Posted on

Outside Money and High-placed friends aided Bergen County Democrats

images-2

Outside Money and High-placed friends aided Bergen County Democrats

NOVEMBER 8, 2014, 4:47 PM    LAST UPDATED: SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2014, 12:01 AM
BY CHARLES STILE
RECORD COLUMNIST |
THE RECORD

A trio of Democrats launched a fierce and costly courtship of Bergen County Democratic Chairman Lou Stellato, whose blessing could make or break their bids to become the next New Jersey governor three years from now.

They arrived in Bergen County eager to demonstrate the depth of their loyalty. They brought their checkbooks. They brought their donors and operatives. And one brought an expensive “micro-targeting” guru to pinpoint Democratic votes.

Phillip Murphy is a former Goldman Sachs executive and a former U.S. ambassador to Germany.

Together they invested nearly $160,000 in Democrat James Tedesco’s defeat of Republican County Executive Kathleen Donovan on Tuesday and the reelection of Freeholders David Ganz and Joan Voss. The money represented nearly 18 percent of the Democratic campaign, state campaign finance records show.

But money told only part of the |story.

Senate President Stephen Sweeney, an officer of a South Jersey ironworkers local, used his influence to steer ironworker money into the state and helped prevent Donovan’s team from snapping up support from other trade unions.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/stile-high-placed-friends-aided-bergen-county-democrats-1.1129627

Posted on

GOP Leaders Shouldn’t Forget That They Won Because Obama Sucks, Not Because They’re Great

obama-golf-midpac-ap

GOP Leaders Shouldn’t Forget That They Won Because Obama Sucks, Not Because They’re Great
John Hawkins | Nov 08, 2014

For the American people, voting in the 2014 election was like choosing whether they’d rather get Democrat Ebola or the Republican flu. Just because they chose the flu doesn’t mean that Republicans should start assuming that people love them.

They don’t.

Hell, I’m a conservative and even I don’t love the Republican Party.

Our leadership teams in the House and Senate are comprised of inarticulate country club Republicans who are to politics what the Waffle House is to fine dining. Many of the Capitol Hill staffers and consultants are out-of-touch lickspittles who hold flyover country conservatives in contempt because they’ve errantly concluded that being in the proximity of members of Congress somehow raises their IQ 40 points. The National Republican Senatorial Committee? Everyone in that organization should be fired and run out of politics. Afterwards, the GOP should burn the building to the ground and salt the earth so nothing will ever grow there again.

That doesn’t mean everyone is doing a bad job. Most people thought Republicans would lose governorships, but we added them instead. Thank you, Republican Governors Association. Also, Reince Priebus and the RNC bent over backwards to improve the GOP’s election data, to increase turnout, and to build bridges to the base. That paid off big time. We also can’t forget conservative Republicans like Ted Cruz, Jeff Sessions, Mike Lee, Tim Scott and Trey Gowdy who have stood tall, fired conservatives up and gave the base a reason to vote when our “leaders” were letting us down. That’s not a small matter because if the whole Republican Party was made up of mediocrities like Lindsey Graham, Thad Cochran and Peter King, it wouldn’t have mattered whether we voted or not because the country would be going to hell on a shutter no matter what we did.

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/11/08/gop-leaders-shouldnt-forget-that-they-won-because-obama-sucks-not-because-theyre-great-n1915796

Posted on

Did New Jersey Miss the Wave?

viewimage

photo by ArtChck for Surf Club

Did New Jersey Miss the Wave?
November 7, 2014 1 Comment
By James Pezzullo | The Save Jersey Blog

Election Night has come and passed and, by the grace of God, Harry Reid is now relegated to the office of Senate Minority Leader. However, one question seems to be on everyone’s mind: did New Jersey, home of perhaps the night’s biggest winner – Chris Christie – manage to completely miss the tidal wave of Republican victory that swept the nation?

The case for a “yes” is clear. The night’s ticket-topping race for the US Senate was won handily by Cory Booker. While it’s true that Jeff Bell outperformed his polls by 2 points, New Jersey polling in recent years has shown a Democratic bias – 3.2 points in 2013 and 4.5 points in 2008. While not 100% constant, a Republican outperforming the polls is to be expected in New Jersey.

There are several counterpoints down the ballot, however.

Tom MacArthur cruised to a 10-point win over Aimee Belgard. Scott Garrett swatted away what was supposed to be a strong challenge from Democrat Roy Cho by the same margin as 2012’s Adam Gussen (13 points), and in the 2nd district Frank LoBiondo laid a 25-point smackdown on challenger Bill Hughes. Cho and Hughes – both anointed by Democrats as the chosen ones who would finally unseat entrenched Congressmen – both came up with at or below average performances against the two veteran Republicans. Burlington and Monmouth’s GOPs came up with wins in their competitive Freeholder races, Ocean County Republicans took care of business across the board (as my good friend Bill Kuncken wrote about right here on Save Jersey) and, in general, it was a good night to be a Republican.

What gives?

https://savejersey.com/2014/11/did-new-jersey-miss-the-wave/

Posted on

Republicans perform better across New Jersey

B1pcONJCYAALbcx

Scott Garrett won by an even larger margin than last time

Republicans perform better across New Jersey

Geoff Mulvhill, Associated Press4:35 p.m. EST November 5, 2014

In the weeks leading up to Tuesday’s election, some polls indicated that a couple of longtime New Jersey Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives may have been at risk for an upset.

In both the 2nd and 5th Districts, the Democratic challengers were running more sophisticated and expensive campaigns than hopefuls usually mount there. And in both cases, the incumbents said they were confident that they would withstand the challenges —though they dug deeper into their campaign coffers to do it.

Not only did Reps. Frank LoBiondo and Scott Garrett retain their seats, they did so by wider margins than two years ago.

That held true across the state. Republicans held onto all six New Jersey congressional seats they won in 2012 and did so by bigger victory margins as measured by percentage points.

Even in the 3rd District, where Democrats thought they had a realistic chance of gaining a seat as Republican Rep. Jon Runyan did not seek re-election, Republican Tom MacArthur not only defeated Democrat Aimee Belgard, but did so with a bigger percentage margin than Runyan had in his re-election last time.

Democrats also won six New Jersey districts. But according to preliminary data returns, they had closer margins than two years ago.

None of the vote counts are final, and two districts had enough precincts not reported by Wednesday afternoon that it was possible that the trend of improved GOP election performance would not ultimately hold everywhere in the state.

https://www.mycentraljersey.com/story/news/elections/2014/11/05/republicans-perform-better-across-new-jersey/18550277/

Posted on

Tedesco Wins Bergen on promises of police-sheriff consolidation

buford-t-justice-3

Tedesco Wins Bergen on promises of police-sheriff consolidation
November 5,2014
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ , While most would admit that taxes are the prime issue , we have for some time questioned the viability of Bergen County . The ugly reality is Bergen is a former shadow of itself . The county depended for years on Wall Street paying extremely high salaries giving the county the luxury of a tax at will mentality ,but since 2008 when massive layoffs hit the street and employment declined in finance that tax at will party came to an end .  Unfortunately the promises made during that period have not . The the ever increasing cost of doing business in Bergen has driven out not only taxpayers  but employers to seek other arrangements another words leave . Leaving the county with a declining tax base but increasing costs for services.

Consolidation of services has been pushed by both parties as a way to save money . Getting off to a fast start with cost cutting Donovan went astray and erred in not realizing that the county government in Bergen is mostly redundant and is itself the cost problem . Donovan pushed for consolidation into a lager county pie which seemed to feed the image of a county power grab , but in Bergen with so many towns having so much of everything it was doomed to fail .

The most obvious point of contention was her attempts to thwart the Police Merger, According to PolitickerNJ ,”Donovan has struggled with the freeholder board over plans to merge the Bergen County Police Department and the county’s Sheriff”s Office. Donovan is opposed to the plan, while the majority of the freeholder board, including Tedesco, now controlled by the Democrats by a 5-2 veto-proof margin, supports the move. The final decision depends on the outcome of ongoing legal battles related to the merger proposal.

Donovan defended her stance on the county police merger issue for both financial and political reasons.

“It’s bogus. I think police departments should merge, but you don’t put a politician in charge of a quasi-military operation,” Donovan told PolitickerNJ.com is response to Tedesco’s comments. “There is no saving of money, because [if the merger took place] we will have to hire non-police people to do things that the police now do.”
https://politickernj.com/2014/03/bergen-county-execs-race-donovan-swipes-at-tedesco-calls-county-police-merger-issue-bogus/

Donovan’s attempts to justify her position fell on deaf ears for over taxed over regulated Bergen residents ( https://theridgewoodblog.net/reader-says-donovans-opposition-to-police-merger-is-the-problem/ ),the feeling being the real story was the ticket income from the Bergen County Police (https://theridgewoodblog.net/county-police-merger-off-due-to-ticket-revenue-from-bergen-county-police/ )

On the other hand , ” Tedesco promises the police-sheriff consolidation will be one of his top priorities during his first 100 days in office. We remain skeptical of the promised savings, but leadership is about taking risk. And if the merger is a bad idea, Tedesco will fully own it.

Promoting smart consolidations and shared services has to be part of the county executive’s mission. So should be addressing alarming drug use – particularly heroin – in the county.”
https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-editorials/tedesco-for-executive-1.1124795

1-800-PetMeds Free Shipping $49

Posted on

Landslide! Republicans capture Senate and prized governorships

images-4

Landslide! Republicans capture Senate and prized governorships
NJTP

GOP holds House, poised for gains in governorships

Republicans held all of their seats and were projected to net the six necessary to take control of the Senate Tuesdaynight, with several more pickup opportunities still to come in undecided races in an election that proved to be a scorching rebuke of President Obama’s tenure.

Pickups in South Dakota, Montana, West Virginia, Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa and North Carolina earned Republicans the majority with a seat to spare, and they were already the favorite to win a runoff in Louisiana in December, which would give them 53 seats. Races in Virginia and Alaska were also still too tight to call, and each of those represented a potential GOP pickup.

Democrats including Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Kay Hagan of North Carolina and Mark Udall of Colorado fell like dominoes as Republicans capitalized on a particularly strong set of candidates, including Arkansas’ Tom Cotton and Colorado’s Cory Gardner, who successfully convinced voters they would be better off with leaders not loyal to an unpopular president.

Voters, seething at an economy still struggling to recover six years after they hired Mr. Obama for that job, directed their anger at his allies in Congress and in the statehouses, though the election was not an affirmative mandate for Republicans either, according to exit polls.

Republicans also cleaned up in key governors’ races, earning re-election in Florida, Wisconsin and Kansas and stunning Democrats by winning governorships in Democratic strongholds Maryland and Massachusetts.

Conservative Joni Ernst won her battle in Iowa, becoming the state’s first female senator.

Wisconsin’s Republican Gov. Scott Walker won a hard fought election over Democratic challenger Mary Burke Tuesday, overcoming fierce opposition from unions and other liberal groups for his third victory in four years and cementing his position as a possible contender for the 2016 GOP presidential nomination.

But of the 36 governors’ races, probably the most painful for Obama was Illinois, where Republican Bruce Rauner ousted Democrat Pat Quinn in the president’s home state.

Compounding Democratic woes, projections showed the GOP could gain as many as 18 House seats, giving Republicans their largest majority since 1946.

Sources: Washington Times, AFP, Drudge Report

Posted on

GOP takeover: Republicans surge to Senate control

beb3b01783c7832b640f6a7067004094

South Carolina’s Tim Scott

GOP takeover: Republicans surge to Senate control

By DAVID ESPO and ROBERT FURLOW
 
Nov. 5, 2014 2:08 AM EST

Two-term incumbent Mark Pryor of Arkansas was the first Democrat to fall, defeated by freshman Rep. Tom Cotton. Sen. Mark Udall of Colorado was next, defeated by Rep. Cory Gardner. Sen. Kay Hagan also lost, in North Carolina, to Thom Tillis, the speaker of the state House.

Republicans also picked up seats in Iowa, West Virginia, South Dakota and Montana, all states where Democrats retired. They had needed a net gain of six seats to end a Democratic majority in place since 2006.

In the House, with dozens of races uncalled, Republicans had picked up 11 seats that had been in Democratic hands, and given up only one.

A net pickup of 13 would give them more seats in the House than at any time since 1946.

Obama was at the White House as voters remade Congress for the final two years of his tenure — not to his liking. With lawmakers set to convene next week for a postelection session, he invited leaders to a meeting on Friday.

The shift in control of the Senate, coupled with a GOP-led House, probably means a strong GOP assault on budget deficits, additional pressure on Democrats to accept sweeping changes to the health care law that stands as Obama’s signal domestic accomplishment and a bid to reduce federal regulations.

Obama’s ability to win confirmation for lifetime judicial appointments could also suffer, including any Supreme Court vacancies.

https://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/050a08651e194c409a95b892b05c9099/senate-control-top-prize-midterm-election

Posted on

10 Exciting Races to Watch in Bergen County

10659218_10153524136585942_4379201673806748243_n

Kathe Donovan with the troops at the BCRO

10 Exciting Races to Watch in Bergen County
Nov. 03 Bergen County, Election 2014, North Jersey no comments
By Matthew Gilson | The Save Jersey Blog

Matt Rooney already gave you ten New Jersey races to watch statewide on Tuesday night, Save Jerseyans.

Without further ado, here are ten worth closely tracking in Bergen County alone, starting with the Garden State’s single most consequential 2014 contest:

1.) County Executive/Freeholder
Nothing else comes close with control of the most powerful office the most county at stake. Incumbent Kathe Donovan has seen the gap between herself and Freeholder Jim Tedesco close in recent weeks and the race may be too close to call. The under card is the battle to take out incumbent freeholder Democrats David Ganz and Joan Voss waged by Republicans Bernadette Walsh and Bob Avery.

2.) Can Scott Garrett win Bergen?
Despite a mini-scare, it appears that Roy has definitely Cho-ked this race away. However, it still remains to be seen whether Garrett will carry the Bergen portion of the district. If he does, it may put this race out of play for 2016 and return Roy Cho to trying on new empty suits.

3.) North Arlington
A swing town and southernmost in the county, Save Jersey previewed this race with an interview with Councilman Dan Pronti who is seeking re-election. The town will prove critical to running up numbers for Kathe Donovan in her south Bergen base, and a win by Council Bianchi over Mayor Massa along with his running mates would put to end eight years of Democratic rule.

4.) Paramus
As important as North Arlington and the south is to Donovan, Tedesco will need to run up numbers in the town he formerly served as mayor to have a shot at what would still be considered an upset. A popular incumbent Democratic mayor headlines the ticket but the race is a battle right to the end.

https://savejersey.com/2014/11/election-bergen-county-new-jersey-results/

Posted on

Scott Garrett for Congress ,People over Government

1982357_10152065578343402_651302655_n

Scott Garrett for Congress ,People over Government

November 3,2014
PJ Blogger and the Staff of the Ridgewood blog
Ridgewood NJ, This election is about the whole sale rejection of President Obama’s policies and no one could be more of a polar opposite to the presidents polices than Scott Garrett. Garrett has consistently been a voice for reason in a time were many have seemingly lost their mind and lost their way. The Current administration has put government over people ,while Scott Garrett puts people first.
Garrett has rightly opposed the president’s tax and spend big government policies  at every turn . Garrett has opposed and warned about Obamacare , the current incoherent foreign policy and recently the handling of the Ebola outbreak .
Garrett has pushed for more openness at the Federal Reserve , opposed the  “too big to fail policy ” , opposed the massive regulatory over reach and over and over has been a voice against government waste and cronyism, putting people over government .
Garrett has opposed “Common Core ” and like most Bergen County residents thinks educational decisions belong in the hands of parents, teachers and local administrators who know best what their children need.
Its a consistent message one that never goes out of style , to live within your means ,and understand the consequences of your actions and to have government the servant of the people ,and not the master.
IMG_20140409_193438455-Copy-Copy
For County Executive the Ridgewood blog supports Kathy Donovan for County Executive , Bernie Walsh and Bob Avery for Freeholders .
While our state and county suffer from many challenges Donovan inherited a mess both politically and fiscally.  Donovan with the addition of Walsh and Avery gives the county its best chance  of getting control of run away government at the county level . The opposition has offered nothing but the same old cronyism and wasteful special interest spending that has gotten us into this mess.  Like it or not Dovovan has shown a willingness to take the heat and take on the many special interest .
Jeff-Bell-AP-620x413
For New Jersey Senator , we endorse Jeff Bell , who has proved himself a man of ideas  and substance unlike his light weight Obamabot opponent , sorry but appearing on Oprah  is no substitute for representation of the people of New Jersey . It would be nice for a change to have someone in the Senate looking out for New Jersey’s interests instead of cowtowing to a national political party  and being a yes man to a president who policies leave much to be desired .
Jeff Bell has continued to surprise many people with his unorthodox iconoclastic style and has focused on the economic issues and jobs. Jeff recognizes like most people the key to New Jersey’s future is a strong economy and current administration and its followers are moving in the opposite direction .
Posted on

For Congress: Garrett

10676116_976059529078189_925550303895944907_n

volunteers come to door-knock this weekend! #NJGOP i

For Congress: Garrett
Posted: Nov 01, 2014 8:51 PM EDT Updated: Nov 01, 2014 8:51 PM EDT

Scott Garrett is routinely characterized as the most conservative member of New Jersey’s House delegation, and maybe of the entire House of Representatives. Voters in New Jersey’s 5th District, which includes most of Sussex County, have elected him to Congress six times. Clearly they feel comfortable with his positions.

Sussex County voters in particular respond to this Wantage resident’s calls to cut spending, reduce taxes, lessen regulation and scale back the federal government’s role in a variety of areas from education to health care, and his full protection of the Constitution.

And Garrett has been consistent in this stance since the beginning, long before much of the Republican Party came around to his way of thinking. He stands by his principles, a too rare trait among politicians.

Garrett’s opponent in Tuesday’s election, Roy Cho, is quite a different animal. His campaign pitch, with its emphasis on infrastructure spending and public-private partnerships, has the tone of a moderate Republican of perhaps a generation or two ago. He’s young, educated and enthusiastic, if inexperienced, and certainly does not have deep roots in our district, having recently moved into it. Cho’s message might have a stronger appeal for the more urban parts of the district, but it doesn’t play as well here in Sussex County.

But while the voters of Garrett’s district invariably come through for him, he could stand to do more for them. His seniority and top committee roles, increasing with each election, should be beneficial to his district.

He admits a preference to working behind the scenes where, without worry of who gets credit, he can accomplish goals over political grandstanding. Consequently, his successes are not clearly communicated to his constituency. In a meeting with the Herald’s editorial board he indicated openness to, if not enthusiasm for, a forum such as a town hall meeting.

Garrett is unlikely to modify his essential conservative approach to governing, and voters thank him for that at the ballot box.

Garrett represents the thinking of a lot of Sussex County residents. The Herald endorses him for a seventh term in Congress.

https://www.njherald.com/story/27184627/2014/11/01/for-congress-garrett-frelinghuysen

Posted on

Republicans get what they want: A midterm election about Obama

1966783_10153842758835203_1417158808_n

Republicans get what they want: A midterm election about Obama
By Justin Sink – 11/03/14 06:00 AM EST

Less than 24 hours before Election Day, Republicans have what they want: a referendum on President Obama.

GOP candidates are training their closing arguments on Obama, full of confidence that voter dissatisfaction with the White House will punch their ticket to a Senate majority.

“This is not brain surgery,” said Republican strategist Ron Bonjean, who argued “it’s obvious Obama has become an anchor” for Democrats.

Aaska Republican Dan Sullivan, who hopes to unseat Sen. Mark Begich (D), in his final campaign ad is pledging to “stand up to Barack Obama and federal overreach.”

The National Republican Senatorial Committee is flooding Georgia with ads highlighting Obama’s claim that a victory by Democrat Michelle Nunn would insure Democrats keep the Senate.

In Louisiana, Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) is hammering Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) over a comment that suggested race was a reason for Obama’s low approval ratings in the state.

In New Hampshire, where a victory by Republican Scott Brown likely would reflect a huge night for Republicans, Brown is mocking Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) for voting with President Obama “99 percent of the time.”

Staffers at the Republican National Committee dressed as Democrats running from the president for Halloween.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/222494-gop-gets-what-it-wants-an-election-about-obama

Posted on

Jeff Bell Presents his closing argument

jeff-bell

Jeff Bell Presents his closing argument

Dear Friends

As I’ve been telling you all along, I ran for U.S. Senate in New Jersey because I felt that we were headed for trouble unless we made a major change in the economy. Let me tell you exactly why.

Right now this country is in the slowest economy recovery of our modern history. Growth is tepid, good job openings are scarce, and most working people struggle to get a loan. The most frequent question I’ve gotten in nine months of campaigning around the state of New Jersey is, Why? Why is the economy stuck in place? Why can’t my child who is a recent college graduate find a decent job? Why are my own wages failing to keep up with rising prices?

My answer is that the Federal Reserve for six years has been stepping on the throat of the economy. Its zero interest rate policy, begun in December 2008, is the culprit. Banks are lending to the government rather than small business — the main source of new job creation — because of the incentive created by it. Individuals can’t earn a return on their savings. We have an economy that wants to recover but is treading water instead.

If we stay in this present course, three outcomes are possible. We could tip into a recession, we could have a market collapse like we had in 2008, or prices could rise dramatically and we would have high inflation. I don’t know which is most likely to happen, but unfortunately I believe the Federal Reserve has done things that will cause at least one of the three to happen.

Simply ending the Federal Reserve’s zero interest rate policy is not enough by itself, because that has big consequences of its own. If interest rates are allowed to return to normal, that will add about $400 billion to the annual federal deficit. It also could set the stage for a dramatic sell-off of stocks, bonds, and other sources of household wealth that have been artificially juiced by the zero interest rate policy. So ending the Fed’s disastrous zero interest rate policy risks the same bad results as keeping it in place.

How do we get out of this straightjacket? I believe we must go back to the gold standard for the first time in 40 years because it contains all of the self-correcting mechanisms for our current situation. A gold-backed dollar would let the marketplace, rather than the Federal Reserve Board, set interest rates and determine the size of the money supply. Instead of watching and worrying what the Fed is going to do, our markets could function knowing that the value of t dollar won’t change and interest rates would adjust according to supply and demand for credit.

Just as importantly, going back on the gold standard would embed limited government in Washington. Congress would need to balance its budgets in the long-run when it could no longer rely on the Federal Reserve to continually print money to finance them. Our existing debt could be refinanced at better terms since the dollar we would be using to pay it back would no longer be depreciating due to inflation. And finally, members of Congress would be at the mercy of anti-deficit voters in a way they aren’t right now.

Do I think we can go back to the gold standard overnight? Of course not. I’ve proposed it as a three-and-a-half year process that gradually brings the market in and cuts the Federal Reserve out of determining the dollar’s value. I still believe the Fed should continue to exist to serve the roles it was created for: administering the money supply to avoid panics and being a lender of last resort if it fails at the first function.

I would not have run for U.S. Senate if I had found someone else to champion this. Here’s why I think I couldn’t: members of Congress — in both parties — are afraid of losing the Federal Reserve’s money printing support for their spending programs. They don’t want to take power away from an institution that lets them off the hook for being accountable for their fiscal policies. If that happened, legislators like Cory Booker would have to justify the return on investment of every new spending measure they introduce. This has the potential to sink whole chunks of the Democratic Party’s agenda. For their part, even anti-deficit Republicans have chosen to be the Party of No rather than problem solvers. That’s why no one is too optimistic things will change if they take over the Senate tomorrow.

I don’t know if Election Day will be the inflection point I’m describing above, but I am sure that the present course we are on isn’t sustainable. And it’s very likely to catch up with Republican candidates in 2016 if our party doesn’t not come up with a way out of the straightjacket. Hillary Clinton knows how to win elections by promising voters government support, and I believe her argument will be politically viable if there’s no compelling alternative offered.

I’ve staked everything on this campaign not because I desire to hold elective office, but because I saw no other way to fix what’s wrong with the economy. I’m hoping that tomorrow will be a big step in the right direction. Whatever happens, it’s been a great privilege to campaign to represent the voters of New Jersey.

Sincerely,

Jeff Bell
Leonia, NJ

Posted on

Paul, Pascrell Face Off

unnamed-19

Paul, Pascrell Face Off

By Larry Yudelson
Published: 31 October 2014

Dr. Dierdre Paul, a 49-year-old Montclair State University professor, faces an uphill battle against Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., the 77-year-old nine-term Democratic incumbent in New Jersey’s Ninth Congressional District.

In a candidate’s forum Monday night at the Community Baptist Church in Englewood, sponsored by the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey and the Bergen County chapter of the NAACP, Dr. Paul said that she has not been a Republican for very long.

In fact, in 2008 she had been the Englewood chair of the Obama campaign. “No one hoped more than me that the president would succeed,” she said. “Even as late as 2012 I tried to maintain that hope and faith in the Democratic party. Instead, it was the African American base masking the same old Democratic policies.

“We have a failed war on poverty, a failed war on drugs,” she continued. “Why does the Democratic establishment feel they only need to show up in election time? People are hurting now.”

Mr. Pascrell opened by saying that his “first objective in Congress is to keep us safe. I solemnly swear to each one of you that I will keep us safe against foreign enemies and any domestic enemies who want to take advantage of us.”

Asked about economic issues, Mr. Pascrell called for raising the minimum wage, and for “fair trade policies that do not simply export jobs.” He said proudly that “the president used one of my pieces of legislation, to stop paying corporations to send jobs overseas, in the State of the Union address.” And he defended President Obama’s economic record: “We are not where we should be, but this president has put more people to work in the private sector in the six years he was president than his predecessor did in the eight years he was president. We now have the smallest federal employment base in 15 or 20 years.”

Dr. Paul said that “People are hurting in a variety of ways” and that Social Security must be maintained.

She declared it “unconscionable” that social security payments are going to ex-Nazis, and called for ending the practice of dunning social security payments to repay student loans. Rep. Pascrell replied: “Nazis are Nazis. I don’t use the word former,” agreeing that they should lose their social security benefits.

Regarding social security in general, “I’m glad you want to keep it,” he said. “I hope you tell your party.”

During the 90 minute exchange, Dr. Paul twice cited a New Testament verse (James 1:8) against the congressman. “My Bible states that ‘A double-minded man is unstable in all his ways,'” she said. The first time, she criticized her opponent as one of 20 congressmen who switched their votes from nay to yay on the Wall Street bailout in 2008. Later she used the verse when she criticized him as being too harsh on illegal immigrants.

Asked about the Affordable Care Act, Dr. Paul said “It’s here. It makes no sense to me to talk about whether I agree or don’t agree. But what I do think is that the implementation was handled poorly.”

Mr. Pascrell said that thanks to the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, there are “almost eight million people who now have insurance who didn’t have it before.” It worked the best “in those states that set up their own insurance exchanges, unlike New Jersey. You have a problem not only with your party in Washington, you have a problem with our party in New Jersey. When I hear criticism of the Affordable Care Act, a bill I voted for, I always look for what are you going to put in its place.”

The candidates were asked about violence against women.

“It’s a serious problem in our society,” Mr. Pascrell said. “The culture needs to change. Equity deserves no equivocation. The first law we passed in the 2009 Congress was the Ledbetter bill, to give equal pay for women.”

The Ledbetter Fair Pay Act passed Congress with only three Republican representatives supporting it, two of them from New Jersey.

“I am a different face of the Republican party,” Dr. Paul declared. “I am a single working mom. A homeowner. A divorced Catholic. I can tell anyone about what domestic violence looks like because I grew up with it. My mother was a victim of domestic violence. It’s something that surpasses party lines. It’s very important to not let go of the gains made for women. In Congress that is what I would consider one of my primary responsibilities.”

Regarding the Middle East, Dr. Paul said that “Israel must have the right to defend itself against Hamas. Hamas is a terrorist organization. Its sole reason for being is to kill Jews and the complete and utter destruction of Israel. Our current policies in the Middle East hurt our friends and reward our enemies.

“For me, radical Islam is our problem. I must be clear that the vast majority of our Muslims in Congressional District 9 are people who are peaceful and value their faith and have the same disdain for radicals the rest of us do.

“I think the majority of Israelis and Palestinians would love to coexist peacefully side by side, but that cannot exist as long as we, the United States, do not adequately support Israel in its right to defend itself. We saw this all summer, where Democrats right and left were questioning Israel’s right. Our allies don’t have confidence in us, in the U.S., and you need that.”

“That’s one of the most bizarre things I’ve ever heard, that Democrats do not support the State of Israel,” Mr. Pascrell retorted. “I’ve voted for every dollar that was supposed to go to Israel, without exception. From the time I stepped into Congress, I supported a two-state solution.

“I support a two state solution and believe Israel should defend itself. I would not want to live in Tel Aviv with rockets over my head – and no one should have to live that way.”

Dr. Paul attacked the congressman for his support of Mohammad Qatanani, the Paterson imam whom the United States is seeking to deport, and for not stepping forward “when Steve Rothman was accused of dual loyalty in the Arab community when you ran against him last time.”

 

“I supported Qatanani because the FBI people I consulted with said there was no basis to the charges,” he said. “I’m not going to act as judge and jury.

 

“I have a great relationship with the Jewish community and with the Arab community. I’m not going to fight that battle over again. I did that loud and clear two years ago.   “I just came back from Israel,” in August, he continued. “They wouldn’t have invited me if they didn’t know they had a true friend here.”

 

On education, Dr. Paul, who is a professor of education, praised vouchers.

“How long should we ask parents in Englewood, in Garfield, in Passaic, in Paterson, to send their children to failing schools? Paterson had 26 college-ready students graduate high school; now that dropped to 19. I believe in educational alternatives, including non-corporatized charters and vouchers. Competition is needed, so failing schools can improve their performance so they can compete, or shut down so they can’t continue to hurt children,” she said.

Mr. Pascrell said that though he was the product of parochial schools, “I believe very strongly in public education. I can support charters, and I did in the past when I was in the state legislature, before it became fashionable, if they have a particular purpose so we know where the money is being spent.

“I do not support vouchers. We should keep the separation between church and state. We have our hands full in trying to make our schools work,” he said.

There was little difference between the candidates on the question of incarceration. Both praised the work being done by Senators Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on drafting a bipartisan sentencing reform bill.

Both also criticized banks.

“I envision my role as not propping up banks that are too big to fail,” Dr. Paul said. “They had no responsibility in giving people mortgages to people who they knew could not pay them back.”

“There’s no question in my mind a lot of folks running banks should be in jail,” Mr. Pascrell said. “My grandfather used to say that the wrong people are jail. Five banks in America control 90 percent of the assets. We have to deal with that.”

On Ebola, Dr. Paul said “I am fully supportive of Governor Christie and Governor Cuomo in their approach. The governors have a responsibility for public safety that far outweighs an individual’s right.”

Mr. Pascrell disagreed. “Both governors have backed off their original position. I would listen to Dr. Fauci” – Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, who testified to Congress about ebola earlier this month – “before Governor Christie.

“We politicians are experts in anything. We’re architects, we can tell you when a bridge is falling down. We can tell you in a 10-year budget what it’s going to look like. And we can tell you how to take care of health care issues without experts advising us.”

In his closing remarks, Mr. Pascrell praised Dr. Paul for her work as a teacher. “There is not enough applause for teachers in the classroom, for teachers of teachers.”

Dr. Paul closed by saying that “Elections are about choices” and that voters should decide “whether they are better off today than they were 17 years ago,” when Mr. Pascrell first entered Congress. “If the answer is no, the choice is a clear one. New leadership is needed for new and more challenging times.

“One of the biggest compliments I have received is that I am a different kind of Republican. And I am.”

Posted on

Cory Booker’s the favorite but Jeff Bell’s winning the battle of ideas

628x471-1-300x171

Cory Booker’s the favorite but Jeff Bell’s winning the battle of ideas
By Paul Mulshine | The Star Ledger
Follow on Twitter
on November 02, 2014 at 8:00 AM, updated November 02, 2014 at 10:58 AM

New Jersey is in court trying to convince a federal judge to permit betting on athletic events.

That would be fun. But it would be even more fun if we could do what the Aussies and the Brits do – bet on elections.

In that case the bookies would have to call on some savvy insider to set the line on a race like Tuesday’s U.S. Senate matchup between the heavy favorite, incumbent Democrat Cory Booker, and Republican challenger Jeff Bell.

The savvy insider I called was Pat Murray of the Monmouth University Poll.

“I would think 14 is probably pretty good for the over and under,” Murray said.

Me, too. The smart money says the former Newark mayor is likely to ring up a double-digit win over the former Reagan-era Republican policy wonk.

https://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/11/cory_bookers_the_favorite_but_jeff_bells_winning_the_battle_of_ideas_mulshine.html

Posted on

Rep Scott Garrett is a Strong Supporter of Israel Unlike the Obama Administration and their clones like Roy Cho

1969353_10152092084118402_1709384519_n

Scott with Teaneck resident Joshua Meier, a finalist in the 2014 Intel Science Talent Search, in my Washington, D.C. office. We discussed the project that earned him this prestigious recognition and his plans for life after high school. Joshua is an impressive young man and I wish him all the best at tonight’s award ceremony.

Rep Scott Garrett is a Strong Supporter of Israel Unlike the Obama Administration and their clones like Roy Cho  
November 2,2014
the Staff of the Ridgewood Blog

Ridgewood NJ, The Crisis in U.S.-Israel Relations Is Officially Here .

“Obama Official Calling Netanyahu ‘A Chickens**t’

It’s probably safe to say that U.S.-Israel relations aren’t exactly at a high point. In an article published Tuesday at The Atlantic by Jeffrey Goldberg, the Obama administration’s preferred conduit for all things Israel-related, an unnamed senior Obama administration official called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “a chicken-bleep.” “The thing about Bibi is, he’s a chicken-bleep,” the official told Goldberg. “The good thing about Netanyahu is that he’s scared to launch wars,” he continued. ““The bad thing about him is that he won’t do anything to reach an accommodation with the Palestinians or with the Sunni Arab states. The only thing he’s interested in is protecting himself from political defeat.” https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/10/the-crisis-in-us-israel-relations-is-officially-here/382031/

Just one more misstep in a long line of anti Israel ,anti Jewish gaffs by the Obama Administration .Meanwhile its important to remember that Congressman Garrett supports the right of Israel to exist as a sovereign, democratic nation and defend itself against attacks from neighboring territories.  While Congressman Garrett supports efforts to have peace between Israel and the Palestinians, he does not believe Israel should jeopardize its security by creating borders that could potentially leave it vulnerable to attack by neighbors.
11588_974186755932133_2936409826700234595_n
At Congregation Bnai Yeshurun 
The Congressman supports strong ties with Israel, and is a strong supporter of ensuring that Israel has the full support of the United States. In the 113th Congress, Congressman Garrett introduced the Jerusalem Embassy and Recognition Act of 2013. This important legislation would require that the United States Embassy in Israel move from its current location in Tel Aviv to Israel’s legal capital, Jerusalem. Congressman Garrett acknowledges the vital role that US support plays in promoting Israel’s safety and security.  Not only does US aid to Israel help promote a more stable Middle East, but also approximately 75 percent of the aid delivered to Israel returns to the United States in the form of military supply purchases.
Congressman Garrett co-sponsored H. Res. 657, a resolution that reaffirms the United States’ support for Israel’s right to defend its citizens and ensure the survival of the State of Israel, condemns the unprovoked rocket fire at Israel, and calls on Hamas to immediately cease all rocket and other attacks against Israel. In July Garrett told the Save New Jersey blog , “As Israel defends itself against countless rocket attacks from Hamas, it shouldn’t also have to defend itself against those in the White House,”
Garrett declared in a statement released Thursday. “While the Obama administration says it supports Israel, these comments obviously stand in stark contrast to that commitment and must be retracted. My heart goes out to those who have been the victims of these attacks. I wholeheartedly support our greatest friend and ally in the Middle East as they seek to eliminate those who are perpetrating this violence.” https://savejersey.com/2014/07/garrett-israel-battling-hamas-and-white-house/
Garrett’s words to the NJJN on October 10 2012 summed the present situation best , “I think the Obama administration has been an absolute disaster from Day One in its handling of foreign affairs and Israel specifically,” said Garrett in an Oct. 4 phone interview. “When Obama came into office, he promised that the United States would be more respected because of his style of handling the world community. I think we are less respected, and we find ourselves in a more vulnerable position than we were four years ago.” https://njjewishnews.com/article/14719/jewish-issues-debated-in-redrawn-fifth-district#.VFFIZ_TF_fE

Last Weekend Garrett honored to receive the endorsement of NORPAC, which is at the forefront of promoting strong US-Israel relations!

https://norpac.net/blog/rep-scott-garrett-r-nj-will-be-hosted-in-teaneck-102014

Garrett’s opponent Roy Cho is a big supporter of President Obama’s current policy .