Posted on Leave a comment

Microsoft to cut up to 18,000 jobs over next year

windows_2421293b

Microsoft to cut up to 18,000 jobs over next year

Microsoft confirmed it will cut up to 18,000 jobs over the next year, part of the tech titan’s efforts to streamline its business under new CEO Satya Nadella.

In a statement released Thursday, Microsoft says about 12,500 of the professional and factory positions will be cut as part of its $7.2 billion acquisition of Nokia’s handset business, which the company closed in April.

“My promise to you is that we will go through this process in the most thoughtful and transparent way possible,” said Nadella in a memo to employees.

Nadella, who replaced Steve Ballmer in February, says the “vast majority” of employees affected by layoffs will be notified within the next six months. They will also earn severance and job transition help in many locations. All cuts will be completed by next June.

The layoffs by Microsoft — which employs 125,000 people — are the company’s largest ever. The acquisition of Nokia’s handset business in April added 25,000 people to Microsoft’s payroll.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/07/17/microsoft-job-cuts/12772901/

Posted on 8 Comments

The Stop & Shop in Ridgewood to close during renovations

SS-Logo1

The Stop & Shop in Ridgewood to close during renovations

JULY 10, 2014    LAST UPDATED: THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2014, 3:18 PM
BY BY LIZ WELLINGHORST
STAFF WRITER

The Stop & Shop in Ridgewood is temporarily closing its doors for a five to six-week renovation, which began on Thursday.

According to Kenny Demchak, assistant store manager, the entire store will be remodeled over the summer, although the floor layout will remain the same.

“We will be adding new floors, redoing shelves and fixtures, adding new signs and expanding our natural and organic food section,” said Demchak.

The second floor pharmacy and liquor store will remain open for customers throughout the renovation, with new store hours for those departments changing during the remodeling.

Parking on the Stop & Shop grounds will be prohibited and strictly enforced throughout the renovation, except for patrons shopping at the pharmacy and liquor store.

An exact date on when Stop & Shop will reopen its doors remains uncertain.

“If all goes according to plan, we hope to reopen by Labor Day and before school begins,” said Demchak. “We will keep customers notified of our reopening by posting updates on our website and with signs in our Ridgewood store windows.”

New pharmacy and liquor store hours are as follows: Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 9 p.m.; Saturday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.; and Sunday, noon to 3 p.m.

– See more at: https://www.northjersey.com/news/business/ridgewood-supermarket-to-close-during-renovations-1.1049477#sthash.j9MQSTIL.dpuf

Posted on 1 Comment

Black Americans: The True Casualties of Amnesty

171-0905104550-illegal-aliens-crossing-fence21

Black Americans: The True Casualties of Amnesty
Democrats throw black voters under the bus.
By A. J. Delgado

One of the sleeper issues surrounding the debate on amnesty for illegal immigrants – an inconvenient one that no proponent of a widespread amnesty wishes to acknowledge – is the devastating effect so-called immigration reform will have on African Americans.

The black unemployment rate is almost 11 percent, far higher than that of any other group profiled by labor statistics. African Americans are disproportionately employed in lower-skilled jobs – the very same jobs immigrants take. As Steven Camarota asked in a recent column, why double immigration when so many people already aren’t working?

https://www.nationalreview.com/article/382338/black-americans-true-casualties-amnesty-j-delgado

Posted on Leave a comment

Four Reasons NOT to Raise the Minimum Wage

tumblr_inline_n7hjyrFsNN1ssu7wz

Four Reasons NOT to Raise the Minimum Wage
The Cato Institute
June 21, 2014

The debate over minimum wage continues to rage across the country. But, would raising the minimum wage actually harm the very people it is purportedly designed to help?

Research shows that businesses would respond to the increased costs by reducing employment, particularly for low-skilled workers. Some businesses may even pass the higher costs on to consumers. Despite the hope of proponents, raising the minimum wage would do little, if anything, to decrease poverty.

Here are four reasons NOT to raise the minimum wage….

It Would Result In Job Loss

Evidence of job losses have been found since the earliest imposition of the minimum wage

The first 25-cent minimum wage in 1938 resulted in significant job losses.
Minimum wage increases recently imposed in American Samoa resulted in economic effects so pronounced that President Obama signed into law a bill postponing them.
A 2006 review of more than 100 minimum wage studies by David Neumark and William Wascher found that about two-thirds found negative employment effects.
In 2010, Joseph Sabia and Richard Burkhauser estimated: “nearly 1.3 million jobs will be lost if the federal minimum wage is increased to $9.50 per hour.”

It Would Hurt Low-Skilled Workers

Evidence shows minimum wage increases disproportionately hurt the people they’re supposed to help

The 2006 Neumark and Wascher review found the literature “as largely solidifying the conventional view that minimum wages reduce employment among low-skilled workers.”
A 2012 analysis of the New York State minimum wage increase from $5.15 to $6.75 per hour found a “20.2 to 21.8 percent reduction in the employment of younger less-educated individuals.”
A 2010 analysis by Michael J. Hicks found: “the latest round of minimum wage increases” account “for roughly 550,000 fewer part-time jobs,” including “roughly 310,000 fewer teenagers working part-time.”

It Would Have Little Effect On Reducing Poverty

Evidence suggests that minimum wage increases don’t reduce poverty

In the previous federal minimum wage increase from $5.15 to $7.25, only 15 percent of the workers who were expected to gain from it lived in poor households, according to a 2012 review by Mark Wilson. If the minimum were today raised to $9.50, only 11 percent of workers who would gain live in poor households.
The 2012 Wilson review noted: “Since 1995, eight studies have examined the income and poverty effects of minimum wage increases, and all but one have found that past minimum wage hikes had no effect on poverty.”
The 2012 Wilson review noted: “One recent academic study found that both state and federal minimum wage increases between 2003 and 2007 had no effect on state poverty rates.”

It May Result In Higher Prices For Consumers

The costs of minimum wage increases must be paid by someone

The 2012 Wilson review noted: A 2004 “review of more than 20 minimum wage studies looking at price effects found that a 10 percent increase in the U.S. minimum wage raises food prices by up to 4 percent.”
A 2007 study from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago found that restaurant prices increase in response to minimum wage increases

Posted on Leave a comment

Village of Ridgewood Local Area Jobs

help_wanted_theridgewoodblog.net_

Village of Ridgewood Local Area Jobs 

Ridgewood Art Institute is Seeking an Instructor for an Oil Painting for Young People
June 25,2014
Ridgewood Art Institute
4:12 PM

The Board of Directors of the Ridgewood Art Institute is seeking a qualified instructor for an “Oil Painting for Young People” class to be held on Wednesdayafternoons from 3:30 pm – 5:30 pm in the West Studio.

If interested, please send a resume, brief class description and ten JPEG images of your most recent work to:

[email protected]

Joel Popadics
Education Chairman
The Ridgewood Art Institute
12 East Glen Avenue
Ridgewood, NJ 07450

Please note, 6 original paintings (plus a hard copy of your resume and class description) will be needed for the Executive Board Meeting which will be held onMonday, September 8th.

 

Village of Ridgewood Employment Opportunities – Deadline June 30th

The following employment opportunities are available in the Village of Ridgewood Building Department – Zoning.

Click Here for description of the Part Time Assistant Zoning Officer

Click Here for Full Time Board of Adjustment Keyboarding Clerk 1

Send resumes to Michael Barker at [email protected] by June 30, 2014

 

Employment Opportunity – Building Dept Director – July 9 Deadline

Director of Building Department


Full-time position. The Village of Ridgewood seeks a Construction Official to act as the Chief Administrator of the Building Department; zoning license preferred. Seeking a strong leader and manager with a proven track record in implementing technology solutions and establishing streamlined processes that are driven by customer needs and compliance with NJ Uniform Construction Code. While actively enforcing the UCC, Village ordinances, zoning and property maintenance ordinances, the selected individual must also demonstrate their commitment to continual process improvement as well as optimizing customer satisfaction. 

Salary commensurate with experience and qualifications. Village of Ridgewood is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer. Send cover letter, resume and references to [email protected] or fax to 201/652-2318 by July 9, 20

Posted on 2 Comments

Why Are So Many Young Adults Not Looking for Jobs?

2014_06_20_Young_Adults_Moore-800x420

Why Are So Many Young Adults Not Looking for Jobs?
Stephen Moore

June 21, 2014

Stephen Moore, who formerly wrote on the economy and public policy for The Wall Street Journal, is chief economist at The Heritage Foundation.

Economists are scratching their heads trying to figure out a puzzle in this recovery: Why are young people not working? People retiring at age 60 or even 55 in a weak economy is easy to understand. But at 25?

The percentage of adult Americans who are working or looking for work now stands at 62.8%, a 36-year low and down more than 3 percentage points since late 2007, according to the Labor Department’s May employment report.

This is fairly well-known. What isn’t so well-known is that a major reason for the decline is that fewer and fewer young people are holding jobs. This exit from the workforce by the young is counter to the conventional wisdom or the Obama administration’s official line.

The White House claims the workforce is contracting because more baby boomers are retiring. There’s some truth to that. About 10,000 boomers retire every day of the workweek, so that’s clearly depressing the labor market. Since 2009, 7 million Americans have reached official retirement age. The problem will get worse in the years to come as nearly 80 million boomers hit age 65.

But that trend tells only part of the story. The chart above shows the real problem: The largest decline in workforce participation has been those under 25.

Idle Youth

The percentage of young Americans earning a paycheck or looking for work has fallen by 4 percentage points over the course of the recovery, and those between 16 and 25 have experienced the largest decline.

Those over 65, by the way, are more likely to be working today than five years ago. This shift has cushioned the blow of young people not working.

Why is this trend so troubling? Studies show that teens who start working at a job at a young age have higher earnings later in life. One study found that those who work as teenagers have earnings that are about 10% higher at age 27 than those who did not work.

“When we hold young Americans out of jobs,” explains Michael Saltsman of the Employment Policies Institute, “that makes it more difficult for them to get higher-paying jobs later.”

The federal minimum-wage hikes that started in 2007 didn’t help. Teens were priced out of the job market. The overall teen jobless rate skyrocketed. For black males, it topped 40%.

The teen unemployment rate remains at 19.2% — even with the participation rate down sharply — so it would be hard to imagine a worse time to raise the minimum wage again.

Minimum Wage Impact

Saltsman’s research shows that a 10% rise in the minimum wage could mean a 2% or 3% decline in young Americans working. Seattle is raising its minimum wage to $15 an hour. A $10.10 federal minimum wage is being pushed by the White House. The current minimum wage is $7.25.

“When wages are held artificially high,” says Ohio University economics professor Richard Vedder, “jobs are a lot more scarce. Unemployment is negatively associated with the wage rate.”

High teen unemployment is a big problem in Europe, where wage floors are very high. In nations such as France and Spain, the young delay their entry into the workforce until their mid- or even late 20s. These workers’ wages rarely catch up to those who start working earlier. Europe has traditionally had a much smaller share of young adults in jobs.

“Where have the workers been going in the U.S.?” asks Louis Woodhill, an economist in Houston. “They have been fleeing into the arms of the welfare state.” Since 2007, 2 million more Americans have started receiving Social Security disability payments, and food-stamp rolls have increased by 20 million. This has substituted for jobs.

Student Loans

One possible reason that the young are staying away from the labor force is student loans. Since 2007, student loans have risen by more than $500 billion, a subsidy that may be giving college-age students an incentive to take aid instead of look for work to become financially self-sufficient and acquire marketable skills.

We do no favors to the young by teaching them that they can consume or have a good time without first earning the money they spend. The decline in young workers couldn’t come at a worse time. At the other end of the spectrum, as the 80 million boomers move swiftly out of the workforce in the decade ahead, who will support them? Mick Jagger isn’t going to be playing forever.

Originally posted on Investors.com.

https://dailysignal.com/2014/06/21/number-employed-young-americans-drops/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Posted on Leave a comment

U.S. Workers Face a Tax Burden of 31.3 Percent

irs

U.S. Workers Face a Tax Burden of 31.3 Percent

Average Worker Pays over $16,000 in Income and Payroll Taxes

Washington, DC (June 19, 2014)—U.S. wage earners face a 31.3 percent tax burden on pre-tax income according to the latest analysis from the nonpartisan Tax Foundation. Although this burden is high, the average across the 34 OECD countries is slightly higher, at 35.8 percent.

Using the latest data from the OECD, the report hones in on U.S. tax policy and explains the breakdown of the average U.S. worker’s tax burden, how it compares to other developed countries, and why workers, instead of employers, bear the weight of the tax burden.

An average wage earner’s tax burden is comprised of income and payroll taxes. Although a little more than half of a worker’s payroll tax burden is paid by his, he ultimately pays this tax through lower take-home pay.

While the revenues from these taxes pay for government programs, it is important to know what the cost of these programs are from the average worker’s perspective.

Key findings include:

The total tax burden faced by wage earners in the United States is 31.3 percent of their pre-tax earnings, paying $16,658 in taxes in 2013, with $8,196 in individual income taxes and $8,462 in payroll taxes.
In the absence of income and payroll taxes and the benefits they provide, the average worker would take home nearly $5,000 in additional annual income for a total of $53,223.
The total tax burden faced by average U.S. workers is the 26th highest in the OECD and below the 34-country average of 35.8 percent.
The average U.S. worker faces an above average income tax burden (15.4 percent vs. the OECD average of 13.3 percent) and a below average payroll tax burden (15.9 percent vs. the OECD average of 22.6 percent).
Many OECD countries have high payroll taxes, such as France, which places a payroll tax burden of 38.5 percent on average workers.
In some countries, over 50 percent of a workers total tax burden is paid by their employer.
Many countries in the OECD, including the United States, have special provisions for families with children that lower their overall tax burdens. 

“Although the United States and most OECD countries are known for having progressive tax systems that tax high-income earners more than low- or moderate-income earners, a large portion of the tax burden still falls on the average worker,” said Tax Foundation Economist Kyle Pomerleau.

“Even here in the United States, which has lower tax burdens than most other OECD countries, average workers end up paying nearly one-third of their income in taxes. It is true that governments in the OECD, especially European countries, provide more government programs. However, their workers end up paying a much higher price for them.”

Posted on 4 Comments

N.J. Democrats to push for paid sick time

l_20140108-trenton-capitol-building-1200

N.J. Democrats to push for paid sick time

TRENTON – New Jersey Democrats and labor activists are pushing to require private employers to provide paid leave for workers who are sick or who need to attend to loved ones with an illness. About 38 percent of the state’s private-sector workforce, or 1.2 million employees, do not have access to earned sick leave, according to a 2013 study by the Rutgers Center for Women and Work. (Seidman/The Philadelphia Inquirer)

https://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20140616_N_J__Democrats_to_push_for_paid_sick_time.html

Posted on Leave a comment

Group questions Christie’s tax breaks for business

help_wanted_theridgewoodblog.net_

Group questions Christie’s tax breaks for business

Bloomberg reported “Since February 2010, New Jersey companies have regained 125,700 jobs, about half the number lost during the slump. New York got back all the jobs it shed by 2012.” The report said eight of New Jersey’s 10 largest subsidies have come since 2010, including $210.8 million for Newark-based Prudential Financial Inc. to build a new office a few blocks away from its old one. Panasonic Corp. was awarded $102.4 million to move its North American headquarters to Newark from Secaucus after the company threatened to leave New Jersey. (Ingle/The Asbury Park Press)

https://www.app.com/story/news/politics/politicspatrol/2014/06/11/28690/10327337/

Posted on Leave a comment

37.2%: Percentage Not in Labor Force Remains at 36-Year High

help_wanted_theridgewoodblog.net_

37.2%: Percentage Not in Labor Force Remains at 36-Year High
June 6, 2014 – 8:05 AM

(CNSNews.com) – The percentage of American civilians 16 or older who do not have a job and are not actively seeking one remained at a 36-year high in May, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

In December, April, and now May, the labor force participation rate has been 62.8 percent. That means that 37.2 percent were not participating in the labor force during those months.

Before December, the last time the labor force participation rate sunk as low as 62.8 percent was February 1978, when it was also 62.8 percent. At that time, Jimmy Carter was president.

In April, the number of those not in the labor force hit a record high of 92,018,000. In May, that number declined by 9,000 to 92,009,000. Yet, the participation rate remained the same from April to May at 62.8 percent.

The labor force, according to BLS, is that part of the civilian noninstitutional population that either has a job or has actively sought one in the last four weeks. The civilian noninstitutional population consists of people 16 or older, who are not on active duty in the military or in an institution such as a prison, nursing home, or mental hospital.

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/372-percentage-not-labor-force-remains-36-year-high

Posted on 2 Comments

The American Dream is out of reach

140603051910-american-dream-poll-american-dream-620xa

The American Dream is out of reach
By Tami Luhby  

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The American Dream is impossible to achieve in this country.

So say nearly 6 in 10 people who responded to CNNMoney’s American Dream Poll, conducted by ORC International. They feel the dream — however they define it — is out of reach.

Young adults, age 18 to 34, are most likely to feel the dream is unattainable, with 63% saying it’s impossible. This age group has suffered in the wake of the Great Recession, finding it hard to get good jobs.

Younger Americans are a cause of great concern. Many respondents said they are worried about the next generation’s ability to prosper.

Some 63% of all Americans said most children in the U.S. won’t be better off than their parents. This dour view comes despite most respondents, 54%, feeling they are better off than their own parents.

The downbeat mood is not surprising, say economic mobility experts.

“The pessimism is reflective of the financial realities a lot of families are facing,” said Erin Currier, the director of the Economic Mobility Project at Pew Charitable Trusts. “They are treading water, but their income is not translating into solid financial security.”

https://money.cnn.com/2014/06/04/news/economy/american-dream/index.html

Posted on 6 Comments

Summertime Blues: Teen Unemployment in Major U.S. Cities Tops 50 Percent

10303748_655574574491262_3770388588557678077_n

Summertime Blues: Teen Unemployment in Major U.S. Cities Tops 50 Percent
June 2, 2014 – 4:16 PM
By Penny Starr

(CNSNews.com) – A new analysisby the Employment Policy Institute (EPI) shows that unemployment among teens without a high school diploma is more than 50 percent in two of the largest U.S. cities.

Using U.S. Census Bureau data from May 2013 to April 2014, the analysis reveals that in Riverside-San Bernardino area of Southern California, the unemployment rate for teens ages 16 to 19 years old who don’t have a high school diploma is 54.2 percent.

In the Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, Ore., metropolitan area, the unemployment rate from that population is 53.8 percent.

“These numbers are staggering,” Michael Saltsman, director of research at EPI told CNSNews.com. “Teens across the country this summer are missing out on valuable work experience as they continue to suffer through an extended period of high unemployment and difficult job prospects.”

https://cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-starr/summertime-blues-teen-unemployment-major-us-cities-tops-50-percent

Posted on Leave a comment

Piketty’s Questionable Data

PARIS:Thomas Piketty, economiste,sur le plateau LCI

Thomas Piketty (Photo: IBO/SIPA/Newscom)
Piketty’s Questionable Data
Salim Furth, Ph.D
May 27, 2014 at 1:36 pm

Thomas Piketty made some questionable choices in adjusting and presenting the data that underlies his bestselling economics tome, “Capital in the Twenty-First Century.” Chris Giles, economics editor of the Financial Times newspaper, published a detailed list of apparent fudges in Piketty’s data.

Giles’ most explosive accusation is that Piketty chose data sources that were friendliest to his own preconceived ideas. For example, both the United States and the United Kingdom have two potential data sources for wealth: estate tax records and surveys of living households. In the U.S., Piketty uses the household survey, which showed rising wealth concentration. But in the U.K., he chose to use the inferior-quality estate tax data, which also showed rising wealth concentration. If he’d flipped both choices, he would have found falling inequality in the U.K. and steady inequality in the U.S. Giles is correct when he says, “Choices matter.” Giles’ estimates of U.K. wealth inequality in recent ecades are much lower than Piketty’s, and Piketty will need to defend his choices if we are to believe that U.K. wealth inequality has been rising.

Piketty presents data showing that wealth inequality rose slightly in Sweden from 2000 to 2010. But his “2000” data point actually is 2004 data, and his “2010” data point actually is an average of 2005 and 2006. When Giles used the data from 2000, he found that inequality actually fell slightly from 2000 to 2006 (the last year available). Perhaps Piketty had a good reason to use the years he did, but he has not offered an explanation.

These questionable choices have been reported as “errors” or “mistakes,” but the questions about Piketty’s data pertain to the choices he made, not the minor goofs. Historian Phillip Magness presents Piketty’s summary data on U.S. wealth inequality alongside its pre-1970 source. The graphs tell very different stories. Perhaps Piketty’s adjustments were valuable and moved the data in the right direction. But it is incumbent on Piketty to explain those adjustments, and it is incumbent on the reader to understand that the data was uncertain and incomplete to begin with and then was adjusted as the author believed necessary.

Even the best data on wealth distributions is uncertain. One of Piketty’s central ideas is that the amount and concentration of wealth has been rising steadily since 1980. He contends that the same economic forces are at work now and he projects the recent changes into the future. But if there is substantial uncertainty about each estimate and disagreement among data sources, then “trends” are highly subjective. As Yogi Berra may have said, “Predictions are hard to make, especially about the future.”

So how should we read Piketty? As others have noted, Capital can be divided into three components: history, prediction and prescription. One can believe the history without agreeing with Piketty’s predictions about the future. And if Piketty’s predictions are correct, he’s still wrong to prescribe brutal, confiscatory taxation, because that would increase poverty and lower wages, especially in poor countries.

What is at stake in Giles’ critique is Piketty’s account of history. Piketty’s story makes broad claims about global trends in the 19th and 20th centuries. If the trends turn out to depend on making specific choices, interpolations and adjustments in his collection of data, then we might have to conclude that predictions are hard to make, even about the past.

https://blog.heritage.org/2014/05/27/pikettys-questionable-data/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social

Posted on Leave a comment

Christie Embraces Irresponsible Spending says credit agencies are the ‘same group of folks who allowed the financial crisis to occur’

money-growing-on-tree-image-8

Christie Embraces Irresponsible Spending says credit agencies are the ‘same group of folks who allowed the financial crisis to occur’

TRENTON – Don’t put too much stock in those Wall Street rating agency downgrades, says Gov. Chris Christie.

The governor, whose administration has been at the helm during six credit rating downgrades over the course of his tenure to date, says he’s not worried about additional downgrades. Christie said he finds it interesting they “continue to downgrade the people who try to act responsibly,” but added he doesn’t live in fear of rating agencies.

“No, I don’t fear it,” he said Wednesday during a Statehouse news conference.

“This is the same group of folks who allowed the financial crisis to occur,” he said, arguing they “sat on their hands collecting huge fees” from clients during the financial collapse and essentially got paid “to look the other way,” he said.

“I don’t know how much credibility these places have,” Christie said.  (Arco/PolitickerNJ)

Christie says credit agencies are the ‘same group of folks who allowed the financial crisis to occur’ | Politicker NJ

Posted on Leave a comment

What science, technology, engineering, and math (“STEM”) Shortage?

pic_giant_052014_SM_What-STEM-Shortage

What science, technology, engineering, and math (“STEM”) Shortage?
The sector isn’t seeing wage growth and has more graduates than jobs.
By Steven Camarota

The idea that we need to allow in more workers with science, technology, engineering, and math (“STEM”) background is an article of faith among American business and political elite.

But in a new report, my Center for Immigration Studies colleague Karen Zeigler and I analyze the latest government data and find what other researchers have found: The country has well more than twice as many workers with STEM degrees as there are STEM jobs. Also consistent with other research, we find only modest levels of wage growth for such workers for more than a decade. Both employment and wage data indicate that such workers are not in short supply.

Reports by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI), the RAND Corporation, the Urban Institute, and the National Research Council have all found no evidence that STEM workers are in short supply. PBS even published an opinion piece based on the EPI study entitled, “The Bogus High-Tech Worker Shortage: How Guest Workers Lower U.S. Wages.” This is PBS, mind you, which is as likely to publish something skeptical of immigration as it is to publish something skeptical of taxpayer subsidies for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

https://www.nationalreview.com/article/378334/what-stem-shortage-steven-camarota