Posted on Leave a comment

>Nothing scares misbehaving policians more than the public space and the light of day

>After being elected and depending on the Ridgewood Chamber of commerce’s members for tax income, it’s only logical for Ten Hoeve and Zussy to play little dictators to the Chamber of Commerce: Take their money, and throw it in the garbage. Isn’t this what power means?

But if we’re to have an effective government and be pro-active, the Chamber of Commerce and whoever was against it should have said something when it happened.

I know, I know in this day and age, when budgets are slashed, and localities’ credit ratings are in play, the mayor and others have better things to do than worry about decorations, but the Chamber of Commerce should have said: ” If you’re going to decorate in this way, use your money, not ours. ” I’m sure that the merchants and other ChoC members have worked hard for that money? Don’t let yourself be bullied! Let the bullies know that you will not be intimidated, and you will call them on it publicly!

You’re not uncouth, unfair, etc. if you tell a politician that HE can’t make a mockery of YOUR hard-earned money (in general) or cherished tradition that have great meaning to all, in this particular case. And if you don’t see the charm of garbage-on-a-string, then you, the payer should get what YOU want.

Also, do it when it happens, not a month later: If you paid for a new car (and with $15,000 you can buy a new car) and they gave you a banged-up car full of garbage would you ever drive the thing off the lot and complain a month later? I don’t think so, so don’t do it again! They (despot-politicians) take this as a sign of weakness.

Nothing scares misbehaving policians more than the public space and the light of day, so call them on it, and if they don’t stop, SHOUT!

Microsoft Store

Posted on Leave a comment

>Chris Christie files papers for Governors Race

>Dear Friend,

This morning I am filing papers to begin the process to become a candidate for the Republican nomination for Governor of New Jersey.

I did not take this step lightly. It was only after careful consideration and consultation with my family that I decided to become a candidate.

New Jersey is broken. New Jersey’s taxes have become so unaffordable that more families are leaving our state than moving here. Our state’s business tax climate is ranked 50th in the nation and has become so unattractive to employers that only government jobs are growing in New Jersey. Yet nothing in Trenton gets done to fix these problems.

We can change this. We can solve these problems if we’re willing to make the tough decisions.

In my seven years as your United States Attorney, I didn’t shy away from any of the tough decisions. I took on corporate greed, political corruption, terrorism and environmental polluters. Public officials from both parties were prosecuted for corruption – more than 130 were convicted, and not one was acquitted. Corporate executives who cheated their companies and hurt their workers were successfully prosecuted. Terrorist plots were disrupted; polluters punished.

Many didn’t believe we could win these battles. We did, and with strong leadership we will win the fight for Governor and change this state for the better.

My formal announcement for Governor will come in the first week in February and I hope you will join us (I will email you the details). With strong leadership now, we can fix our broken state and make it more affordable for all New Jersey families.

Sincerely,

Chris Christie

PS. Our website is still in formation, but please visit, https://www.christiefornj.com/
, to sign up for email updates and details about our announcement.

Posted on Leave a comment

>111th Congress Convenes This Week

>Dear Friends,
Yesterday, I took the oath of office to begin serving my fourth term in the United States Congress as your representative from the 5th District of New Jersey.

I’m deeply honored for the faith and trust that the people of northern New Jersey have again placed in me to serve as their voice in Washington, and I would like to take this time to reiterate my commitment to serving you.

While we face many challenges in the coming days, including mending our economy and combating unemployment, I look forward to working with Members from both sides of the aisle to reach consensus that will best serve the American people.

Upon his inauguration in 1985, Ronald Reagan said, “In this blessed land, there is always a better tomorrow…Let history say of us, ‘There were golden years – when the American Revolution was reborn, when freedom gained new life, when America reached for her best.”

My friends, what will history say of us? President Reagan challenged America to make the future worthy of the past. We too must undertake this great test. How can we make our future worthy of our past? We must rehabilitate our economy by helping small businesses to promote growth. We must protect our environment by searching for renewable energy sources and promoting conservation. We must shrink our mountainous debt by reducing wasteful government spending. And we must preserve and protect the individual freedoms of the American people.

As the 111th Congress begins, I will keep these challenges firmly in mind as I continue my work as your advocate in Washington. Thank you, and God bless America.

Sincerely,

Scott Garrett

Member of Congress

Free Tax Returns.com Inc.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Calls Grow to Cap Property Taxes

>NA AV067 PROPTA NS 20090104181214

By JENNIFER LEVITZ
Support for property-tax rollbacks is building from Arizona to New York, fueled by angry homeowners in some locales who are seeing rising tax bills despite plunging home prices.

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123111472983052521-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAxNzEwMTc0Wj.html

Seacoast Online Media Group
Protesters angered by rising property-tax assessments in Hampton, N.H., release tea into the wind in a re-enactment of the Boston Tea Party.
Legislatures in New York, Georgia, Oklahoma and Wyoming are considering taking up proposals to curb property taxes in their 2009 sessions. In Indiana, a cap on property taxes enacted last year became effective Jan. 1, and lawmakers are planning to vote this year on whether to put before voters a constitutional amendment that would cap taxes permanently at 1% of a property’s value.

In recent months, citizen groups in Montana, Nevada and Arizona have organized to get property-tax-relief measures on state ballots. Florida voters last year amended the state’s constitution to increase a number of property-tax exemptions, lowering their assessments.

“We just can’t afford these increases in property taxes,” said Lynne Weaver, a 59-year-old retired swimsuit saleswoman in Phoenix, who said her investment nest egg “has pretty well been cut in half” by market declines. She is a leading volunteer for Prop. 13 Arizona, an organization collecting signatures seeking a 2010 ballot measure that would roll back home valuations to 2003, before the boom that preceded the bust in home prices, and which would also cap annual property-tax increases at 2% of home value.

New York City boosted property taxes by 7% effective Jan. 1, and other towns in the state are also sending out higher bills, even as Gov. David Paterson and some legislative leaders are supporting a recent report that recommended a 4% statewide cap in property-tax increases. A commission empaneled by Gov. Paterson’s predecessor called for the cap in response to concern that the state’s levies — among the highest in the nation on property — were curbing growth and encouraging migration.

Taxes can go up when prices decline because assessed values lag behind market realities. The values that cities and towns use to calculate tax bills are often based on house sales a year or more before the bills are issued. That means that many recent bills don’t take into account the meltdown of 2008, when house prices fell by an average of about 20% across the country.

In addition, cities and towns are facing a barrage of recession-related financial pressures, including cuts in state aid and investment losses. That is tempting many to look for added revenue from property taxes, one of the few revenue sources they control.

That has set the stage for more tension between taxpayers and municipal officials hard-pressed to pay bills.

“It’s pretty hard not to institute some increase in property taxes,” said Stephen Altieri, town administrator of Mamaroneck, N.Y., whose town board voted Dec. 17 to raise the town property-tax rate in a main part of the New York City suburb to $14.25 per $1,000 in assessed home value, from $10.20. Mr. Altieri said Mamaroneck is facing a “sort of a perfect storm” because of declining investments, and falling revenue from a 1.3% tax it receives on the value of new mortgages. Along with raising property taxes, the town is also trimming its own spending, he says.

In Evans, N.Y., outside Buffalo, October assessments reflected strong home prices through July 1, 2007, and residents were so irked that they picketed Town Hall, started a Web site, and presented the town clerk with a petition calling for the assessments to be thrown out. The town declined to do that, but it says it has been hearing individual appeals.

Parts of the country that felt the real-estate bust early have seen some reductions in property taxes, but some residents in communities that were hit by the downturn later are in shock.

“Disbelief” is how 55-year-old John Kane, a financial adviser, describes his reaction to the assessed value of his home in Hampton, N.H., which soared 55% to $850,200 recently, from $549,300 in 2007. His annual taxes jumped 30%, to nearly $14,000. “We see empty houses, for-sale signs,” Mr. Kane said. “And they value our houses like this?”

About 100 Hampton residents formed a group called the Coalition for a Fair Assessment, and staged a protest at Hampton Harbor, waving tea bags in a mini re-enactment of the Boston Tea Party. The group urged local homeowners to appeal their bills — which many are doing. They also got on the Town Council’s agenda on Monday to advocate a reassessment that reflects the real-estate slump.

In Louisiana’s St. Tammany Parish, north of New Orleans, tax assessor Patricia Schwarz Core said 15,000 residents have requested a formal review of their 2008 revaluations, compared with 500 in a typical revaluation.

On his Web site, Louisiana state Rep. Kevin Pearson, a Republican, calls the 2008 revaluations in St. Tammany ridiculous and says some residents saw their assessed values jump 150% since the revaluation four years ago. In an interview, he said he is working with other legislators to craft an agenda for the next session that may include limits on increases in tax bills and more oversight of local taxing entities.

In Wyoming, rising property assessments have “stirred up some problems, especially for fixed-income people,” said state Rep. Rodney Anderson, a Republican who is chairman of the Wyoming House of Representatives’ revenue committee. Last month, Mr. Anderson was part of a joint committee of legislative leaders that endorsed a bill that would exempt part of a home’s value from property taxes.

“People are just astounded that this year, of all years,” the assessed value “of their property has increased,” said Georgia Rep. Larry O’Neal, a Republican and chairman of the Ways and Means Committee of the state’s House of Representatives. Mr. O’Neal said he supports a bill that would bar communities from raising taxes by increasing assessed values, eliminating what he calls “the back-door tax increase.” If it passes, entities would have to go through the public — and often difficult — process of raising rates to increase revenue. He expects the bill will be taken up by the legislature this year.

Write to Jennifer Levitz at [email protected]

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123111472983052521-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAxNzEwMTc0Wj.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>New N.J. Law Exempts Corporate Earnings Out of State From Tax

>https://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202427279972

Charles Toutant
New Jersey Law Journal
January 8, 2009

Gov. Jon Corzine has signed a bill that exempts New Jersey corporations from tax on income earned in other states, a measure designed to keep existing businesses in the state and to attract others to come here.

The bill, A-2722/S-3 , undoes a 2002 amendment that assesses corporate income tax based on a formula that includes income not taxed by other states.

At present, a company’s tax rate is determined through a series of weighted fractions — 50 times the amount of New Jersey sales over total sales, plus 25 times the amount of New Jersey payroll over total payroll and 25 times the amount of New Jersey real property over total real property.

But sales in other states that do not impose a corporate tax are excluded from the denominator of the sales fraction, resulting in higher taxes. The bill signed by Corzine eliminates that provision.

Businesses have criticized the exclusion as contrary to the U.S. Constitution’s Due Process and Commerce clauses because it results in taxation of activity that has no substantial nexus to the taxing state.

“During a time of national recession and economic uncertainty, this overhaul should be a welcome relief to businesses, particularly those that are struggling,” says Senate President Richard Codey, D-Essex, a prime sponsor.

The bill also permits corporations with no offices outside the state to use the same formula that will be permitted under elimination of the exclusion scheme. Currently, under what’s known as the regular-place-of-business rule, a company with a presence outside the state must attribute 100 percent of its income to New Jersey.

The Treasury Department estimates the state will lose $149 million in tax revenue each year for the first two fiscal years, under the legislation.

Even though the state has repealed the exclusion rule, an appeal by a group of multistate corporations will continue. Last May, the state Tax Court rejected the constitutional challenge in Pfizer v. Director, Division of Taxation, No. 000055-2006.

The Appellate Division refused to hear an interlocutory appeal, but on Oct. 30 the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal and summarily remanded the case to the Appellate Division to consider the appeal on its merits.

The case is still active because the plaintiffs want to recoup taxes paid from 2002 until the new law takes effect, says Paul Frankel of Morrison Foerster in New York, who represents Whirlpool Properties Inc. and Macy’s in the case.

The bill’s prime Assembly sponsors were Democrats Joseph Vas of Middlesex, Louis Greenwald of Camden and Albert Coutinho of Essex.

The bill, signed on Dec. 19, takes effect on July 1, 2010.

https://www.law.com/jsp/ihc/PubArticleIHC.jsp?id=1202427279972

Posted on Leave a comment

Close Encounters Of The Jersey Kind?

13433220 10208221383944555 1519247414283871758 o

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Morristown NJ, Strange lights were seen hovering over Morris County in New Jersey.  According to CBS  people are asking ,was it a UFO or is there an explanation for it?

Strange, red, blinking lights could be seen across Morris County on Monday night, and officials thought they had figured out what caused them. Some suggested and aircraft or balloons.

Now, they’re not so sure.

Continue reading Close Encounters Of The Jersey Kind?

Posted on Leave a comment

>Route 17 & Paramus Road – What to build? – A hotel?

>paramus+road
Here’s an aerial view of the vacant property on Paramus Road where the Baker Group wants to build a much debated multi-family housing complex.

This property has been the subject of past controversy with regard to zoning.

A self-storage facility was proposed and rejected, and Ridgewood resident Ned Cancellmo’s plan to move Brogan Cadillac to the location was met by blank stares and frowns from the previous Village Council. State DOT officials also talked about moving a salt shed to the property; this too was deemed as being “not appropriate.”

Now it is rumored that, in all likelihood, Zoning Board of Adjustment members will reject the Baker Group’s multi-family housing proposal.

So what do Village officials have in mind for this property? Certainly, they don’t expect anyone would build luxury housing there, do they? What then?

Rumors have circulated for several years now about a group of local investors wanting to build a hotel in Ridgewood. Now that the Schedler property is targeted for preservation as open space, could this be only remaining vacant site where construction of a hotel could be possible?

Please read this condensed biography of Albert J. Pucciarelli, Vice Chairman of Ridgewood’s Planning Board, and let The Fly know what you think about the possibility of a hotel being in Ridgewood’s future.

Albert J. Pucciarelli

Partner

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney, and Carpenter, LLP Attorneys

Ridgewood, NJ

Chair of the Hotels and Resorts Practice Group

ALBERT J. PUCCIARELLI is admitted to practice law in both New York and New Jersey. His practice is concentrated in the areas of hotel and resort development and hotel operations, aviation law, general corporate law and real estate law. In 1999, he co-founded the law firm of Hooker Pucciarelli & Tibbs, L.L.P. in which he was a partner until joining McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP in 2005 as Chair of the firm’s Hotels and Resorts Practice Group. From 1988 through 1998, he was Executive Vice President and General Counsel of Inter-Continental Hotels & Resorts with over 200 hotels in 70 countries. He served on the Board of Directors of Inter-Continental, was chair of the company’s Life Safety and Security Committee and a member of the Development Committee and the Pension and Benefits Committee. Prior to joining Inter-Continental, Mr. Pucciarelli served as Vice President and Counsel to Grand Metropolitan (U.S.) and its publicly owned (NYSE) predecessor, Liggett Group, Inc. He has served as Chair of the Hotels, Restaurants and Tourism Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (2001-2004) and as Chair of the Aeronautics Law Committee of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York (1998-2001). He has served as a member of the Hospitality Law Council of the Conrad N. Hilton College of Hotel & Restaurant Management, University of Houston (2003-2004), and is a member of the Hotel Industry Liaison Committee of the ABA Committee on Hotels, Resorts and Tourism. He has taught International Business Law as an adjunct professor at the Fordham University Graduate School of Business, and was member of that school’s Advisory Board (1996-2004).

Mr. Pucciarelli is fluent in Russian. He is an instrument-rated commercial pilot, an FAA certified advanced ground instructor and an aircraft owner. He serves his local community as Vice Chairman of the Ridgewood, New Jersey, Planning Board and is a Director of the Board of the Ridgewood Public Library Foundation. Until 1998, he was Vice Chairman of the Ridgewood, New Jersey, Zoning Board of Adjustment on which he served for ten years.

Mr. Pucciarelli’s clients include the owners and developers of Marriott, Courtyard, Ritz-Carlton, Fairmont, Mandarin Oriental, Hyatt, St. Regis and Westin mixed-use hotel and resort projects, hotel management companies and owners, several closely held companies in a variety of businesses, including hotels and restaurants, the second largest dealer of Cessna aircraft in the U.S. and purchasers and sellers of general aviation aircraft.

Mr. Pucciarelli is nationally recognized for his expertise in hotel management agreements and hotel and resort development. He has recently published “Be Smart When You Negotiate” that appeared in the June 2008 edition of Lodging Hospitality, “Hotel Owner’s Budget Approval Rights in Hotel Management Agreements” in the October 2007 edition of Hospitality Lawyer Newsletter, “Smoothing the Legal Path to Development” that appeared in the April 2007 edition of Lodging Hospitality, a two-part article, “Structure of Mixed-Use Hotel Residential Resort Projects” for HospitalityLawyer.com (March, 2006), “Selling and Buying an Existing Hotel – Structure of an Asset Transaction” for Hospitality E-Newsletter (July, 2006) that he co-authored with Eunice Moon, “Recording Hotel Management Agreements – Why?” that he authored for the 16th Annual Real Property Symposium of the Real Property, Probate and Trusts Law Section of the American Bar Association in April, 2005, and “Hotel Mixed-Use Development Projects” that he co-authored for the 2004 Hospitality Law Conference sponsored by the University of Houston School of Law in February 2004. He participated in two panel discussions at the 2006 Phoenix Lodging Conference on hotel and resort development and led a panel discussion at the 2007 Hospitality Law Conference in Houston on the subject of hotel general counsel’s selection and utilization of outside counsel and will speak at that conference in 2009 on the subject of Incentive Fees in Hotel Management Agreements.

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

>Local Democrats Oppose Unfolding COAH Nightmare

>
January 5, 2009 Contact: John Gorman / (609) 292-5199

Senator Kevin J. O’Toole (R-40) Local Democrats Oppose Unfolding COAH NightmareTrenton

Democrat Leadership Silent as Chorus of Opposition Grows

Senator Kevin O’Toole (R-Bergen) called upon Trenton Democrats to reverse course and abandon their new subsidized housing law as the groups of officials calling for a change in policy has grown to include local Bergen County Democratic officials.

“Republicans have been saying for months that the new Democrat subsidized housing law would wreak economic disaster in our State,” said O’Toole. “Now local Bergen County Democrats are using terms like ‘Alice in Wonderland’ and ‘disaster’ to describe the impact of the COAH housing law that was rushed through the Legislature with little debate or deliberation. If the Trenton Democrats cannot listen to Republicans and work to repair the debacle they have created, maybe they should listen to the members of their own party who are ridiculing this incoherent and unworkable law.”

Media reports have indicated that the elimination of “regional contribution agreements” in the Council on Affordable Housing law has placed a home-improvement program that has helped 98 individuals and families in Garfield since 2004 in jeopardy.

“The Trenton Democrats must finally come to grips with the fact that members of their own party have concluded that the COAH law is now hurting the very middle class communities that it purports to help,” said O’Toole. “When a former member of the Assembly Democratic caucus calls the law a ‘disaster, ‘ you would think that somebody in the present legislative leadership would take notice.”

Under the newly adopted COAH law, municipalities such as Wallington would need to create 147 new affordable housing units, Woodridge 171 and Fort Lee 569.

“To use the words of one of my Democratic colleagues, the COAH law is pushing New Jersey into an ‘economic abyss’ at the worst possible time. Reasonable Democrats must tell their leadership to come to the table and work with Republicans to scrap this disastrous law before even more damage is done.”

Link to Post:

https://www.senatenj.com/index.php/otoole/local-democrats-oppose-unfolding-coah-nightmare/1953

Posted on Leave a comment

>Panel suggests N.J. consider driving privileges for undocumented immigrants

>https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/report_nj_may_consider_driving.html

A panel advising Gov. Jon Corzine on immigrant issues is considering recommending the state allow undocumented immigrants “driver privilege cards” and in-state college tuition rates.

Two Hispanic leaders told the Record that the state’s public advocate, Ron Chen, told them the measures would be included in a panel’s report to Corzine.

But a spokeswoman for Chen told the newspaper that it hasn’t been decided what would be included in the report.

The “driver privilege cards” and in-state tuition would need legislative approval before becoming law. Groups that support tighter immigration control have said they’d oppose the measures.

Corzine assembled a panel on immigrant rights with the idea of passing comprehensive immigration reform.

https://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2009/01/report_nj_may_consider_driving.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Ridgewood Schools

>
Schools Re-open

December Recess is December 24 – January 2. Schools will re-open on Monday, January 5, 2009.

Friends of Music Scholarship Benefit Happens January 9
Friends in the Business is the popular musical review put on each year by John Lange and Ridgewood Friends of Music. This year, nationally-acclaimed musicians from Broadway, jazz and opera will come together on Friday, January 9, at George Washington Middle School at 8 p.m. The artists will donate their talents to raise money for scholarships for Ridgewood music students. Tickets are on sale at Town & Country Apothecary, or by mail at “Friends in the Business” Concert, 197 Lincoln Avenue, Ridgewood, NJ 07450. Prices are $20 for adults, $15 for students and seniors. Make checks payable to “Ridgewood Friends of Music.”

Fourth Annual RHS Alumni Art Show Opens
The Ridgewood High School Department of Art and Design is holding its annual Alumni Art Show in the RHS Carroll Art Gallery, Room 135, through January 9, 2009. A public reception will be held for the artists on Tuesday, January 6, 2009, from 3-5 p.m. The gallery will be open during school hours for the duration of the show.

January Board of Education Meetings
The Ridgewood Board of Education will hold regular public meetings on January 12 and 26, 2009. The Board meets on Floor 3 of the Ed Center, 49 Cottage Place, at 7:30 p.m.


Coming Soon: RAHP Info Sessions

Information sessions for Ridgewood Academy Health Professions (RAHP) will be held in the RHS Campus Center on Saturday, January 10, from 9:30-11 a.m. and Wednesday, January 14, from 7-9 p.m. Current RHS freshmen and their parents/guardians are invited to attend. For more information contact Lucy Fern, RAHP coordinator, at [email protected].

Martin Luther King Day
The Ridgewood Public Schools will be closed on Monday, January 19, 2009, in observance of Martin Luther King Day.

January Board of Education Meetings
The Ridgewood Board of Education will hold regular public meetings on January 12 and 26, 2009. The Board meets on Floor 3 of the Ed Center, 49 Cottage Place, at 7:30 p.m.

Microsoft Store

Posted on Leave a comment

>New Jersey Is the Perfect Bad Example

>Obama should look here to see what high taxes do.

https://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB123059756486341161-lMyQjAxMDI5MzAwMjUwOTI3Wj.html

Madison, N.J.

When Barack Obama makes his New Year’s resolutions, at the top of his list ought to be the following: “I will not allow America to become New Jersey.”

Think of it as our gift to the nation. Other states offer promising experiments in areas such as Medicaid, taxes, education and regulatory reform. In contrast, the People’s Republic of New Jersey offers America something truly unique: the perfect bad example.

As harmful as this has been for our own prosperity, our example could be invaluable for President-elect Obama. That’s especially true given that his team appears to be considering some of the same things that have long been popular in Trenton. For years, the solons in our state capital have operated on the assumption that you can have high taxes everywhere — on income, on property, on business — without suffering any consequences.

Well, Gov. Jon Corzine is now dealing with those consequences, and his budgets show it. Earlier this year, he pushed through a budget that was one of the few in New Jersey history to be less than the one that preceded it. With revenues now running $1.2 billion short of what was expected, the next budget will undoubtedly be tougher still.
The Opinion Journal Widget

Download Opinion Journal’s widget and link to the most important editorials and op-eds of the day from your blog or Web page.

Not all of Mr. Corzine’s choices have been good ones. In fairness, however, he is dealing with huge problems that have been years in the making. In some ways, we are a mini-California. That is to say, where New Jersey was once a national leader in terms of economic growth and job creation, more recently we have become a national laggard.

It seems not to have dented the consciousness of our political class that New Jersey’s dismal economic performance might be linked to the state’s tax policy. According to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, New Jersey is home to the most hostile tax environment for business in the nation. We also bear the nation’s highest burden of state and local taxes. And on the list of the 10 counties with the highest median property tax, we claim seven of them.

During the last recession, we began to feel the full weight of these burdens. Other states responded by cutting back on spending and getting their houses in order. Not New Jersey. Then-Gov. Jim McGreevey added to the burden by borrowing and spending and raising the corporate tax — including the imposition of an alternative minimum tax on business. And we’ve been paying for these bad choices ever since.

Mr. Obama might pay special attention to what these measures have meant for jobs, especially given his expressed concern for the struggling middle class. Though the state did ultimately emerge from recession in 2003, private-sector job creation since then has been a pale shadow of what we enjoyed after the recessions of the 1980s and 1990s.

Of course, there was one area where jobs did grow. From 2000 to 2007, says the New Jersey Business & Industry Association, the government added 54,800 jobs. To put that in proper perspective, that works out to 93% of all jobs created in New Jersey over those seven years.
In Today’s Opinion Journal

So how do we respond to these new hard times? Beginning New Year’s Day, New Jersey workers will see even more money taken from their paychecks. The money will support a new mandate offering six weeks of paid family leave to almost all New Jersey employees — right on down to those working in very small operations. In itself, the family-leave tax will not be the ruin of the state economy. But the imposition of yet another new tax at this moment bespeaks a lack of seriousness about what both New Jersey workers and businesses can afford.

For the moment, Mr. Corzine, like Mr. Obama, is putting his faith in public-works spending. Indeed, he has even called on the president-elect to expand his own plans for an infrastructure stimulus to $1 trillion. And it would be hard to deny that our tired infrastructure could use some attention.

But amid all the debate over jump-starting the economy through public works, we risk losing sight of a larger truth: What governors and citizens alike need most is a growing economy that is creating jobs for the people and sending revenue to the capital. Over the long run, the only way to have a healthy and growing economy is to do exactly what New Jersey has not: Trust the people with their own money, and create an environment where initiative and enterprise are rewarded rather than penalized.

Absent a thorough-going revolution in Trenton, New Jersey may be lost for some time to come. But if Mr. Obama can learn from our bad example and do the opposite, New Jersey’s loss might yet be America’s gain.

Write to [email protected]

Posted on Leave a comment

Toxic-items disposal offered by counties

>Toxic-items disposal offered by counties

Friday, January 2, 2009
Last updated: Friday January 2, 2009, 7:46 AM
BY SCOTT FALLON
NorthJersey.com
STAFF WRITER

Some things don’t belong in an ordinary trash can, like computer chips, motor oil or paint thinner.

To help you get rid of some of the more toxic household items, recycling coordinators in Bergen and Passaic counties have set up a 2009 schedule for free disposal.

Computers and electronics: Computers contain heavy metals like lead and arsenic that can be harmful if released into the air through incineration or leaked from a landfill.

Motherboards, monitors, laptops, printers, keyboards, fax machines, hard drives, modems, speakers, wiring and other electronics will be accepted during several dates this year in Bergen and Passaic.

Passaic County officials expect to receive more than the 35 tons collected last year. The bulk of the increase, they say, will come from televisions that can’t receive a digital signal.

The federal government is requiring a switch to all digital transmissions in February, meaning some older televisions will require converter boxes.

In Bergen

* April 26, and Aug. 22 at the Bergen County Community Services Building at 327 E. Ridgewood Ave. in Paramus.

* June 13 and Nov. 7 at Campgaw Mountain Reservation at 200 Campgaw Road in Mahwah. Proof of residency is required at both locations. Residential disposal only.

In Passaic

* May 8 and 9 and Sept. 25 and 26 at the Passaic County Para-Transit facility, 1310 Route 23 north in Wayne. Businesses can schedule an appointment for either May 8 or Sept. 25.

Household chemicals: Head down to your basement or out to the garage and chances are you’ll find a dusty bin of batteries, paint remover or insecticide. While they may no longer serve their purpose, the toxicity in these items still remains.

“We’ll take just about anything: solvents, herbicides, oil-based paints, propane tanks, antifreeze, used motor oil, fire extinguishers, you name it,” said Nina Seiden, Passaic County’s solid water and recycling administrator.

About the only items Bergen and Passaic officials won’t accept are explosives, medical waste and radioactive material.

In Bergen

* April 5, June 28 and Oct. 4 at Bergen Community College, 400 Paramus Road in Paramus.

* March 14 and July 18 at the Bergen County Utilities Authority, Empire Boulevard in Moonachie.

* May 16, Sept. 12 and Nov. 21 at Campgaw Mountain Reservation in Mahwah.

In Passaic

* April 25 and Oct. 10 at the Passaic County-Para Transit Facility in Wayne and June 6 at the West Milford Recycling Center at 30 Lycosky Drive.

Tires: If not properly disposed of, tires can become a fire hazard, a source of air pollution or a perfect incubator for mosquito larvae.

In Bergen

* April 26, and Aug. 22 at the Bergen County Community Services Building in Paramus.

* June 13 and Nov. 7 at Campgaw Mountain Reservation in Mahwah.

Proof of residency is required at both locations. Tires can be with or without rims. There is a four-tire limit per person.

Passaic County does not have a tire disposal program for 2009.

Posted on Leave a comment

>South Broad Street was chosen for COAH housing because . . .

>As evidenced by recent postings on this Blog and others, spin doctors with close ties to Planning Board and Village Council members are working hard now to sell South Broad Street as the only “practical/reasonable” location for affordable housing in Ridgewood.

Thus far, we’ve heard the following rationales:

1) South Broad Street’s proximity to public transportation – Isn’t the property on Paramus Road where The Baker Organization wants to construct cluster housing within walking distance of several bus stops along Route 17 (including the Park & Ride) and Linwood Avenue?

2) South Broad Street’s proximity to shopping – Again, isn’t the Paramus Road site within walking distance of K-Mart, Stop & Shop, and other stores on Route 17 in Paramus?

3) The availability of a large parcel, a willing property owner, and interested developer on South Broad Street – Ditto for the Paramus Road location, correct?

It is being widely rumored now that South Broad Street was selected as the sole location for construction of all additional affordable housing units because Planning Board and Village Council members believe residents of the South Broad Street area would be less capable of forming an organized opposition group than residents of any other Ridgewood neighborhood.

Specifically, due to organized opposition to the Baker Organization’s Paramus Road cluster housing proposal, neither the Planning Board nor Village Council wanted to designate any area near Route 17 (including the Schedler property) as being suitable for affordable housing.

If Planning Board/Village Council endorsed COAH units had been included in the Baker Organization’s plan, it might have increased Baker’s chances before the Zoning Board of Adjustment. Neither the Planning Board nor Village Council wished to be in a position of endorsing a project being opposed by a large block of potential voters.

The lesson here folks is certainly that the squeaky wheel gets greased. Like it or not, potential votes matter, even when the next Village Council election is more than one year away.

Enterprise Rent-A-Car

Posted on Leave a comment

>N.J. remains likely to forfeit House seat, new data show

>December 23, 2008

https://www.app.com/article/20081223/NEWS03/812230316/1001/newsfront

N.J. remains likely to forfeit House seat, new data show

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

New Jersey still appears likely to lose a seat in the House of Representatives despite a slowing of the migration to the South and West, new Census figures indicate.

The population estimates released Monday by the Census Bureau show the nation’s great migration south and west is declining, thanks to a housing crisis that is making it hard for many to move. Most southern and western states aren’t growing nearly as fast as they were at the start of the decade, pausing a long-term trend fueled by the desire for open spaces and warmer climates.

The development could impact the political map when House seats are divvied up following the 2010 Census, and New Jersey has been pegged as a likely loser.

In response to the possible loss of a House seat, officials from the state Department of Labor and Workforce Development told lawmakers at a hearing in October they were were striving to ensure every person in the state is counted.

According to the figures released Monday, Southern and Western states still will take congressional seats away from those in the Northeast and Midwest. Florida could gain as many as two House seats, and Texas could pick up four. But some seats hanging in the balance could stay put, and California could be in danger of losing a seat for the first time since it became a state.

“People want to go to where it’s warm and where there are a lot of amenities. That’s a long-term trend in this country,” said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution in Washington.

“But people have stopped moving,” he said. “It’s a big risk when you move to a new place. You need to know that moving and getting a new mortgage is going to pay off for you.”

The Census Bureau released state population estimates as of July 1, 2008. The data show annual changes through births, deaths, and domestic and foreign migration.

According to the estimates, New Jersey’s population is 8,682,661, up 3.2 percent from 2000. Despite the increase, other states grew at faster rates, leading to the possible loss of one of New Jersey’s 13 House seats.

The population shifts will be felt following the 2010 census, when the nation apportions the 435 seats in the House of Representatives, based on population.

Texas stands to be the biggest winner, picking up as many as four seats, while Ohio could be the big loser, giving up as many as two seats, according to projections by Kim Brace of Election Data Services, a Virginia-based firm that crunches political numbers.

Other states projected to lose single seats are Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. Brace projects Arizona to add two seats, while Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina and Utah could add one each. Florida could add one or two seats, Brace said.

Utah was the fastest growing state, knocking Nevada from the top ranks. Utah’s population climbed by 2.5 percent from July 2007 to July 2008. It was followed by Arizona, Texas, North Carolina and Colorado. Nevada was ranked eighth, after 23 years of ranking in the top four each year.

Nevada was listed as the fastest growing state a year ago when the 2007 estimates were released. But adjustments to the 2007 numbers, released Monday, show that Utah was the fastest growing state in 2007 and Nevada was ranked third.

Only two states — Michigan and Rhode Island — lost population from 2007 to 2008, according to the new estimates. But growth rates fell in many states, even for those that had been adding residents at a rapid clip.

Foreign immigration has slowed since the start of the decade and fewer people are moving around within the nation’s borders. Florida has attracted more people from other states than any other state in the nation since the start of the decade. However, from 2007 to 2008, more people left Florida for other states than moved in — a net loss of nearly 9,300 people. The state still gained population from births and foreign immigration, but growth was slower than in previous years.

From 2007 to 2008, California had the biggest net loss of people moving to other states — more than 144,000 people. It was followed by New York, Michigan, New Jersey and Illinois.

https://www.app.com/article/20081223/NEWS03/812230316/1001/newsfront
——————————————————————————–