The Council would rather hear themselves talking than hear those who pay the bills talking.
What objective criteria are being used to determine whether a remark is personally abusive or offensive? Answer: there are no objective criteria to determine such. This is a subjective call based upon the whim of our mayor.
Remarks that are either personally abusive or offensive. “With the Three Amigos that anything that doesn’t tout the accomplishments .
Aronsohn and Pucciarel , and Hauck regularly put down their colleagues on the council for no good reason. Usually they are trying to cow somebody into refraining from accurately describing the three amigo’s actual behavior, or what they should have done but didn’t, or explaining why what they did or failed to do was ethically or legally or morally wrong. So they basically want to disarm their political opponents while retaining complete flexibility to fillet people they don’t like with impunity. How and why do we put up with this transparently mendacity behavior in our elected officials?the Council would rather hear themselves talking than hear those who pay the bills talking.
Be fair JJJ speakers can have their but
,
within required protocol limits of the Village ordinance.
definition of personally objective – You don’t agree with the Mayor or Deputy Mayor
Funniest part was Pooch calling an end to slander, then slandering.
Question:
If the Mayor stops short, how far up his posterior does Dom go?
Thank You # 4 I was just thinking the same thing.
Dom keep sucking up and your BFF Paul will name a street after you. Oh wait they already have it called DEAR END.
dead end?
people can say what ever they like. this is the u s a. if some don’t like o well. move away. if i can’t say it in village hall then i will say it in the parking lot. we all pay taxes so pauly take a walk.