Clinton instructed an aide to remove the classification marking from information, a federal offense
by Keith Koffler
The latest batch of Hillary Clinton emails released by the State Department early Friday contain what may be the smoking gun that forces the Justice Department to charge the former secretary of state with a crime, according to former federal prosecutor Joseph diGenova.
“This is gigantic,” said diGenova. “She caused to be removed a classified marking and then had it transmitted in an unencrypted manner. That is a felony. The removal of the classified marking is a federal crime. It is the same thing to order someone to do it as if she had done it herself.”
On the June 17, 2011, email chain with senior State Department adviser Jake Sullivan, Clinton apparently asked Sullivan to change the marking on classified information so that it is no longer flagged as classified.
Clinton, using her private email server, asks for “the TPs,” apparently a reference to talking points being prepared for her. Sullivan, who is using his official State Department email, responds, “They say they’ve had issues sending secure fax. They’re working on it.” Clinton responds, “If they can’t, turn into nonpaper w[ith] no identifying heading and send nonsecure.”
https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/smoking-gun-email-suggests-hillary-committed-a-crime/
She needed information. They were unable to send it through secure fax, they had tried and failed a few times.
This was her was of getting time sensitive information, working around a problem. Should she have waited a few days until IT figured out the problem?
This is no smoking gun. Conspiracy theorists need to move on and get a life.
So let me ask, If I had a video of Hillary, first showing us her official State Department ID proving beyond a shadow of a doubt it was her and then she goes on to killing a baby seal, a baby polar bear and a pregnant human and the fetus, would you still say she is qualified to become the next president right 7:18 AM? I’m betting the answer to my question is yes.
9:35. You need to sort out your debate skills. Make a point.
Ok 10:24, obviously you have extremely limited comprehension skills. How’s this, my point is some people will vote for the CRIMINAL Hillary Clinton no matter what she does. They want a coronation, not an election.