Posted on 20 Comments

Parking garage may now cost up to $15 million

20150624_114913_resized

June 24,2015
Boyd A. Loving

Ridgewood NJ, Despite the contention by Ridgewood Deputy Mayor Albert Pucciarelli that nobody on the dais knows exactly how much the new parking garage will cost (“. . . no price has been set. . . “) the number $15 million was put into play during Wednesday evening’s Village Council Work Session.  The last I heard (just a few weeks ago), the number being kicked around was $10 million.  A 50% increase in less than 60 days; I must say, somewhat surprising, but not utterly shocking.

Ridgewood Mayor Paul Aronsohn said on Wednesday evening that between $10-$15 million in public finding would “presumably” be “asked for.”  Then the Mayor read the draft of a question intended to be part of a non-binding referendum the Council is considering including on the ballot of November’s general election.

The draft question was read as follows:  “Do you support a proposal to finance and build a downtown parking garage on the Hudson Street lot, located on the corner of Hudson Street and South Broad Street, by bonding up to $15 million of public funds through Parking Utility revenues.”

Remember folks; following damage caused by Hurricane Floyd, renovations to Village Hall were expected to cost $4.5 million (or at least that’s what taxpayers were told).  Change orders approved by the Village Council back then escalated the actual costs to above $11 million.  How far above $11 million we spent is a closely guarded secret.

So now we’re being told, by our mayor, that we might spend up to $15 million to build a single garage.  Anyone out there want to hazard a guess on what the real number will turn out to be?  Will history (the Village Hall renovation fiasco) repeat itself?

And what about the language of that draft question (and you can insert any number you want into the equation).  Is it just me, or would many of you interpret that language to indicate Parking Utility revenues will completely pay for the project (including bond interest?).  Translation, our property taxes won’t increase?  Am I the only one who’s a bit worried by that statement?

I am neither for nor against the financing and construction a parking garage at this point, but I am completely against being misled as to projected costs and the impact on an average homeowner’s property tax bill.  I refuse to be fooled again.

If there is a non-binding referendum on your November ballot, be sure to read the entire financing plan very carefully before you make a choice.

Posted on 4 Comments

Bigger historic district proposed for Ridgewood

20150604_115449_resized

JUNE 23, 2015    LAST UPDATED: TUESDAY, JUNE 23, 2015, 1:21 AM
BY CHRIS HARRIS
STAFF WRITER |
THE RECORD

RIDGEWOOD — The Historic Preservation Commission wants to expand the downtown historic district as part of the Planning Board’s impending update to the master plan.

At the board’s meeting last week, Ridgewood’s planner, Blais Brancheau, outlined the Historic Preservation Commission’s recommendations for the master plan’s next iteration.

The commission suggests widening the Village Center Historic Zone to encompass Ridgewood’s entire business district as well as Doremus Avenue, Prospect Street, both sides of Franklin Avenue and the area surrounding the railroad station on Garber Square.

Such an expansion would promote consistency throughout the heart of the village.

The commission said the expansion would further en-sure “renovations and new construction conform to the his-toric streetscape” and increase scrutiny of proposed demoli-tions.

Discussion of the master plan update will continue for the foreseeable future at Planning Board meetings.

But members of the board did comment last Tuesday on the potential benefits and possible pitfalls of designating more of the village as “historic.”

Mayor Paul Aronsohn, a Planning Board member, said he was both “sensitive to the imperative of historic preservation as well as the needs and rights of property owners in the vill-age.”

 

https://www.northjersey.com/news/bigger-historic-district-proposed-1.1360939

Posted on Leave a comment

New Businesses Call Ridgewood Home

Welcome_to_the_village_theridgewoodblog
Ridgewood’s GRAND OPENINGS

all invited

RACEFASTER (in Bookends)
211 E. Ridgewood Ave.
ribbon cutting 1pm
June 20, 2015
a great fit!

 
GiGi’s Boutique
48 E. Ridgewood Ave.
ribbon cutting 11am
June 27, 2015
fashion perfect!

 
Interim Healthcare
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
NEW ADDRESS join us
27 Chestnut Street
take elevator to first floor
ribbon cutting 5:30pm
join the celebration!

Posted on 2 Comments

Ridgewood forum focuses on parking , parking and more parking

parking_CBD_theridgewoodblog

JUNE 18, 2015    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, JUNE 18, 2015, 2:04 PM
BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

The sixth in a series of Central Business District (CBD) forums took place on Wednesday night.

Residents and local business owners gathered to hear a comprehensive overview on the parking changes that have been made over the past few months, as well as a review of the current progress on the potential parking garage projects downtown.

One of the most noticeable changes made to the parking process in the CBD is the implementation of ParkMobile, which went live in the second week of May. ParkMobile is a pay-by-phone application and is currently in use at the downtown parking lots. It is also exclusively in use at the Chestnut Street lot and Route 17 Park & Ride.

Village officials expect to add this service to street meters no later than July 1, according to Janet Fricke, assistant to the village manager.

The village has also overhauled its hourly parking rates as well as the options for parking available to residents and non-residents during the first half of 2015.

The Ridgewood Parking Permit (RPP) is available for all Ridgewood residents and gives them unlimited parking in all lots at a cost of $750 per year, prorated monthly depending upon the point during the year in which it is purchased. Non-residents can purchase unlimited parking at either Cottage Place or the Park & Ride for $1,500 per year.

Employees working in the CBD can purchase a permit for $80 per month or $40 for half of a month. These permits are interchangeable among employees if they wish to split the cost. The pass must be displayed in the windshield and can be used at either Cottage Place or the Ken Smith property.

Eight hour parking has also become available at Cottage Place for 75 cents per hour, using coins or ParkMobile. Metered times are 10 a.m. until 6 p.m.

 

https://www.northjersey.com/community-news/ridgewood-forum-focuses-on-parking-1.1358689

Posted on 13 Comments

Readers suggest maybe we don’t really need a parking garage ?

20150611_111743_resized

It’s certainly not needed like it once was. Maybe if we keep talking about it we will never need it. Outside of inconveniencing  a few restaurant goers on Saturday nights, Ridgewood Sales Days, and Christmas shopping, what the hell is the point in spending $10 million on this thing ?

Dont build for max capacity at peak useage. Bad business reasoning. This is Eco 101

It’s horiffic.. Where are the residents of Ridgewood when the council meets? a huge parking garage will cause huge congestion in that small street as cars line up to park and get out of garage. Will they charge in the garage after 6 p.m.

How much to park in the garage during daytime? It will change character of town. Will look monstrous; but fit in with high buildings of new high density housing.

What a laugh. No one really cares.

Posted on 1 Comment

RIDGEWOOD PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC MEETING

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog

PLANNING BOARD PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE/AGENDA

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Village Hall Court Room– 7:30 P.M.

(all timeframes and the order of agenda items below are approximate and subject to change)

  1. 7:30 p.m. – Call to Order, Statement of Compliance, Flag Salute, Roll Call – In accordance with the provisions of Section 10:4-8d of the Open Public Meetings Act, the date, location, and time of the commencement of this meeting is reflected in a meeting notice, a copy of which schedule has been filed with the Village Manager and the Village Clerk, The Ridgewood News and The Record newspapers, and posted on the bulletin board in the entry lobby of the Village municipal offices at 131 North Maple Avenue, and on the Village website, all in accordance with the provisions of the Open Public Meetings Act.

 

Roll call: Aronsohn, Bigos, Knudsen, Nalbantian, Joel, Reilly, Dockray, Peters, Thurston, Altano, Abdalla

 

  1. 7:35p.m. – 7:40 p.m. – Public Comments on Topics not Pending Before the Board

 

  1. 7:40 p.m. – 7:45 p.m. – Committee/Commission/Professional Updates for Non Agenda Topics; Correspondence Received by the Board
  2. 7:45 p.m. – 8:15 p.m. – Memorializing Resolutions – Amendments to the Land Use Plan Element of the Master Plan: AH-2, B-3-R, C-R and C Zone Districts
  3. 8:15 p.m. – 10:30 p.m. – Reexamination of Master Plan and Development Regulations – Discussion of Historic Preservation and Environmental Protection Provisions
  4. 10:30 p.m. – 10:40 p.m. – Approval of Minutes: June 2, 2014; May 20, 2014
  5. 10:40 p.m. – 11:00 p.m. – Executive Session

 

  1. Adjournment

In accordance with the Open Public Meetings Act, all meetings of the Ridgewood Planning Board (i.e., official public meetings, work sessions, pre-meeting assemblies and special meetings) are public meetings, which are always open to members of the general public.

         Members: Mayor Paul Aronsohn, Nancy Bigos, Councilwoman Susan Knudsen, Charles Nalbantian, Richard Joel, Kevin Reilly, Wendy Dockray, Michele Peters, David Thurston, Isabella Altano, Khidir Abdalla

        Professional Staff: Blais L. Brancheau, Planner; Gail L. Price, Esq., Board Attorney; Christopher J. Rutishauser, Village Engineer; Michael Cafarelli, Board Secretary

Posted on 8 Comments

Readers say another parking study?

ParkingCBD-theridgewoodblog

Another study and a referendum huh? Here’s to hoping that we get a study on the demand and impact with regard to multi-family housing and a referendum on the ballot…

$500 K for Pre-Construction? what a joke! the people of Ridgewood are getting hosed and not a one cares…

So we’re spending more than Millburn to get their report with about ten pages changed. Nice work if you can get it

A blank check to do whatever the Council wants. What will be the cost of this bond at its payment end. Oh that right the 3 Amigos and their supporters will not be here.

Here are the result of the study, for free. The downtown business district doesn’t have enough parking. Build a garage. Land and construction are expensive, the village can’t afford it. Don’t build a garage. The parking meters aren’t providing the revenues that everyone says they will, even without theft. $500,000 down the drain with the bond being paid for years and the parking problem still won’t have a solution. The Three Amigos are un-seated in the next election and it becomes the next mayor and council’s problem. End of story.


 

Posted on Leave a comment

TODAY : Fox News Contributors, Mary Katherine Ham and Guy Ben at Bookends

Guy_Benson_cover

Mary Katherine Ham and Guy Benson
Saturday, June 13th @ 12:00noon
Fox News Contributors, Mary Katherine Ham  and Guy Ben will discuss and sign their book: End of Discussion
Books available June 9th

Appearing authors will only autograph books purchased at Bookends and must have valid Bookends Receipt.

Availability & pricing for all autographed books subject to change.
First In Line Certificate use is the the discretion of Bookends. Blackout dates may apply.
Bookends cannot guarantee that the books that are Autographed will always be First Printings.
Autographed books purchased at Bookends are non-returnable.

While we try to ensure that all customers coming to Bookends’ signings will meet authors and get their books signed, we cannot guarantee that all attendees will meet the author or that all books will be signed.  We cannot control inclement weather, author travel schedules or authors who leave prematurely.

Bookends, 211 E. Ridgewood Avenue, Ridgewood, NJ   07450   201-445-0726

Posted on 13 Comments

6th Village of Ridgewood Central Business District Forum to focus on Parking

parking_enforcement_theridgewoodblog

6th Central Business District Forum – Parking – Wednesday, June 17th 7:30pm – 9:00pm

The 6th Central Business District Forum will take place on Wednesday, June 17, 7:30 to 9:00 PM in the Courtroom in the Village Hall. An open mic will be available until 8:00 PM for anyone with ideas, comments and suggestions concerning the CBD. Then Bob Rooney, Director of the Parking Utility, Janet Fricke, our Assistant to the Village Manager and Charley DeBow of Park Mobile will conduct a seminar on using Park Mobile, review the new parking rules and times in the CBD and discuss the proposal for a parking garage on Hudson and Broad Streets. We are especially interested in hearing from commuters and welcome everyone who has not yet tried Park Mobile. Please join us.

Posted on 9 Comments

Ridgewood to designate funds for design, engineering of parking garages

ParkingCBD2-theridgewoodblog

JUNE 11, 2015    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, JUNE 11, 2015, 3:15 PM
BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

As the concept of a new parking deck edges closer to becoming a reality, the Village Council has introduced a bond ordinance in the amount of $500,000 for pre-construction activities.

The ordinance was introduced unanimously on Wednesday night and designates money for the design and engineering phases of the project, which would follow a decision on the type of parking deck to be built. Two weeks ago, the village hired Walker Parking Consultants to perform a study of the Hudson Street lot to issue a report which will assist officials in making that determination.

Last week, council members discussed the bond for pre-construction costs and laid out an ideal timeline for completion of such activities, and a potential non-binding referendum in November for a garage on Hudson Street.

Village Manager Roberta Sonenfeld said the $500,000 figure was based on the approximately $467,000 spent by Millburn on design and engineering when it constructed a downtown parking deck a few years ago, along with the financing costs for the bond issue and the contract amount for Walker Parking Consultants.

If all goes according to plan, the village will have the results of the traditional versus automated parking deck study by the end of June or early July, said Sonenfeld. The council would then be able to decide what type of garage will be built and a request for proposal (RFP) can be advertised. With a design in hand by October or November, the construction can be bid and shovels would be in the ground after the winter thaw in 2016.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/ridgewood-designates-money-for-design-engineering-1.1354367

Posted on 9 Comments

Planning Board decision on housing draws mixed reaction in Ridgewood

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog

JUNE 12, 2015    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, JUNE 12, 2015, 12:31 AM
BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

Last week, the Ridgewood Planning Board ended a five-year process of work session meetings, testimony from experts, board deliberation and public comment hearings with the approval of a master plan amendment that will allow for higher density and mixed use housing projects in the Central Business District (CBD).

The amendment allows housing in the AH-2 zone, an affordable housing district encompassing the Brogan Cadillac site on South Broad Street, the B-3-R zone, which includes the Ken Smith property on Franklin Avenue and the section of North Maple Avenue between East Ridgewood and Franklin avenues, and the C-R zone, which is a small plot of land on Chestnut Street intended for commercial and mixed use development.

These zones will allow 30 units per acre of for-sale affordable housing and 35 units per acre of for-rent affordable housing and cap the height of the buildings at 50 feet. The original amendment allowed for as much as 50 units per acre, but was scaled back in a revised amendment presented to the Planning Board in late April.

Throughout the process, developers representing three potential housing projects presented testimony regarding their respective proposed developments. The projects presented were The Dayton, a 106-unit complex in the old Brogan Cadillac lot; the 52-unit Enclave proposed for the intersection of East Ridgewood and North Maple Avenues; and Chestnut Village, a 52-unit luxury development slated for Chestnut Street near the village’s central garage.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/decision-draws-mixed-reactions-1.1354518

Posted on 4 Comments

Obama making bid to diversify wealthy neighborhoods

RidgewoodRealestatesign_theridgewoodblog2

By Tim Devaney – 06/11/15 06:00 AM EDT

The Obama administration is moving forward with regulations designed to help diversify America’s wealthier neighborhoods, drawing fire from critics who decry the proposal as executive overreach in search of an “unrealistic utopia.”

A final Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule due out this month is aimed at ending decades of deep-rooted segregation around the country.

The regulations would use grant money as an incentive for communities to build affordable housing in more affluent areas while also taking steps to upgrade poorer areas with better schools, parks, libraries, grocery stores and transportation routes as part of a gentrification of those communities.

“HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a HUD spokeswoman said. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds.”

It’s a tough sell for some conservatives. Among them is Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), who argued that the administration “shouldn’t be holding hostage grant monies aimed at community improvement based on its unrealistic utopian ideas of what every community should resemble.”

“American citizens and communities should be free to choose where they would like to live and not be subject to federal neighborhood engineering at the behest of an overreaching federal government,” said Gosar, who is leading an effort in the House to block the regulations.

https://thehill.com/regulation/244620-obamas-bid-to-diversify-wealthy-neighborhoods

Posted on 2 Comments

Ridgewood Planning Board approves master plan amendment

Abraham-Godwin_theridgewoodblog

JUNE 5, 2015    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, JUNE 5, 2015, 12:31 AM

BY MARK KRULISH
STAFF WRITER |
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

Minutes after the clock signaled a transition from Tuesday night to Wednesday morning, the Ridgewood Planning Board capped a years-long master plan amendment debate with the approval of four new zones in downtown Ridgewood.

An evening that began with comment from the public, most of whom stated their opposition to the master plan amendment, came to an anticlimactic end nearly four hours later – after many residents had left their seats – with a majority of the board members giving their approval.

The board voted on each amendment separately, with each zone receiving yes votes from board members David Thurston, Nancy Bigos, Charles Nalbantian, Richard Joel, Kevin Reilly and Mayor Paul Aronsohn. Board member Wendy Dockray voted against all four zones while Michele Peters opposed all but the C-R zone and Councilwoman Susan Knudsen only cast an affirmative vote for the C zone.

The amendments will now go before the Village Council, which will consider an ordinance to change the master plan.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/board-approves-master-plan-amendment-1.1349573

Posted on 8 Comments

Opinion: 35 Units an Acre is Too Many

Welcome_to_the_village_theridgewoodblog

We thought we would share an opinion piece that was written by a resident for the “Tips From Town” website.

The recent decision by the Planning Board to approve the amendment of our master plan to allow for 35 units an acre, three times what is currently allowed, has me experiencing a flood of negative emotions, everything from sadness, to fear, to anger.

A recent article in North Jersey.com, notes all three of the builders left the vote with big smiles on their faces, and why wouldn’t they? It feels very much as if the 6 out of 9 members who voted “Yes” had exactly the builders’ satisfaction and approval in mind when they cast their careless vote. Many are arguing they may have had some more selfish motives in mind, but I won’t speculate. The four builders who originally petitioned for the change asked for 55 units/acre, probably hoping for half that, and the Town Planning Board, whose responsibility should be to the residents of Ridgewood, nodded their heads like puppets, and essentially said, “Whatever you need to turn a profit at the expense of our village.” Thank you to the three members who voted no.

I know the town needs to change with the times. I support multi-family housing development, just not at this density. There is no doubt if the Village Council supports the Planning Board’s recommendation, we Ridgewood residents are in for a helluva time. I can barely drive through town now with all the congestion. Imagine what this will do to traffic. It took months to “improve” the underpass at Garber square, what will this kind of massive construction do to the safety and usability of downtown? And, that is just in the short term.

https://ridgewood.tipsfromtown.com/2015/06/05/opinion-35-units-an-acre-is-too-many/

 

If you agree, please share with your neighbors and consider signing the petition to let our council know just how many residents are opposed to the proposal before them

Posted on 5 Comments

Any development should enhance Ridgewood’s character

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog

Any development should enhance Ridgewood’s character

JUNE 5, 2015    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, JUNE 5, 2015, 12:31 AM
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

Any development should enhance village’s character

To the Editor:

Those of us who chose to move to Ridgewood made a careful decision and chose a village with character over urbanized cities such as Morristown or Hackensack.

My family has experienced what Ridgewood has to offer young families, and it’s plentiful. However, I have noticed there is an obvious need for housing for empty nesters.

Overdevelopment in town is being driven by corporations’ strong desire to cash in, not enhance our downtown.

Our schools are overcrowded already; overdevelopment will increase taxes because it will increase the number of children who attend our schools, therefore adding more costs to taxpayers.

In order to protect the quality of our schools, the suburban life and the peace and tranquility of our neighborhoods; development should be reasonable and enhance our village character, not drastically alter it. One example of how development can enhance our downtown is providing green space and parking.

Overdevelopment and an unreasonable increase in density in our zoning laws will lower property values for all and hurt our village life. Urbanization of Ridgewood will decrease property values, as well. We must question the true intentions of those supporting special interests rather than protecting our community.

Wilkin Santana

Ridgewood

 

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/letter-to-the-editor-any-development-should-enhance-ridgewood-s-character-1.1349607