Tag: Ridgewood Schools

>And you can’t tell the players without a program.

Here are the Planning Board players:
Members:Morgan Hurley – Chairman (Ethelbert Place)David Nicholson – Vice-Chairman (Liberty Street)David Pfund – Mayor (Hillcrest Road)Kim Ringler Shagin – Councilwoman (Walthery Avenue)James Bombace (Midwood Road)Richard Fricke (Woodland Avenue)Anne Ward (Melrose Place)Albert Pucciarelli (Cottage Place)Nick Tsapatsaris (North Murray Avenue)Charles Nalbantian – Alternate 1 (Bellair Road)Richard Barclay – Alternate 2 (Brookside Avenue)

Staff:Gail L. Price, Esq., Board AttorneyBlais L. Brancheau, PP, PlannerChristopher J. Rutishauser, PE, Village EngineerBarbara K. Carlton, Board Secretary

And also for the record, Valley Hospital President, Ms. Audrey D. Meyers, lives on Highland Avenue. The Valley’s attorney, Charles (Chuck) Collins, owns property on Bellair Road and on Prospect Street.

>TERC – WHEN IT FAILS, IT’S BECA– USE OF THE TEACHERS, not our Mishugona* curriculum

An excerpt from “Changing the Elementary Mathematics Curriculum: Obstacles and Challenges”, Susan Jo Russell

TERC , 2067 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140

Curriculum as teacher development

We see our curriculum as a vehicle for teacher development. The actual curriculum is not what we envision and write down, but what happens between students and teachers in the moment of teaching and learning. So while part of our responsibility is to provide the material, the actual investigations, in which students will participate-and this in itself is no easy matter-the other, equally critical part of our responsibility is to open up that material to teachers, to invite them in both to the mathematics and to children’s mathematical thinking.

The audience, therefore, for our materials, is teachers, not students. Our units are written to the teachers with many digressions about mathematics and about children’s learning of mathematics. The responsibility is absolutely on the teachers to make this material work. If they fail, the material fails. On the other hand, by not making teachers partners in the past, we have made a grievous error. By not inviting teachers in to mathematics, by attempting to make materials “teacher proof” because educators or mathematicians believed that classroom teachers were not smart enough about mathematics to teach it, not only have we denied the students a good mathematical education, but we have denied generations of elementary teachers-largely women-access to mathematics.

It could be me, but if I were a teacher, I’d be insulted.

*”Mishugona” is Yiddish for crazy, the fly is trying to appeal to a more ethnic audience

>

>How the Ridgewood superintendent was hired…

Hard Questions….

>”Bombace posted in that “obscure blog” at the request of one of the math moms. She evidently felt that posting on your blog was not cool.You did not have to dig too far, the comment is also posted on the VOR math website.So your feelings are hurt that your blog did not get the scoop, it looks like Grandpa Nizzo outdone you! No apology needed, the comments by the Board were true and validated by facts. Many of the parents involved in this controversy have chosen to distance themselves from those who chose those tactics.I can only hope they chose to distance themselves from this blog. Choosing to post on another blog looks like a start. “

*BUT this blogger wants to know ,what are these “tactics” everyone is taking about ?

>

Beautiful down town Ridgewood

https://www.artchickphotos.com/

>The Office, 32 Chestnut Street Ridgewood, NJ 07450, a great place to unwind and catch a game with much improved service coupled with great drink specials, and decent pub food at reasonable prices make the office a local favorite, not a place for a romantic interlude more a beer with the boy’s kind of place.

*And as a special note I hope everything is ok at Smith Brothers

>

the Ridgewood Blog has a sugestion for the BOE and anyone else interested in getting a qualified candidate for Superintendent,its free and its called Google!

https://www.google.com/

>7:30 p.m. – Meeting

AGENDA
* * * * *
MEETING REGULATIONS

At all regular meetings, two opportunities are provided for citizens to make comments.� The public comment periods will be scheduled at approximately 7:30 p.m. and approximately 9:00 p.m. or just prior to the end of the meeting, whichever occurs first. The first opportunity may be limited by the presiding officer to conclude at about 8:00 p.m. in order for the Board to continue with its scheduled agenda.� The second opportunity will occur at about 9:00 p.m. at the discretion of the presiding officer taking into consideration a break point in the agenda.

At every opportunity for public comment, citizens are invited to comment on subjects on the agenda or general topics.

At the discretion of the presiding officer, public comments may be permitted at other times.

Persons wishing to speak must, upon being recognized, rise and state their name and address.� Each speaker shall be limited to four minutes.� The Board Recorder will note the time.� A speaker who has not finished in the allotted time will be directed by the Presiding Officer to summarize quickly and relinquish the floor within 30 seconds.

Comments shall be limited to issues.� If personal remarks or discourteous statements are made, the presiding officer shall require the speaker to stop.� No person will be recognized for a second time until all others asking to speak have been heard.

>

>

>