a portion of the sales tax to property tax relief. The open space money has all been spent. (No statewide open space funding question has failed in New Jersey in a dozen or so requests to voters dating back decades.)

Environmentalists said they are frustrated the question of long-term funding keeps cropping up without being resolved.

“A one-year stopgap doesn’t get the job done, and I’m not even sure it would pass (in this economy),” said David Pringle of the New Jersey Environmental Federation. “We shouldn’t be living referendum to referendum.”

Jeff Tittel of the New Jersey Sierra Club said $200 million a year is needed, and that there are many ways to get it: through a modest water-user fee, from the sales tax or gas tax, by taxing those who develop farmland, through a multiyear bond referendum, or by taxing billboards, SUVs or recreation equipment.

The proposal to dedicate a portion of existing sales tax revenue to open space purchases had support from a majority of lawmakers in both political parties, Tittel said, but became a casualty of the caustic budget battle of 2006 that shut down state government. A similar proposal became a political casualty the next year, when Corzine tried to tie permanent funding for open space to a failed plan to pay down state debt by raising tolls.

“This is the first time since 1961 that we are out of money for open space,” Tittel said. The governor should never have allowed us to get into that situation in the first place.”

Senate Republican Leader Tom Kean Jr. of Westfield agreed, accusing Corzine, a Democrat seeking re-election in November, of “playing politics with land preservation goals as opposed to finding a real solution that has worked very well for two decades.”

Kean said he continues to support a Senate resolution he and Democratic leader Steve Sweeney co-sponsored dedicating $175 million in existing tax revenue to open space through 2038, if voters approve the idea.

Assemblyman John McKeon, D-South Orange, said he is drafting a bill that would provide $350 million a year to the open space preservation fund by imposing a water use fee that would cost the average household $2 per month. The proposal also would require voter approval.

McKeon, long a champion of open space funding, said failing to replenish the fund would cause economic peril.

For example, if the Highlands watershed region were to be developed rather than preserved, he said the costs of treating and delivering clean, safe tap water to the state would become so astronomical no one could afford to live in the Garden State any longer.

“The bottom line _ it’s unpalatable to do nothing,” he said.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Laurie posted on her blog: Doing my research…myself

>friday, January 16, 2009
Doing my research…myself
Just wanted to share with you my reading and study on math. Lest anybody think I get all my info from the Ed Center, the truth is I actually get very little over there. Sure, I’m receiving updates from the Math Planning Team, but those aren’t too detailed. Mr. Vallerini and Mrs. Lenhard are the Board Members on the Curriculum Committee, so they are more involved with them. I’m sure I could get all kinds of materials at the Ed Center, but my style is to do my own research. Below is a list of what I’ve been reading the past year or so (approximately 90% of this was sourced be me directly…the advantage of self-employment is plenty of time to surf the web…some of them are on my shelf waiting to be read ASAP).

Please suggest any reading you think I should be doing!

in no particular order (list updated 1/17/09)…

Books
The Equation for Excellence: How to Make Your Child Successful at Math (Vohra)
Math Doesn’t Suck: How to Survive Middle School Math without Breaking a Nail (McKellar)
Math for humans: Teaching Math through 8 Intelligences (Wahl)
Math Wars: A Guide for Parents & Teachers (Latterell)
Standards-Based School Mathematics Curricula: What are they? What Do Students Learn? (Studies in Mathematical Learning), (Senk & Thompson)
What’s Math Got to Do with It? (Boaler)
What Successful Math Teachers Do. (Posamentier)

Articles & Reports
“A Formula to End the Divide,” Posamentier, Bergen Record, 6/19/07
“Abandoning traditional math approach doesn’t add up.” Posamentier, Bergen Record, 6/11/08
“How Does it Add Up?” Views on Math Education.” Posamentier. Education Update, Inc.
“Where Has All the Knowledge Gone?”, Boaler, Education Week, 10/8/08
“Reaching for Common Ground in K-12 Mathematics Education,” Ball, et al., Notices of the AMS, 10/05
“Study Suggests Math Teachers Scrap Balls and Slices,” Chang. NY Times 4/25/08
“Report Urges Changes in Teaching Math,” Lewin. NY Times 3/14/08
“Clarifying Misconceptions about Investigations in Number, Data and Space,” Prince William County Schools Mathematics Focus Group
“Are We Failing Our Geniuses?,” Cloud. Time. 8/16/07
“10 Myths (Maybe) About Learning Math,” Mathews. Washington Post. 5/31/05
“Learning from Singapore Math,” Leinwand & Ginsburg. Educational Leadership, 11/07
“On Professional Judgment and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Curricular Content,” Thompson. Educational Researcher, 12/08

Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel

Curriculum Focal Points for Prekindergarten through Grade 8 Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2006

Websites
What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences
Mathematically Correct
Mathematically Sane
Math Panel Watch
National Assessment of Educational Progress Mathematics Study 2003
Math Forum at Drexel University
Posted by Laurie Goodman at 1:11 AM
Labels: math
6 comments:

Posted on Leave a comment

>I am dismayed and surprised by your 13 January 2009 post on the Ridgewood Blog

>Dear Ms. Goodman,

I am dismayed and surprised by your 13 January 2009 post on the Ridgewood Blog in which you accused a parent of ‘undermining the administration’ by offering Sandra Stotsky, a distinguished math standards expert, to consult with RPS’ Math Planning Team (MPT). You couldn’t have chosen a more negative characterization of the parent’s actions. Instead this parent should be complimented for attempting to provide balance to the MPT, whose external advisors are far to one side of the ideological divide.

The external advisors Daro, Rosenstein, and Schultz represent a point of view shared by far fewer than 1% of mathematicians. They are the ‘understanding first’ and ‘multiple solutions’ crowd that leave little time for our children to become fluent in standard algorithms for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. These algorithms are efficient and they provide the foundations of algebra.

The only advisor with a point of view respected by mathematicians is Posamentier, but his chances of providing balance are slim. He has only 30 minutes with the MPT, while Daro was given an entire day, and Schultz is both a member of the team and an external advisor. If the external advisors represented both sides of the ideological divide, and all were given equal time, then I would agree that we don’t need Stotsky.

Most outrageous is your characterization of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP) as ‘political,’ and your insinuation that it’s being treated as dogmatic religious text. In my view the NMAP report is far more balanced than the MPT: It acknowledges the importance of reform math, but cautions that traditional mathematical rigor should not be compromised. But the education establishment you have chosen to defend is deeply threatened by the NMAP report. It’s a simplistic cheap shot to dismiss it as political.

I hoped when you were elected that you would be a voice for concerned parents. Instead it seems that you’ve become that administration’s biggest cheer leader.

John G. Sheehan, Ph.D.

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Village Council Poised to Offer $2.9 million for Schedler Property

>Village Council members are scheduled to introduce a $2.9 million bond ordinance for purchase of the Schedler property during tonight’s regularly scheduled Public Meeting. The $2.9 million would cover property purchase only; improvements necessary to convert the parcel to athletic playing fields would be extra.

The Village has already received a $1 million grant from the Bergen County Open Space fund for purchase of the property; other grants may be forthcoming (the operative word is “may”). If no additional grant money is awarded above and beyond the Bergen County Open Space award, Ridgewood’s taxpayers will be obligated to cough up as much as $1.9 million.

The Schedler tract is located at the intersection of West Saddle River Road and Route 17. Current assessed value of the entire parcel is $2,597,500.

Village Manager Jim Ten Hoeve previously indicated his desire to purchase an adjacent parcel owned by the Shotmeyer Oil Corporation along with the Schedler purchase. That parcel, located on Route 17 northbound, is currently assessed at $67,500.

Save up to 40% on Last Minute Flights with Hotwire Limited Rates!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Teaneck fires township manager in late-night vote

>THE RECORD

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

BY JOSEPH AX

TEANECK — The Township Council fired Township Manager Helene Fall in a surprise move Tuesday, faulting her leadership style and reluctance to listen to other viewpoints.

The vote to fire Fall came at 11:29 p.m., after a lengthy closed- session discussion.

Fall took part in some of that discussion about her job, but left the building before the vote was taken without commenting.

Mayor Kevie Feit, Deputy Mayor Lizette Parker, Councilwoman Barbara Toffler, Councilman Mohammed Hameeduddin and Councilman Elie Katz voted to fire Fall. Councilman Adam Gussen and Councilwoman Monica Honis voted against the move.

The resolution to fire her stated that the council had “lost confidence” in Fall, who “has been unwilling” to try new ideas.

Municipal Clerk Lissette Aportela will serve as acting manager until the council hires Fall’s replacement.

Fall will be suspended with pay for 30 days until the effective date of her dismissal. After that she will be paid three months’ salary.

The decision comes just weeks after the town was hit with a $4.1 million jury verdict in the latest of a string of harassment lawsuits in recent years. It also comes just two days before the town’s first public meeting on the 2009 budget, which Fall put together.

Mayor Kevie Feit said the decision was a difficult but necessary for the future of the town.

“From my perspective, it’s definitely been something that’s been brewing,” he said. “It goes to the issue of, are we going to keep doing things the same way and expect different results?”

Gussen criticized the majority of the council for letting Fall go just as the budget season begins.

“To take this action leaves us without the person that put together the budget, and that troubles me,” he said.

But Feit said the council could attend to the budget without Fall.

“It’s never the right time,” he said of the decision to fire a manager. “But we can handle it.”

Three weeks ago, John Shouldis, a former police officer, won a $4.1 million judgment in a 2006 lawsuit that alleged he had been harassed after he testified for a fellow officer in her own harassment suit.

That officer was Diane Mancini, who eventually received a $1.1 million settlement in 2004 after years of legal wrangling.

The Shouldis verdict led the town to establish an investigative committee last week with subpoena power to examine potential ongoing discrimination and harassment issues.

The committee, the second in three years tasked with looking into the town’s employment practices, consists of Feit, Parker and Katz.

Other recent cases include a series of lawsuits from firefighter Bill Brennan, who agreed to an $800,000 settlement in 2005, and a racial discrimination lawsuit from former firefighter Harold Harmon, who received a $750,000 settlement in 2007.

Last week, former firefighter Matthew Vogelman claimed to be the victim of a hostile work environment and anti-Semitic remarks as a result of his support for Brennan in a federal lawsuit filed in Newark.

While noting that he is legally barred from discussing the specific reasons for Fall’s firing, Feit said that the lawsuits were part of the discussion.

Fall, the town’s first female manager, was born and raised in Hackensack. She first worked in Teaneck in the 1980s as an assistant to the longtime manager Werner Schmid.

She returned in 1998 after stints in Bernards Township in Somerset County and in Montvale and served as the deputy manager under Gary Saage for two years before taking over the town’s day-to-day operations. The council did not interview other candidates and praised Fall for her professionalism.

“What I’ve been most impressed with is her level of integrity and knowledge that the town will be hard-pressed to replace,” Gussen said Tuesday.

Fall has said that she hoped to finish her career in Teaneck, where she lives with her husband.

In her early years as manager, she clashed repeatedly with the police and fire unions, leading the council in 2006 to appoint an investigative committee to look into accusations of retaliation and harassment.

Fall received support from a number of supervisors and department heads, who defended her job performance. The committee made some recommendations but did not fund all of them.

Fall and Tiernan said they were never told of the specific allegations against them nor given an opportunity to defend themselves.

Tuesday’s resolution was not part of the agenda but was added by special vote at the end of the meeting’s regular agenda.

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. Check it out.
Reply

Forward

Posted on Leave a comment

>Persistent Village Personnel Dilemma Resurfaces – Mayor & Council Helpless?

>It is being rumored that a sensitive personnel issue Village Council members believed had been resolved several months ago, resurfaced with a vengeance in the height of cleanup efforts following this past weekend’s snow storm.

Several Village employees were witnesses to the latest series of incidents. They are all now wondering whether Ridgewood’s Mayor & Council are sincerely interested in putting an end to a history of behavior that clearly would not be accepted by any reputable private sector employer.

Well Mayor & Council; do you have what it takes to make the toughest of decisions, or are you going to disappoint Village employees and your constituents (yet again)?

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462