Posted on Leave a comment

>I am dismayed and surprised by your 13 January 2009 post on the Ridgewood Blog

>Dear Ms. Goodman,

I am dismayed and surprised by your 13 January 2009 post on the Ridgewood Blog in which you accused a parent of ‘undermining the administration’ by offering Sandra Stotsky, a distinguished math standards expert, to consult with RPS’ Math Planning Team (MPT). You couldn’t have chosen a more negative characterization of the parent’s actions. Instead this parent should be complimented for attempting to provide balance to the MPT, whose external advisors are far to one side of the ideological divide.

The external advisors Daro, Rosenstein, and Schultz represent a point of view shared by far fewer than 1% of mathematicians. They are the ‘understanding first’ and ‘multiple solutions’ crowd that leave little time for our children to become fluent in standard algorithms for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. These algorithms are efficient and they provide the foundations of algebra.

The only advisor with a point of view respected by mathematicians is Posamentier, but his chances of providing balance are slim. He has only 30 minutes with the MPT, while Daro was given an entire day, and Schultz is both a member of the team and an external advisor. If the external advisors represented both sides of the ideological divide, and all were given equal time, then I would agree that we don’t need Stotsky.

Most outrageous is your characterization of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP) as ‘political,’ and your insinuation that it’s being treated as dogmatic religious text. In my view the NMAP report is far more balanced than the MPT: It acknowledges the importance of reform math, but cautions that traditional mathematical rigor should not be compromised. But the education establishment you have chosen to defend is deeply threatened by the NMAP report. It’s a simplistic cheap shot to dismiss it as political.

I hoped when you were elected that you would be a voice for concerned parents. Instead it seems that you’ve become that administration’s biggest cheer leader.

John G. Sheehan, Ph.D.

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Village Council Poised to Offer $2.9 million for Schedler Property

>Village Council members are scheduled to introduce a $2.9 million bond ordinance for purchase of the Schedler property during tonight’s regularly scheduled Public Meeting. The $2.9 million would cover property purchase only; improvements necessary to convert the parcel to athletic playing fields would be extra.

The Village has already received a $1 million grant from the Bergen County Open Space fund for purchase of the property; other grants may be forthcoming (the operative word is “may”). If no additional grant money is awarded above and beyond the Bergen County Open Space award, Ridgewood’s taxpayers will be obligated to cough up as much as $1.9 million.

The Schedler tract is located at the intersection of West Saddle River Road and Route 17. Current assessed value of the entire parcel is $2,597,500.

Village Manager Jim Ten Hoeve previously indicated his desire to purchase an adjacent parcel owned by the Shotmeyer Oil Corporation along with the Schedler purchase. That parcel, located on Route 17 northbound, is currently assessed at $67,500.

Save up to 40% on Last Minute Flights with Hotwire Limited Rates!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Teaneck fires township manager in late-night vote

>THE RECORD

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

BY JOSEPH AX

TEANECK — The Township Council fired Township Manager Helene Fall in a surprise move Tuesday, faulting her leadership style and reluctance to listen to other viewpoints.

The vote to fire Fall came at 11:29 p.m., after a lengthy closed- session discussion.

Fall took part in some of that discussion about her job, but left the building before the vote was taken without commenting.

Mayor Kevie Feit, Deputy Mayor Lizette Parker, Councilwoman Barbara Toffler, Councilman Mohammed Hameeduddin and Councilman Elie Katz voted to fire Fall. Councilman Adam Gussen and Councilwoman Monica Honis voted against the move.

The resolution to fire her stated that the council had “lost confidence” in Fall, who “has been unwilling” to try new ideas.

Municipal Clerk Lissette Aportela will serve as acting manager until the council hires Fall’s replacement.

Fall will be suspended with pay for 30 days until the effective date of her dismissal. After that she will be paid three months’ salary.

The decision comes just weeks after the town was hit with a $4.1 million jury verdict in the latest of a string of harassment lawsuits in recent years. It also comes just two days before the town’s first public meeting on the 2009 budget, which Fall put together.

Mayor Kevie Feit said the decision was a difficult but necessary for the future of the town.

“From my perspective, it’s definitely been something that’s been brewing,” he said. “It goes to the issue of, are we going to keep doing things the same way and expect different results?”

Gussen criticized the majority of the council for letting Fall go just as the budget season begins.

“To take this action leaves us without the person that put together the budget, and that troubles me,” he said.

But Feit said the council could attend to the budget without Fall.

“It’s never the right time,” he said of the decision to fire a manager. “But we can handle it.”

Three weeks ago, John Shouldis, a former police officer, won a $4.1 million judgment in a 2006 lawsuit that alleged he had been harassed after he testified for a fellow officer in her own harassment suit.

That officer was Diane Mancini, who eventually received a $1.1 million settlement in 2004 after years of legal wrangling.

The Shouldis verdict led the town to establish an investigative committee last week with subpoena power to examine potential ongoing discrimination and harassment issues.

The committee, the second in three years tasked with looking into the town’s employment practices, consists of Feit, Parker and Katz.

Other recent cases include a series of lawsuits from firefighter Bill Brennan, who agreed to an $800,000 settlement in 2005, and a racial discrimination lawsuit from former firefighter Harold Harmon, who received a $750,000 settlement in 2007.

Last week, former firefighter Matthew Vogelman claimed to be the victim of a hostile work environment and anti-Semitic remarks as a result of his support for Brennan in a federal lawsuit filed in Newark.

While noting that he is legally barred from discussing the specific reasons for Fall’s firing, Feit said that the lawsuits were part of the discussion.

Fall, the town’s first female manager, was born and raised in Hackensack. She first worked in Teaneck in the 1980s as an assistant to the longtime manager Werner Schmid.

She returned in 1998 after stints in Bernards Township in Somerset County and in Montvale and served as the deputy manager under Gary Saage for two years before taking over the town’s day-to-day operations. The council did not interview other candidates and praised Fall for her professionalism.

“What I’ve been most impressed with is her level of integrity and knowledge that the town will be hard-pressed to replace,” Gussen said Tuesday.

Fall has said that she hoped to finish her career in Teaneck, where she lives with her husband.

In her early years as manager, she clashed repeatedly with the police and fire unions, leading the council in 2006 to appoint an investigative committee to look into accusations of retaliation and harassment.

Fall received support from a number of supervisors and department heads, who defended her job performance. The committee made some recommendations but did not fund all of them.

Fall and Tiernan said they were never told of the specific allegations against them nor given an opportunity to defend themselves.

Tuesday’s resolution was not part of the agenda but was added by special vote at the end of the meeting’s regular agenda.

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. Check it out.
Reply

Forward

Posted on Leave a comment

>So here is the spin on Dr. Stotsky from Laurie Goodman

>

Did you hear the one about the math expert who wasn’t invited to the party?

I understand a few folks are riled up about a Harvard-educated math person, Dr. Stotsky, who supposedly “offered” her services to the District in our math quest. There’s an email circulating with plenty of misinformation and spin. Here’s my PERSONAL take on, and clarification of, the situation. (And, just so we’re clear, by “personal” I mean these are my opinions and perspectives only and I am in no way speaking for the Board.)

1) We are pretty far into the process (as the email writer says, 2 years) and the administration may feel that to bring in new participants now might bog things down, require backtracking, etc. I can understand that. We need to keep moving forward, the community has waited long enough.

2) The Math Planning Team’s experts are also learned and experienced. One could argue that they may be more math-focused than Dr. Stotsky, as my quick read of her background shows an emphasis also on reading/language. But I’ll agree that she’s at least “as expert” as the others. (And BTW, the more I learn about the politics involved in the National Math Panel, the less I view its report as the 10 Commandments, nor its participants as the high priests of math…sorry, not sure why I veered into religious terminology!)

3) Dr. Stotsky should not be characterized as a somehow “more objective” observer. Like many mathematics experts, she is also a consultant to a textbook company (Sadler-Oxford Mathematics). I have no idea if that company’s programs are being considered in Ridgewood, but the point is, everyone has a point of view; seems to me there is no such thing as a truly objective expert.

4) Dr. Stotsky did not benignly “learn of” our internal math divisions but rather was actively recruited by a parent with an agenda and admitted desire to undermine the administration. It would not surprise me if District personnel were at least suspect of the motivations. (This is my guess; no one said this to me.)

5) There has been no direct communication between Dr. Stotsky and the District administration. She did not approach, write, call or email the District.

6) The misinformation email says there’s “no end in sight” in our math effort. That’s not true. The Team is working according to a publicized schedule/plan and the end is certainly within sight.

7) The email mentions Dr. Stotsky’s involvement in Massachusetts’ high scores in the TIMMS test, and that Mass is “one of only two U.S. states to receive top scores in the international TIMMS tests, scores that rank them near the Asian countries that lead the TIMMS every year.” The truth of Massachusetts’ TIMMS performance should be taken with a grain of salt — there were only a few states who even participated in the tests as states. New Jersey did not. (It’s my understanding that any state or group of schools can pay to be scored as a group). The test mainly measures countries’ performance. Also, Massachusetts is not New Jersey (in a nutshell). (And as an aside, isn’t Massachusetts the home of TERC/Investigations? Aren’t they using it in a lot of schools there? What does that mean?. Kind of ironic, at the very least!)

You know what, Mr. Misinformation? This is not helping. (And by “this” I don’t mean talking about math. Talking and sharing are good. I welcome your comments. What’s not helpful is spreading misinformation and trying to fan the flames.) We have a plan. We have smart Ridgewood educators working on the plan. We have experts advising our educators. I’m looking forward to seeing what the Team comes up with and asking my questions at that time.

Posted on Leave a comment

>NJ Transit Jeopardizes Employee & Passenger Safety to Maintain On-Time Performance

>The Fly has learned that NJ Transit’s Rail Operations Division routinely jeopardizes employee and passenger safety by keeping trains moving despite the existence of on-board medical emergencies or unruly passengers.

Trains are not halted at the closest station stop because NJ Transit does not want to block tracks and prevent any following trains from continuing on schedule. Instead, NJ Transit train dispatchers are instructed to route trains requesting police or emergency medical (EMS) personnel response to the nearest station with “passing track” capability.

The Ridgewood station has a passing track; our police and EMS units are frequently dispatched to meet trains with unruly passengers, or those with persons requiring emergency medical assistance.

One such incident happened on the evening of Thursday, January 8th, at approximately 8:18 PM, when four (4) Ridgewood police officers were dispatched to meet NJ Transit Train #65, for assistance in removing two (2) unruly passengers from the train.

Train #65 (express from Secaucus Junction to Suffern) left Hoboken at 7:57 PM with a Secaucus Junction station stop recorded at 8:07 PM. Two (2) passengers became unruly near the Rutherford station. The train crew was instructed to continue operating the train through to Ridgewood’s passing track, where they would be met by uniformed Ridgewood PD and NJ Transit PD officers.

Why wasn’t the train stopped at the station just beyond Rutherford? What if the two (2) unruly passengers had been armed and began using their weapons in Rutherford? If a passenger had collapsed with a heart attack in Rutherford, would NJ Transit have also continued the train up to Ridgewood?

The Fly believes NJ Transit must place the goal of passenger and employee safety ahead of on-time performance.

IdentityTruth Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Nothing scares misbehaving policians more than the public space and the light of day

>After being elected and depending on the Ridgewood Chamber of commerce’s members for tax income, it’s only logical for Ten Hoeve and Zussy to play little dictators to the Chamber of Commerce: Take their money, and throw it in the garbage. Isn’t this what power means?

But if we’re to have an effective government and be pro-active, the Chamber of Commerce and whoever was against it should have said something when it happened.

I know, I know in this day and age, when budgets are slashed, and localities’ credit ratings are in play, the mayor and others have better things to do than worry about decorations, but the Chamber of Commerce should have said: ” If you’re going to decorate in this way, use your money, not ours. ” I’m sure that the merchants and other ChoC members have worked hard for that money? Don’t let yourself be bullied! Let the bullies know that you will not be intimidated, and you will call them on it publicly!

You’re not uncouth, unfair, etc. if you tell a politician that HE can’t make a mockery of YOUR hard-earned money (in general) or cherished tradition that have great meaning to all, in this particular case. And if you don’t see the charm of garbage-on-a-string, then you, the payer should get what YOU want.

Also, do it when it happens, not a month later: If you paid for a new car (and with $15,000 you can buy a new car) and they gave you a banged-up car full of garbage would you ever drive the thing off the lot and complain a month later? I don’t think so, so don’t do it again! They (despot-politicians) take this as a sign of weakness.

Nothing scares misbehaving policians more than the public space and the light of day, so call them on it, and if they don’t stop, SHOUT!

Microsoft Store

Posted on Leave a comment

>Chris Christie files papers for Governors Race

>Dear Friend,

This morning I am filing papers to begin the process to become a candidate for the Republican nomination for Governor of New Jersey.

I did not take this step lightly. It was only after careful consideration and consultation with my family that I decided to become a candidate.

New Jersey is broken. New Jersey’s taxes have become so unaffordable that more families are leaving our state than moving here. Our state’s business tax climate is ranked 50th in the nation and has become so unattractive to employers that only government jobs are growing in New Jersey. Yet nothing in Trenton gets done to fix these problems.

We can change this. We can solve these problems if we’re willing to make the tough decisions.

In my seven years as your United States Attorney, I didn’t shy away from any of the tough decisions. I took on corporate greed, political corruption, terrorism and environmental polluters. Public officials from both parties were prosecuted for corruption – more than 130 were convicted, and not one was acquitted. Corporate executives who cheated their companies and hurt their workers were successfully prosecuted. Terrorist plots were disrupted; polluters punished.

Many didn’t believe we could win these battles. We did, and with strong leadership we will win the fight for Governor and change this state for the better.

My formal announcement for Governor will come in the first week in February and I hope you will join us (I will email you the details). With strong leadership now, we can fix our broken state and make it more affordable for all New Jersey families.

Sincerely,

Chris Christie

PS. Our website is still in formation, but please visit, https://www.christiefornj.com/
, to sign up for email updates and details about our announcement.

Posted on Leave a comment

>111th Congress Convenes This Week

>Dear Friends,
Yesterday, I took the oath of office to begin serving my fourth term in the United States Congress as your representative from the 5th District of New Jersey.

I’m deeply honored for the faith and trust that the people of northern New Jersey have again placed in me to serve as their voice in Washington, and I would like to take this time to reiterate my commitment to serving you.

While we face many challenges in the coming days, including mending our economy and combating unemployment, I look forward to working with Members from both sides of the aisle to reach consensus that will best serve the American people.

Upon his inauguration in 1985, Ronald Reagan said, “In this blessed land, there is always a better tomorrow…Let history say of us, ‘There were golden years – when the American Revolution was reborn, when freedom gained new life, when America reached for her best.”

My friends, what will history say of us? President Reagan challenged America to make the future worthy of the past. We too must undertake this great test. How can we make our future worthy of our past? We must rehabilitate our economy by helping small businesses to promote growth. We must protect our environment by searching for renewable energy sources and promoting conservation. We must shrink our mountainous debt by reducing wasteful government spending. And we must preserve and protect the individual freedoms of the American people.

As the 111th Congress begins, I will keep these challenges firmly in mind as I continue my work as your advocate in Washington. Thank you, and God bless America.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett

Member of Congress

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Calls Grow to Cap Property Taxes

>NA AV067 PROPTA NS 20090104181214

By JENNIFER LEVITZ
Support for property-tax rollbacks is building from Arizona to New York, fueled by angry homeowners in some locales who are seeing rising tax bills despite plunging home prices.

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123111472983052521-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAxNzEwMTc0Wj.html

Seacoast Online Media Group
Protesters angered by rising property-tax assessments in Hampton, N.H., release tea into the wind in a re-enactment of the Boston Tea Party.
Legislatures in New York, Georgia, Oklahoma and Wyoming are considering taking up proposals to curb property taxes in their 2009 sessions. In Indiana, a cap on property taxes enacted last year became effective Jan. 1, and lawmakers are planning to vote this year on whether to put before voters a constitutional amendment that would cap taxes permanently at 1% of a property’s value.

In recent months, citizen groups in Montana, Nevada and Arizona have organized to get property-tax-relief measures on state ballots. Florida voters last year amended the state’s constitution to increase a number of property-tax exemptions, lowering their assessments.

“We just can’t afford these increases in property taxes,” said Lynne Weaver, a 59-year-old retired swimsuit saleswoman in Phoenix, who said her investment nest egg “has pretty well been cut in half” by market declines. She is a leading volunteer for Prop. 13 Arizona, an organization collecting signatures seeking a 2010 ballot measure that would roll back home valuations to 2003, before the boom that preceded the bust in home prices, and which would also cap annual property-tax increases at 2% of home value.

New York City boosted property taxes by 7% effective Jan. 1, and other towns in the state are also sending out higher bills, even as Gov. David Paterson and some legislative leaders are supporting a recent report that recommended a 4% statewide cap in property-tax increases. A commission empaneled by Gov. Paterson’s predecessor called for the cap in response to concern that the state’s levies — among the highest in the nation on property — were curbing growth and encouraging migration.

Taxes can go up when prices decline because assessed values lag behind market realities. The values that cities and towns use to calculate tax bills are often based on house sales a year or more before the bills are issued. That means that many recent bills don’t take into account the meltdown of 2008, when house prices fell by an average of about 20% across the country.

In addition, cities and towns are facing a barrage of recession-related financial pressures, including cuts in state aid and investment losses. That is tempting many to look for added revenue from property taxes, one of the few revenue sources they control.

That has set the stage for more tension between taxpayers and municipal officials hard-pressed to pay bills.

“It’s pretty hard not to institute some increase in property taxes,” said Stephen Altieri, town administrator of Mamaroneck, N.Y., whose town board voted Dec. 17 to raise the town property-tax rate in a main part of the New York City suburb to $14.25 per $1,000 in assessed home value, from $10.20. Mr. Altieri said Mamaroneck is facing a “sort of a perfect storm” because of declining investments, and falling revenue from a 1.3% tax it receives on the value of new mortgages. Along with raising property taxes, the town is also trimming its own spending, he says.

In Evans, N.Y., outside Buffalo, October assessments reflected strong home prices through July 1, 2007, and residents were so irked that they picketed Town Hall, started a Web site, and presented the town clerk with a petition calling for the assessments to be thrown out. The town declined to do that, but it says it has been hearing individual appeals.

Parts of the country that felt the real-estate bust early have seen some reductions in property taxes, but some residents in communities that were hit by the downturn later are in shock.

“Disbelief” is how 55-year-old John Kane, a financial adviser, describes his reaction to the assessed value of his home in Hampton, N.H., which soared 55% to $850,200 recently, from $549,300 in 2007. His annual taxes jumped 30%, to nearly $14,000. “We see empty houses, for-sale signs,” Mr. Kane said. “And they value our houses like this?”

About 100 Hampton residents formed a group called the Coalition for a Fair Assessment, and staged a protest at Hampton Harbor, waving tea bags in a mini re-enactment of the Boston Tea Party. The group urged local homeowners to appeal their bills — which many are doing. They also got on the Town Council’s agenda on Monday to advocate a reassessment that reflects the real-estate slump.

In Louisiana’s St. Tammany Parish, north of New Orleans, tax assessor Patricia Schwarz Core said 15,000 residents have requested a formal review of their 2008 revaluations, compared with 500 in a typical revaluation.

On his Web site, Louisiana state Rep. Kevin Pearson, a Republican, calls the 2008 revaluations in St. Tammany ridiculous and says some residents saw their assessed values jump 150% since the revaluation four years ago. In an interview, he said he is working with other legislators to craft an agenda for the next session that may include limits on increases in tax bills and more oversight of local taxing entities.

In Wyoming, rising property assessments have “stirred up some problems, especially for fixed-income people,” said state Rep. Rodney Anderson, a Republican who is chairman of the Wyoming House of Representatives’ revenue committee. Last month, Mr. Anderson was part of a joint committee of legislative leaders that endorsed a bill that would exempt part of a home’s value from property taxes.

“People are just astounded that this year, of all years,” the assessed value “of their property has increased,” said Georgia Rep. Larry O’Neal, a Republican and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee of the state’s House of Representatives. Mr. O’Neal said he supports a bill that would bar communities from raising taxes by increasing assessed values, eliminating what he calls “the back-door tax increase.” If it passes, entities would have to go through the public — and often difficult — process of raising rates to increase revenue. He expects the bill will be taken up by the legislature this year.

Write to Jennifer Levitz at [email protected]

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123111472983052521-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAxNzEwMTc0Wj.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>New N.J. Law Exempts Corporate Earnings Out of State From Tax

>https://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202427279972

Charles Toutant
New Jersey Law Journal
January 8, 2009

Gov. Jon Corzine has signed a bill that exempts New Jersey corporations from tax on income earned in other states, a measure designed to keep existing businesses in the state and to attract others to come here.

The bill, A-2722/S-3 , undoes a 2002 amendment that assesses corporate income tax based on a formula that includes income not taxed by other states.

At present, a company’s tax rate is determined through a series of weighted fractions — 50 times the amount of New Jersey sales over total sales, plus 25 times the amount of New Jersey payroll over total payroll and 25 times the amount of New Jersey real property over total real property.

But sales in other states that do not impose a corporate tax are excluded from the denominator of the sales fraction, resulting in higher taxes. The bill signed by Corzine eliminates that provision.

Businesses have criticized the exclusion as contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s Due Process and Commerce clauses because it results in taxation of activity that has no substantial nexus to the taxing state.

“During a time of national recession and economic uncertainty, this overhaul should be a welcome relief to businesses, particularly those that are struggling,” says Senate President Richard Codey, D-Essex, a prime sponsor.

The bill also permits corporations with no offices outside the state to use the same formula that will be permitted under elimination of the exclusion scheme. Currently, under what’s known as the regular-place-of-business rule, a company with a presence outside the state must attribute 100 percent of its income to New Jersey.

The Treasury Department estimates the state will lose $149 million in tax revenue each year for the first two fiscal years, under the legislation.

Even though the state has repealed the exclusion rule, an appeal by a group of multistate corporations will continue. Last May, the state Tax Court rejected the constitutional challenge in Pfizer v. Director, Division of Taxation, No. 000055-2006.

The Appellate Division refused to hear an interlocutory appeal, but on Oct. 30 the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and summarily remanded the case to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on its merits.

The case is still active because the plaintiffs want to recoup taxes paid from 2002 until the new law takes effect, says Paul Frankel of Morrison Foerster in New York, who represents Whirlpool Properties Inc. and Macy’s in the case.

The bill’s prime Assembly sponsors were Democrats Joseph Vas of Middlesex, Louis Greenwald of Camden and Albert Coutinho of Essex.

The bill, signed on Dec. 19, takes effect on July 1, 2010.

https://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202427279972

Posted on Leave a comment

Close Encounters Of The Jersey Kind?

13433220 10208221383944555 1519247414283871758 o

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Morristown NJ, Strange lights were seen hovering over Morris County in New Jersey.  According to CBS  people are asking ,was it a UFO or is there an explanation for it?

Strange, red, blinking lights could be seen across Morris County on Monday night, and officials thought they had figured out what caused them. Some suggested and aircraft or balloons.

Now, they’re not so sure.

Continue reading Close Encounters Of The Jersey Kind?

Posted on Leave a comment

>Route 17 & Paramus Road – What to build? – A hotel?

>paramus+road
Here’s an aerial view of the vacant property on Paramus Road where the Baker Group wants to build a much debated multi-family housing complex.

This property has been the subject of past controversy with regard to zoning.

A self-storage facility was proposed and rejected, and Ridgewood resident Ned Cancellmo’s plan to move Brogan Cadillac to the location was met by blank stares and frowns from the previous Village Council. State DOT officials also talked about moving a salt shed to the property; this too was deemed as being “not appropriate.”

Now it is rumored that, in all likelihood, Zoning Board of Adjustment members will reject the Baker Group’s multi-family housing proposal.

So what do Village officials have in mind for this property? Certainly, they don’t expect anyone would build luxury housing there, do they? What then?

Rumors have circulated for several years now about a group of local investors wanting to build a hotel in Ridgewood. Now that the Schedler property is targeted for preservation as open space, could this be only remaining vacant site where construction of a hotel could be possible?

Please read this condensed biography of Albert J. Pucciarelli, Vice Chairman of Ridgewood’s Planning Board, and let The Fly know what you think about the possibility of a hotel being in Ridgewood’s future.

Albert J. Pucciarelli

Partner

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney, and Carpenter, LLP Attorneys

Ridgewood, NJ

Chair of the Hotels and Resorts Practice Group

ALBERT J. PUCCIARELLI is admitted to practice law in both New York and New Jersey. His practice is concentrated in the areas of hotel and resort development and hotel operations, aviation law, general corporate law and real estate law. In 1999, he co-founded the law firm of Hooker Pucciarelli & Tibbs, L.L.P. in which he was a partner until joining McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP in 2005 as Chair of the firm’s Hotels and Resorts Practice Group. From 1988 through 1998, he was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Inter-Continental Hotels & Resorts with over 200 hotels in 70 countries. He served on the Board of Directors of Inter-Continental, was chair of the company’s Life Safety and Security Committee and a member of the Development Committee and the Pension and Benefits Committee. Prior to joining Inter-Continental, Mr. Pucciarelli served as Vice President and Counsel to Grand Metropolitan (U.S.) and its publicly owned (NYSE) predecessor, Liggett Group, Inc. He has served as Chair of the Hotels, Restaurants and Tourism Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (2001-2004) and as Chair of the Aeronautics Law Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (1998-2001). He has served as a member of the Hospitality Law Council of the Conrad N. Hilton College of Hotel & Restaurant Management, University of Houston (2003-2004), and is a member of the Hotel Industry Liaison Committee of the ABA Committee on Hotels, Resorts and Tourism. He has taught International Business Law as an adjunct professor at the Fordham University Graduate School of Business, and was member of that school’s Advisory Board (1996-2004).

Mr. Pucciarelli is fluent in Russian. He is an instrument-rated commercial pilot, an FAA certified advanced ground instructor and an aircraft owner. He serves his local community as Vice Chairman of the Ridgewood, New Jersey, Planning Board and is a Director of the Board of the Ridgewood Public Library Foundation. Until 1998, he was Vice Chairman of the Ridgewood, New Jersey, Zoning Board of Adjustment on which he served for ten years.

Mr. Pucciarelli’s clients include the owners and developers of Marriott, Courtyard, Ritz-Carlton, Fairmont, Mandarin Oriental, Hyatt, St. Regis and Westin mixed-use hotel and resort projects, hotel management companies and owners, several closely held companies in a variety of businesses, including hotels and restaurants, the second largest dealer of Cessna aircraft in the U.S. and purchasers and sellers of general aviation aircraft.

Mr. Pucciarelli is nationally recognized for his expertise in hotel management agreements and hotel and resort development. He has recently published “Be Smart When You Negotiate” that appeared in the June 2008 edition of Lodging Hospitality, “Hotel Owner’s Budget Approval Rights in Hotel Management Agreements” in the October 2007 edition of Hospitality Lawyer Newsletter, “Smoothing the Legal Path to Development” that appeared in the April 2007 edition of Lodging Hospitality, a two-part article, “Structure of Mixed-Use Hotel Residential Resort Projects” for HospitalityLawyer.com (March, 2006), “Selling and Buying an Existing Hotel – Structure of an Asset Transaction” for Hospitality E-Newsletter (July, 2006) that he co-authored with Eunice Moon, “Recording Hotel Management Agreements – Why?” that he authored for the 16th Annual Real Property Symposium of the Real Property, Probate and Trusts Law Section of the American Bar Association in April, 2005, and “Hotel Mixed-Use Development Projects” that he co-authored for the 2004 Hospitality Law Conference sponsored by the University of Houston School of Law in February 2004. He participated in two panel discussions at the 2006 Phoenix Lodging Conference on hotel and resort development and led a panel discussion at the 2007 Hospitality Law Conference in Houston on the subject of hotel general counsel’s selection and utilization of outside counsel and will speak at that conference in 2009 on the subject of Incentive Fees in Hotel Management Agreements.

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

>Local Democrats Oppose Unfolding COAH Nightmare

>
January 5, 2009 Contact: John Gorman / (609) 292-5199

Senator Kevin J. O’Toole (R-40) Local Democrats Oppose Unfolding COAH NightmareTrenton

Democrat Leadership Silent as Chorus of Opposition Grows

Senator Kevin O’Toole (R-Bergen) called upon Trenton Democrats to reverse course and abandon their new subsidized housing law as the groups of officials calling for a change in policy has grown to include local Bergen County Democratic officials.

“Republicans have been saying for months that the new Democrat subsidized housing law would wreak economic disaster in our State,” said O’Toole. “Now local Bergen County Democrats are using terms like ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and ‘disaster’ to describe the impact of the COAH housing law that was rushed through the Legislature with little debate or deliberation. If the Trenton Democrats cannot listen to Republicans and work to repair the debacle they have created, maybe they should listen to the members of their own party who are ridiculing this incoherent and unworkable law.”

Media reports have indicated that the elimination of “regional contribution agreements” in the Council on Affordable Housing law has placed a home-improvement program that has helped 98 individuals and families in Garfield since 2004 in jeopardy.

“The Trenton Democrats must finally come to grips with the fact that members of their own party have concluded that the COAH law is now hurting the very middle class communities that it purports to help,” said O’Toole. “When a former member of the Assembly Democratic caucus calls the law a ‘disaster, ‘ you would think that somebody in the present legislative leadership would take notice.”

Under the newly adopted COAH law, municipalities such as Wallington would need to create 147 new affordable housing units, Woodridge 171 and Fort Lee 569.

“To use the words of one of my Democratic colleagues, the COAH law is pushing New Jersey into an ‘economic abyss’ at the worst possible time. Reasonable Democrats must tell their leadership to come to the table and work with Republicans to scrap this disastrous law before even more damage is done.”

Link to Post:

https://www.senatenj.com/index.php/otoole/local-democrats-oppose-unfolding-coah-nightmare/1953

Posted on Leave a comment

>Panel suggests N.J. consider driving privileges for undocumented immigrants

>https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/report_nj_may_consider_driving.html

A panel advising Gov. Jon Corzine on immigrant issues is considering recommending the state allow undocumented immigrants “driver privilege cards” and in-state college tuition rates.

Two Hispanic leaders told the Record that the state’s public advocate, Ron Chen, told them the measures would be included in a panel’s report to Corzine.

But a spokeswoman for Chen told the newspaper that it hasn’t been decided what would be included in the report.

The “driver privilege cards” and in-state tuition would need legislative approval before becoming law. Groups that support tighter immigration control have said they’d oppose the measures.

Corzine assembled a panel on immigrant rights with the idea of passing comprehensive immigration reform.

https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/report_nj_may_consider_driving.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Ridgewood Schools

>
Schools Re-open

December Recess is December 24 – January 2. Schools will re-open on Monday, January 5, 2009.

Friends of Music Scholarship Benefit Happens January 9
Friends in the Business is the popular musical review put on each year by John Lange and Ridgewood Friends of Music. This year, nationally-acclaimed musicians from Broadway, jazz and opera will come together on Friday, January 9, at George Washington Middle School at 8 p.m. The artists will donate their talents to raise money for scholarships for Ridgewood music students. Tickets are on sale at Town & Country Apothecary, or by mail at “Friends in the Business” Concert, 197 Lincoln Avenue, Ridgewood, NJ 07450. Prices are $20 for adults, $15 for students and seniors. Make checks payable to “Ridgewood Friends of Music.”

Fourth Annual RHS Alumni Art Show Opens
The Ridgewood High School Department of Art and Design is holding its annual Alumni Art Show in the RHS Carroll Art Gallery, Room 135, through January 9, 2009. A public reception will be held for the artists on Tuesday, January 6, 2009, from 3-5 p.m. The gallery will be open during school hours for the duration of the show.

January Board of Education Meetings
The Ridgewood Board of Education will hold regular public meetings on January 12 and 26, 2009. The Board meets on Floor 3 of the Ed Center, 49 Cottage Place, at 7:30 p.m.


Coming Soon: RAHP Info Sessions

Information sessions for Ridgewood Academy Health Professions (RAHP) will be held in the RHS Campus Center on Saturday, January 10, from 9:30-11 a.m. and Wednesday, January 14, from 7-9 p.m. Current RHS freshmen and their parents/guardians are invited to attend. For more information contact Lucy Fern, RAHP coordinator, at [email protected].

Martin Luther King Day
The Ridgewood Public Schools will be closed on Monday, January 19, 2009, in observance of Martin Luther King Day.

January Board of Education Meetings
The Ridgewood Board of Education will hold regular public meetings on January 12 and 26, 2009. The Board meets on Floor 3 of the Ed Center, 49 Cottage Place, at 7:30 p.m.

Microsoft Store