Posted on

Reader contradicts , No Councilman Hache did not say “free parking for Employees”

Parking_meters_theridgewoodblog

WHAT??? I was at that meeting and that is not what Councilman Hache said. He was supporting a reduction in the parking fee at Cottage Pl for 60 spots to be set aside for employee parking. It was just for those spots only. He suggested reducing the rate to 25 cents. It was a suggestion in order to get employees to use that lot instead of parking on the street, which will open up spots for customers. And yes, it could also help some of the employees who are minimum wage earners. The free parking was suggested by somebody else.

Editors Note: From what we have heard ,there are over 700(?) employees in the Central Business District so employee parking represents a major issue .Frankly we think employees should be parking at some kind of discounted rate , or free if they park in some distant out of the way spots. We also think meter rates should be lowered but meter times should be extended later into the evening say 9pm ,to give dinners a chance to participate and take some of burden off CBD shoppers .

 

5 thoughts on “Reader contradicts , No Councilman Hache did not say “free parking for Employees”

  1. Yes, these are all great suggestions.

  2. Hache should be next mayor

  3. Go to the tape of the meeting.

  4. Thank you Ramon (9:58)

  5. NO, NO, NO… it was not FREE parking… it was 25 cents parking…
    REALLY?
    What’s the (real world) difference?
    Let’s not forget that many of these (even minimum wage) workers are parking and buying their $3 morning Lattes from Starbucks…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *