>Climate Change Hoax : Reader Points out the Obvious
Maybe Perry is right. How do climatologists explain the previous periods of extreme global climate change over millions of years, since fossil fuels have only been used over the past couple hundred years or so? Oh, right. it must have been a series of mysterious huge asteroid collisions that triggered extremely warm periods, followed by an ice age, followed by subsequent warming periods (which we have not witnessed since in the past several thousand years).
Or, maybe the climate around the globe naturally tends to change over thousands of years, seeking some equilibrium. Which do you think is more plausible? Given the misinformation and questionable “facts” put forth in favor of the current global warming debate, one must seriously question the premise that fossil fuels are the culprit. Maybe it is true. But, until there is truly indisputable evidence, I’m a skeptic.
However, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t moderate our consumption of them and preserve our landscapes and seascapes. It just means we shouldn’t blindly disrupt our economies to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars, just to satisfy the rants of a handful of questionable scientists and their lemming followers. Rather, we should pursue a balance between our massive energy needs and pursuit of the most economic sources of supply to satisfy those needs.