
Posted by Dan Cirucci On July 07, 2015 4 Comments
By Dan Cirucci | Dan Cirucci’s Blogspot
And so we ask an important question.
In America, is it possible to have open, vigorous, no-holds-barred debate?
Is it? Is it really possible?
It’s a shame we have to even ask the question but consider the following:
– If you question the theory of climate change (formerly known as global warming till that was discredited), you’re attacked as neanderthal.
– If you disagree with the Supreme Court’s bare majority (5 to 4) ruling on gay marriage, you’re called a bigot.
– If you argue that separation of church and state was never meant to separate us from church, you’re targeted as a raving evangelical.
– If you defend the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, you’re a threat to society; among those who “cling to their guns.”
– If you seek to have a reasonable discussion about the waves of illegal immigrants coming across our southern border, you’re termed a racist.
– If you opposed Obamacare, you are have no compassion.
– If you defend capitalism, financial success and property rights, they call you selfish and greedy.
– If you don’t want your kids to be subjected to government-sponsored sex education or a curriculum that reinvents American history, you’re accused of being unenlightened or, worse yet — guilty of parental neglect.
– If you defend states’ rights, you’re divisive. If you’re weary of radical Islamists and you’re wondering when we’ll respond in kind, you’re a war-monger. If you don’t admire European-style socialism, you’re myopic and provincial.
– If you speak up on these or similar matters, you’re likely to be branded mean or jingoistic or imbecilic.
This is what we’re dealing with. This is what “argument” has been reduced to. And it’s juvenile, self-serving, demagogic and ultimately destructive.
As a high school and collegiate debater I learned that there were at least two sides to every issue and that issues can and should be fairly and fully aired based on fact. But today we have a government, a media and a popular culture that engage in name-calling, broad-brushing, stereotyping, band-wagoning, hand-wringing, fear and intimidation. All of these are among the worst types of propaganda.
And, make no mistake about it, the biggest purveyors of these techniques can be found on the left among re-branded “progressives” (aka liberals).
They preach tolerance and understanding but they practice a near maniacal form of intolerance. In the name of compassion, they will swat you down quicker than you can say “Why?” or “Where” or “When?” or “How?”
Those are question they don’t want to deal with — questions they have no intention of answering.
We’ve reached a stage of polarization where people simply do not want to be challenged. Period.
https://savejersey.com/2015/07/america-debate-political-correctness-left/
Absolutely not! There is no upside to an open and honest debate. You will be labeled by those who disagree with you.
No matter what you say about race you will be called a bigot. You can’t be PC and honest.
One need look no further than our own little Village Council. Just try voicing an opposing opinion there and see how that works out.
PC = censorship plan and simple
(and that’s the nicest definition)
9:01am is right on the money.
Everything changed with the new Viagra commercials…
I have posted to this very blog a number of times, only to never see the post materialize. Of course I was posting an opposing point of view.
Yes the blog owner has the right to decide what ends up here, but this site is not the place to complain about an honest and open debate. This site is clearly “fair and balanced”.
Hopefully this post makes it.