Posted on

Promises Made on the Ridgewood Parking Campaign

Parking Garage

file photo by Boyd Loving

Dear Paul,

I hope the holidays were kind to you and that the power issues at town hall are resolved. In case they aren’t, I’ve also included your other email address.

I wanted to discuss your recent Mayor’s Corner column which appeared in my inbox on January 2nd, where you spoke at length about civility.

Civility is something I am so with you about. It is too easy for people to forget this and to fall into behavior that is shortsighted and damaging to the fabric of our wonderful democracy. For you to keep bringing this up is exemplary and serves as a reminder of us all continuing to raise the bar in this regard.

It’s certainly reminded me, which is why I’m writing to you.

While I applaud your efforts to get things done (certainly as a filmmaker, I know the herculean effort it sometimes requires to do so) I also feel obligated to our community to speak out when I observe actions that fall below this bar of civility you and I hold ourselves to.

When I read in your January 2nd email/column that “We need to honor the votes cast by the 3,236 Ridgewood residents – a full 65% — who voted “yes” to building a 400-car parking deck at Hudson Street” it prompts me to speak out.

I speak out because of what you wrote in the pasted below email from November 1st with the subject heading “Parking Campaign – Please Read and Please Share” (bolding/CAPs from your original email included) :

“Tuesday’s referendum question is ONLY asking if residents support financing and building a garage on the Hudson Street lot.   Nothing more.  Nothing less.   You will NOT be voting on the size, look or any other aspect of a proposed parking deck.”

As you clearly stated in that email, the vote was not a ‘yes’ for a 400 car parking garage. It was a non-binding referendum and to add parking at Hudson, bond the money and work with the public on scale and design.

Furthermore, your intention to vote a bond through the county if you don’t achieve a super majority from our council is not an acceptable path for one who wishes to respect the needs of one’s constituents and to maintain civility.

Lastly, as dictated by September 30th Village Council vote and based on the specificity of the comprehensive traffic study that you voted in favor of that evening, any movement on the traffic garage should be tabled until that study is complete. To override that vote and forcibly move forward with this bond puts the whole process into question.

Paul, many of us, myself included, are in favor of finding ways to assuage the parking situation in town. In the name of civility and for the sake of our village, I urge you to honor the vote you cast on September 30th with regards to completing the comprehensive parking study before moving forward with this traffic garage.

See you Wednesday night at 7:30pm.

Sincerely,

Dana

Dana H. Glazer
61 Clinton Avenue

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Paul Aronsohn <paul@paularonsohn.com> wrote:

 Dear Neighbor,

Election Day is just around the corner … and the campaign to build Ridgewood’s first parking deck has been gaining support.   As I walk through town and talk to literally thousands of residents, I can tell you that people increasingly realize that a “yes” vote for the parking referendum is a “yes” vote for Ridgewood.

And in addition to the many individual residents who have expressed strong support, we now have three important letters of endorsement – all supporting this initiative, all encouraging a “yes” vote on Tuesday.

§                  The Ridgewood Financial Advisory Committee
§                  The Ridgewood Historic Preservation Commission
§                  The Ridgewood Chamber of Commerce President
 
Without question, this is all very exciting.

Unfortunately, however, an anonymous mailer was sent to many Ridgewood homes this weekend – an anonymous mailer that was sent from a Newark Post Office and that is full of misinformation and distortions.  And although no one was willing to take responsibility for the mailer, the language in it is strikingly similar to that used recently by others trying to undermine this important project for the Village.

So, let me set the record straight on some of the key issues being discussed:

ü  Parking revenues – NOT taxes – would pay for this parking deck.  We have commissioned an independent financial analysis that demonstrates that we could easily pay for a parking deck using only parking revenues.  Here is that analysis.

ü  There would be NO charge for parking on Sundays.  We don’t charge for parking on Sundays.  Period.  That’s true now.  That will be true if/when we build a parking deck.

ü  There have been NO decisions taken with respect to meter times or rates.   The independent financial analysis gave us a menu of options for paying for a parking deck without raising taxes.  It would be up to the Council – with public input – to decide on any rate or time changes.

 ü  The size and appearance of the proposed parking deck have NOT yet been decided.  Our design team – with a great deal of public input – has been developing renderings of what a parking deck could look like, but we have NOT decided on size or appearance.  Those two issues would be decided after the vote on the referendum.  

ü  Tuesday’s referendum question is ONLY asking if residents support financing and building a garage on the Hudson Street lot.   Nothing more.  Nothing less.   You will NOT be voting on the size, look or any other aspect of a proposed parking deck. Here is a copy of the official ballot question.

ü  The anonymous mailer greatly DISTORTS the size of the proposed parking deck.  As noted on the mailer in very small letters, “artist rendering, not to exact scale.”

ü  A parking deck would likely lead to a significant DECREASE in traffic.  According to our independent traffic consultant, a parking deck on the Hudson Street lot would have a very positive affect on the overall downtown traffic situation.  The primary reason for this is that a parking deck would eliminate the need to drive around and around and around looking for a parking space.
 
 ü  A parking deck would benefit ALL Ridgewood residents … commuters as well as shoppers/diners.    The Council would have to decide how best to use the parking deck, but we would likely set aside some parking for commuters and some for those shopping, dining and working downtown.

ü  Tuesday’s vote provides ALL Ridgewood residents with a unique opportunity.   As outlined in my letter-to-the-editor,  we have an opportunity to do something smart, important and wonderful for our community.

As always, thank you….

Best,

Paul

Paul Aronsohn, Mayor
Village of Ridgewood
@paularonsohn