Posted on Leave a comment

>The Ridgewood Symphony Orchestra

>nsogroup

The Ridgewood Symphony Orchestra is a regional, all volunteer, intergenerational orchestra located in Ridgewood, New Jersey. Supported by the surrounding communities and friends in neighboring areas, the orchestra serves the Northern New Jersey region with many musical and educational activities. These include the outstanding Festival Strings Youth Orchestra, which provides a unique opportunity for young string players to benefit from the experience of playing in an orchestral setting.

https://www.ridgewoodsymphony.org/

Next Concert…

Friday, February 27, 2009

at 8:00 PM

Paramus High School Auditorium

99 Century Road

Paramus, NJ 07652


“The French Connection”

Music of Claude Debussy, Maurice Ravel and César Franck

Featuring: Gary Graffman, piano

&

Diane Wittry,
Conductor and Artistic Director
https://www.ridgewoodsymphony.org/

Posted on Leave a comment

>Corzine’s Competition Push Stops at ‘Volatile’ Munis

>By Terrence Dopp and Jeremy R. Cooke

https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aYXbUWrzknFg&refer=home#

Feb. 12 (Bloomberg) — New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine wants to require state and local politicians to gather competitive bids for buying everything from office supplies to pickup trucks — just not necessarily for the financing.

Corzine, a first-term Democrat and the former head of Goldman, Sachs & Co., says bond sales wouldn’t be included in his push to end no-bid public contracts in his state. In the past year and a half, 95 percent of New Jersey’s offerings were sold via negotiations. More than a dozen academic studies show that opening sales to competitive bidding saves taxpayers money.

“I’m in favor of competitive bidding when somebody shows up,” the governor said in a Feb. 6 interview aboard the inaugural trip of an express train to whisk gamblers from Manhattan to Atlantic City. “But if nobody shows up, then you’re in a negotiated situation anyway. The realities of the marketplace today are different.”

Citing consolidation among underwriters over the past year and soft institutional demand that sent yields for tax-exempt bonds higher than rates on comparable Treasuries, Corzine and others say competition in the $2.67 trillion municipal bond market doesn’t always bring lower costs. Last year, state and local politicians chose negotiations over bids for 86 percent of the $391.5 billion in long-term municipal bonds sold. This month, officials in Georgia, one of the top-rated U.S. states, joined them for the first time in a decade.

Accelerating Trend

The trend toward negotiated sales may be accelerating, even as Christopher “Kit” Taylor, a former chief regulator, calls for banning the practice to stem corruption. No-bid deals in New Mexico are at the heart of a federal investigation into how a political contributor to Governor Bill Richardson won state financial work. The probe led Richardson to withdraw from consideration for U.S. commerce secretary in January.

Last year, Corzine, 62, prohibited state agencies from awarding contracts to campaign contributors — a ban he’s asking the legislature to extend to New Jersey’s municipalities.

Competitive bond offerings force banks to line up on an advertised day and submit the lowest interest-cost bid to win underwriting business. In a negotiated sale, states and cities decide in advance which banks will market the bonds. Underwriters have promoted the no-bid method, saying it allows them to get the best prices for issuers by tailoring the debt to specific types of investors.

Bid sales saved issuers 17 to 48 basis points, “on average and all else equal,” according to a study published in the Winter 2008 issue of the Municipal Finance Journal. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point. On $100 million of debt, the savings mean $1.7 million to $4.8 million less interest over the life of a 10-year bond.

Yield Ratio Flipped

The research by Mark Robbins and Bill Simonsen of the University of Connecticut in West Hartford cited “almost all studies on this issue.”

“That’s in normalized times,” Corzine said of the findings. “We’re not in normalized times. With the current circumstances, you’ve reduced the number of purchasers to a narrower and narrower group.”

Municipalities that don’t expect multiple bidders should use negotiation for bond offerings, Robbins, one of the researchers, said in an interview. High-quality issues will still draw bids, which results in lower costs, he said.

“Nothing has changed in the market that would mean the market wouldn’t work the same way it always has,” he said. “It’s just going to be harder to attract bidders.”

Georgia’s Switch

In December, as investors sought the safety of Treasury debt, even the highest-rated states and cities paid as much as 2.2 times what the federal government was paying. That was a record, according to data compiled by Municipal Market Advisors and Bloomberg. Since then, the so-called yield ratio of AAA tax- exempt bonds to comparable Treasuries reached 1.38. Before the credit crisis, it averaged 0.96.

Four of the 12 largest municipal-bond underwriters in 2007, including New York-based Merrill Lynch & Co., merged with other banks last year. A fifth, Zurich-based UBS AG, exited the institutional public finance business.

The auction-rate securities market also collapsed last year, and all except three tax-exempt bond insurers were stripped of top ratings. Bigger institutional investors shook the market with waves of selling that sent municipal bonds to a 4 percent loss, their worst performance in nine years, based on Bank of America Merrill Lynch indexes.

Georgia, the most populous of seven states with top grades from the three major credit-rating firms, opted for its negotiated fixed-rate bond sale in response to such conditions.

‘Negative Signal’

The resulting annual debt service was $5.9 million below budget and the rates “more favorable” than those received in the state’s last bond sale in June, Governor Sonny Perdue said in a Feb. 4 news release.

State leaders chose negotiation to market the bonds to retail investors and to allow for increasing the offering’s size as demand allowed, said Susan Hart Ridley, director of Georgia’s Financing and Investment Division. Officials initially planned to offer as little as $200 million and ultimately raised the amount to $614 million.

It would have been the largest competitive municipal deal since the market freeze that followed Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s bankruptcy, Bloomberg data show.

“If we didn’t get any bids, I would think that would send a negative signal about the quality of our debt,” Ridley said.

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey got no bids on Dec. 3 for a $300 million sale of taxable three-year notes.

‘No Risk Whatsoever’

“It’s not necessarily comparable to us, but it’s an indicator of where the market was, the tenuous nature of the market” at the time, Ridley said.

There’s no proof that a canceled round of bids “would put a taint on your issue,” said Joy Howard, principal at St. Louis- based WM Financial, adviser to local governments on bond sales.

Florida this week returned to its usual practice of auctioning fixed-rate debt, after negotiating a bond deal at the beginning of January when benchmark yields were higher.

The state attracted seven bidders for $200 million of bonds to finance capital spending for schools. Barclays Plc’s winning interest cost of 4.7 percent beat out bids that were all within 0.05 percentage point, said Ben Watkins, director of the state’s Division of Bond Finance.

‘Pretty Efficiently’

“That’s indicative of a market that’s functioning pretty efficiently,” Watkins said. “High-grade frequent issuers with name recognition and very straightforward credit are in demand.”

Negotiated deals make sense for offerings “that are less solid,” said John Mousseau, a municipal portfolio manager at Vineland, New Jersey-based Cumberland Advisors Inc., in an e- mail. “However, it is very evident that dealers are taking no risk whatsoever these days.”

The New York Yankees hired Goldman Sachs Group Inc., successor to Corzine’s former firm, to manage the team’s second round of city-approved tax-exempt ballpark financing last month. Yankee Stadium LLC agreed to pay 7 percent on $259 million of 40- year bonds. The next day, the same securities jumped in price and fell in yield by about half a percentage point, according to Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board trade data.

“They left an incredible amount of money on the table for the Yankees,” because the drop in yield indicates investors may have been willing to settle for less interest, Mousseau said. Alice McGillion, a Yankees spokeswoman, didn’t reply to a request for comment on the financing.

Ban Proponent

Taylor, who calls for banning negotiated debt sales, was executive director of the tax-exempt bond industry’s self- regulatory organization, the MSRB, for almost three decades until 2007.

He proposes a national market that would force dealers to bid for maturities of new tax-exempt issues they want to sell. The format would help address concern that fewer dealers and less capital have hurt the market, Taylor said.

Since 1994, MSRB rules have limited campaign contributions by underwriters trying to win business in so-called pay-to-play practices. That requirement doesn’t apply to financial advisers who contract with public agencies.

Corzine took steps to limit corruption in the state government’s executive branch with four executive orders he signed in September 2008. Among other things, they prohibited agencies from awarding contracts to campaign donors and expanded employees’ financial disclosure requirements.

Pushing Lawmakers

Now he’s asking state lawmakers to extend the ban on contractor contributions to the county and local levels, replace a patchwork of local finance regulations with one state law and prohibit those holding contracts with school districts from giving to municipal candidates or political action committees.

The New Mexico investigation that kept Richardson out of President Barack Obama’s cabinet echoes a pay-to-play scandal from more than a decade ago in New Jersey. In 1995, former Governor Jim Florio’s chief of staff, Joseph C. Salema, pleaded guilty to sharing in more than $200,000 in payments from a New Jersey bank that sought a bond offering in Camden County.

As the case broke in 1993, Florio signed two executive orders specifying that competitive bidding should be used for bond sales, with certain exceptions approved by the state treasurer. While the orders were in effect, from May 1993 to October 1994, negotiated financing dropped to less than 50 percent of bond sales from 79 percent.

Complexity in Abundance

In 1994, then-Governor Christine Todd Whitman issued a new order, establishing conditions in which negotiations would be allowed. They included sales of poor or complex credits, issues involving an untested financing structure and deals made in volatile markets.

Since September 2007, the state has sold $8.25 billion of bonds via negotiation and $456 million through bids, according to data provided by New Jersey’s Treasury Department.

“We’re in some of the most volatile market conditions in the history of Wall Street,” Tom Vincz, a treasury spokesman, said in an e-mail. “Given the many calisthenics to exit the auction-rate securities market last year, complexity was in abundance.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Terrence Dopp in Trenton, New Jersey at [email protected]; Jeremy R. Cooke in New York at [email protected].

Last Updated: February 12, 2009 11:10 EST
https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aYXbUWrzknFg&refer=home#

Posted on Leave a comment

>Indicted Guardian Always Had Excuses for Filing Late, Examiners Say

>New York Law Journal

Vesselin Mitev

February 11, 2009

https://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202428177805

Obtaining regular reports from Steven T. Rondos, the Brooklyn attorney accused of fleecing guardianship accounts of $4 million, was like “pulling teeth,” said one of the court-appointed examiners charged with monitoring Rondos’ performance.

Albert E. Spencer, a Manhattan attorney, inherited two cases from prior court examiners in early 2006. He said that Rondos had not provided the required reports for 2004, 2005 and 2006.

After Rondos’ indictment last month, the Office of Court Administration acknowledged that court examiners who monitored Rondos’ accounts should have detected sooner at least some of the alleged thefts that occurred between 2001 and 2008.

At least 16 examiners had signed off on the accounts that gave rise to the investigation of Rondos.

David Bookstaver, an OCA spokesman, said that five examiners, who monitored accounts from which $2.4 million allegedly was stolen, have resigned in the wake of the investigation of Rondos’ conduct, which began last year. Another has been suspended pending further inquiry.

Court officials are continuing to go through “thick files” to determine to what extent examiners failed to conduct due diligence, Bookstaver said.

Spencer has not been asked to resign. And he said in an interview that he had performed his duties as an examiner conscientiously “without a doubt.”

Rondos is charged with stealing $45,000 during April 10 to June 12, 2008 from one of the accounts Spencer served as examiner.

Spencer said that Rondos engaged in “stringing us along” by requesting repeated delays and offering excuses for tardy filings. On one occasion, Spencer recalled that the guardian claimed that he could not work for a month because he had suffered several broken limbs in an accident.

Spencer said he gave Rondos the benefit of the doubt and at first tried to be patient.

“Usually when we go at this we don’t try to act in a hostile manner because ultimately that results in more delay and we had no indication that Steven Rondos [would] be accused of bad acts,” Spencer said, pointing to Rondos’ position as vice-chair of the guardianship committee of the state bar’s Elder Law section as evidence of his prominence in the field.

“My letters to him began to get more hostile as time continued,” Spencer said, and in July 2008, after two compliance conferences, he said he moved to permanently remove Rondos.

Such a move usually is viewed as a last resort, Spencer said.

“One of the difficult factors in making that call is that there aren’t that many people around who want to take [the guardianship] job,” he said, adding that often times the guardian is a relative of the ward and may not be an attorney.

By the time Spencer moved against Rondos, the guardian already was under investigation.

According to the indictment, Rondos, 44, of Ridgewood, N.J., allegedly stole from 23 living victims including mentally and physically impaired elderly people as well as children, and one estate. Rondos and his firm, Raia & Rondos in Brooklyn, were both named in the indictment.

His wife, Camille Raia, the firm’s other named partner, has not been charged, but she was the named guardian of Andrea Spagnoletti, whose account was fleeced of more than $1 million, according to the prosecutor.

Rondos was extradited from New Jersey and arraigned before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Michael H. Melkonian last week. He pleaded not guilty and was remanded on $2 million bail. His attorney, David Frankel, has not responded to requests for comment.

EXAMINER REACTION

Court examiners contacted bristled at the suggestion that their lack of supervision contributed to the alleged thefts.

Brooklyn attorney Paul I. Krohn, who has been suspended from the list of court examiners, said that his suspension “had nothing to do with Rondos as far as I’m concerned,” but declined to comment further.

According to Bookstaver, Manhattan attorney Seymour Ostrow was one of the five people who resigned from the examiner list. Ostrow disputes that.

“I sure as hell never resigned,” although he said that he had agreed not to take new cases after he broke his hip about a year ago.

Ostrow insisted that he had “kept after [Mr. Rondos] … even with a broken hip.”

Ostrow said his reviews of Rondos’ accounting turned up “nothing untoward.” And he said that he had gone above and beyond the call of duty as an examiner.

“My reports are 50 to 100 pages where others turn in five and 10 pages, I analyze the law, I visit homes,” he said, adding that he had even trained himself in accounting in order to do a better job.

Lewis E. Alperin, a Mount Vernon attorney who was the court examiner in one of Rondos’ cases said he felt “lucky” that there had been no theft under his watch, although the district attorney has asked Rondos to forfeit $36,090 in earnings from the account.

Alperin said that reflected commissions taken by Rondos before they were due, an issue the two had argued about.

“One of my issues with him was how he should take commissions — we disagreed strongly on how to compute commissions. What he wanted was double the amount,” Alperin said.

Alperin, who has not been suspended or asked to resign, said that as an examiner, he said, one can only do so much.

“If your intent as a lawyer is to steal then you are going to get away with it for a while,” Alperin said.

He noted that a guardian who is appointed in January 2008 has until May 2009 to file a report and then “you can say ‘Oh, I’m a little behind, I’m just waiting for some bank statements,’ so the examiner gets the report in June or July.”

Court examiners are not court employees and are appointed from a list compiled by each Appellate Division department of lawyers and others who have met specific educational and training requirements. They are compensated annually based on the size of the estate they are monitoring.

In a 2005 report, a state commission on court fiduciaries concluded that court examiners are “key to guardian oversight in New York” but found significant problems with the process, including cursory examinations of financial records, rare face-to-face interviews with guardians and poor lines of communication.

According to the report, the average court examiner in New York handles “well over 100 examinations annually” for relatively low fees. They rely on volume to turn a profit.

The commission issued a number of recommendations, including increasing the annual compensation limit of court examiners to $75,000 and creating the position of a court examiner specialist to help oversee examiners and deal with problematic cases.

Chief Administrative Judge Ann Pfau said that oversight would be further tightened in the wake of the alleged thefts, including immediately implementing an electronic tracking system to warn officials of potential problems with the filing of guardians’ reports and mandatory compliance conferences.

The commission’s chair, Sheila L. Birnbaum, said that the reforms had resulted in “many fewer complaints” about the system but cautioned that a theft-proof system could be unrealistic.

“You can’t stop people from fraud and being crooks,” said Birnbaum, a partner in Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.

https://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202428177805

Posted on Leave a comment

>Sandra Stotsky Responds to Ridgewood News Article on Math Panel

>I just got it in the mail today, and I thank you very much for sending it. It confirms what I know has been a major problem. The newspaper, perhaps inadvertently, set up the debate as between reform and traditional math (in the call-out box), never mentioning that the findings of the NMPanel do not support what reformers call reform. The battle for a solid math curriculum is lost if the reformers get their appealing description into the public eye as reform, and traditional math is described in totally negative terms. The battle is at its core about the intellectual content of the math curriculum and its adequacy. Reform math simply teaches much less math, and incoherently to boot. Can you get in something to correct what is a common misunderstanding, maybe even by this alert reporter? Can you get something on record somewhere that the Board has purposely excluded anyone who could bring a research perspective to the discussion.

Fishbein is another story. Right now, 3 of the 4 consultants are clearly on the Reform side, and Posamentier and I are not on the same page in most respects. He is a math ed prof, and I’m into education research. I’m the only one who would bring that perspective, and that seems to be the one perspective the Board does not want. I have no idea what Fishbein is insinuating about costs for me. All I ever indicated was plane costs, and I would even waive that if the Board was open-minded enough to want to know what is supportable by rational evidence. I’d pay my own way, if necessary. I find the Board’s approach to be reprehensible–they seem to be totally opposed to even finding out what is supported by research. I doubt they would do that if medical care were an issue.

Sandra

3balls Golfshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=149749

Posted on Leave a comment

>Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey

>**Stimulus Bill Content Alert**

Ruin Your Health With the Obama Stimulus Plan: Betsy McCaughey


Commentary by Betsy McCaughey

https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_mccaughey&sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs#

Feb. 9 (Bloomberg) — Republican Senators are questioning whether President Barack Obama’s stimulus bill contains the right mix of tax breaks and cash infusions to jump-start the economy.

Tragically, no one from either party is objecting to the health provisions slipped in without discussion. These provisions reflect the handiwork of Tom Daschle, until recently the nominee to head the Health and Human Services Department.

Senators should read these provisions and vote against them because they are dangerous to your health. (Page numbers refer to H.R. 1 EH, pdf version).

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.

But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”

Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.

New Penalties

Hospitals and doctors that are not “meaningful users” of the new system will face penalties. “Meaningful user” isn’t defined in the bill. That will be left to the HHS secretary, who will be empowered to impose “more stringent measures of meaningful use over time” (511, 518, 540-541)

What penalties will deter your doctor from going beyond the electronically delivered protocols when your condition is atypical or you need an experimental treatment? The vagueness is intentional. In his book, Daschle proposed an appointed body with vast powers to make the “tough” decisions elected politicians won’t make.

The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Elderly Hardest Hit

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision.

Hidden Provisions

If the Obama administration’s economic stimulus bill passes the Senate in its current form, seniors in the U.S. will face similar rationing. Defenders of the system say that individuals benefit in younger years and sacrifice later.

The stimulus bill will affect every part of health care, from medical and nursing education, to how patients are treated and how much hospitals get paid. The bill allocates more funding for this bureaucracy than for the Army, Navy, Marines, and Air Force combined (90-92, 174-177, 181).

Hiding health legislation in a stimulus bill is intentional. Daschle supported the Clinton administration’s health-care overhaul in 1994, and attributed its failure to debate and delay. A year ago, Daschle wrote that the next president should act quickly before critics mount an opposition. “If that means attaching a health-care plan to the federal budget, so be it,” he said. “The issue is too important to be stalled by Senate protocol.”

More Scrutiny Needed

On Friday, President Obama called it “inexcusable and irresponsible” for senators to delay passing the stimulus bill. In truth, this bill needs more scrutiny.

The health-care industry is the largest employer in the U.S. It produces almost 17 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product. Yet the bill treats health care the way European governments do: as a cost problem instead of a growth industry. Imagine limiting growth and innovation in the electronics or auto industry during this downturn. This stimulus is dangerous to your health and the economy.

(Betsy McCaughey is former lieutenant governor of New York and is an adjunct senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. The opinions expressed are her own.)

To contact the writer of this column: Betsy McCaughey at [email protected]

Last Updated: February 9, 2009 00:01 EST

From:
https://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_mccaughey&sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs#

Posted on Leave a comment

>Incurring Massive Debt is Not a Stimulus Plan

>Dear Friends,
As I write to you, Congress is contemplating spending over $800 billion dollars in a bill aimed at reviving the economy. Unfortunately, this massive spending bill will do little to stimulate economic growth, and will simply serve to put future generations of Americans in greater debt. If deficit spending could expand the economy, U.S. financial markets would be booming in the wake of the $1.2 Trillion record deficit that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have racked up since October of 2008.

The total cost of this one piece of legislation is almost as much as the annual discretionary budget for the entire federal government. President Reagan said the best way to understand a trillion dollars is to imagine a crisp, new stack of $1000 bills. If you had a stack 4 inches high, you’d be a millionaire. A trillion-dollar stack of $1000 bills would measure just over 63 miles high.

President Obama has said that his proposed stimulus legislation will create or save three million jobs. This means that this legislation will spend about $275,000 to create each job. The average household income in the U.S. is $50,000 a year. If you do the math, the proposal would cost each and every household $6,700 additional debt, paid for by our children and grandchildren.

This proposed spending package comes at a perilous time in our nation’s history. While the public continues to climb past $10.6 trillion, this is not nearly an accurate picture of the nation’s current and future liabilities. When Congress effectively nationalized Fannie and Freddie, the government assumed the companies’ $5 Trillion in mortgage debt. And of course, sitting on top of all these obligations lays the approximately $50 Trillion in unfunded liabilities of the nation’s entitlement programs.

As an alternative to this “borrowing and spending” plan, I introduced legislation which would provide tax relief to American businesses, entrepreneurs, and families, while refraining from starting a multi-trillion dollar debt-financed spending spree. The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act would give the country needed short-term stimulus, while also encouraging long-term economic growth. This legislation focuses on growth-oriented, permanent incentives for economic activity across all sectors, and includes provisions such as reducing the corporate income tax rate to 25 percent, repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax for individuals, indexing capital gains for inflation, and a 5 percent across-the-board reduction to individual income tax rates. The stimulus package also includes spending cuts, and extends the current two-year Net Operating Loss (NOL) carryback period to seven years.

History has shown that the most effective way to reinvigorate the economy and spur economic growth is to ensure that job creators face a lower tax and regulatory burden. If Congressional leaders adopt a stimulus package based on these or similar principles, instead of adopting a package of increased spending, then we will hopefully create real economic stimulus for America.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett
Member of Congress

Posted on Leave a comment

>Garrett Statement on Obama Meeting

>Washington, Jan 27 –

Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ) released the following statement regarding President Obama’s meeting with House Republicans today:

“I thank President Obama for his efforts to reach out to Republicans in the conversation about how best to stimulate our economy. The discussion centered on many Republican-offered suggestions, such as tax cuts for small businesses. While he did not embrace any of the ideas offered, I look forward to additional opportunities to share our pro-growth ideas with the president so we can work together to find a solution to the current economic crisis.

“My main concern with this bill is that some Members of Congress are seeking this opportunity to institute major spending projects that are not at all stimulative. We will stimulate the economy by allowing American businesses to grow and create jobs, and allowing American taxpayers to keep more of their money in their wallets.

“The proposed plan on which we will begin debate today includes $200 million to re-sod the National Mall, $600 million for Federal vehicles and $1.3 billion to upgrade the IT systems for various State and Federal agencies. Now, some of the projects listed in this bill are certainly worthy of government funding, but let’s not masquerade these projects as a stimulus. Stimulus is not an excuse to expand government programs. Stimulus means the economy will grow. Stimulus means people will be employed. Stimulus means we empower taxpayers, rather than burden future generations of Americans with unbridled debt.”

Scott Garrett

Posted on Leave a comment

>Mayor Hints He Won’t Seek Re-election In 2010

>Mayor David T. Pfund dropped a bombshell during last night’s Village Council Work Session when he hinted that he would not seek re-election to the Village Council prior to the expiration of his current term in 2010.

The Mayor commented that he would not be serving on the Village Council in 2011, which is when the proposed $13.9 million “Graydon Water Park” would open if construction begins as proposed in August of 2010.

It is being reported that Mayor Pfund is supporting every major capital project currently under consideration by Council members, including:

The $2.9 million purchase of vacant property on West Saddle River Road for preservation as open space

An $18 million parking garage/retail complex on North Walnut Street

The $13.9 million “Graydon Water Park”

The Fly wonders if Mr. Pfund is supporting these expensive projects only because he won’t be around to deal with the mess that will surely follow if our economy continues to go down the tubes, and the Village has trouble paying off the interest on any municipal bonds sold to raise cash.

GigaGolf, Inc.show?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=60066

Posted on Leave a comment

>Another Idiot Law Advances:Bill to mandate removal of snow, ice advances

>By LARRY HIGGS
TRANSPORTATION WRITER

Drivers, including truckers, would have to clean snow and ice from their vehicles before hitting the road, under a bill released by the Assembly Transportation Committee on Monday.

The committee unanimously released an amended bill over protests by trucking industry representatives that the proposed requirement is unsafe for truck drivers and relies on technology they say doesn’t exist here.

“There are still problems. This could be the last straw for some (small) trucking companies,” said Sam Cunningham of Spring Lake, who handles government relations for the Association of Bi-State Motor Carriers.

Safety experts said ice and snow flying off the tops of tractor-trailers and other large trucks is a hazard.

“We know that people have been killed and people have suffered property damage,” said Pam Fischer, state Division of Traffic Highway Safety director.

In a poll of 1,000 drivers by AAA clubs of New Jersey, seven of 10 motorists support such a law, which would allow police to pull over vehicles being driven with ice and snow on them or flying off them, said David Weinstein, AAA spokesman.

“What we’re talking about is 2,000 pounds of ice when they leave it there (on the roof of an 18-wheeler),” said William Margaretta, New Jersey Safety Council executive director. He referred to a transportation study provided by trucking industry officials saying that is the weight of an inch of snow and ice on a 48-foot-long trailer.

Trucking industry officials said federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration rules prohibit drivers from climbing on the roof of a 13-foot-high tractor-trailer to clean off snow and ice.

Fischer said equipment to clear trucks of ice and snow exists in Canada, but local trucking officials said they know of no such equipment here.

Posted on Leave a comment

>The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Ac

>Dear Friends,
Last week, I introduced H.R. 470, The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act, an economic stimulus package designed to provide short-term stimulus, while encouraging long-term economic growth.

This legislation, developed in conjunction with the Republican Study Committee (RSC), focuses on broad, growth-oriented, permanent incentives for economic activity across all sectors and industries, with immediate application and sustained, long-term implications. Provisions center around three main themes: support for families through tax relief, economic relief for American businesses and entrepreneurs, and protection for future generations from a crushing debt burden.

The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act, with its emphasis on America’s small business and middle class, is a much-needed jumpstart to our nation’s economy. This bill is a commonsense approach to protecting and preserving American jobs. History has shown that the most effective way to reinvigorate the economy and spur economic growth is to ensure that job creators face a lower tax and regulatory burden. Congress and the Administration must pass an economic package that actually works to stimulate our economy long-term. Protecting and securing America’s jobs is the taxpayer friendly approach to accomplishing this.

We must liberate Americans from their overwhelming tax burden in order to empower individual taxpayers and keep more money in the wallets of American families. We must cease the excessive federal spending that continues to bloat our national debt, and create opportunities for private initiatives to spur economic growth. And we must end the government interference in the marketplace that many experts say have helped create our current economic problems.

Provisions contained in The Economic Recovery and Middle-Class Tax Relief Act include:

• 5% across the board reduction to individual income tax rates
• Repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax for individuals
• No increase in capital gains and dividends tax rates for individuals
• Increase the child tax credit from $1,000 to $5,000, but it is not refundable
• Permanently repeal the 70.5 distribution requirement on IRAs
• Increase the tax deduction for student loans from $2,500 to $3,750 and increase income limits up to $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for families with no phase out
• Increase the tax deduction for qualified higher education expenses from $4,000 to $6,000 and increase income limits up to $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for families with no phase out
• Temporarily make all withdrawals from IRAs not subject to taxation or penalties for 2009
• Reduce the corporate income tax rate to 25%
• Reduce the alternative capital gains rate for corporations to 15%
• Index capital gains for inflation
• Repeal limitations on expensing allowance (Sec. 179) of depreciable business assets
• Make the R&D tax credit permanent
• Extend the two-year “carryback” period for net operating losses to seven years
• A one percent across the board cut to non-defense discretionary spending

I look forward to an open discussion with Members on both sides of the aisle about the ideas presented in this bill. I am confident that we can work together to find relief for Americans and bring an end to the economic crisis facing our country.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett
Member of Congress

Posted on Leave a comment

>NJ’s open space fund needs money

>

Newsday.com

newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj–xgr-legislativepr0118jan18,0,1413200.story

By ANGELA DELLI SANTI

Associated Press Writer

January 18, 2009

TRENTON, N.J.

Gov. Jon Corzine’s nod to open space in his State of the State address could give new life to stalled efforts to direct long-term funding to the purchase of farmland, green acres and historic sites.

At least two bills already in the Legislature address permanent funding for open space, which environmentalists have long advocated and Corzine said he supports, though he has not said where he thinks the money should come from. Several proposals have come and gone since Corzine was elected in 2005, including a plan to dedicate a portion of the sales tax to open space preservation. A new legislative proposal is being drafted.

“It is my preferred approach that we put in place a long-term funding solution,” Corzine said in the State of the State message Tuesday. “That said, we need, at a minimum, an interim bonding question for November’s ballot to extend the financing the votes approved in 2007.”

Voters approved an emergency $200 million bond referendum in 2007, the same year they rejected borrowing for stem cell research and dedicating a portion of the sales tax to property tax relief. The open space money has all been spent. (No statewide open space funding question has failed in New Jersey in a dozen or so requests to voters dating back decades.)

Environmentalists said they are frustrated the question of long-term funding keeps cropping up without being resolved.

“A one-year stopgap doesn’t get the job done, and I’m not even sure it would pass (in this economy),” said David Pringle of the New Jersey Environmental Federation. “We shouldn’t be living referendum to referendum.”

Jeff Tittel of the New Jersey Sierra Club said $200 million a year is needed, and that there are many ways to get it: through a modest water-user fee, from the sales tax or gas tax, by taxing those who develop farmland, through a multiyear bond referendum, or by taxing billboards, SUVs or recreation equipment.

The proposal to dedicate a portion of existing sales tax revenue to open space purchases had support from a majority of lawmakers in both political parties, Tittel said, but became a casualty of the caustic budget battle of 2006 that shut down state government. A similar proposal became a political casualty the next year, when Corzine tried to tie permanent funding for open space to a failed plan to pay down state debt by raising tolls.

“This is the first time since 1961 that we are out of money for open space,” Tittel said. The governor should never have allowed us to get into that situation in the first place.”

Senate Republican Leader Tom Kean Jr. of Westfield agreed, accusing Corzine, a Democrat seeking re-election in November, of “playing politics with land preservation goals as opposed to finding a real solution that has worked very well for two decades.”

Kean said he continues to support a Senate resolution he and Democratic leader Steve Sweeney co-sponsored dedicating $175 million in existing tax revenue to open space through 2038, if voters approve the idea.

Assemblyman John McKeon, D-South Orange, said he is drafting a bill that would provide $350 million a year to the open space preservation fund by imposing a water use fee that would cost the average household $2 per month. The proposal also would require voter approval.

McKeon, long a champion of open space funding, said failing to replenish the fund would cause economic peril.

For example, if the Highlands watershed region were to be developed rather than preserved, he said the costs of treating and delivering clean, safe tap water to the state would become so astronomical no one could afford to live in the Garden State any longer.

“The bottom line _ it’s unpalatable to do nothing,” he said.

Posted on Leave a comment

>I am dismayed and surprised by your 13 January 2009 post on the Ridgewood Blog

>Dear Ms. Goodman,

I am dismayed and surprised by your 13 January 2009 post on the Ridgewood Blog in which you accused a parent of ‘undermining the administration’ by offering Sandra Stotsky, a distinguished math standards expert, to consult with RPS’ Math Planning Team (MPT). You couldn’t have chosen a more negative characterization of the parent’s actions. Instead this parent should be complimented for attempting to provide balance to the MPT, whose external advisors are far to one side of the ideological divide.

The external advisors Daro, Rosenstein, and Schultz represent a point of view shared by far fewer than 1% of mathematicians. They are the ‘understanding first’ and ‘multiple solutions’ crowd that leave little time for our children to become fluent in standard algorithms for addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. These algorithms are efficient and they provide the foundations of algebra.

The only advisor with a point of view respected by mathematicians is Posamentier, but his chances of providing balance are slim. He has only 30 minutes with the MPT, while Daro was given an entire day, and Schultz is both a member of the team and an external advisor. If the external advisors represented both sides of the ideological divide, and all were given equal time, then I would agree that we don’t need Stotsky.

Most outrageous is your characterization of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel (NMAP) as ‘political,’ and your insinuation that it’s being treated as dogmatic religious text. In my view the NMAP report is far more balanced than the MPT: It acknowledges the importance of reform math, but cautions that traditional mathematical rigor should not be compromised. But the education establishment you have chosen to defend is deeply threatened by the NMAP report. It’s a simplistic cheap shot to dismiss it as political.

I hoped when you were elected that you would be a voice for concerned parents. Instead it seems that you’ve become that administration’s biggest cheer leader.

John G. Sheehan, Ph.D.

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Village Council Poised to Offer $2.9 million for Schedler Property

>Village Council members are scheduled to introduce a $2.9 million bond ordinance for purchase of the Schedler property during tonight’s regularly scheduled Public Meeting. The $2.9 million would cover property purchase only; improvements necessary to convert the parcel to athletic playing fields would be extra.

The Village has already received a $1 million grant from the Bergen County Open Space fund for purchase of the property; other grants may be forthcoming (the operative word is “may”). If no additional grant money is awarded above and beyond the Bergen County Open Space award, Ridgewood’s taxpayers will be obligated to cough up as much as $1.9 million.

The Schedler tract is located at the intersection of West Saddle River Road and Route 17. Current assessed value of the entire parcel is $2,597,500.

Village Manager Jim Ten Hoeve previously indicated his desire to purchase an adjacent parcel owned by the Shotmeyer Oil Corporation along with the Schedler purchase. That parcel, located on Route 17 northbound, is currently assessed at $67,500.

Save up to 40% on Last Minute Flights with Hotwire Limited Rates!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Teaneck fires township manager in late-night vote

>THE RECORD

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

BY JOSEPH AX

TEANECK — The Township Council fired Township Manager Helene Fall in a surprise move Tuesday, faulting her leadership style and reluctance to listen to other viewpoints.

The vote to fire Fall came at 11:29 p.m., after a lengthy closed- session discussion.

Fall took part in some of that discussion about her job, but left the building before the vote was taken without commenting.

Mayor Kevie Feit, Deputy Mayor Lizette Parker, Councilwoman Barbara Toffler, Councilman Mohammed Hameeduddin and Councilman Elie Katz voted to fire Fall. Councilman Adam Gussen and Councilwoman Monica Honis voted against the move.

The resolution to fire her stated that the council had “lost confidence” in Fall, who “has been unwilling” to try new ideas.

Municipal Clerk Lissette Aportela will serve as acting manager until the council hires Fall’s replacement.

Fall will be suspended with pay for 30 days until the effective date of her dismissal. After that she will be paid three months’ salary.

The decision comes just weeks after the town was hit with a $4.1 million jury verdict in the latest of a string of harassment lawsuits in recent years. It also comes just two days before the town’s first public meeting on the 2009 budget, which Fall put together.

Mayor Kevie Feit said the decision was a difficult but necessary for the future of the town.

“From my perspective, it’s definitely been something that’s been brewing,” he said. “It goes to the issue of, are we going to keep doing things the same way and expect different results?”

Gussen criticized the majority of the council for letting Fall go just as the budget season begins.

“To take this action leaves us without the person that put together the budget, and that troubles me,” he said.

But Feit said the council could attend to the budget without Fall.

“It’s never the right time,” he said of the decision to fire a manager. “But we can handle it.”

Three weeks ago, John Shouldis, a former police officer, won a $4.1 million judgment in a 2006 lawsuit that alleged he had been harassed after he testified for a fellow officer in her own harassment suit.

That officer was Diane Mancini, who eventually received a $1.1 million settlement in 2004 after years of legal wrangling.

The Shouldis verdict led the town to establish an investigative committee last week with subpoena power to examine potential ongoing discrimination and harassment issues.

The committee, the second in three years tasked with looking into the town’s employment practices, consists of Feit, Parker and Katz.

Other recent cases include a series of lawsuits from firefighter Bill Brennan, who agreed to an $800,000 settlement in 2005, and a racial discrimination lawsuit from former firefighter Harold Harmon, who received a $750,000 settlement in 2007.

Last week, former firefighter Matthew Vogelman claimed to be the victim of a hostile work environment and anti-Semitic remarks as a result of his support for Brennan in a federal lawsuit filed in Newark.

While noting that he is legally barred from discussing the specific reasons for Fall’s firing, Feit said that the lawsuits were part of the discussion.

Fall, the town’s first female manager, was born and raised in Hackensack. She first worked in Teaneck in the 1980s as an assistant to the longtime manager Werner Schmid.

She returned in 1998 after stints in Bernards Township in Somerset County and in Montvale and served as the deputy manager under Gary Saage for two years before taking over the town’s day-to-day operations. The council did not interview other candidates and praised Fall for her professionalism.

“What I’ve been most impressed with is her level of integrity and knowledge that the town will be hard-pressed to replace,” Gussen said Tuesday.

Fall has said that she hoped to finish her career in Teaneck, where she lives with her husband.

In her early years as manager, she clashed repeatedly with the police and fire unions, leading the council in 2006 to appoint an investigative committee to look into accusations of retaliation and harassment.

Fall received support from a number of supervisors and department heads, who defended her job performance. The committee made some recommendations but did not fund all of them.

Fall and Tiernan said they were never told of the specific allegations against them nor given an opportunity to defend themselves.

Tuesday’s resolution was not part of the agenda but was added by special vote at the end of the meeting’s regular agenda.

Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail. Check it out.
Reply

Forward

Posted on Leave a comment

>So here is the spin on Dr. Stotsky from Laurie Goodman

>

Did you hear the one about the math expert who wasn’t invited to the party?

I understand a few folks are riled up about a Harvard-educated math person, Dr. Stotsky, who supposedly “offered” her services to the District in our math quest. There’s an email circulating with plenty of misinformation and spin. Here’s my PERSONAL take on, and clarification of, the situation. (And, just so we’re clear, by “personal” I mean these are my opinions and perspectives only and I am in no way speaking for the Board.)

1) We are pretty far into the process (as the email writer says, 2 years) and the administration may feel that to bring in new participants now might bog things down, require backtracking, etc. I can understand that. We need to keep moving forward, the community has waited long enough.

2) The Math Planning Team’s experts are also learned and experienced. One could argue that they may be more math-focused than Dr. Stotsky, as my quick read of her background shows an emphasis also on reading/language. But I’ll agree that she’s at least “as expert” as the others. (And BTW, the more I learn about the politics involved in the National Math Panel, the less I view its report as the 10 Commandments, nor its participants as the high priests of math…sorry, not sure why I veered into religious terminology!)

3) Dr. Stotsky should not be characterized as a somehow “more objective” observer. Like many mathematics experts, she is also a consultant to a textbook company (Sadler-Oxford Mathematics). I have no idea if that company’s programs are being considered in Ridgewood, but the point is, everyone has a point of view; seems to me there is no such thing as a truly objective expert.

4) Dr. Stotsky did not benignly “learn of” our internal math divisions but rather was actively recruited by a parent with an agenda and admitted desire to undermine the administration. It would not surprise me if District personnel were at least suspect of the motivations. (This is my guess; no one said this to me.)

5) There has been no direct communication between Dr. Stotsky and the District administration. She did not approach, write, call or email the District.

6) The misinformation email says there’s “no end in sight” in our math effort. That’s not true. The Team is working according to a publicized schedule/plan and the end is certainly within sight.

7) The email mentions Dr. Stotsky’s involvement in Massachusetts’ high scores in the TIMMS test, and that Mass is “one of only two U.S. states to receive top scores in the international TIMMS tests, scores that rank them near the Asian countries that lead the TIMMS every year.” The truth of Massachusetts’ TIMMS performance should be taken with a grain of salt — there were only a few states who even participated in the tests as states. New Jersey did not. (It’s my understanding that any state or group of schools can pay to be scored as a group). The test mainly measures countries’ performance. Also, Massachusetts is not New Jersey (in a nutshell). (And as an aside, isn’t Massachusetts the home of TERC/Investigations? Aren’t they using it in a lot of schools there? What does that mean?. Kind of ironic, at the very least!)

You know what, Mr. Misinformation? This is not helping. (And by “this” I don’t mean talking about math. Talking and sharing are good. I welcome your comments. What’s not helpful is spreading misinformation and trying to fan the flames.) We have a plan. We have smart Ridgewood educators working on the plan. We have experts advising our educators. I’m looking forward to seeing what the Team comes up with and asking my questions at that time.