Posted on

Purchasing health care a pig-in-a-poke process, which is no way to run a railroad

10407711_10204685141440448_3931753339455986992_n-169x300

10407711_10204685141440448_3931753339455986992_n-169x300

Purchasing health care a pig-in-a-poke process, which is no way to run a railroad

Posted by Scott St Clair On January 30, 2015 0 Comment

By Scott St. Clair | The Save Jersey Blog

Sometimes an isolated incident can offer profound insight into a large problem such as the exorbitant cost of health care in America. This week I experienced one that took an abstract academic argument down to a human level where that human was in pain and forced to make a crap-shoot medical decision.

Tuesday evening, I was forced to go to the emergency room of an Essex County hospital because I was in incredible pain. Now, I had a good idea what prompted the pain since I went to the same Essex County hospital four years earlier for the same thing.

My trip to the hospital was revealing!

Turned out then that I was diagnosed with some nerve issues in my lower spine that cause sciatica and blah, blah, blah because who cares about my problems.

Suffice to say that the pain was as severe as I have ever experienced.

While in the ER, the attending physician’s assistant wanted to give me morphine for the pain and an anti-inflammatory for whatever it is that anti-infammatories do – I don’t know since I’m a liberal arts grad.

She gave me the choice of receiving them, of which I wasn’t in doubt because at that point if I was a horse you’d shoot me, either through an IV drip or two injections.

I asked her, “Since it’s early in the year and everyone’s health insurance has kicked over into another $2 trillion worth of co-pays and deductibles, which method is cheaper?”

She good-naturedly laughed and responded saying, “I have no idea!”

And therein, dear readers, lies the rub.

In a common commercial transaction and necessary to create a binding contract, the buyer or consumer and the seller of goods or services must agree upon a price before the deal can be sealed. You’re not going to buy anything from a can of cat food to a new car without knowing what you’ll be paying. Generally, the seller won’t sell it to you without knowing what it cost him and how much he must sell it for in order to make a profit sufficient to keep the doors open.

Not so in health care where pig-in-a-poke purchasing is the norm.

Exactly what is your health care provider’s bottom line? What’s his cost for each hit of aspirin, each bandage, each whatever it is that he sells you that, at that moment in time, you don’t realize you’re buying?

In the hospital, what is the price differential between an IV drip and two injections, which I opted for in the end, and it was in the end that I received one of them because the nurse who gave it to me said the needle was very, very long, and she needed a very, very fleshy place in which to stick it?

I doubt if I’ll ever learn the answer, but had I the answer, I could have made a better-informed decision.

Assuming, as I did, that the medications were vital to my survival – at that point, were I a horse, I’d shoot me – and taking them wasn’t the issue, wouldn’t it have been helpful to choose the cheaper of the two alternatives since in either case I’d get what I needed and wanted?

Health care consumers and providers mostly grope in the dark when it comes to cost and price without any resort to arm’s-length bargaining for products and services. When you leave out this key factor, you lose any ability to control it through negotiation, opting for a less-expensive alternative or deciding to forego treatment altogether.

Prices are then left uncontrolled, and it’s up to the insurance company to cover the tab after you’ve satisfied that $2 trillion deductible. Is that any way to run a railroad?

This isn’t a new issue – it’s been talked about for years. But it hit home with me because I was confronted with it. I walked away – limped, actually – more convinced than ever that we’ll never get a real handle on health care costs in this country so long as consumers and vendors are ignorant as to the cost of the goods and services they’re buying and selling and not transacting health care business at an arm’s-length basis.

https://savejersey.com/2015/01/purchasing-health-care-a-pig-in-a-poke-process-which-is-no-way-to-run-a-railroad/

Posted on

5 Takeaways from the CBO’s Report on Obamacare

imgres-10

imgres-10

5 Takeaways from the CBO’s Report on Obamacare

Melissa Quinn / @MelissaQuinn97 / January 27, 2015

A nonpartisan entity of the federal government has found that the Affordable Care Act will cost the government less than expected. However, the reduction in the law’s price tag comes among findings that millions of Americans could lose their employer-provided health insurance.

The Congressional Budget Office came out with a report yesterday revising the costs and budgetary effects of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

Though the agency found that the health care law is projected to cost the government less than originally thought, the CBO projected enrollment in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) will continue to increase.

The CBO attributed the drop in Obamacare costs to lower-than-expected enrollments and subsidies given to those who are eligible.

Subscribe to updates and alerts

The number of consumers receiving subsidies could decrease even further following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in the court case King v. Burwell. The high court will decide whether Americans purchasing health insurance on the federal exchange, HealthCare.gov, are eligible for subsidies.

The CBO found that Obamacare will cost the government less than expected, but up to 10 million will lose their employer-based coverage.

Here are five takeaways from the CBO’s report:

Obamacare provisions related to health insurance will cost the federal government $571 billion through 2019, a 20-percent reduction from the CBO’s projections in 2010.
Up to 10 million Americans will lose employer-based coverage.
Beginning in 2018, up to 16 million more Americans will have health insurance coverage through Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Medicaid and CHIP will cost the federal government $59 billion more than previously estimated.
About 31 million people will remain uninsured by 2025.

https://dailysignal.com/2015/01/27/5-takeaways-cbos-report-obamacare/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thffacebook01272015

Posted on

Congressional Budget Office : Obamacare will cost $50,000 per person

imgres-10

imgres-10

Congressional Budget Office : Obamacare will cost $50,000 per person
JANUARY 26, 2015 6:56 PM
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, the UK Daily Mail is reporting ,that buried in a 15-page section of the nonpartisan organization’s new CBO ten-year budget outlook that the government will spend $1.993 TRILLION over a decade and take in $643 BILLION in new taxes, penalties and fees related to Obamacare .

The $1.35 trillion net cost will result in ‘between 24 million and 27 million’ fewer Americans being uninsured costing taxpayers, $50,000 for every person who gets health insurance under the Obamacare law, the Congressional Budget Office revealed on Monday.

The ACA will still leave ‘between 29 million and 31 million’ nonelderly Americans without medical insurance

These numbers assume Obamacare insurance exchange enrollment will double between now and 2025.

The best-case scenario described by the CBO would result in ’between 24 million and 27 million’ fewer Americans being uninsured in 2025, compared to the year before the Affordable Care Act took effect.

MrBeer Home Brewing Kits - Make a great gift!  Free shipping on select kits throught Christmas.

Posted on

Obamacare penalty may come as shock at tax time

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

1379441947-obamacare3-300x2772

Obamacare penalty may come as shock at tax time

By Tom Howell Jr. – The Washington Times – Sunday, January 18, 2015

Those Americans who didn’t get health insurance last year could be in for a rude awakening when the IRS asks them to fork over their Obamacare penalty — and it could be a lot more than the $95 many of them may be expecting.

The Affordable Care Act requires those who didn’t have insurance last year and didn’t qualify for one of the exemptions to pay a tax penalty, which was widely cited as $95 the first year. But the $95 is actually a minimum, and middle- and upper-income families will actually end up paying 1 percent of their household income as their penalty.

Read more: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/18/obamacare-penalty-may-come-as-shock-at-tax-time/#ixzz3PGuVeKXu

Posted on

Need help filing out your tax return? Don’t call the IRS

1379441947-obamacare3-300x27721

1379441947-obamacare3-300x27721

Need help filing out your tax return? Don’t call the IRS

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON (AP) — Filing a federal tax return is about to get more complicated for millions of families because of President Barack Obama’s health law. But they shouldn’t expect much help from the Internal Revenue Service.

Got a question for the IRS? Good luck reaching someone by phone. The tax agency says only half of the 100 million people expected to call this year will be able to reach a person.

Callers who do get through may have to wait on hold for 30 minutes or more to talk to someone who will answer only the simplest questions.

“Taxpayers who need help are not getting it, and tax compliance is likely to suffer over the longer term if these problems are not quickly and decisively addressed,” said a report Wednesday by agency watchdog Nina E. Olson.

IRS Commissioner John Koskinen says budget cuts are forcing the agency to reduce taxpayer services and other functions. The number of audits will decline, technology upgrades will be delayed and the agency might be forced to shut down and furlough workers for two days later this year, Koskinen said.

https://news.yahoo.com/irs-cuts-taxpayer-services-filing-returns-gets-harder-150035056–finance.html

Posted on

The Magnificent Failure of www.Healthcare.Gov

healthcare-gov-homepage-thumb-570x348-125912

The Magnificent Failure of www.Healthcare.Gov

Editorial Note: We hate to..ahem..kick a guy when he’s down, but the launch of ObamaCare online has been such a spectacular fail, we are savoring the opportunity to gloat. Who isn’t tempted in Tea Party ranks to utter, “Told ya so” when we hear people complain about being dropped from their health insurance company? I mean, really, who saw this coming? They called us crazy. Well, who’s crazy now?

Here’s a good gloat from Gary North – The Tea Party Economist, October 28, 2013

In what is one of the greatest examples of crony capitalism of my adult life, the main company that produced the incomparable failure known as www.healthcare.gov turns out to have gained its share of the $678 million contract without facing competitive bids. That’s right. There were other companies that submitted bids, but those bids were not considered, or so initial reports indicate. Why no bids? We are not told.

This kind of thing goes on all the time, but usually it is never discovered. But the website was rolled out as the prime example of President Obama’s signature program, which bears his name unofficially: ObamaCare. This program was going to be the deliverance long awaited for by 15 million Americans who did not have healthcare coverage.

It went online, and it was dead on arrival: a corpse of government medicine. It died so spectacularly that it became front-page news around the world. It is such a total failure that there is a kind of magnificence about it. Millions of people tried to get in. Millions of people could not get in.

Now Congress is conducting an investigation of how this happened, and it turns out, that it happened because it was a sweetheart deal from the get-go.

The man who is in charge of the company became an Obama supporter in 2012, I can hardly blame him. His ship came in.

Unfortunately, the ship has just sunk in full public view. It is like the capsized cruise ship on its side off the coast of an Italian island in 2012. The site is there, dead in the water, for the whole world to see.

More of the story here: https://www.garynorth.com/public/11712.cfm