Posted on

Reader says We Need Cameras

Jimmy-Kimmel-unveils-GoPro-camera-for-dogs

Yes, placing at least a temporary camera in places where problems have been identified would make a lot of sense and cost very little. We are so lucky to have curbside trash pickup FREE roughly twice a month. There is no excuse for this laziness and yes, commission of a crime. The trouble is that once trash begins to accumulate, it’s seen as a free zone. Not true. We should all care about our parks.

One thought on “Reader says We Need Cameras

  1. YES…
    Let’s get the government surveilence “toe” in the door.

    .
    Lets start with “temporary” cameras to surveil a known crime scene – most people likely agree with this.
    .
    Then let’s say “It makes sense to keep the cameras there permanently and besides it will cost more to remove the cameras”
    .
    Then let’s say “Since it worked so well here, let’s have a ‘trial run’ of cameras in and around municipal proerties”
    .
    Then of couse “it just makes sense” to make these a permanent item in the budget.
    .
    Then it becomes clear that “its obvious that surveillance cameras should be in the CBD”
    .
    Of course “it logically follows that surveillance cameras should be placed on all streets in the village.
    .
    And finally “With today’s technology the village should tie in to all of the personal surveillance cameras on residents properties – voluntary compliance of course, but we’ll entice the residents by giving them a tax credit to join their personal surveillance cameras into the municipal network”
    .

    So YES… let’s implement those cameras.
    Big Brother was supposed to be implemented over 30 years ago.

    .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *