AP and Bergen Record sympathize with Jihadist mother of Boston Bomber
Calling the mother of the Boston Bombers embrace of terrorism “a spiritual turn”, in disgusting and offensive article the Bergen Record and Associated Press look sympathize with Jihadist “Muslim Mommy Dearest” of Boston Bombers, ignoring facts she was on FBI and CIA Terrorist watch list .Both the record and the AP own the 3 who died and the 44 injured a public apology. The mainstream media propaganda machines seems to know no bounds.
Bomb suspects’ mother took a spiritual turn in recent years
Sunday April 28, 2013, 10:50 PM
BY DAVID CARUSO, MICHAEL KUNZELMAN AND MAX SEDDON
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Associated Press
In photos of her as a younger woman, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva wears a low-cut blouse and has her hair teased like a 1980s rock star. After she arrived in Massachusetts from Russia in 2002, she went to beauty school and did facials at a suburban day spa.
But in recent years people noticed a change. She began wearing a hijab and cited conspiracy theories about 9/11 being a plot against Muslims.
Now living in the Russian republic of Dagestan, Tsarnaeva is drawing increased attention as the angry and grieving mother of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects. Federal officials say Russian authorities had intercepted her phone calls, including one in which she vaguely discussed jihad with her elder son. She also was recorded talking to someone in southern Russia who is under FBI investigation in an unrelated case, U.S. officials said.
Tsarnaeva insists there is no mystery. She’s no terrorist, just someone who found a deeper spirituality. She insists her sons — Tamerlan, who was killed in a gunfight with police, and Dzhokhar, who was wounded and captured — are innocent of the April 15 attack.
Looks like they’re just telling a story. How is that sympathizing? Or is sympathy now defined as “failure to demonize”?
I watch the news and I read the print and online papers. Thee are a lot of opinions out there and I see them for what they are. I did not find anything in the article to be “disgusting and offensive”. Just another story.