Posted on Leave a comment

>Graydon:The only way to ensure that no one drowns is to not have a pool.

>Life is full of risks and danger. The only way to ensure that no one drowns is to not have a pool. It is just as likely that some fool could break their neck diving into a cement bottom pool as it is that someone might drown in a blue/green pond. Already, what, 5 or 6 people have drowned off the beaches of Long Island.

The RPP wants a cement bottom pool for only one reason, the swim team at RHS. This would be a moot point if the village had built a pool at the high school 10 years ago. But as I remember, it was the Ridgewood YMCA that lobbied hardest against it and got the bond referendum defeated.

Our BOE, having the political acumen of Attila the Hun, failed to include a larger constituency when they put the bond to a vote. Once they repackaged the referendum to include elementary schools the bond passed. Of course, by that time they had to take out the pool due to political damage done by the YMCA.

Had they been more politically savvy, they would have included all the elementary schools the first time around, thus guaranteeing the votes for passage of a bond that included a HS swimming pool.

Now that the YMCA has booted the RHS swim team from its facilities, the team must go out of town to practice and hold meets. And it wasn’t like the Y was making it easy for the team when they did swim there. They got crappy times slots. I blame this directly on the self serving interests of the YMCA. At the time, they wanted the rent from the BOE so worked overtime to kill the RHS pool. Now they don’t. This leaves parents wanting a place for the RHS swim team to practice and hold meets here in Ridgewood.

Trust me on this, once an Olympic size lap pool is built at Graydon, which is stand alone from the pictures I saw, the next item on the RPP’s agenda will be to cover it with a bubble so that it cab be used year around.

Ask Mrs. Morales if she thinks a bubble might be a good idea once the pool is built. Afterall, her children are/where members of the RHS swim team?

Posted on Leave a comment

>Graydon Pool :"do we really need to throw the baby out with the bathwater?

>It is the year 2009 and advanced technology and scientific improvements allow us MANY options for maintaining a clean pond-like pool for swimmers.

The problem seems to be that only a few unpublicized attempts have been made over the years to make the necessary water upgrades to the pond. During that period, most of the Summer badge users have simply left for “cleaner,” clearer waters, as geese and ducks overran the pool.

I do not blame them. I left too.

Now, Graydon is a financial drain on the Village because not enough badges are sold to offset its maintenance, nor to provide for the major upgrades that must happen to win even some of those members back and, hopefully, attract new ones.

But, do we really need to throw the baby out with the bathwater? Let’s admit it: Graydon is beautiful and far better to look at year round than a cement bottomed pool.

Could we, perhaps, identify ways to improve the water quality, improve the facility and remove the impediments to greater public use that currently exist? I think we can and we can do so without enormous financial debt and public expenditures.

First, let’s consider a real CEO — to be paid, or one who is voluntary to run the facility as a public/private partnership.

Second, let this person organize a team to outline the community’s goals for Graydon; review its public image within the community; explain its legal status according to state and federal mandates; and provide a report which can guide discussion and the list of initial undertakings (short and long term) to achieve those goals.

Third, communicate with all Ridgewood residents. Graydon is a community treasure. We all have a stake in it.

There never should have been an us versus them scenario created to fix Graydon. This will not serve the community nor the project well. It hasn’t so far. The Village Council needs to take some responsibility for allowing this to happen. It has weakened the process, has sidelined too many citizens who naturally feel disenfranchised, and has curtailed the likelihood of a positive outcome by being perfunctory in its goals and diffuse with regard to its outcome.

Wholesale, expensive re-designs are ahead of the public sentiment right now. Isn’t this obvious to all? So, let us do what is necessary, politically feasible and financially sound. Let’s clean up the water beyond the allowable “units per part.” This is necessary to overcome the years of bad publicity, lax effort, and rampant geese and duck droppings that drove so many away.

This should not be the “end” of Graydon as a Village icon, but should be the beginning of a full community effort to make Graydon viable and enjoyable for years to come.

Frances Edwards

Posted on Leave a comment

>Oppposition has legitimate arguments in health care debate

>Thursday, August 13, 2009
Last updated: Thursday August 13, 2009, 9:42 AM
BY TIM ADRIANCE
The Record

https://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&aIdx=1&articleID=58911520&aogid=57924476&gid=1906747&gid=1906747&srchType=nws&srchCat=WOTC&trk=news_brkout&goback=.nvr_1906747_1

REGARDING BOTH “Debate, not tirade” (Editorial, Aug. 12) and Jimmy Margulies’ editorial cartoon (“Who needs the government making decisions for me?” Aug. 12), I see hypocrisy on your own editorial page and, dare I say, a “tirade” on your own part.

The editorial states, “Dissent is welcome. Destroying any chance for substantive discussion is not.” But isn’t the cartoon, which paints those who speak out against the administration as mere puppets of “right-wing lobbies,” inflammatory and a clear slap against many of us who comprise an informed and vocal electorate?

With an estimated 400 other citizens, I was at Rep. Steve Rothman’s town hall meeting in Elmwood Park. Although I do not agree with most of Rothman’s position on the health care issue, I do commend him for running a fair and civil – for New Jersey – meeting where everyone was given a chance to speak.

The only “puppets” of lobby groups I saw were the few who were for the administration-proposed plan; they were clearly identifiable because they all had the same professionally printed signs paid for by a lobby group. The majority present were just citizens who have had it with a Congress held in contempt by the people they control. Simply put, the majority opinion at Rothman’s meetings has been, “We do not trust Congress.”

I agree that there are some wild claims made about the House bill, HR-3200. I have read it, and there is much that is wrong and much to fear (health-wise and fiscally). There are no “death panels,” but there is voluntary end-of-life counseling and that counseling may not be done by your own doctor.

Nevertheless, how can we not believe that the very words of one of President Obama’s chief aides on the health care issue, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, do not reflect what is really intended: rationing of health care, among other things?

In a Hastings Center report from 1996, Dr. Emanuel said “communitarianism” should guide decisions on who gets care. He said medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens. An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia.”

In a June 2008 Journal of the American Medical Association article, he wrote that “savings will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic oath too seriously, as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others.”

Even Obama in his June 24 WABC televised town hall meeting on health care contributed to this discussion. He was questioned about whether there should be a cutoff of surgical options for older people after they have reached a certain age. Obama stated, “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.”

We the people want debate. We want truth. And we want to be governed by our consent. We will not stand silent any longer. We are not pawns of a lobby. We are educated citizens who are simply speaking out in order to preserve freedom and liberty.

Tim Adriance is co-founder and on the leadership committee of the New Jersey Tea Party Coalition, the Bergen County group of New Jersey Tea Parties United, the statewide organization of the regional groups.

https://www.linkedin.com/news?actionBar=&aIdx=1&articleID=58911520&aogid=57924476&gid=1906747&gid=1906747&srchType=nws&srchCat=WOTC&trk=news_brkout&goback=.nvr_1906747_1

Posted on Leave a comment

>CHLORINE: there are PLENTY of natural, cost effective and productive alternatives that really do work.

>Yes Chlorine is a nasty chemical and the human body was not made to swim in it nor drink it. But there is another way..

My daughter has VERY sensitive skin and chlorine causes her face and heiney to break out to the point it causes the skin to crack and bleed. And as a pool owner and most importantly a parent this was a major problem/concern. So this year my wife had done excessive research and even gone to the reaches of spoking with Ed Begley Jr. who is not only an actor but an amazing eviromentalist, and he suggested a filtration system that utilizes almost NO chlorine. AND IMAGINE THIS…IT COST LESS THAN WHAT I WOULD SPEND ON CHLORINE FOR THE SEASON! It utilized cooper and natural minerals to maintain the proper water balance. It basically fills your pool with the same quality water of that as you would buy by the gallon at Whole Foods. Furthermore, this is the first summer that my daughter’s cheeks have not broken out to the point it bleeds. So please don’t be hung up on the Chlorine and chemical issue, as there are PLENTY of natural, cost effective and productive alternatives that really do work.

In regards to fecal matter in the water, no matter how you can justify that, it is straight up NOT GOOD for business in any way, shape or form. Sorry.
As for which side of the debate I stand; this is coming from a guy who spent summers swimming in lakes up in the Poconos and has no problem swimming in Graydon,and thus I can say I sincerely sit on the fence. However, I feel that safety should be the first issue here. As much as I feel the Graydon lifeguards do a GREAT job their Herculean efforts are greatly restricted by the fact that the body of water being watched over is not clear enough to see the bottom. I’m not saying that a clear pool will prevent a loss of life but I will go as far to say that it will make it easier for the good men and woman that are out there looking to keep that from happening much, much easier.

In no disrespect or malice, it just riddles me to see how ignorance or lack of knowledge of the facts is what seems to be controlling this debate. As for the aesthetics; let’s again look to the facts. The Village of Ridgewood is a beautiful place to live, it is well kept. I would hate to think that the powers that be would allow an eyesore to be put in the place of the current Graydon “pool”. Granted, those in power are politicians and God knows they have made some stupid moves as of late, but they live here too and don’t want to look at a “Theme Park” right next door to Village Hall and most importantly in their home town.
In closing, it is well understood that change can no doubt be a doubled edged sword, but when the sword is yielded by the hand of knowledge and fairness, it is safe to say that shall only be swung in the direction for positive change.

Respectfully,

Craig S. Hueneke

1-800-FLOWERS.COMshow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=100462

Posted on Leave a comment

>Program continues in honor of co-founder :The late John Mailler Handley

>Program continues in honor of co-founder
Friday, August 14, 2009
Last updated: Friday August 14, 2009, 4:55 PM
The Ridgewood News
STAFF WRITER

https://www.northjersey.com/recreation/news/Program_continues_in_honor_of_co-founder_.html

The Unitarian Society of Ridgewood’s Citizens for Swimming initiative continued this year in honor of its co-founder, a Ridgewood resident who passed away in April.

and his wife, Sue, helped to establish the program at Graydon Pool more than 30 years ago. The Handleys worked with other Unitarian Society members to establish the Community Association with a Ministry for People Youth Development Program (CAMP-YDP). CAMP-YDP is a combined after-school program and summer camp for children from the north side of Paterson.

The summer camp portion, which also includes the “Citizens for Swimming” program, raises money to buy Graydon Pool guest badges for the children every August. In the past, it ran three days a week for four weeks and provided the kids with swimming lessons.

The tradition continued with a successful 2009 season kickoff on Aug. 4. This past Wednesday afternoon, despite inclement weather, the children, who are between the ages of 2 1/2 and 13, still made it out to Graydon for a quick dip.

“We just missed Mr. Handley’s presence, but we know that he was there in spirit on the first day,” said CAMP-YDP Director Maria Benavides. “We are going to make him proud and we will raise this ‘baby.’ So it’s up to us to continue that and do it to the best of his wishes.”

CAMP-YDP Assistant Director Terrence Pitts recalled participating in the program as a child. He said the experience helped to expose him “to the various different cultures that are outside of the City of Paterson.” Pitts has been assisting the program for more than nine years.

“I choose to work with the kids of the camp because I love each and everyone of them,” said Pitts, a Paterson resident. “Working with these children is my life’s work and I will be here with the camp in the future.”

Eileen Mohan and Sue Handley are co-chairs of this year’s program. The community initiative has raised enough money to bring the children to the village daily for the next two weeks. Mohan praised the Ridgewood Parks and Recreation Department for its continuing cooperation with the program. Since its inception, the rate for the Graydon visitor passes hasn’t gone up; the going rate is $3 for each Paterson child.

“It’s a valid program and it does a lot of good for the kids,” said Mohan, who is also a CAMP-YDP board member. “And the village has done a lot. There’s a long history of ties between the village and Paterson. I think most village residents don’t realize. As a resident of Ridgewood, I think everyone should know how good the village [really] is.”

Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Nancy Bigos said Tuesday that the reduced Graydon pass fees exemplify the village’s realization of “the significance and the beauty of the program.” Bigos said the department is vying to keep the long-standing Ridgewood tradition alive.

“I think the program is a legacy in the goodness of mankind,” Bigos said. “The committee and the village are working together to provide this opportunity to learn to swim and enjoy Graydon for the young residents of Paterson.”

For more than five years, the Ridgewood YMCA has provided free swimming lessons to the children. The Parks Department worked with the “Y” to bring in professional swim instructors, Bigos said. Ridgewood YMCA Aquatics Director Susan Ludzki said the organization chose to participate because it wanted to “provide an opportunity that in general they [the Paterson children] couldn’t afford.” Ludzki said four instructors are at Graydon every Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday to offer half hour lessons.

“We divide the kids into groups according to their level,” Ludzki said. “[And] we have seen that returning campers have made great progress.”

“That [the swimming instruction] has been an added plus,” said Benavides. “That’s so very important, because you are giving an opportunity to children who don’t know how to swim the chance to learn how. We are grateful for that gift.”

Benavides said CAMP-YDP kids and personnel are grateful for the opportunity to visit the village’s municipal pool year in and year out.

“[Because we are coming from Paterson], our resources are rather limited,” Benavides said. “So going to Graydon is a breath of fresh air. It can’t be replaced, no matter where you go. There is never going to be another Graydon Pool.”

E-mail: [email protected]

https://www.northjersey.com/recreation/news/Program_continues_in_honor_of_co-founder_.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Volunteers for Village Risk Management Committee

>Rum+Truck

The Village of Ridgewood is seeking volunteers to serve on its Risk Management Committee. It meets quarterly to review insurance matters, and implement strategies to meet Village needs. This Committee’s analysis and recommendations has been very beneficial to the Village.

Candidates should be experienced in general liability, workers compensation, and employee benefits. Resumes should be submitted by September 15, 2009 to the Treasurer’s Office, Finance Department, Village Hall, 131 N. Maple Avenue, Ridgewood, NJ 07450. For further information, please call Steve Sanzari at 201/670-5500 x224.

Posted on Leave a comment

>Reopen hospital, Christie declares

>Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Last updated: Tuesday August 18, 2009, 8:02 AM
BY SCOTT FALLON
The Record
STAFF WRITER

https://www.northjersey.com/news/health/hospitals/Reopen_hospital_Christie_declares.html

WESTWOOD – Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie said he wants Pascack Valley Hospital to reopen — adding another political voice to the ongoing battle between Bergen County’s hospitals.

At a news conference in front of the Westwood hospital Monday, Christie said area residents “deserve and need” Pascack to reopen.

Hackensack University Medical Center has applied for state permission to open a 128-bed, for-profit community hospital in Westwood. Hackensack, which bought the property after Pascack Valley closed two years ago, currently operates an emergency department at the Westwood site.

Hackensack’s effort is opposed by The Valley Hospital and Englewood Hospital Medical Center, who say they already meet the health care needs of the area and that reopening Pascack would harm the remaining hospitals.

“At the end of the day, adding a new hospital to a county with an oversupply of hospital beds would weaken the area’s existing hospitals,” a statement released by both hospitals Monday said. “This is not a partisan issue. This is not about any political party or any candidate for office — it is about the long-term health of Bergen County’s hospitals.”

A spokesman for Governor Corzine’s campaign called Christie’s announcement “political grandstanding” and refused to comment further beyond saying it is up to the state health officials to decide whether Pascack will reopen.

Corzine’s running mate, state Sen. Loretta Weinberg, D-Teaneck, has opposed reopening Pascack calling it “irrational health policy.” Assemblyman Gordon Johnson, D-Englewood, and Sen. Bob Gordon, D-Fair Lawn, have also opposed the plan.

Hackensack recently took its application off the state Health Planning Board’s agenda. Hospital officials wanted time to strengthen their case after learning that health officials were preparing a recommendation against the reopening.

Christie’s appearance at the hospital lasted only 20 minutes. Standing with about 40 supporters in a sweltering parking lot, the former U.S. attorney made a point to criticize Weinberg for her stance.

“I would ask Loretta Weinberg today to get into a private room with Jon Corzine and tell him that it’s time for him to get his Department of Health &hellip to make sure a certificate is granted so we can start serving patients from Pascack Valley once again,” he said.

The issue has sparked an intense debate among local and state officials. A public meeting in June drew 700 people, most of whom supported the reopening.

Supporters include Bergen County Executive Dennis McNerney and the Democratic Freeholder Board, who called over the weekend for all hospital leaders to meet and hammer out an agreement.

Sen. Gerald Cardinale, R-Demarest, Assemblywoman Charlotte Vandervalk, R-Westwood, and Assemblyman John Rooney, R-Northvale, also support the reopening and stood with Christie at the news conference.

Sen. Paul Sarlo, D-Wood Ridge, also wants Pascack to reopen, but criticized Christie for his statements Monday.

“I feel that this process should be done with all the stakeholders at the table, with no political grandstanding,” he said.

E-mail: [email protected]

https://www.northjersey.com/news/health/hospitals/Reopen_hospital_Christie_declares.html

Posted on Leave a comment

>Years ago the RHS Varsity Baseball team played its home games at Vets. For some reason that changed.

>The topic was the proposed upgrade/renovation of a baseball field on Vets, not Air Horns on Maple. It isn’t being “sneaked through during summer” when no one is around. The proposed renovations of the BOE athletic facilities calls for the construction of a 400 meter track at BF. The construction of the track will eliminate the “full size” baseball diamond at BF that is currently used by the RHS Baseball program as well as other youth baseball teams. The Fields and Rec Master Plan calls for the baseball diamond at Lower Hawes to be renovated and upgraded to make up for the loss of the field at BF.

Years ago the RHS Varsity Baseball team played its home games at Vets. For some reason that changed. A group of former RHS Baseball players would like to see the RHS and youth teams return to Vets instead of moving to Lower Hawes. (Lower Hawes will still be renovated as the loss of the diamond at BF must be replaced.) The HS Administration has expressed strong interest in locating as many teams “on campus” as possible to help foster school spirit and lessen the wear and tear on elementary and middle school facilities and playing at Vets would fit with that goal.

The proposal for Vets was first discussed many months ago. It was first presented to some concerned individuals and then to some of the sports groups that would benefit or be affected. Subsequent to that it was brought to the sports council as an idea for their feedback. The next logical step would be for the “Village Departments” to look at the plans to see if; 1) they are legal in regards to flood plain, etc… and 2) would the improvements negatively impact any other activities at Vets. Only after that is done can the decision be made to move forward or not.

The inference in the orginal post is that somehow this is some big bad project. It isn’t. It is simply a renovation and upgrade of the existing field that has been there for decades. The proposed “netting” is simply bringing the field up to current standards and will be much less intrusive visually then an old rusting backstop. The outfield fence and warning track are problematic for other sports (Youth Football & Soccer) that use Vets and probably will not be included in the final plans but it doesn’t hurt to put the entire project out there so people can see what the final intent is.

The reference to the plan as “a scheme that has neither been reviewed, nor approved by the BOE” is very misleading. Veterans Field is owned by the Village of Ridgewood, why would the BOE be involved in reviewing or approving any improvement to a Village Field? And with the history the BOE has in not getting anything of substance done properly if you were the person working on getting the plan implemented why would you want them involved?

Save up to 40% on Last Minute Flights with Hotwire Limited Rates!

Posted on Leave a comment

>Preserve Graydon !

>Dear Suzanne Kelly and Marcia Ringel,

I just wanted to lend my encouragement to your efforts to raise the voice of dissent. I hope you won’t be intimidated. Like so many other Ridgewood residents, I don’t want a theme park marring the appeal of the Ridgewood landscape. Since moving to Ridgewood, I’ve already seen one Graydon Pool renovation. This is certainly not the time to spend any money doing it over again—especially not in order to create an eyesore.

Yours,
Joyce Rheuban

1-800-PetMeds

Posted on Leave a comment

>Stay in Touch ………..

>If your looking to run ads or get in touch with the Ridgewood Blog please send all correspondence to [email protected]

thank you for your support!!!!

Special Events
Garage Sales
Open Houses
Birthday’s
Birth Announcements
Obits
News
Tips
ADVERTS

thanks again

PJ Blogger
the Ridgewood Blog

also now on twitter : www.twitter.com/ridgewoodblog

Speak Your Mind ……………………..

Posted on Leave a comment

>"Keep your mouth closed." Indeed!!

>graydon2 “Keep your mouth closed.” Indeed!!

I don’t know about others, but this is the first I’ve heard of the 200:1 advantage Graydon has over other municipal pools when it comes to avoiding regulatory consequences from poor results in fecal coliform tests. That’s a pretty nice cushion to have if you can get it.

I pay attention pretty well, and I don’t recall seeing Graydon described as a one-of-a-kind man‐made pond having no circulation or filtration systems. Does this mean that if Graydon implements any form of circulation or filtering system at all, that it will immediately be shackled with burdensome cleanliness standards that it has no chance of meeting?

“Don’t drink the water.” NFN, 10:27, but I don’t think you’ll be accomplishing much in the way of personal persuasion with that approach.

It sounds as if Graydon, if it is to be improved much at all, will have to be professionally managed on the Village’s behalf once the improvements are in place, or possibly privately owned under preferential rules set by the Village, if it has any chance of surviving, much less thriving, in today’s modern regulatory environment. Can anyone else with a higher altitude perspective weigh in on this question?

Posted on Leave a comment

>State Says Graydon is not a pool, it is a man‐made pond

>According to the State, Graydon is not a pool, it is a man‐made pond. It is filled using well water and there are no circulation or filtration systems. Graydon is therefore subject to much different regulations and standards than other municipal swimming facilities. For many years, chlorine was used to disinfect the water at Graydon. Then, in 1992, the Village was fined for this practice because, at the time, there were no chlorination products registered for use in natural bottom swimming pools. The result was that a Special Local Need (SLN) pesticide label was created that allows the Village to treat the water for algae control only, but there are no longer any disinfecting chemicals allowed to be used at Graydon. RPP Final Report, p. 6.

Why does the State require more stringent criteria for a traditional swimming pool different than ponds? Notwithstanding the effects on animal and plant life inherent to ponds, is it because the State intends a different use and purpose in terms of scope and extent for a pond in comparison to a traditional swimming pool? If not, then why aren’t the regulations and standards for a pond sufficient for a traditional swimming pool?

Further, I have read that because there are no disinfecting chemicals allowed to be used at Graydon, the bacteria count in the water is higher than in a traditional swimming pool. The New Jersey State Department of Health has set bacterial and chemical standards for both traditional swimming pools and ponds such as Graydon. In swimming pools, an acceptable fecal coliform test result is less than one organism per 100 ml versus 200 organisms per 100 ml in ponds. See Public Recreational Bathing Water Standards, N.J.A.C. 8:26-1, et. seq. If you were to fill a half-liter drinking bottle with water from a traditional swimming pool, the State would only allow less than one bacteria organism to be present. However, if you fill that same bottle with water from a pond like Graydon, the State would allow up to 200 organisms to be present. Therefore, Graydon is permitted by law to have roughly 200 times the bacteria count of a traditional swimming pool. Again, we must understand why the State makes a distinction between ponds and traditional swimming pools.

I think many residents would find it helpful to have more information regarding the statement about the
grand-father clause referenced above.

I have read the DEP regulations and determinations. In March 2008, the DEP Assistant Commissioner of Compliance and Enforcement
“offered direction as to how to more effectively utilize the approved chemicals, but then stated, “The Department still recommends, however, that Graydon Pool be replaced with a bona fide swimming pool in the future.” RPP, pg. 6.

I would like to know what administrative opinion the DHS would issue regarding the Village’s decision to use a pond as a municipal swimming pool that does not meet State standards for recreational bathing water.

If you refute any of the information I have read above or have answers to the questions I posed, please be kind enough to provide the links and resources to such information.

Posted on Leave a comment

>“Graydon Pool Complex”

>The Village Engineer has decided to incorporate into the draft RFP the DEP, State of New Jersey Health Code rulings and site plan for the “Graydon Pool Complex”, which has yet to be reviewed and approved by The Village Council.

The rules and regulations of the DEP and State of New Jersey Health Codes are in and of themselves state and federal regulations and cannot be manipulated by Ms. Ringel, or any other member of the PGC for that matter. If anything, these regulations/restrictions may become even tighter despite all the ranting and ravings from Ms. Ringel and Ms. Kelly.

I fail to see the PGC and RPP reaching any real compromise. The objectives of both groups are completely different, and in my opinion are not within the possibilities of any compromise.

The PGC does not bother to provide any professional guidance regarding the Graydon Pool Complex; they reject any possible guidance and thereby threaten the entire Graydon Pool Complex project.

Thus, I don’t foresee the PGC being successful in their attempts to thwart the efforts of the RPP, but we will only know this with the passage of time.

As you know, I have been sending out letter after letter to Suzanne Kelly and Marcia Ringel, Co-Chairs of the PGC but all of these letters have been returned to my office marked “Delivery Refused”, thus, both women have lost the opportunity to read any of the information contained in any of these letters.

Frankly, I am surprised at their aloof attitude as to their knowledge or lack thereof regarding the “Graydon Pool Complex”.

David F. Bolger

LINK to NJ. Health Code:
https://www.state.nj.us/health/eoh/phss/recbathing.pdf

Posted on Leave a comment

>Chicken Little Comes to Ridgewood- Unscrupulous Fox to Follow Shortly?

>“If our housing plan fails, we have to be prepared for builders to come in here and go to court and say, ‘I’m building what I want on any piece of property I can get, as long as I include affordable housing,’” Pfund explained. “I don’t think I’m being Chicken Little crying the sky is falling on that, but we have to be very careful.” – Ridgewood, NJ Mayor David T. Pfund, August 12, 2009

There are many versions of the Chicken Little story, but the basic premise is that a chicken eats lunch one day, and believes the sky is falling down because an acorn falls on her head. She decides to tell the King, and on her journey meets other animals who join her in the quest. In most retellings, the animals all have rhyming names such as Henny Penny, Cocky Lockey and Goosey Loosey. Finally, they come across Foxy Loxy, a fox who offers the chicken and her friends his help.

After this point, there are many endings. In the most famous one, Foxy Loxy eats the chicken’s friends, but the last one, usually Cocky Lockey, survives long enough to warn the chicken and she escapes. Other endings include Foxy eating them all; the characters being saved by a squirrel or an owl and getting to speak to the King; the characters being saved by the King’s hunting dogs; even one version in which the sky actually falls and kills Foxy Loxy.

Depending on the version, the moral changes. In the “happy ending” version, the moral is not to be a “Chicken”, but to have courage. In other versions the moral is usually interpreted to mean “do not believe everything you are told”. In the latter case, it could well be a cautionary political tale: The Chicken jumps to a conclusion and whips the populace into mass hysteria, which the unscrupulous fox uses to manipulate them for his own benefit, sometimes as supper.

So, if you believe Ridgewood Mayor David T. Pfund is Chicken Little, who do you think the unscrupulous fox is in Ridgewood?

3balls Golf 234 X 60 Half Bannershow?id=mjvuF8ceKoQ&bids=172534

Posted on Leave a comment

>Planned Move of RHS Baseball Games to Vets Field Comes Under Scrutiny

>parkingmap

A proposal to relocate RHS varsity baseball games from Benjamin Franklin Middle School to a new baseball diamond at Vets Field is now the subject of an intense review by several Village departments.

Plans, as revealed during a Village Council Work Session on August 5th, call for the construction of a new baseball diamond, equipped with dugouts, coaches boxes, and bleachers, in an area of Vets Field located just east of Village Hall.

Additionally, baseball team supporters have requested permission to install a galvanized steel fence along the entire outfield line, and a 40 foot long, 27 foot high black “foul ball net” to replace an existing chain link backstop. The net would be erected parallel to the walking path just east of Village Hall.

The proposed “foul ball net” and galvanized steel outfield fence have raised eyebrows among many of the Village’s professional employees. Concerns have surfaced with respect to: 1) the visual impact of a large black net right next to Village Hall, 2) how the outfield fence might impede use of the field for other purposes, and 3) whether the planned changes would violate any existing DEP regulations.

Although the plan presented to Village Council members was said to have been related to the construction of a “suitable” playing surface for RHS’ Varsity Baseball team, it was revealed that the scheme has neither been reviewed, nor approved, by Ridgewood Board of Education (BOE) members.

On August 5th, Mayor David T. Pfund had requested the Village Council approve plans immediately in order that construction could begin in September. However, The Fly has learned that at least two (2) Council members object to the plans as presented and have forced a Planning Board review of the project. This review is scheduled to take place on August 18th. It is not known either when or if BOE members will sign off on this project, nor if DEP approval is necessary.

Stay tuned folks.

Hybrid 240x160