Reader says Its a matter of being reasonable,
The way to do things the right way is not to change any zoning for any project. Since any project would then require many variances, it would allow ‘control’ to be maintained on size, density, and impact (on traffic, schools, etc). It would allow proposed projects to proceed within reason.
Valley needs to upgrade, but they don’t need to double their footprint while doing so. The owners of the car dealerships have the right to continue the current use of their properties with the current zoning. If they want a change of use, then they will have to do so within the current zoning, and any changes would require variances that would keep developments within limits agreed to.
Its a matter of being reasonable, by both the ‘opposition’ and the developers. We do need senior housing, so if apartments are built that are for 55+, that would have zero impact on the schools while increasing tax revenues. Many ‘empty nesters’ are still here in town, but many that I speak with are about to sell due to the increased taxes.
Unfortunately, it’s more about greed. I really do not know anything about the Village Mgr. situation, but he did make an interesting observation. This town has definitely become more political.
My observation as a long time resident…it can’t afford it.