Posted on

Central Business District Advisory Committee ,a better approach for inclusive dialogue on the Future of Ridgewood’s Central Business District

CBD Ridgewood by ArtChick

file photo by ArtChick

July 26,2016
the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, Many readers have voiced concern and suspicions over Village committees, sighting the fact that several namely the Historic Preservation Commission and the Financial Advisory Committees have acted more like promoters of former Mayor Aronsohn’s special interest agenda than looking out for whats best for Ridgewood .

“I don’t like it and believe we already have too many advisory groups. They have too much clout and are not necessarily to be trusted. REAC’s first pronouncement was that turf is great. FAC said we need the biggest parking garage–and the chairman of the Historic Preservation Commission concurred, no doubt helping the first garage referendum to pass last November. I’d rather see them all disbanded and let the council do its own research. Appropriate people could still help.”

“A real concern is that the new council falls prey to this nonsense. Aronson was a disaster for Ridgewood. Continuing his policies is a mistake. Yes, there is a lot on their plate, but this council really needs to get moving fast to undo the damage he did. Fidgeting isn’t going to carry the day. And if they are not up to the task they said they were capable of performing, then they need to take a good hard look at themselves. Now is the time to appeal the Valley Hospital debacle and undo the Village massive family housing ordinances.”

Councilman Ramon Hache told the Ridgewood blog yesterday that the Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce will fill three positions on the Central Business District Advisory Committee . Ramon went on to say the point of the committee is to create a more inclusive dialogue unlike the previous administration that ignored residents wishes ,and only listened to a small group of people or packed committees with developers and or friends of developers creating a situation where Central Business Development plans were “out of whack” with what residents wanted giving Ridgewood residents no voice in the decision making process.

At the end of the day its a leadership issue ,although the new council is green they do appear to have all the necessary ingredients ;an open-mindedness,willing to listen ,independent thinking and a concern for the Village  to lead Ridgewood into the future.

Posted on

Ridgewood Impact Study presentations for Multifamily housing Tonight at Benjamin Franklin Middle School

clock_cbd_theridgewoodblog

MEETING TUESDAY NIGHT

Tuesday, January 12, 2016 – 7:30pm – Benjamin Franklin Middle School- Impact Study presentations for Multifamily housing, North Walnut Redevelopment Zone, Hudson Street Parking Garage -Presentations by Vendors:
a. Heyer, Gruel & Associates
b. Maser Consulting
c. Ross Haber Associates
d. The RBA Group
e. BFJ Planning/Urbanomics

Posted on

Ridgewood Council adds second hearing on multifamily housing

clock ridgewood NJ

SEPTEMBER 11, 2015    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2015, 12:33 PM
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS

In response to a request by a local grassroots organization, village officials have decided to extend the public hearing on multifamily housing in Ridgewood’s Central Business District (CBD) to a second evening.

A statement submitted to The Ridgewood News on Thursday by Citizens for a Better Ridgewood (CBR) called for the Village Council to reschedule its public hearing on the ordinances that would approve the changes made to the master plan passed by the Planning Board in June.

The public hearing is scheduled for Sept. 16, which is the same night that four village schools – Hawes, Ridge, Somerville and Willard elementary schools – have their annual back-to-school nights scheduled.

On Friday morning, representatives from CBR sent the statement along with another message urging the mayor and council to reschedule or add more opportunities for residents to voice their concerns for the ordinances.

Mayor Paul Aronsohn replied that village officials could not have known about the conflict when the hearing was originally scheduled in June and noted residents were encouraged to speak on the topic at any meeting during the two months between introduction of the ordinances and the scheduled hearing.

https://www.northjersey.com/news/ridgewood-council-adds-second-hearing-on-multifamily-housing-1.1408234

Posted on

Multifamily housing would increase enrollment at Ridgewood schools

Abraham-Godwin_theridgewoodblog

JULY 3, 2015    LAST UPDATED: FRIDAY, JULY 3, 2015, 8:56 AM
THE RIDGEWOOD NEWS
Print

Housing projects would increase school enrollment

To the Editor:

It was hard to read the report in The Ridgewood News of July 26 (“Parents question increase in class sizes,” page A1) of classes with 24 children and the inability of the school board to guarantee that children will be placed in schools close to their homes, without marveling at the recent arrogance of the Ridgewood Planning Board in totally disregarding the concerns and testimony of taxpayers in this regard by passing the high-density zoning for which developers clamored.

These issues go hand in hand. The notion that school-age children will not cascade into these developments is ludicrous. Board of Education President Sheila Brogan is quoted in the article as saying, “Unlike surrounding towns, Ridgewood tends to support more students in our school districts.” Yet, as a proponent of the development on Broad Street, this obvious fact was nowhere in evidence.

The town can only hope that the full council is more attuned to the tremendous costs in traffic, taxes and school crowding that high-density projects will engender. Save the Village. Do not adopt this disastrous recommendation.

Patricia R. Kruger

Ridgewood

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/letter-to-the-editor-multifamily-housing-would-increase-enrollment-at-ridgewood-schools-1.1368243

 

Posted on

Sounds Familiar : More development pressures in Bergen

Clock_Ridgewood_theridgewopodblog.net_-16

Sounds Familiar : More development pressures in Bergen

News and commentary from Bergen County’s many municipalities besieged by heavy-handed development proposals underscores boiling dissatisfaction with plans for gross changes in heretofore cherished communities.

Ordinary residents can’t accept claims that big development won’t bring negative impacts, and they can’t understand why their elected and appointed officials and “experts” paid with local property taxes buy into those claims.

Montvale’s Hoboken-based “master planner,” who touts experience developed in Johannesburg and elsewhere in Africa, has told locals that state planners encourage denser development than has prevailed in Bergen traditionally.

That requires zoning changes blessed by planners and local officials alike. The blessings can lead to snags. Montvale’s mayor has told residents he testified in court for four days in a lawsuit brought by The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

In a case that has received virtually no public attention, A&P makes the thunderous charge that Montvale is guilty of “spot zoning” in favor of one family of local farmers and their development partners.

Whether or not the court agrees, proposals in Montvale and elsewhere in Bergen are pitting the few against the many.

Kurt F. Kron

Montvale, Nov. 21

 

https://www.northjersey.com/opinion/opinion-letters-to-the-editor/the-record-letters-tuesday-nov-25-1.1140816